Campaign : To Have “Unite Against Fascism” Proscribed As A Terrorist Organisation

Written by Cigpapers

Legal Research by Watt Tyler

$(KGrHqUOKjkE29zTBlvOBN1V4K3e3!~~_12The Unite Against Fascism are an establishment-financed group who intimidate, bully, threaten to kill, rob and assault anyone (particularly those from the White working-class) who dares to object to multiculturalism and/or Globalisation. Not only do you get beaten, robbed, assaulted and threatened you also get smeared as a fascist.

Here is a detailed description of the UAF and their backers both political and financial:

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/who-are-the-uaf-unite-against-fascism/

Here is a report on the Wythenshawe by-election that was seriously disrupted by UAF violence:

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/report-on-the-wythenshawe-and-sale-east-by-election-february-13th-2014/

Because of the violent and corrupt nature of the UAF this blog is organising a campaign to have them proscribed as a terrorist organisation, and for the British Government to facilitate the seizure of their assets and those of their backers, to distribute to their victims. If you can help please copy and paste the following letter to your MP, MEPs and any members of the House of Lords you can think of on the website (whose address is at the bottom of this article).

Dear (name of MP, MEP, Lord or Lady)

         I am writing to you regarding having the so-called “Unite Against Fascism” Group proscribed as a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. The UAF intimidate, bully, threaten to kill, rob and assault those (particularly from the White working-class) who dare to object to multiculturalism and Globalisation. Not only do you get beaten, robbed, assaulted and threatened you also get smeared as a fascist. A number of people have been unable to stand as candidates and/or leaflet and canvass for elections across Britain because of the violence and threats of violence this group are involved directly in, or have incited. Please visit the link below for an example of their behaviour and total disregard for British law, democracy and freedom. The old man receiving the public punishment beating is a candidate for a Parliamentary constituency seat:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b02_1370111676

The Terrorism Act 2000 clearly defines what terrorism is:

Section 1

(1) In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where-

(a) the action falls within subsection (2)

(b) the use or threat is designed to influence the Government or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and

(c) the use or threat is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.

(2) Action falls within this subsection if it-

(a) involves serious violence against the person

(b) involves serious damage to property

(c) endangers a person’s life, other than that of the person committing the action,

(d) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public, or

(e) is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system.

(3) the use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1) (b) is satisfied.

 

The UAF are quite clearly a terrorist organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000 and should be proscribed as such by the Home Office as soon as possible. The Government should also facilitate the seizure of the UAF’s assets and those of their backers to compensate the UAF’s many victims. 

I would expect you to back this campaign and contact the Home Office immediately.

        Yours sincerely ( Add your name )

 

Please send to your MP, MEP and Member of House of Lords at the link below:

https://www.writetothem.com/

Sir Winston Churhill is attributed with the quote: "The fascists will come back as anti-fascists."

Sir Winston Churchill is attributed with the quote: “The fascists will come back as anti-fascists.”

 

Also consider signing a UK Government petition to proscribe the UAF:

https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51496

 

Greater Manchester Police Confiscate BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” Banner

Written by Cigpapers

Red Mafia Starts To Crack In Greater Manchester:

On 9th April 2014 a BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner protest was taking place on the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester, England. At about 8:00 AM this banners was safely secured with professional attachments above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester by BNP activists.

2014-04-05 10.32.12

BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner hangs between two commercial signs above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester.The banners are secured with professional attachments before being swung over to the outside.

The banner was warmly supported by the majority of the public with only a few obscene hand gestures by multiculturalists. At around  8:45 AM a Police Officer approached the demonstration. The Police Officer ( Collar Number 14953 ) was friendly enough but had been ordered by his Inspector to take the banner down, then confiscate it and take one demonstrator’s name and details under Section 5 Public Order Act. We’re not sure about his understanding of the legal position here regarding Electoral Law and the Public Order Act.

How offensive is a "Stoo Paedophile Rings" banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

How offensive is a “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

The Greater Manchester Police seizing this banner, which has been warmly supported around Greater Manchester, shows a few cracks appearing in the red Mafia of the Greater Manchester Police and the local Labour Party. There is a video of the confiscation by Greater Manchester Police here:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO7Jvy90Vy4

The confiscation of this banner led to the cancellation of a planned “Stop Paedophile Rings” demonstration outside Manchester Town Hall against Labour Party paedophile rings. Whether this was deliberate or coincidental is impossible to say.

The same banner at a previous bridge banner flash demonstration in Tameside.

The same banner at a previous banner drop flash demonstration in Tameside.

The Police Officer in charge of the election in Greater Manchester is Chief Superintendent O’Hare of Greater Manchester Police ( telephone 0161 872 5050)  who had previously stated he wanted a good, clean election.

The BNP's banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide?

The BNP’s banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide in Manchester?

These “Stop Paedohile Rings” campaign banners have been well received by tens of thousands of members of the Greater Manchester public. The banners are very good for bridge drop flash demonstrations, or for hanging or holding at other demonstrations. Each banner should also last several years/elections if looked after.

Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986:

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which a constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

BNP Rescue Banner 10th April 2014:

On April 10th 2014, Gary Tumulty (North West Regional Organiser) went to Swinton Police Station to demand the return of the “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner. Here is the video of what happened:

Rebel Assault By BNP Activists On The “Red Citadel” (Manchester)

Written by Cigpapers

Manchester has long been seen as the “Red Citadel” in the North of England due to the socialist’s violent and corrupt choke-hold on the local people and politics. Globalist groups such as Antifa, Unite Against Fascism, Manchester Anti-Fascist Action, Red Strike Force, Red Army Faction, Hope Not Hate, Love Music – Hate Racism and other assorted violent and deranged multiculturalists had vowed The BNP would never be active in Manchester.

Red thugs are given a free hand in Manchester by the corrupt authorities.

Red thugs are given a free hand in Manchester by the corrupt authorities.

On 1st April 2014 two intrepid BNP activists decided to penetrate deep behind enemy held territory to promote The BNP and their message of hope to the people of Manchester. This is their story:

Tameside 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM

With the reds still festering in their pits a flash demo took place on a footbridge over the M67 in Tameside (East Greater Manchester). A 10 foot by 3 foot banner was unfurled boldly proclaiming “British National Party Say: STOP PAEDOPHILE RINGS”.

Early morning BNP flash demo above M67 motorway in Tameside. The banner says "British National Party Say : STOP PAEDOPHILE RINGS."

Early morning BNP flash demo above M67 motorway in Tameside. The banner says “British National Party Say : STOP PAEDOPHILE RINGS.”

The mood in the traffic jams was generally supportive with horns beeped and many thumbs up and waves. A small minority of degenerate reds chose to support paedophilia with various obscene hand gestures. Knowing Greater Manchester Police would soon be on their way, and having made their demonstration, the BNP activists rolled up the banner and made good their exit.

Central Manchester 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM 

With Tameside reds still reeling the BNP activists were leafleting in Central Manchester on Market Street by 9:00 AM. A grateful Manchester public lapped up their leaflets and cheers of “Good to see The BNP” , “Keep up the good work lads” and other supportive shouts were soon echoing through Central Manchester.

BNP activist deep behind enemy lines on Market Street, Central Manchester.

BNP activist deep behind enemy held lines on Market Street, Central Manchester.

At about 9:50 AM The BNP activists burst in to the Arndale Shopping Centre. With only one or two demented Globalists refusing BNP leaflets, and their message of hope, The BNP activists had a fruitful half hour in the Arndale Shopping Centre. At about 10:20 AM The BNP activists were approached by two apologetic security guards saying their bosses had ordered them to evict The BNP activists. The BNP activists explained they had no such powers to evict them but would leave as a gesture of goodwill.

BNP activists openly leaflet outside Manchester Town Hall (AKA The Kremlin)

BNP activists openly leaflet outside Manchester Town Hall (AKA The Kremlin)

After leafleting along Deansgate The BNP activists leafleted outside Manchester Town Hall (AKA The Kremlin) with no problems, many council workers gratefully accepted The BNP leaflets. The BNP activists had their photos taken by a passerby who claimed to be ex-Labour.

South-East Manchester 11:15 AM to 12:30 PM

At around 11:00 AM  The BNP activists were approached by a contingent of up to 10 foul-mouthed Red Strike Force thugs. The BNP activists decided to head to the student area of South-East Manchester. By around 11:15 AM The BNP activists were hard at work leafleting student accommodation door to door. By 12:30 PM  The BNP activists decided to call it a day and twenty minutes later were enjoying a couple of well-earned pints of “Hobgoblin Ruby Ale” in a local pub staffed by Nationalists. In total around 500 to 600 leaflets were distributed and around 1,000 people saw the banner over the motorway.

The Next Day (April 2nd 2014) In Tameside Greater Manchester:

Here is what happened the next day (April 2nd 2014) in Tameside Greater Manchester when these two BNP activists were approached by Greater Manchester Police while doing another “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner drop over the M67 motorway:

Book Review: The Holocaust Hoax Exposed by Victor Thorn

This is the book you need to read if you are new to 'the Jewish question'!

This is the book you need to read if you are new to ‘the Jewish question’!

THE TRUTH IS DANGEROUS

Today, if a book similar to this one were published in Europe, its author would be arrested and imprisoned. Their crime: simply questioning the so-called holocaust where six million Jews were allegedly exterminated during WW II.

Indeed, researchers have endured solitary confinement, brutal beatings by Jewish assailants, ongoing harassment, lengthy court battles, career suicide, and media attacks directed against their work – all because they presented a “revisionist history” of this pivotal event.

Other writers have been the victims of hate crimes, extensive smear campaigns, fines, death threats, and monetary rewards placed upon their heads after going into hiding.

The perpetrators behind these jack-booted Thought Police tactics are an entire holohoax industry devoted to suppressing factual data in favour of peddling heavy-handed doses of propaganda.

Despite these obvious dangers, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed dissects every element of what has become the 20th century’s most grotesque conspiracy. Covered in jarring detail is the mythology surrounding “concentration camps,” the truth about Zyklon B, Anne Frank’s fable, how the absurd “six million” figure has become a laughing stock, and the betrayal by maniacal Zionists of their own Jewish people that led to their deaths (via starvation and disease) after Allied bombings cut off supply lines to German work camps.

Yet, the only way an Israeli state could be created on stolen Palestinian land following WWII was through the most outlandish lies imaginable. Consequently, the holohoax industry has become a tyrannical dictatorship that incessantly manipulates, distorts, marginalises and manufactures false results to achieve their Machiavellian ends. By taking their hysterical obsessions to psychopathic levels, the charlatans behind this ruse make it glaringly apparent how weak their foundation is.

To compensate, these intellectually dishonest conmen (and women) continue to persecute revisionist historians all because they’re incapable of supporting their arguments through legitimate debate. The Holocaust Hoax Exposed is the final nail in a rotting coffin that has long been buried beneath a plethora of deceit.

Holohoax-stories-3

Oy Vey!

Oy Vey!

It sure is a great demolition job of the Holohoax. In fact, this book makes such a mockery of the 20th century’s biggest lie that you will literally ‘laugh out loud’ or LOL at certain bits! Yep, a five year old could see through the Holohoax with just a little bit of study. That’s how badly constructed the Holohoax lie truly is!

I remember the first time I ever looked into the possibility of the Holocaust being a fabrication. It took me about 10 to 15 minutes to know that it was a load of shit. Then it took a few months for the enormity of the lie to truly sink in. Once it has sunk in you realise just how strong the Jewish death grip is over the mass-media and everything else for that matter!

Also try this article:

Holocaust Or Holohoax? 21 Amazing Facts:

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/holocaust-or-holohoax-21-amazing-facts/

Is Peter Tatchell A Paedophile Or Simply Misunderstood?

Written by Cigpapers
Additional material and photos by Watt Tyler
Peter Tatchell was born in Melbourne Australia on 25th January 1952, he moved to London in 1971 to avoid conscription. In 1978 Tatchell joined the Labour Party and moved to Bermondsey, South East London. Tatchell ran as the Bermondsey Labour Party candidate in the 1983 General Election. Despite Bermondsey being a Labour stronghold he lost to Liberal candidate Simon Hughes. In February 2000 he left the Labour Party for unknown reasons. In 2004 he joined the Green Party and was chosen to be their candidate for Oxford East in the 2010 General Election, however for some reason he withdrew his candidacy in 2009.
TatchellJewPhoto01.jpg-large

Peter Tatchell (the UK’s most prominent homosexual activist and a favourite of the BBC) has done more than demand the abolition of the age of consent, he has broken the law on the age of consent in Britain at least once.

img122

Peter Tatchell is a regular on the BBC. The BBC have refused to state whether he appears as a human rights activist, homosexual campaigner or paedophile apologist. They have also refused to state how much they have paid him for appearances.

As a gay 18-year-old Australian anti-Vietnam war draft-dodger, he came to the UK in 1971 and lived with a 16-year-old boy in London. The homosexual age of consent in England at the time was 21. Later he campaigned for lowering it to 16, and now he wants it lowered again to 14. What will he want after that?

When the age of consent for homosexuals was lowered to 16 an Outrage (Tatchell’s organization) banner said “16 is just a start” – it didn’t state what the end goal was.

 

Mr Tatchell criticises the age of consent laws. Here is a quotation from his own website:

Nevertheless, like any minimum age, it is arbitrary and fails to acknowledge that different people mature sexually at different ages. A few are ready for sex at 12; others not until they’re 20. Having a single, inflexible age of consent doesn’t take into account these differences. It dogmatically imposes a limit, regardless of individual circumstances“.

Peter Tatchell wrote the chapter “Questioning Ages of Majority and Ages of Consent” for a book openly advocating paedophilia and finding ways “to make paedophilia acceptable“.

This book, published in 1986 and called The Betrayal of Youth (B.O.Y.), was edited by Warren Middleton, then vice-chairperson of the Paedophile Information Exchange, Britain’s number one paedophile advocacy group.

Stephen Green, anti-paedophile campaigner wrote: “The book was part of a campaign to abolish all ages of consent,  destroy the responsibilities of parents for their children, deny any ill-effects on children of interference by paedophiles, and withal to make it easier for paedophiles to gain sexual access to children.

In The Betrayal of Youth Tatchell wrote that the age of sexual consent is “Reinforcing a set of increasingly quaint, minority moral values left over from the Victorian era“.

Tatchell often ambushes public figures who don't support the homosexual/paedophile agenda. The MSM and especially the BBC usually give him great publicity for these stunts.

Tatchell often ambushes public figures who don’t support the homosexual/paedophile agenda. The MSM and especially the BBC usually give him great publicity for these stunts.

He was not on his own in this belief.Many of his fellow socio-communists and homosexual activists thought the same:

Campaign for Homosexual Equality chairman Michael Jarrett was identifying paedophiles as an oppressed group, and the CHE list of “demands” included the complete abolition of minimum ages for sexual activity. The Labour Gay Rights Manifesto of 1985 said ‘A socialist society would supersede the family household. … Gay people and children should have the right to live together. … It follows from what we have already said that we favour the abolition of the age of consent.’

27092011583[1]

Feminists like Beatrice Faust contributed to The Betrayal of Youth, as well as other homosexual activists besides Tatchell, including Jeffrey Weeks and Eric Presland, who “related his first paedophile experience with an Asian boy of thirteen, and boasted of interfering with a little boy of six“.

The book is considered so toxic that Amazon doesn’t sell it and you cannot search its content in Google Books.

Tatchell is well aware of how much all this is bad publicity for him and keeps rationalizing and adjusting his positions, but only the ideologically blind or pathologically naive cannot see through his self-excuses.

He has prepared a standard self-defence which can be found on his own website and has been repeated verbatim on many outlets. It used to also be on the site of his friend militant atheist, Richard Dawkins, but it’s not there any more. Maybe even Dawkins draws a line at what is morally allowed, even though his motto is “There’s probably no God – now stop worrying and enjoy your life”.

In this article that supposedly should serve to exculpate him, Tatchell has nothing better than this: “The critics also cite Warren Middleton’s 1980s book, Betrayal of Youth, to which I contributed a chapter. I had no idea that he was involved in child sex abuse matters when I was asked to write.”

Considering that Warren Middleton was co-founder and vice-chairperson of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a prominent group promoting paedophilia, it was impossible for Tatchell not to have known his propensities. In addition, both Tatchell and Middleton were part of the Gay Liberation Front/Angry Brigade, a neo-Marxist revolutionary group of radical students at the London School of Economics, thus making Tatchell’s protestations of ignorance verge on the ridiculous.

Peter Righton of the Paedophile Information Exchange.

Peter Righton of the Paedophile Information Exchange – a Child welfare expert who wanted the age of consent lowering to four.

Were you aware that Tatchell contributed a chapter to this book?

THE BETRAYAL OF YOUTH

The contents and contributors of The Betrayal of Youth:

Chapter 1: ‘Incest’ by Clive Coliman: Described as “An ardent supporter of the children’s rights movement.”

Chapter 2: ‘Child Pornography and Erotica’ by Richard Green: Illustrator for the Paedophile Information Exchange magazine under the pseudonym “Dominik”

Chapter 3: ‘Child Prostitution’ by Warren Middleton of P.I.E.

Chapter 4: ‘Gender Differences’ by Liz Holtom and Kathy Challis: both from the anti-Christian Peace News.

Chapter 5: ‘Power and Consent’ by Eric Presland: Homosexual activist. Contributed also to the American paedophile book “The Age Taboo.”

Chapter 6: ‘Love and Let Love’ by Tuppy Owens, Editor of the Sex Maniac’s Diary, and Tom O’Carroll: ex-Chairman of P.I.E. who was convicted in 1981 of conspiracy to corrupt public morals by sending out a paedophile contact list.

Chapter 7: ‘Children and Sex’ by Fr Michael Ingram: Catholic priest, defender of paedophilia.

Chapter 8: ‘The Paedophiles’ by Beatrice Faust: militant feminist & civil libertarian.

Chapter 9: ‘Questioning Ages of Majority and Ages of Consent’ by Peter Tatchell.

Chapter 10: ‘Ends and Means: How to Make Paedophilia Acceptable?’ by Roger Moody of Peace News: “One of the most outspoken advocates of children’s rights in Britain .” Well-documented as a ubiquitous paedophile intellectual.

Chapter 11: ‘Socialism, Class, and Children’s Rights’ by John Lindsay: “ardent supporter of children’s rights.” Member of the Socialist Workers’ Party. Homosexual activist, hates the institution of the family.

Chapter 12: ‘Childhood Sexuality and Paedophilia: Some Questions Answered’ by Warren Middleton of P.I.E.

Chapter 13: ‘The Oppression of the Young: An Inside Perspective’ by Jeff Vernon: Involved in Gay Youth Movement and Campaign for Homosexual Equality.

Appendix 1: “P.I.E., from 1980 Until its Demise in 1985” by Steven A. Smith: ex-chairman of P.I.E. Fled to Holland in 1984, became “active in the Dutch crusade for children’s rights,” was deported back to the UK in 1991 and sentenced to 18 months for sending indecent articles through the post.

Appendix 2: “The Uranians” by Timothy d’Arch Smith: Bookseller. Author of “Love in Earnest.”

Peter Tatchell’s self-defence begins with:

Unlike many Catholic clergy, I have never abused anyone. Unlike the Pope, I have never failed to report abusers or covered up their crimes.”

These are blatant falsities. It wasn’t many Catholic clergy, it was an extremely small minority. And, as shown in Lies About The Catholic Church Child Sex Abuse Scandal, there is no reason, except bigotry and prejudice, to single out Catholic clergy who in fact have committed fewer of these crimes than any other pedagogic institution, religious or secular.

Peter Tatchell and his homosexual/paedophile allies often attacked the Christian Church for having Christian values. There is no record of him bursting in to a synagogue or mosque to protest against their religous values.

Peter Tatchell and his homosexual/paedophile allies often attacked the Christian Church for having Christian values. There is no record of him bursting in to a synagogue or mosque to protest against their religious values.

Saying what he does about the Pope is a criminal act, it is slander. The Pope has never covered up for anyone.Tatchell and his friends in the mainstream media (especially the BBC) think that if you repeat a lie enough times your audience will start to believe that it’s true.

But blaming the Church whenever you’re in trouble is a good way to distract the public from your own deviations from the norm. It’s worked so far so why shouldn’t it work now? Maybe because people have started calling your bluff, Pete.

Peter Tatchell has a seething hatred of Christian morals and values.

Peter Tatchell has a seething hatred of Christian morals and values.

The above should tell you how trustworthy and credible Tatchell is, but there’s more.

Look at his defence of the book Dares To Speak:

“Dares to Speak was an academic book published in 1997, authored by professors, anthropologists, psychologists, sociologists, a Dutch senator and a former editor of a Catholic newspaper. It discussed the age of sexual consent and whether all sex between young people and adults is necessarily unwanted and harmful, based on what it said was objective research with young people.

The book does not endorse or excuse sexual relationships with young people that involve coercion, manipulation or damage. The authors queried, among other things, the balance between giving young people sexual rights and protecting them against abuse. These are entirely legitimate issues to discuss.”

Leaving aside the irony (probably lost on humorless Tatchell) about his using a “former editor of a Catholic newspaper” as a guarantor of the morality of a book while he constantly treats the Catholic Church like a den of abusers. The book Dares to Speak, that Tatchell praises so much as an academic achievement, was edited by Joseph Geraci, who was also the editor of Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia. The book is a collection of articles from the journal.

Before it was quietly removed, this was Wikipedia’s entry for the publication:

Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia (1987–1995) was a journal published by the Stichting Paidika Foundation whose purpose was to promote the normalization of pedophilia. Its editor was Joseph Geraci and the editorial board included articles by writers Frits Bernard, Edward Brongersma, Vern L. Bullough, and D. H. (Donald) Mader, some of whom campaigned as pro-pedophile activists.

After the normalization of homosexuality, we’ll have the normalization of paedophilia.

15092011573[1]
Here is Tatchell’s letter to the Guardian dated 26th June 1997 (a few weeks after Labour’s General Election win) which he denied writing when I asked him about it. However I can find no record of a complaint to the Guardian, the Press Complaints Commission or any lawsuit for libel:
Ros Coward (Why Dares to Speak says nothing useful, June 23) thinks it is “shocking” that Gay Men’s Press has published a book, Dares To Speak, which challenges the assumption that all sex involving children and adults is abusive. I think it is courageous. The distinguished psychologists and anthropologists cited in this book deserve to be heard. Offering a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people, they document examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike.
Prof Gilbert Herdt points to the Sambia tribe of Papua New Guinea, where all young boys have sex with older warriors as part of their initiation into manhood. Far from being harmed, Prof Herdt says the boys grow up to be happy, well-adjusted husbands and fathers. The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted,abusive and harmful.
Peter Tatchell.
 Picture 9
Peter Tatchell has repeatedly denied writing the letter above. However below is his reply in the Guardian (1st July 1997) to criticism of his original letter. In his second letter (below) he never denies writing the first letter (above) or claims he was edited in any way.
Peter Tachell's second letter to the Guardian on 1st July 1997.

Peter Tachell’s second letter to the Guardian on 1st July 1997.

Peter Tatchell has often claimed he lives a monk-like existence living on a mere £9,000 income per annum. When I challenged him on this he changed his claim to £29,000 plus expenses. However he has refused to disclose his payments for his numerous main stream media appearances or disclose how much his yearly expenses are.
Peter Tatchell in his Council flat.

Peter Tatchell in his Bermondsey Council flat.

Peter Tatchell has declined to be interviewed for this article, however I will leave him the option of the right of reply in the comments section.

img537

img870

Tachell was also a major player in legalising homopaedo marriage and adoption.

Report On The Wythenshawe And Sale East By-Election February 13th 2014

Written by Cigpapers

Photos and Captions by Watt Tyler

The Labour Party are corrupt, violent, war criminals and multiculturalists.

The Labour Party are corrupt, violent, war criminals and multiculturalists.

There was a by-election in Wythenshawe and Sale East constituency on February 13th 2014 following the death of Labour MP Paul Goggins on January 7th 2014.

There Were Seven Candidates:

John Bickley (UKIP)

Captain Chaplington-Smythe (Monster Raving Loony Party)

Daniel Critchlow (Conservative)

Mary Di Mauro ( LibDem)

Mike Kane (Labour)

Eddy O’Sullivan (BNP)

Nigel Woodcock (Green)

Manchester Evening News:

The M.E.N. has an average daily circulation of 73,622 of which only 47,633 are paid for. Stop buying this rag and put it out of business.

The M.E.N. has an average daily circulation of 73,622 of which only 47,633 are paid for. Stop buying this rag and put it out of business.

The reporting of the by-election by the local paper the Manchester Evening News was a disgrace to journalism and democracy. The Labour Party was promoted heavily and the M.E.N didn’t even print Eddy O’Sullivan’s (BNP candidate) biography, even though they printed everyone else’s including the candidate for The Monster Raving Loony Party. The M.E.N. also failed to report on the electoral fraud, violence, intimidation, robberies and death threats that were present during the election against The BNP and UKIP. A Freedom Of Information Act Request has revealed a possible reason for this bias. The Labour Party controlled Manchester City Council spends heavily with the M.E.N. on advertising. Their direct spending, of Council Taxpayer’s money, on advertising with the M.E.N. in the last five years was as follows:

Manchester City Council recruitment advertising with M.E.N.  £179,384.30

Manchester City Council non-recruitment advertising with M.E.N. £2,024,015.00

TOTAL SPENT ON M.E.N. = £2,203,399.30

This total must also be added to the amount spent by the other nine Councils that make up Greater Manchester resulting in a bought and paid for local press.

Greater Manchester Police:

img104

Greater Manchester Police always compete with the Metropolitan Police for the most corrupt Police Force in Britain. They have a history of supporting, if not organising, political violence against any Party seriously opposing the Labour Party in Greater Manchester. Their complete inaction in combating political violence gives a green light to the Labour Party, and their attack dogs the UAF, to commit any act of violence against the Labour Party’s political rivals.

Without establishment support and protection the "anti-fascist" groups wouldn't last five minutes.

Without establishment support and protection the “anti-fascist” groups wouldn’t last five minutes.

During the by-election masked gangs of Labour/UAF thugs were openly roaming the streets attacking, robbing and threatening BNP (and to a lesser extent UKIP) canvassers and activists. Any attempt to fight back against these Labour/UAF political tinkerbells is dealt with firmly by G.M.P. At the election count, at the G-Mex Centre on February 13th 2014, a gang of about 20 deranged multiculturalists tried to stop BNP Party members entering the count. G.M.P. Officers were present but took no action as usual. A number of complaints were made to G.M.P. about political violence but no arrests were made because of reasons such as the CCTV not working due to sunlight reflecting on the lens.

Postal Voting, Electoral Fraud And Intimidation:

As usual the Labour Party relied heavily on postal votes to get elected. Out of a total of 24,024 votes cast 10,141 were postal votes – just over 42% of total votes cast. There were instances of up to 15 voters registered at some addresses and no proof of identity is required. Judge Richard Mawrey QC, an election commissioner in Birmingham, has criticised postal voting in a report and described it as “hopelessly insecure” and warned electoral fraud would “continue unabated” unless changes were made.

The BNP were the only Party in the by-election not allowed to have seals on the ballot boxes, with no satisfactory reason given as to why not.

During the by-election campaign I spoke to a number of elderly voters living in residential homes who stated they were pressured in to postal voting. Their votes are collected by their “carers” who are all virtually Labour supporters and largely immigrants. Several confided  in me they were too scared to vote anything but Labour.

A number of residents, mostly on Wythenshawe, have reported being threatened for showing BNP or UKIP placards on their homes. This usually entails visits by gangs of masked men at night telling them to take down election placards.

The Unite Against Fascism (UAF) :

$(KGrHqUOKjkE29zTBlvOBN1V4K3e3!~~_12The UAF (Unite Against Fascism) are a type of organised gang who attack, bully, intimidate and assault anyone they consider an opponent of Globalisation and zio-multiculturalism. Their leader is Weyman Bennett (UAF National office on 07734032314 / 020 78334916). A fuller description of the UAF, their links to organised paedophilia and who funds them can be found here:

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/who-are-the-uaf-unite-against-fascism/

The UAF openly support political violence and are backed and financed by the British establishment.

The UAF openly support political violence and are protected, backed and financed by the British establishment.

On February 1st 2014 Mike Killian (Manchester UAF Spokeperson 07903586191) had called for a day of action against UKIP and BNP activists, canvassers and supporters involved in the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election. They had superficially organised a table top demonstration outside ASDA in Wythenshawe at 1p.m.and called for supporters to come along. However their table top demonstration never materialised and instead UAF supporters were roaming Wythenshawe and Sale attacking BNP and UKIP activists, canvassers and supporters. There were a number of assaults, robberies and a death threat to a Lady Pensioner by so-called “anti-fascists”. Whether the UAF had ever intended to have a table top demonstration isn’t known.

Public gang punishment beatings by the UAF are now the norm for British Nationalists in multicultural Britain. Despite video evidence hardly anyone is ever prosecuted.

Public gang punishment beatings by the UAF are now the norm for British Nationalists in multicultural Britain. Despite video evidence hardly anyone is ever prosecuted.

Greater Manchester Police claim they are investigating a number of serious criminal offences committed against the BNP and UKIP on 1st February 2014, and civil proceedings are being brought by numerous individuals against the UAF for damages. The GMP Police Officer in charge of this alleged investigation is Sergeant Phillips (telephone 0161 856 4882).

Here are some of the alleged supporters of the UAF believed to be involved in “anti-fascist” action on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014.

Chris Haddon:

Chris Haddon.

Chris Haddon.

Chris Haddon is believed to be born around 1990 and claims to be a Wythenshawe resident. He is the lead singer of a seemingly unknown band called “The Minx Band”, he works as a receptionist at Blueprint Studios, Elizabeth House, 39 Queen Street, Manchester, M3 7DQ (0161 8172520). Haddon claims to be a “top boy” on Wythenshawe Estate, although no one we spoke to on Wythenshawe had ever heard of him. Chris Haddon was involved with two other males and a female in some sort of bizarre staring match at a BNP organiser on Wythenshawe Civic Centre Car Park. The BNP organiser fearing for Haddon’s mental health telephoned the authorities.

pic001

Andy Evans, his girlfriend Lisa Capelli, Chris Haddon,”Chucky” full name as yet unknown. Wythenshawe Civic Centre car park on 1st Februuary 2014.

Some of Haddons’ Tweets on @HaddonMinx have included:

February 1st 2014: Don’t just sit back and let it happen. I want a war against the BNP.

February 1st 2014: We’re stood in Civic car park having a blazing row with the BNP. We don’t want their van here. There’s only 4 of us. Where are you?

February 1st 2014: Only took 4 of us to unnerve the BNP today in Wythenshawe and get the message across that we don’t want them, or their stupid Monty Python..
..esq vans spouting shite and causing racial tension on our doorsteps. If everyone did the same, the world would be a much better place.

February 1st 2014: That we don’t want their Nazi views around here, to take that shite van and fuck off.

Chris Haddon's new look - same toxic politics.

Chris Haddon’s new look – same toxic politics.

Although there is no evidence yet to directly connect Chris Haddon to the robberies, assaults and the death threat to a British Pensioner he does seem to advocate violence against his political opponents. He has refused to identify who he was with, or provide a witness statement to the Police about UAF criminal activity in Wythenshawe on February 1st 2014.

Andy Evans:

Andy Evans is a close associate of Chris Haddon and fellow band member (drummer) of “The Minx”. He was involved in the bizarre staring match at a BNP organiser on Wythenshawe Civic Centre Car Park on 1st February 2014 in the photo above.

Andy Evans - self-styled "anti-fascist" and clearly involved with the UAF.

Andy Evans – self-styled “anti-fascist” and clearly involved with the UAF. From the videos he has made of himself he appears to be borderline mentally subnormal.

Yet again there is no direct evidence to connect Andy Evans to the more serious violence and crime on February 1st 2014 committed by self-styled “anti-fascists”. However from reading his Twitter account, @EvansMinx , he was clearly planning on meeting up with UAF organisers at 1 PM at ASDA on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014.

Some of Evans’ Tweets on @EvansMinx have included:

January 30th 2014: Anti-BNP Leafletting In Wythenshawe This Saturday, Meet At ASDA From 1. Antifa Hooligans.

February 1st 20144 Of Us Here Trying To Fuck The BNP Off, Where Are You Lot?

February 1st 2014: @Joe_Farrardise We Needed You Mate, And More..

Kieran Perkins:

Another band member of “The Minx” is called Kieran Perkins. We don’t have any evidence of his involvement or photos of him on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014 yet. However the “anti-fascists” are habitually pack animals and usually operate with one brain.

Kieran Perkins - did you see this individual on Wythenshawe on February 1st 2014.

Kieran Perkins – did you see this individual on Wythenshawe on February 1st 2014?

Kieran Perkins has a Twitter account, @Kieran_Perkins , and made it clear he supports attacking the BNP, UKIP and any other political party or group he considers fascists.

February 1st 2014: @EvansMinx smash the fash

Vehicle Of Interest:

One of the vehicles used in a violent robbery committed by UAF members or supporters was seen by one of the robbery victims. He has described it as a green/blue small saloon or hatchback. The registration plate he noted down was DE04YWD . However Greater Manchester Police are stating that DVLA have no record of this registration plate and he must have got a letter or number wrong. Let Greater Manchester Police (Sergeant Phillips telephone 0161 856 4882) or the BNP know if you have any knowledge of this vehicle, or a similar one, used by UAF thugs.

Persons Of Interest:

There were a number of other people believed to be connected to the UAF on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014 that we are still looking in to. If you saw any of the following people please let us know or talk to Greater Manchester Police  (Sergeant Phillips telephone 0161 856 4882) at the Wythenshawe Police Station:

This photo was on the Twitter account @_JoeMurray . The young man on the right answers the description of a suspect in at least one UAF robbery.

This photo was on the Twitter account @_JoeMurray . The young man on the right answers the description of a suspect in at least one UAF robbery.

Joe Murray has denied having any knowledge of the violent crimes that were committed by the UAF on 1st February 2014, but has declined to identify the persons on the above photo or provide a witness statement.

This photo was on the Twitter account @AdrianParry. The young man on the left is believed to have some knowledge of UAF violent crimes on February 1st 2014 on Wythenshawe.

This photo was on the Twitter account @AdrienParry. The young man on the left is believed to have some knowledge of UAF violent crimes on February 1st 2014 on Wythenshawe.

Another person of interest, at least as a possible witness, is Adrien Parry (born 1st February 1996). Known to a number of UAF supporters in the Manchester area.

Further Disruption Of The BNP In Sale:

With the “anti-fascists” getting more desperate about The BNP delivering their message of hope to the British People, there was a further incident on Wednesday 5th February 2014 at about 2:40 PM in Sale town centre shopping precinct. With the public of Sale gratefully receiving The BNP’s message of hope, BNP canvassers were disrupted by a seemingly preplanned incident.

This man disrupted BNP election campaigning - but who is he and what party or group is he with?

This man disrupted BNP election campaigning – but who is he and what party or group is he with?

One man approached The BNP and started asking a lot of questions about BNP policies. While they were being explained to him in detail another man ran up and started screaming “racists” in The BNP canvasser’s face.

Who is attacking who in this photo?

Who is attacking who in this photo?

As the BNP canvasser put his arm up to defend himself the man started shouting he’d been assaulted and was telephoning the Police.

He's telephoning the Police here but who attacked who and why?

He’s telephoning the Police here but who attacked who and why?

Interfering with any Political Party to stop it electioneering is a criminal offence and a breach of electoral rules. We need to identify this man, and find out which group and/or party he is with.

img091Please either let the Electoral Commission know or contact The BNP on  enquiries@bnp.org.uk 
with any details you have about this man.

Green Party Political Violence:

Surprisingly even the Green Party decided to join in the political violence against The BNP with an attack on a BNP lady activist on February 13th 2014 (polling day) early in the afternoon in Wythenshawe shopping centre.

This man seemed very strange and had attacked a lady BNP canvasser.

This man seemed very strange and had attacked a lady BNP canvasser. We need his details.

To be fair to the Green Party after a member of the BNP spoke to their candidate, Nigel Woodcock, he did send this character home. However the attacker did then show at the election count that night causing distress to the lady he had previously attacked. No apology has been issued by the Green Party yet.

The Result:

The result (if it can fairly be called that) of this by-election was:

Labour 13,261

UKIP 4,301

Conservatives 3,479

LibDem 1,176

Greens 748

BNP 708

Monster Raving Loony Party 288

Turnout 28.24% (11.92% postal votes 16.32%ballot box votes)

Conclusion:

There was a very low turn out for a Parliamentary by-election with 71.76% of the electorate not bothering to vote. From my personal observations this low turn out was due to complete disenchantment with British politics.

As in nearly all elections The BNP won on a vote per pound spent basis.

Labour won officially because of their postal voting fraud, other electoral fraud, violence, intimidation and bullying.

Without the postal vote there is a good chance that UKIP would have taken this seat which should be safe for Labour.

The political website http://www.stirringtroubleinternationally.com gave this election a score of 12 on a scale of 1 to 10 for electoral dodginess.

img107

Following the disgraceful and totally biased coverage of the Wythenshawe by-election by the Manchester Evening News (owned by the Guardian until 2010 when it was bought by Mirror Group Newspapers) it is time for the BNP to fight back.

As previously reported the M.E.N. has received over £2.2 million of Council taxpayer’s money in the last 5 years from Labour controlled Manchester City Council alone. Further Freedom Of Information Act requests will reveal the amounts from the other 9 Greater Manchester Councils and other Labour controlled organisations.

The M.E.N.  is already a shrinking newspaper, now down to  47,633 sold copies per day – I’m currently investigating how many of these are bought by Labour Councils and other Labour controlled organisations. The size of the M.E.N. has also shrunk to 14 sheets (56 pages).

Fightback Against The Manchester Evening News:

The M.E.N. has several obvious weaknesses relating to advertising:

1. Living off immoral earnings – the M.E.N. has an “Adult Massage” section of paid for adverts. These are all quite clearly brothels making it a criminal offence to advertise them in exchange for financial renumeration. Please email the M.E.N. at the earliest opportunity to point this out to them at email address newsdesk@men-news.co.uk this will remove the “We didn’t realise” defence at a later date. Also report the M.E.N. for their criminal behaviour to Greater Manchester Police at http://www.gmp.police.uk/content/feedbackintelligence.html?openform

Below is a letter you can copy if required:

Dear Officer, I am writing to complain about the “Adult Massage” section in the Manchester Evening News. These “Massage Clubs” are quite clearly brothels. Apart from my obvious moral revulsion at the thought of someone making money from a Woman being reduced to selling her body, there is the criminality of the Manchester Evening News in accepting money for these adverts. Living off immoral earnings is a very serious criminal offence in England. After analysing old Manchester Evening News newspapers I realised this has been going on for at least 25 years, if not longer. There is not only the prosecution of these criminals at the Manchester Evening News, there is also the aspect of seizure of the proceeds of crime. By a very rough estimate the Manchester Evening News has raked in about £10 to 15 million from this sleaze over the last 25 years which needs seizing by the authorities. As you are well aware there is no statute of limitations on these criminal offences in the UK and they would be very easy to prove.

2. Their acceptance of millions of pounds of Greater Manchester Council taxpayer’s money combined with their biased political coverage has put them in breach of the PCC Code of Practice on journalistic standards. Why not drop the PCC an email asking for an investigation in to their relationship with Labour controlled Councils and other organisations at complaints@pcc.org.uk

Below is a letter you can copy if required:

Dear Press Complaints Commission, Could you please investigate the Manchester Evening News for their blatantly biased coverage of the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election. The Manchester Evening News has collected over £2.2 million from Labour controlled Manchester City Council in newspaper adverts alone over the last five years. There are ongoing investigations in to other deals between Manchester City Council and the Manchester Evening News, which may uncover other much bigger financial transactions. I would urge you to look at the relationship between MCC and the MEN and the biased reporting by the MEN of the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election.

3. The M.E.N. still has a number of commercial companies that advertise with it. I will be compiling a full list of these with a view to internet campaigns against these companies and a threatened boycott of them. Not many companies will be interested in advertising anywhere which may be costing them business and creating a bad smell for their company.

4. There are very serious questions relating to the relationship between senior figures in Labour controlled Manchester City Council and the Manchester Evening News relating to rates paid for advertising. I will be publishing all my findings at the earliest opportunity.

img106

Even though none of these reds were involved this is the sort of shit we have to put up with around Manchester.

Even though none of these reds were involved this is the sort of shit we have to put up with around Manchester.

5th Columnists In Britain

Written by Mike Whitby

pic004

First appeared on BNP website 26th January 2014

According to Wikipedia – 5th Columnists are; …‘A group of people who clandestinely undermine a larger group, such as a nation, from within’…. 

…‘A clandestine operation is an intelligence or military operation carried out in such a way that the operation goes unnoticed’…

In short, they are SPIES, and they are operating right under our noses, and to use one of their favourite terms, they are; ‘hidden in plain sight’.

HOLLYWOOD FILMS

If you’ve seen the films; ‘The 39 Steps’ and ‘Notorious’, you’ll know that the plots of both of those films revolve around 5th Columnist spies, living amongst the people and working on their plans to subvert the course of democracy in those countries.

In the films, this idea seems so preposterous, that nobody believes it. Also, the 5th Columnists had connections in such very high places, that the authorities wouldn’t even consider the possibility that they were spies, let alone investigate them.

Those were Hollywood films, but back to REAL LIFE; it sounds hard to believe, but such people are conspiring to destroy OUR country, right now! And, what they’re up to is nothing less than the GENOCIDE of our nation.

Here’s What Wikipedia Says About Genocide:

‘Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a co-ordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.’  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/multiculturalism-is-white-genocide/

Who Are The 5th Columnists?

There are, and have been, 5th Columnists operating in Britain for a very long time; the master controller’s are the Banksters, followed by the Iluminatti; Bilderbergers; Fabians; Freemason’s; Common Purpose agents. They are all very secretive and their members are not allowed to openly discuss their involvement in those organisations. In recent years, they’ve stepped-up their plans to take over our nation.

The Chain Of Command:

1) The Twelve Banking Families have dominated and controlled world governments for a very long time. For legal reasons, THEY are the ones that cannot be named. They are often said to be Jews, Christians and Muslims, but the only god they serve is Satan, and they belong to what the bible calls; “The synagogue of Satan”, Revelation 3:9

Their control became particularly strong a few hundred years ago, when they bribed monarchs and governments to allow them to steal vast quantities of money from the people of virtually every nation, through their central banking scam – which purports to ‘lend’ money to nations, but in reality it only takes money from them.

This utterly corrupt process has created worldwide poverty and tax-slavery. In return for money and power, Monarchs, Presidents and Prime Ministers, are dangled like puppets on strings, and willingly do the bankster’s bidding. 

Nowadays the banksters choose the Presidents and Prime Ministers that are most willing to carry out the bankster’s instructions to the letter. Regardless of the pretence of “democracy”, the bankster’s candidates are guaranteed to win – because they control all of the main parties and their leaders.

So, even if the government changes hands, very few real changes take place – each one of those puppets will pretend to do the right thing for the people, but there is absolutely no doubt who they really serve.

In their quest to achieve global dominance, THEY are responsible for virtually every war and revolution throughout the world over the past 400 years. They own/control all of the following organisations; Bank of England; National Reserve Bank; World Bank; IMF; ECB; UN (formerly the League of Nations); NATO; UNICEF; They also own/control most of the well known ‘charitable trusts’.

THEY decide which countries are allowed to manufacture and produce their own goods, and also which countries and organisations are to be demonised, or left to starve. They control the underworld and drug barons, and they decide upon the quantity of drugs to be produced in Afghanistan (and China, in the 19th century) and put on the streets, to poison our youngsters.

They own the ‘dark skinned’ countries of the British Commonwealth, and they have decided to flood Britain with foreigners – by controlling the world’s money supply, they control everything.

2) The Iluminatti is a highly secretive organisation, which is controlled by the banking families. They are the henchmen and Puppet-Masters of world governments and they are the leading bankster-puppets of the New World Order.

27092011583[1]

The Iluminatti was created in 1770 by Adam Weishaupt, as a revolutionary organisation. He and his group set out to infiltrate Freemasonry and (according to several authors) within ten years they had control of EVERY Masonic Chapter in the world, without the knowledge of most Freemasons. From that point on, the Freemason’s have carried out the bidding of the Iluminatti.

They believe that there should ONLY be 500 million people on this Earth. But, there are currently seven billion people. So, in the view of these master-controller’s, six and a half billion of us are surplus to requirements! (see the Georgia Guidestones – (http://www.thegeorgiaguidestones.com/Message.htm)

3) The Bilderberg Group is also a highly secretive organisation, and consist of very powerful globalist industrialists and politicians. They created the totally corrupt organisations known as the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU); they control the governments of the world, mainly through bribery and corruption, and they often place sexual perverts in positions of power; presumably, to demonstrate their Satanic beliefs. In fact, one of the UN’s most prominent people let the cat out of the bag, when he said; 

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation.” David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations (UN).  

The Bilderberg Group was used by Ian Fleming, in the James Bond books, as the model for the evil criminal fraternity, known as S.P.E.C.T.R.E. But, be assured that the Bilderbergers are certainly NOT a fictional group.

4) The Order of Freemasons consists of businessmen, politicians, policemen & civil servants and many members of the establishment. If a ‘new direction’ is required by the banksters, then it is co-ordinated through the Masonic movement.

Membership and activities are usually kept secret, for ‘historical reasons’, even between individual members. Consequently, it’s quite easy for the controllers to invoke new directions, simply by suggesting to their members that “we believe this ‘new direction’ is the way forward”, but without telling their members the real reasons.

Because many of them are true patriots and would not stand for it. Hence the fact that it is very difficult to establish exactly how and when members of the establishment were instructed to begin to usurp our country and hand over our sovereignty to the banksters and a foreign power – the EU. 

Freemasonry was originally based upon noble and chivalric traditions and most Masons joined that organisation to make social and commercial connections to improve their chances of success – due to the fact that they each help fellow members to get on in life, and many of them do good charitable work.

But, most of them appear to be oblivious to the fact that their organisation is the conduit for the controllers. From the 17th to the mid-20th century, virtually EVERY man that aspired to climb the greasy pole in business or public office, was a Freemason; all the way from the Church Warden and Vicar, to bankers, Bishops and Kings.

They are the pawns of the Iluminatti and Bilderberger’s, who regard them as, quote; “useful idiots”. Although many honourable men have been Freemasons, the list of usurpers includes Karl Marx and Friederick Engels, who were both Freemason’s and they were financed by the banking dynasties to create Communism and Trade Unions, to control and manipulate people and countries. 

5) The Fabian Society is a semi-secretive Communist organisation, which was established in 1883, the same year that their mentor, Karl Marx left this mortal coil.

They knew that the British people would never voluntarily accept Communism, so in order to gain political power, by stealth and trickery; this organisation has adopted a policy of deceit for 130 years – that is to pretend to be something that it is not.

A very good example of this is the coat of arms that the Fabians used for over a hundred years – a wolf in sheep’s clothing – need I say any more?

$(KGrHqMOKkEE1vjFW+JIBNcSuOh1D!~~_12

In the late 1950’s, a member of the Fabian Society, who was also a very prominent member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, none other than Harold Wilson, gave a speech at a meeting in Oxford, announcing that; 

“…The Communist Party of Great Britain is to disband, because the British people will never accept Communist extremism. Instead, we intend to infiltrate the other political parties in Britain – we will dominate the left wing of the Conservative Party and the right wing of the Labour Party, and we will control British politics forever…”

Within a few years, Wilson became the leader of the Labour Party and was elected to the office of Prime Minister, twice! Since then, Great Britain has had several ‘Communist’ Prime Ministers, all of whom have been wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing!

Membership of the Fabian Society is very secretive and consists of predominantly, but not exclusively, members of the Labour Party and the Trade Union movement, although many Conservatives have owned up to being members of this 5th Columnist control mechanism.

Fabians are the bankster’s link which chooses candidates to stand as MP’s and Prime Ministers, effectively controlling the Houses of Parliament – therefore, nobody is allowed to become a candidate to be a Labour MP, unless they have been sanctioned by the Fabian Society.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/the-fabian-society-a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing/

6) Common Purpose is a Marxist organisation and a registered “charity” which claims to be a training organisation for ‘leaders in the post-democratic era’. So they acknowledge that we no longer live in a democracy!! 

Common Purpose agents are the pawns of all the above, and these 5th Columnist’s are the glue that carries out the orders of the New World Order. Common Purpose agents, or graduates, as they choose to be called, are the eyes and ears in the workplace and on the streets, of those that wish to subjugate and enslave our people and country.

They are predominantly found in the establishment, civil service, politicians, local authorities, charities, police, Fire Brigade, banks, courts, law firms, insurance firms, NHS, architectural practices, job centres, enterprise centres, social entrepreneurs,  Saul Alinsky trainers, construction companies, church ministries, regeneration programmes, prison service, National Trust, GCHQ – the list goes on and on.

These are the people that promote what is popularly known as ‘political correctness’ and they are the ones that ensure that the Marxist subversion continues. Many Common Purpose agents are high ranking judges and establishment bosses, but typically, their members are shallow, selfish people who are easily manipulated, and believe they are special, simply because they were chosen.

The one thing that they all have in common is a self-interested greed, because, just like many Masons, they are only in it for what they can get out of it.

They were recruited because of their position within their particular organisation, or their potential to influence others, and are manipulated to follow the CP mantra – they are useful idiots, but they are still 5th Columnist traitors!

Common Purpose agents are instructed to stealthily spread the tenets of the Bolsjewik (original spelling) Marxist Revolutionaries, which had previously failed to spread their vile and destructive message across Western Europe – their plan was to enslave the world within Communism.

But, no matter what they did, the evil manipulators could NOT break the code of honour in the Western world, where the vast majority of people’s focus was on; the Family, God and Country; so the Bolsjewiks established a Communist think-tank to spread their propaganda. 

Their purpose was to find a solution to the biggest problem facing the implementers of World Communism and their question was; “How can Communism be spread throughout the world?” As their meetings were held in Frankfurt, Germany, they decided to call that think-tank ‘The Frankfurt School’ political correctness was born and Common Purpose agents are the day-to-day proponents of that sick agenda.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/common-purpose-exposed-illuminati-front-organisation/

The Frankfurt School, which began in 1923, recommended the following list of actions; 

Read carefully and see if any of these things sound familiar…

1) The creation of ‘Racialism’ offences – to break down Nationalist ideals, by demonising those who prefer to mix with their own kind.

2) Continual change – to create confusion and destroy the morale of the people.

3) The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children – to distort young minds, break up families and destroy moral values.

4) The undermining of schools and teachers’ authority – to encourage unrest within youngsters and to reduce the value of their education.

5) Mass immigration – to destroy national identity and commitment to land and country, leading to the destruction of national borders.

6) The promotion of excessive drinking – to induce a helpless, alcoholic and drugged nation, that can easily be controlled.

7) Emptying the churches – to remove all moral belief systems that challenge the state’s authority.

8) An unreliable legal system, with bias against the victim of crime – to instil anger and resentment, to create constant upheaval.

9) Dependency on the state (or state benefits) – to ensure that the people do exactly as they are told, for total state-control of the masses.

10) Control and dumbing down of the media – only propagandist news will be allowed; to ensure that people remain controlled and follow orders.

11) Encourage the breakdown of families – as the family and its roots are the links to race, identity and nation – Nationalism; which is the enemy of Communism.

Just remember that when you read or hear about teachers showing primary school children, how to put a condom onto a plastic penis, or tell 5-year-old schoolchildren stories like; ‘And Tango Makes Three’, you will understand that they are being taught the disgusting principles of the Frankfurt School! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364360/Sex-education-Do-want-5-year-old-child-given-explicit-lessons.html

WHY do young children need to know about things like this?! It is nothing but STATE PAEDOPHILIA on a massive scale. Politicians want to reduce the age of consent, so that they can’t be prosecuted for having RENT BOYS & GIRLS! (Labour paedophiles. Google: Labour25 – http://labour25.com/)

Harriet Harman, Deputy Leader of the Labour Party said; “Sexually explicit photographs of children should be legalised”.

Peter Tatchell, Labour Party activist and gay rights campaigner, said; “Not all sex involving children is unwanted”.

Germaine Greer, Marxist author, said; “I admit to being sexually attracted to pre-adult boys”.

Youngsters are also being taught that sexual perversion is normal, and that it’s okay to indulge in disgusting acts of depravity.

All of these are Frankfurt School teachings and they are going on right now in your child’s school!

Brainwashing IOur Youth By Colleges And Broadcasting

Communist teachers and lecturer’s at schools, colleges and universities propagandise students with Marxist, anti-British, mantra’s and teach these pliable youngsters to demonise Nationalism. They use World War 2 propaganda to convince people that Nationalism is wrong (Google: David Cole in Auschwitz, for the facts http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU).

But they don’t tell you about the seven million Christians that were killed by Stalin’s Communists, in ONE YEAR! (Google: The Soviet Story http://www.sovietstory.com/) or the 100 million+ people who have been murdered by Communists so far!

Students are also told that it’s better to have mixed race couples, than to stick to their own kind. But, there’s an old saying that; “Birds of a feather flock together”. That’s because throughout human nature, most people, regardless of their race, colour or creed, would prefer to be with their own kind. The same thing applies to the animal kingdoms.

Hollywood; Music Videos; TV and Newspapers are filled with pornography, to brainwash our youngsters into the Hedonistic (me, me, me) mindset of the Bolsjewik Frankfurt School. This trash and a great deal more is served up to us by the BBC, and the result is that many people are now refusing to pay the BBC TV Licence, due to the BBC’s outrageous lies and Marxist propaganda.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/tv-license-resistance-not-paying-discounts-refunds/

The essence of ‘nationalism’ is the extended family

In 21st century Britain, we have several political parties, but they all sing the same Zionist tune; Conservative, Liberal, Labour, UKIP, Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru. They all stick together against the British people, and not one of them is willing to expose the bankster puppet masters, but they all claim to speak for the people! 

Many of those politicians are former members of the murderous Communist movement, including; Blair, Brown, Darling, Straw, Harman, Reid, Cameron, Clegg, Clarke, Pickles, and many more. And, Cameron is a signatory to the Communist organisation, Unite Against ‘Freedom’ (UAF).

Also, the Marxist Trades Union Congress (TUC) ensures that all of the unions are controlled by Communists. Thereby, controlling the masses of the British people – ironically, all union members PAY HUGE MEMBERSHIP FEES – for the ‘privilege’ of being controlled and indoctrinated by communists! 

Recently, RT News ran a news bulletin on British Trade Unions; in particular UNISON, marching through London carrying massive banners praising Stalinist Communism – Stalin was one of the most evil monsters that has ever lived!

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/nationalist-trades-union-congress/

Yet, the people who take YOUR union subscriptions are openly supporting him and his murderous thugs on the streets of your capital city. Also, seven thousand Muslims were recently allowed to march through Bolton, and counter demonstrations by British patriots were banned by the police. http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/whites-threatened-muslims-march

The British media, police and politicians turn a blind eye to this – because they know that the bankster-controllers want to make it known that Britain is now a Communist country, which also embraces the so-called “religion of peace” – Islam. But, woe-betide anyone extolling the genuine virtues of Nationalism and the love of your own nation and people, as you will be hounded and bullied by the thugs-in-uniform.

The truth is that Nationalism is the most natural thing in the world. It is purely based on the instinctual desire to protect your own family and extended families, and those of your neighbours and friends. What could be more natural than that? The people of every nation have the inalienable right to determine their own future, in their own country.

The British people don’t need to literally ‘fight’, to free our country; we only have to get enough people to stand with us, and say; ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, we want our country back?!

Next time your politically correct friend says; “I’m also against immigration, but I’m going to vote for UKIP”, ask them if they realise who finances UKIP and why Nigel Mirage, the Merchant Banker, has been allowed to appear on the BBC’s ‘Question Time’ more often than ANY other politician, over the past 40 years – could he be a friend of theirs? 

Also, do those people understand UKIP’s policy of ‘Balanced Migration’?

What this means is:- UKIP is very happy to see a million immigrants COME INTO OUR COUNTRY, as long as a million British people LEAVE ! Is that what British people REALLY want? I don’t think so. Also, UKIP believes that it is acceptable to force schoolchildren to visit mosques! Here is a clip from a recent report;

‘…Parents fears on Islam “garbage” says UKIP… 

‘…a UKIP politician has announced plans to visit a city mosque at the centre of a row surrounding parents’ decision to stop their children attending on a school trip to a Muslim mosque. Mr Stanley said: “I am in no way condemning these parents but I do not agree with this decision (by the parents) and so I want to go and reassure the Muslim community…

“UKIP is not a racist party and has a clear vision that someone’s religion is their own matter. We want to be clear as a party that we do not back any of the garbage uttered on the subject…

“For anyone to say schoolchildren visiting a mosque is anything to do with political correctness is just nonsense.” http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/parents-fears-islam-garbage-says-ukip

So, to assess what the UKIP man, Mr Stanley is saying is that; He wants to reassure the Muslim community, because he thinks that the Muslims may be offended by the actions of the parents. As he believes that the parents’ action, to protect their children, is somehow ‘wrong’ and he evidently thinks it is racist to stop schools from forcing this evil ideology onto their children.

The UKIP man also believes that the parents’ objections are garbage! There is a word for the UKIP man, but you are far too polite for me to use it.

Would YOU allow someone to force your children to visit a mosque? If you would, you have been well and truly brainwashed, and you probably need to visit a psychiatrist.

We are constantly told that we live in a democracy, yet we were never given the choice about the genocide and enslavement of Britain, by 5th Columnist traitors. There’s only ONE party that can save our people and country and that’s the British National Party.

Those that oppose us are either, anti-British racists, brainwashed, misguided fools, ‘useful idiots’, or they are Communist agitators, who are well aware of the mass deception of the British people.

So, we ALL need to let the public see that we are NOT nutters, or extremists. We are ordinary people, just like them, except that WE have the courage to speak the truth, when, as George Orwell said; 

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act”.

Courage seems to be lacking in Britain today, because many people can see what is going on and they agree with us, but they are too frightened to say so. But, when they realise that we are merely struggling for the survival of our people, they will join us in droves. One thing is certain, the only political party that will save Britain, is the British National Party.

Golden Dawn, Amnesty International And Charitable Status

Written By Cigpapers

Photos and Captions by Watt Tyler

Golden Dawn Leader, mathematician and Greek National hero Nikos Michaloliakos was arrested on 28th September 2013 and has been jailed pending trial on charges that he used the organisation to operate a criminal gang. He was arraigned before a Magistrate on 2nd October 2013 when he was denied bail.

Golden Dawn Leader Nikos Michaloliakos arrested on the orders of international Jewry.

Golden Dawn Leader Nikos Michaloliakos arrested on the orders of international Jewry.

Nikos Michaloliakos is the first elected political head to be incarcerated in almost 40 years in Greece. A number of other Golden Dawn elected MPs and Party leaders are now also being held in Greek jails without bail.

Appearing on Skai television, former Greek Justice Minister Roupakiotis claimed that pressure from international Jewry was behind for the Golden Dawn arrests.

Appearing on Skai television, former Greek Justice Minister Roupakiotis claimed that pressure from international Jewry was behind for the Golden Dawn arrests.

On Monday, September 23 2013, World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder demanded that the Golden Dawn be destroyed to save democracy, saying:

“It is high time Greek politicians honor their pledge and adopt effective legislation that will put an end to completely unacceptable harassment of immigrants, ethnic minorities, immigrants and political opponents by the extremist Golden Dawn party.

Words of condemnation, although important, won’t suffice. Greece’s leaders need to take action against those who create a climate of fear and who pose a threat to many of their fellow citizens.”

Ilias Panayiotaros, when arrested by the masked servants of the Jewish occupational government, said “Shame on them, the people will lift Golden Dawn higher.”

Ilias Panayiotaros, when arrested by the masked servants of the Jewish occupational government, shouted “Shame on them, the Greek people will lift Golden Dawn higher.”

On Saturday, September 28, MPs and key party members were arrested and imprisoned on nonsensical charges that the democratically elected party is a ‘criminal organization.’

Golden Dawn's Ilias Kasidiaris being hauled off by masked thugs.When he was grabbed, he shouted “Nothing will bend us! Long live Greece!”

Golden Dawn’s Ilias Kasidiaris being hauled off by masked thugs.When he was grabbed, he shouted “Nothing will bend us! Long live Greece!”

So What Happened To Amnesty International?

Amnesty International claim to be a non-political human rights organisation.

Amnesty International claim to be a non-political human rights organisation.

Amnesty International claim to be a non-political human rights organisation that support human rights for everyone irrespective of their political beliefs.

Amnesty International UK is divided into two legal entities – the UK Section and the Charitable Trust – and each has its own constitution.The UK section is Amnesty’s  membership arm and it is responsible for much of their work, including campaigning, communications, fundraising and administration.For legal reasons the Section cannot be a charity. But  the Section does carry out some activities that are considered charitable under English Law.

Amnesty International UK is a company limited by guarantee registered in England no 01735872.
Amnesty International UK Section Charitable Trust no 1051681.

Registered in Scotland as Amnesty International UK Section Charitable Trust no SC039534.

Amnesty International solicit donations and membership fees from the general Public by claiming to be a human rights organisation. If they are in fact a political organisation then they have been involved in a long-running and very serious fraud by obtaining money by deception. If they are a political organisation they have also clearly breached their charitable status which would need removing. There would also be the question of refunding membership fees and donations. Supporters of Amnesty International may also request payment for voluntary work done on campaigns which they weren’t informed were in fact political work.

At the moment we must give Amnesty International the benefit of the doubt on their lack of action regarding the imprisonment of Golden Dawn leaders. However this lack of action needs rectifying as soon as possible.

Please contact Amnesty International at the earliest opportunity about the Golden Dawn situation. Stay calm, polite and non-threatening in all your communications. Their contact details are:

Telephone: 020 7033 1500

Email: sct@amnesty.org.uk

Postal address:

Amnesty International UK
Human Rights Action Centre
17-25 New Inn Yard
London
EC2A 3EA

The Charity Commission:

pic004

In England and Wales all charities are regulated and policed by The Charity Commission. The Charity Commission clearly state that charities can not be political or support certain political parties.If you do not receive a positive response from Amnesty International on the Golden Dawn situation please consider contacting The Charity Commission to ask them to investigate here:

For England and Wales Charity complaints:

http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/contact-us/general-enquiries/report-a-concern-about-a-charity/raising-concerns-about-a-charity/

For Scotland Charity complaints go to the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator here:

http://www.oscr.org.uk/managing-your-charity/how-to-complain-about-a-charity/making-a-complaint/

Charities are often the most appropriate organisations to speak out and campaign on behalf of their users. From lobbying politicians to running online petitions, you can engage in a range of activities to support your charity’s aims. But charities must never be politically biased – See more at:

http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/running-a-charity/your-charitys-work/campaigning-and-elections/campaigning-and-political-activities/#sthash.Q3UnQ5jB.dpuf

It has now been revealed that Amnesty International has been involved in a campaign to decriminalize prostitution, pimping and brothels:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545003/Amnesty-calls-legal-prostitution-Charity-says-laws-ban-people-buying-selling-sex-breach-human-rights.html#ixzz2rbx9imlC

BBC TV Licence Resistance : Not Paying – Discounts – Refunds

Written by Cigpapers

Photos, Captions and Video Links by Watt Tyler

There is a resistance to the BBC TV Licence growing across the UK, so here’s some facts for those thinking of joining it.

pic005

1. What Is The BBC TV Licence:

The TV Licence fee funds public broadcasting by the BBC, allowing it to allegedly run a politically impartial TV and Radio service. The current colour TV Licence Fee is £145:50 per year (a black and white TV Licence is £49:00 per year) . The fee makes up about 75% of the BBC’s income – the BBC are very secretive about where the other 25% comes from.

Here’s a Freedom Of Information Request About BBC funding sources:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bbc_funding_sources

The BBC contracts the collection and administration of the TV Licence out to TV Licensing who in turn employ Capita. According to the BBC, the money you pay is split between the following services:

Licence Fee Costs

2. You Only Need A Licence If You Watch Or Record “Live” TV:

pic004

Everyone in the UK who watches or records “live TV” (content as it is being broadcast) needs to be covered by a TV Licence.

You do not need a TV Licence if you only watch content after it’s been shown on television. This includes TV programmes downloaded or streamed after broadcast using a catch-up service.

So, if you have a TV but only use it to watch videos/DVDs, for gaming or for watching catch-up TV (eg, BBC iPlayer, 4oD), then you don’t need a TV Licence.

What’s ‘live TV’?

When we talk about “live TV”, confusingly it isn’t necessarily a live episode of a programme, it could be pre-recorded.

“Live TV” is content at the time it’s being broadcast on a TV channel.

A TV channel doesn’t just mean the big five on terrestrial TV, nor any channel that’s just on Freeview. It means any channel (including, say, +1 channels or foreign channels) on any main TV platform, including Freeview, Virgin or Sky.

Internet-only services such as YouTube or Netflix don’t need a TV Licence though.

Here are a few examples to show what this means:

  • When watching an episode of Hollyoaks on your TV, on Channel 4, you DO need a TV Licence.
  • When watching an episode of Hollyoaks via the Channel 4 online streaming service (4oD) at the same time as it’s being shown on Channel 4, you DO need a TV Licence.
  • When watching an episode of Hollyoaks online at a time that it isn’t being broadcast “live” on Channel 4, you DON’T need a TV Licence.

pic004

3. What If You Have The Equipment To Watch TV But Don’t Use It:

Simply having the necessary equipment to watch TV i.e. a TV, Freeview box, aerial etc. does not mean you must have a TV Licence. For example if you only use your TV, aerial, Freeview box and connectors to listen to the radio, watch DVDs/videos or play games you do not need a TV Licence. If you had a radio, but not a television, until 1971 you had to pay for a Radio Licence.These days, you don’t need a licence to listen to the radio (including BBC stations). This applies however you listen, even if you listen using television equipment, a Freeview box and a TV aerial.

img096

4. Eligibility For A Discount Or Free TV Licence:

Depending on your circumstances, it may be possible to get a discount or free TV Licence.

Over-75s get a free TV Licence. If you’re over 74 and your licence will run out before you turn 75, you’re entitled to a short-term licence covering you until you reach 75.If you’ve got a short-term licence, you should receive the free one automatically as soon as you reach 75. If not, get in touch with TV Licensing.

If you or someone you live with is blind or severely sight-impaired, you’ll get 50% off the cost of a TV licence. So it’s £72.75 for a colour set or £24.50 for a black and white one.

You must provide TV Licensing with a photocopy of one of these documents to confirm you’re certified as either blind or severely sight-impaired:

  • A copy of the certificate or document issued by or on behalf of your local authority.
  • A copy of the certificate from your ophthalmologist.

If you’re only partially sighted or sight-impaired, you won’t qualify for the concession.

If you live in a residential care home and watch TV in your own room or flat, then you need a licence. You may be able to apply for an Accommodation or Residential Care Concessionary Licence though, if you qualify.This costs £7.50 per room, flat or bungalow. Both you and your accommodation must qualify.

Go to http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/  to get details on these free or discounted TV licenses.

5. Recording Or Watching Recorded TV:

If you record any live TV programmes from any channel at the time of broadcast by any means (video recorder,DVD recorder,Sky+,TiVo etc.) and through any equipment (aerial, Freeview box, cable or satellite) you will require a TV Licence. However to watch DVDs, videos etc. previously recorded at another premises you will not require a TV Licence.

6. Getting Caught Watching “Live Broadcast TV” Without A Licence:

The BBC claim they have handheld detectors and TV detector vans, most people agree this is highly unlikely due to technical problems and there is no evidence of prosecutions due to this alleged detecting equipment.

pic004

How people are usually caught is through a Capita agent knocking on their door. They get the addresses to check simply by going to every home not on the TV Licence data base. These Capita agents are believed to be on a £20 commission for every TV Licence evader they catch.  These Capita agents have no right of entry in to your home if you decline to let them in, you are also under no obligation to answer any of their questions. Your best bet is to always video these encounters in full. Here are some Capita TV Licence agents being dealt with on video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfHRhXW1hno

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWiKEdGcIGk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt7o5IOUnfY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvXu23rDEUg

If you don’t need a TV Licence the best advice to deal with the Capita agents would probably be to politely:

a. Ask to see their identity card.

b. Give your name if you’re the householder.

c. Explain you don’t watch or record live broadcast TV so don’t need a TV Licence.

d. Decline to let them in your home – they have no right of entry if they don’t have a uniformed Police Officer with a warrant with them.

e. If you do make the mistake of letting them in, or they have a Police Officer with a warrant with them, don’t comply with any requests to turn on or demonstrate any equipment to them.

f. At no time become angry, abusive or threatening – you’ll just get arrested.

g. Under no circumstances sign a 178 form even if you have been caught “bang to rights”.

The notorious 178 form - never sign one.

The notorious 178 form – never sign one.

Even when they come with a Uniformed Police Officer with a search warrant they don’t always get in Peoples’ houses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRQTkOk__48

7. Punishments For Not Having A TV Licence:

In the UK getting caught watching (or recording) live TV broadcasts without a TV License is a criminal offence. If you do sign the 178 form you will probably be summoned to your local Magistrates Court for plea and sentencing. Your guilt, if you signed a 178 form, is taken for granted and you can be fined up to £1,000. The normal fine for a first time offender is about £50 to £100. There is also the prosecution costs, which are about £90, that you also have to pay. About 10% of criminal prosecutions in British Magistrates Courts are now for TV Licence evasion. You can’t be sent to prison for TV Licence evasion, but can be sent to prison if you don’t pay your fine. A third of women sent to prison in Britain are now for failure to pay a TV Licence fee evasion fine.

A mock up of a TV detector unit - there's no evidence this equipment actually exists.

A mock-up of a TV detector unit – there’s no evidence this equipment actually works.

Here’s a major player with the TV Licence Resistance making a video about witnessing TV Licence evasion prosecutions at his local Magistrates Court:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzzweUmp8Rw

You’ll notice at the Magistrates Court he attended there were 86 prosecutions ( 19 men and 67 women) in a total of 75 minutes. All the cases were based on the defendant signing the notorious 178 form with no evidence from TV detector vans or hand-held detectors. The fines ranged from £35 to £600 with a standard £90 prosecution costs.

Freedom Of Information Act Request About TV Licence Fee Prosecutions And Detector Equipment:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bbc_license_evasion_prosecutions

Freedom Of Information Act Request About TV Licence Fee Magistrate Issued Search Warrants Due To Alleged Detector Equipment:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bbc_tv_detector_equipment_search

8. Refund Of TV Licence Fee:

If you realise you have paid for a TV license you didn't need it's easy to claim a refund.

If you realise you have paid for a TV Licence you didn’t need it’s easy to claim a refund.

If you have realised that you have been paying for a TV Licence when you didn’t need one, or were eligible for a discount, you can claim up to 2 years ago here:

https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one/refunds-and-cancellations/apply-for-a-refund/ 

There’s usually no problem with getting up to two years refunded. For periods before two years ago you will need to make a written application to:

Head of Revenue Management
BBC TV Licensing
2nd Floor, The Lighthouse
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London
W12 7TQ

9. As The BBC Is Clearly A Corrupt Criminal Organisation Can It Collect Legally:

pic005

Technically the answer is the BBC can’t legally collect the TV Licence anyway. Think of its corruption regarding paedophilia, 911, the Royal Family, foreign wars, PFI Fraud etc. However you are very unlikely to get any result on these defences due to the corruption of the British legal profession and judiciary. Some people who are well resourced with a top legal team and expert witnesses can get results on this basis, however it is not a recommended route to take. Here is a 911 truther who did get a not guilty verdict for TV Licence fee evasion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZBM-pkJPio

pic004

10. Read Up Before Applying For Your Refund Or Joining The TV Licence Resistance:

Before applying for your refunds/discount or joining the TV Licence Resistance it is advisable to read up fully so you know what your exact legal position is. Here are some recommended sites:

http://tv-licensing.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/utilities/tv-licence

Here is a UK Column video on the BBC TV Licence:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZPPy4yR4Hw

pic005

Here Is A Letter Removing Implied Right Of Access You May Want To Use:

Customer Relations                                                         Insert Your Address Here
TV Licensing                                                                       Insert Date Here
Darlington
DL98 1TL

Removal Of Implied Right Of Access –Insert Your Address Here
TV Licensing Reference Number  –Insert Ref. No. From TV Licensing Here

This instruction is made in accordance with the BBC TV Licensing Withdrawal Of Implied Right Of Access (WOIRA) Policy (The Policy).

As the legal occupier of the above mentioned property I hereby remove TV Licensing’s implied right of access to the property, in accordance with the terms of the Policy. By “TV Licensing” I mean any employees, agents or contractors acting on behalf of the BBC as TV Licensing Authority.

The Policy is quite clear that I do not need to give a name for my instruction to be legally valid, so I will not be doing so. You can verify my status as the Legal Occupier by matching the reference number above to my property.

This instruction comes into effect immediately . Should TV Licensing personnel trespass on my property after receipt of this instruction, I reserve the right to eject them from my property and seek redress from the Courts.

Please confirm receipt of this letter and acknowledgement of its terms by writing back to me.

Yours sincerely

The Legal Occupier

Freedom Of Information Act Request Relating To Withdrawl Of Implied Right Of Access : RFI20090807

Please read the Freedom Of Information Act Request at the link below relating to “Withdrawl Of Implied Right Of Access”:

Click to access Freedom%20of%20Information%20-%20no%20name%20needed%20for%20WOIRA.pdf

BBC Spends £7million On Refreshment:

 The BBC has just been caught out again by BNP activists spending Licence Fee payer’s money like water. A Freedom Of Information Act request has revealed the staggering amounts spent by BBC staff on expense accounts.

These latest figures are only for food, drink and refreshments over the last three years. The BBC is stalling on giving the most expensive bottles of champagne and wine purchased but we are hunting these figures down.   

The figures are:

2010 to 2011  £2,306,496

2011 to 2012  £2,233,938

2012 to 2013  £2,416,070

Total               £6,956 ,504

 

That is a staggering £44,593 every week for the last three years.

 

These expenses are just for food, drink and food for refreshments for staff purchased off BBC premises.

These figures do NOT include subsidised restaurants and cafes on BBC premises.

These figures do NOT include travel or hotel expenses – we are chasing these expenses down and will release them as soon as we can get them.

As usual this shows the complete contempt the BBC have for the hard pressed Licence Fee payers of Britain.

 

 

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/193559/response/490915/attach/3/RFI20140257%20Final%20responses.pdf

BBC Blows Nearly £29 Million On Hotels In Last Three Years:

The BBC has a reputation for having complete contempt for Television License fee payers. A Freedom Of Information Act request has revealed just how much of our money is blown by this corrupt, racist and paedophile-infested organisation on luxury hotel rooms for its staff. These figures do not include transport, meals, drinks or any costs other than hotel rooms:

2011 – £8.4 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.
2012 – £8.8 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.
2013 – £11.6 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.

The reason for the jump in 2013 is explained by the BBC as being due to the Sochi Olympics, Brazil World Cup and Glasgow Commonwealth Games. This however would imply that the BBC spent an average of nearly £1 million on hotel rooms for each of these three events.

The BBC hasn’t provided full figures yet but here is a list of the most expensive hotel room paid for each year by the BBC for staff:

2011 – £306 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.
2012 – £632 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.
2013 – £411 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bbc_hotel_accomodation_expenses#incoming-517926

 

 

Book Review: HOW DID THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

HOW DID THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

SMOKESCREENS AND MIRRORS
LIES, CONFUSION, TRICKERY AND PRETENSIONS.

A Study of Language

A short summary/review of Dr Thomas E. Turner’s book

By Boadicea

Millions pour in from the third world as if a Camp of the Saints(1) were occurring in slow motion. This brings many problems and much strife and grief, e.g.: thousands of British girls are raped; working Brits lose a fortune in lower wages (2) and by paying extra taxes to support the immigrants (and to fund the related industries, etc.(3)); large areas of the land are ‘ethnically-cleansed’ by immigrants; there is destruction of British culture and of the social fabric; and, most significantly, there is the facilitation and threat of genocide of the British people. The people are anxious, angry, unhappy, hurt – the people are being harmed and yet they dare not speak out. How did those who engineered this get away with it?

Picture 9

One significant factor in pulling this off was the use of various words as tools to suppress dissent. These terms suppress dissent by direct means, and also by indirect means – they are used as tools of power to exert social and political power over the people.

In Dr Turner’s book these terms are analysed and it is shown that these words are not even ‘proper’ words – that’s how they work their power.

‘Wayycist!!!’

Picture 9

These terms are a specific type of term: ‘nebulous-power-words’. These terms can act as tools of power because of the very nature of the words. The characteristics of these terms enable them to obscure truth, inhibit rationality – confusing people and distorting perception – and hence the emotions and social forces associated with such terms can act to manipulate people. The power of these terms is contingent upon their features, e.g. their lack of rationality (4) and the fact that most people do not recognise this lack – but instead misperceive the terms as properly rational terms. It is because of these features that the social and emotional power associated with the terms can operate to control people.

You might have heard the non-white Cohesion Officer on television dismissing a poor white person who might have had the audacity to say that he thinks that the policy of favouring non-whites in employment might be unfair and not an act of ‘equality’ – ‘At our Unit’ the Officer snarls, then raising the voice to a terribly superior pitch, ‘we celebrate the diversity and do you not realise that ‘equality’ is the root of ‘multiculturalism’? And quite honestly I think your statement is dangerously close to sounding like ‘racism’!’ The white person will now deny being a ‘racist’ and say how many black friends he has, how much he supports ‘equality’, he thinks it should not matter what a person’s skin colour is, blablabla….on the defence. But defence to what? The statement from the state-paid official is mumbo jumbo.

image001(1)

‘Multiculturalism’ is rooted in ‘equality’ and opposed to ‘racism’

The three terms ‘racism’, ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘equality’ are nebulous-power-words and should not be used in rational discourse. These terms do not possess high referentiality and also hold strong emotional associations and social force. People celebrate ‘multiculturalism’, even constructing monuments to it (5), and opposing ‘equality’ is heresy. Being a ‘racist’ often is considered the most terrible thing.

These terms have been used to discuss, justify and explain changes in the lives of millions of people. But what so these words actually mean?

Let us examine the definitions of these 3 terms. Definitions are available in dictionaries, glossaries, in the literature, from interviews, etc.

I support ‘equality’ as a moral good!

First, examining ‘equality’ (6) one finds many definitions available. In the sense of being the same (in quantity and/or quality, i.e. equivalence), this term possesses high referentiality – it would be perfectly rational to use this term in such senses (7). However, in the social and political sense one finds that this term is problematic. There are many ways in which this term is used in the social and political context(8), including(9): equality of outcome, (e.g. wealth, income, representation, distribution of goods, etc.); equality of process, (e.g. equality of opportunity, etc.); ontological equality; the idea of being the same; equality of recognition; equality of condition; equality of fraternity; equality before the law; equality of rights; etc.

The very fact of multiple meanings is a factor denoting low referentiality – since one could never be sure which definition was being used. However, there are other problems with this set of definitions. For example, some of these uses of the term ‘equality’ are inconsistent with one another. A well-known form of ‘equality’ is that of equality of opportunity. One could use this in reference to places at university, or jobs, etc. However, if the relevant groups differ on the relevant criterion (or criteria), then equal processing will produce unequal outcomes. Hence, in these circumstances, one could not have ‘equality’: one could have equality of outcome at the expense of inequality of process, or vice versa(10). So, if the cry is for ‘equality’ – then to which form of ‘equality’ is one referring? ‘Equality’ is not a sufficient term in itself. One would need to specify the exact form of ‘equality’, and then, if there were such transparency, certain issues might become apparent. For example, if one merely wants equal numbers in relation to outcome, then one might wonder why this is? Is this some sort of numerical OCD? Is it moral to deprive the best qualified candidates merely because of their group membership? And if so, is this ‘equality’? Will this rule apply (dare I say ‘equally’) in all contexts? And how does one determine membership in the group categories – is this not inherently unequal? What harms are associated with this (hence raising moral issues)? Why would this necessarily be a moral good? Or an aim?

A single clear high referentiality definition of the term would illuminate many issues concerning the public good, logic, truth, morality, etc. – issues that are obscured by use of the confused and unclear term ‘equality’. Nebulous-power-words tend to confuse and obscure, yet how very dare anyone object to the holy and righteous term of ‘equality’.

We need action against ‘racism’!

‘Racism’ is a very powerful nebulous-power-word. People go to great lengths to avoid being called ‘racist’ (11) – sometimes even making ‘friends’ with people from other races. Many people do not do what is correct because they want to avoid being labelled as ‘racist’ – this allegation also made against the police(12). International conferences are held to combat ‘racism’(13) and governments speak against it. We need to stop ‘racism’ in football too(14). Some believe ‘racism’ is a criminal offence(15) – many are reported in the media as being arrested for ‘racism’(16). ‘Racism’(17) warrants censorship and many other punishments(18). This term controls speech, perceptions, conception and behaviour.

However, what does this word actually mean?

Many people cannot define the term at all, and some definitions available present low referentiality, e.g. that a racist incident is one so perceived(19) . If one examines the definitions that are available, one finds many definitions – again denoting low referentiality. Popular definitions include (in relation to a race or races): hatred; superiority; stereotyping; prejudice; discrimination; mistreatment; ‘inequality’; genocide(20); preference; intolerance; power; and yet others, including the idea that ‘racism’ is the state of being uninformed/uneducated/unintelligent, evil/wicked, etc.

Again, if a single definition were chosen, then the power of this term would diminish. This term, as a nebulous-power-word, has the immense power it does because it lacks high referentiality. For example if one were to pick the popular definition of ‘hatred’. If this had always been(21) the one and only definition of the term, then what would be so terrible about this? People hate all sorts of groups, why is this case so demonised and not others? Surely people are entitled to their own emotions? And if this were the only definition, then the numerous times this term is attributed in an unwarranted manner (used to silence and control) would become apparent. For example, if someone were to state that ‘group X has on average a lower ability in Y’, then why should this necessarily be attributed to hatred? Could it not just be true or false? This replacement exercise(22) can be performed with all the commonly-found definitions of the term and the intellectual dishonesty becomes clear, as do other matters – such as questions of morality. If one wants action against ‘racism’ what exactly is one wanting to prevent, and why?

All the definitions of ‘racism’ present problems – such as the inconsistent manner in which ‘stereotyping’ is used. It is not ‘racist’ to stereotype groups unless it is unfavourable to non-white groups(23). ‘Anti-racists’ can sneer at whites, including Brits, no problem – ‘Brits are too lazy to work and need immigrants’, etc.(24) Even putting to one side the unequal application, if ‘racism’ were merely defend as stereotyping/generalising about a race(s), then ‘racism’ would merely be such generalising. What is so very terrible about that? Do we really need to hold an International Conference because someone might have made a generalisation in their mind? Or even said it out loud? What if the thought is actually true(25)? And surely if ‘racism’ is defined as mistreatment of a racial group – then is not mass immigration a racist act against us? Which would mean that ‘multiculturalism’ were ‘racism’ and also ‘anti-racism’ (internally inconsistent)? So if ‘racism’ is defined only to disempower one racial group – then is this ‘racist’?

Dr Turner deconstructs this term to the extent that after reading his analysis you will never view the term ‘racist’ the same again.

It’s a celebration of ‘multiculturalism’

Investigating the definitions available of the term ‘multiculturalism’ one finds that there are 7 commonly found parts of the definitions that are available(26), plus the descriptive definition:

1.    All groups practising their own culture
2.    All the same
3.    Celebration of diversity
4.    Everyone living happily together
5.    Equality
6.    ‘Anti-racism’
7.    Cultural relativism

These elements present problems from a rational perspective – whether examined alone and/or in combination, as will be shown briefly here.

I want to preserve all the world’s cultures and the diversity!!

Element one presents an idea that is not achievable in practice: all groups cannot practise their own cultures(27) in one place at one time. This simply is not possible. The one set of rules dilemma illuminates the logical fact that since a culture is described by a set of descriptive ‘rules’(28), only one such set can define the culture in question. Thus, if two (or more) cultures differ on any of these rules(29), then both sets cannot describe the resultant area at any one time. For example, if a culture has the custom of all houses being painted pink, then if a blue-house-painting culture moves in to the city, then the city-scape cannot remain all blue and all pink. Not possible. One or both cultures will be changed(30). The idea of ‘everyone doing their own thing’ is not preserving the original cultures, and neither does it represent ‘everyone doing their own thing’ in this context. This dilemma is played out across immigrised areas in Britain today(31). Is the Muslim call to prayer to be played across public space(32)? Are gays to be allowed to be gay? What are women to wear? May they drive on the roads? Is alcohol allowed? Is Piglet allowed(33)?

If one really did believe in preservation of culture and all cultures being allowed to practise their own cultures, then the political policy of mass immigration would not be a good idea.

All the different groups are the same!!

As to element two, we are not all the same, and if we were on wonders how on earth one would be able to categorise people into the relevant groups anyway. This is simply an untrue statement as are all the related lies such as ‘we are no different to other people’, ‘there is no such thing as race’, ‘we are all the same inside’, etc. If this element is used to define the term ‘multiculturalism’, then ‘multiculturalism’ is defined with an untruth.

It’s just a non-stop celebration here!!

Picture 9

Element Three (celebration of diversity) does not describe general reality. Diversity (as brought by immigration – which is the only type of diversity relevant here) in fact tends to make people less happy and, despite frequent claims to the contrary, tends to harm the people/society experiencing it (other things being equal). Studies show diversity causes people to be less trusting, less willing to sacrifice for others, less secure, less mentally healthy, more anxious, and is also associated with lower levels of social capital(34).

Such diversity tends to bring discomfort, strife, conflict and increases the chances of civil disorder, (e.g. race riots in 2001 across Britain, Birmingham’s inter-racial riots in 2005(35), etc.) and even civil war(36). Caldwell notes that every country that has experienced mass immigration has some form of ‘simmering’ ethnic conflict (Caldwell, 2009(37)). John Derbyshire predicts our grandchildren asking why we couldn’t see that such diversity obviously causes trouble – and they will be asking ‘what could be more obvious?’(38). Some hold that inter-group conflict is merely the way of nature – and that hostility and separation between groups may be instinctive and natural.
It would be inconsistent to celebrate all diversity (this could involve celebrating uniformity if practised by a group), and amoral by definition. This would also entail celebrating any practice – including child sacrifice, slavery, rape, etc. (e.g. see Press, 2007, page 17(39)). These practices, and others, are still found around the world – even human sacrifice.
Such diversity in one space also tends to uniformity, and this is hence inconsistent (in the context of immigration). This contradiction has prompted some  to say that ‘multiculturalism’ is ‘the anti-thesis’ of what is presented as meaning, thereby making it a form of Orwellian ‘doublethink’(40). If one were a big fan of diversity, then mass immigration should not be a policy one should support.

Picture 9

Hence, such ‘celebration’ is inconsistent, immoral, is rarely found in real life (other than amongst journalists, politicians, etc.), and irrational in light of the problems it brings – plus the diversity brought by immigration ironically tends to become uniformity.

Everyone’s so happy together!!

Element Four (everyone living happily together) also does not describe reality accurately. As documented by Taylor (2011(41)) with numerous real-life examples, people generally prefer to separate and will do so when feasible (and in the absence of other incentives, etc.). Segregation in Britain is increasing, and is significant – as noted by many. For example, the head of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Trevor Phillips, has stated that Britain is ‘sleepwalking’ into segregation(42) and Ted Cantle referred to communities living ‘parallel lives’ in his Report following the 2001 riots(43), etc.
When people are mixed together, this tends to decrease happiness and many other measures of well-being (as noted above). Different groups living together increases the chances of civil disorder or even war (as noted earlier).
Most people do not believe that ‘everyone lives happily together’; quite the contrary. During the author’s research it was found that most people not only desire to be ‘amongst their own kind’, but also believe that this makes people happier. Taylor cites a study conducted by the Institute of Governmental Studies at Berkeley, which found that the majority of the four major racial groups in California surveyed (blacks, whites, Hispanics and Asians) agreed with the statement that ‘people are happier when segregated’ (Taylor, 2011, page 41, ibid).
The desire to live amongst one’s ‘own kind’ is reported around the world – sometimes to and/or by governments (which hence would make it difficult for those governments to claim not to know this). For example, the British Government Home Office Report commissioned after the 2001 riots noted that the main cause for the segregation found in Oldham was the preferences of groups ‘to live with their own kind’ (Oldham Independent Review, 2001, page 9, ibid). German Chancellor Angela Merkel is quoted as stating that:
‘Of course the tendency had been to say, ‘let’s adopt the multicultural concept and live happily side by side, and be happy to be living with each other’. But this concept has failed, and failed utterly,’
(E.g. as quoted in the Guardian, 17th October 2010)
The fact that groups do not live together happily is sometimes noted even by some proponents of ‘multiculturalism’. In fact, the ‘multiculturalism’ industry is based largely on the assumption that diversity is problematic. Many other phenomena implicitly acknowledge that in fact groups do not simply live happily together. For example, the very existence of numerous lavishly-funded government bodies to ‘create cohesion’(44) and suchlike admit, if only by implication, that there is at least a strong possibility of problems between groups. One could also cite the systematic media censorship and distortion conducted for the purpose of ‘maintaining’ ‘cohesion’.
As a description this element is therefore false and irrational, and as an aim it is irrational to attempt since it seems unlikely to occur and is harmful (because of the problems it causes – increasing unhappiness, increasing the chances of civil disorder, etc.).
Some believe that the problems that arise from ethnic diversity are best resolved by the achievement of homogeneity through inter-marriage (hence refuting Element Four). There are a number of influential people in politics, academia and the media who explicitly call for miscegenation as a solution, (e.g. Podhoretz(45)). But if the problems of mixing ethnic/racial groups within one country are so severe and intractable that the best solution involves the ending of the relevant groups  (or at least the indigenous group(46)), this calls into question both the attainability and the descriptive accuracy of this idea of  ‘everyone living happily together’.
Hence, this element is neither a rational description nor an easily achievable policy. The moral justification for attempting to achieve this situation is not clear – especially if this involves destruction of groups (culture and/or people).

Equality! Even if it’s unequal it’s good!

As noted above, the term ‘equality’ (in the social and political sense) is a nebulous-power-word and hence should not be used in rational discourse. However, in the context of mass immigration (descriptive ‘multiculturalism’) this nebulous-power-word presents further specific problems – including the fact that equality of fraternity is not generally found (which can present various problems as well as inconsistencies). Also, in relation to indigenous rights(47), the indigenous group inherently have many of these rights infringed by the very fact of immigration, presenting an intrinsic inequality when descriptive ‘multiculturalism'(48) exists. Equality of representation is not achievable if numbers differ and/or distributions in relation to the relevant criterion (a) – unless some inequalities are enforced to make it equal. This renders descriptive ‘multiculturalism’ incompatible with ‘equality’ in these senses – and in many others.

‘Racism’ is very very bad
‘Anti-racism’ is good
‘Racist’ ‘anti-racism’ – still good!!

‘Racism’ is a nebulous-power-word – and as such should not be used in rational discourse. This is true in general, but there are specific additional issues if this nebulous-power-word is used in the context of descriptive ‘multiculturalism’. For example, if ‘racism’ is hatred (of a racial group or groups), could not mass immigration be viewed as an act of hatred(49) against indigenous people(50)? Some supporters of mass immigration claim that animosity, or even loathing(51), towards Britain is a motivation, e.g. Hitchens states that: ‘we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain’(52). As many have stated, integration/assimilation and having children outside one’s race could be viewed as killing one’s own race and as hateful(53). Which would mean that ‘multiculturalism’ in its descriptive sense is defined both as anti-racism, and also is ‘racist’. The associations of the term ‘racism’ with genocide(54) might become illuminated were the term merely defined as ‘hatred’ (or any other definition). The power to control people and inhibit objections to mass immigration would diminish were this term clearly defined(55).

It’s all relative – don’t bother thinking about it…

Under what is thought to be the original usage of the term ‘cultural relativism’ it was suggested that cultures should (or could) only be judged on their own terms. If this is true, then is problematic for descriptive ‘multiculturalism’, e.g. how is public space to be governed, (e.g. how are laws to be formulated?)?
The more recent interpretations of this phrase include that of ‘you shouldn’t/can’t judge’ – but this is a judgement and hence internally inconsistent, as well as being immoral. The spreading of such ideas has harmed society as some people are inhibited from making moral judgements(56).
Other popular interpretations include that of ‘all cultures are equal’. As ‘equality’ is a nebulous-power-word it is not clear what this actually means. The ways one might interpret this do not necessarily make sense alone or as a definition of the term ‘multiculturalism’ either – this would be a true or a false statement and so what does this have to do with mass immigration? And does anyone actually believe this in the sense of being ‘equally good’?

It’s just a description…

Of course, the term ‘multiculturalism’ is sometimes used in its descriptive sense – to refer to an area that has experienced as influx of incomers and is hence racially and/or ethnically mixed. In Britain this thus denotes the results of the political policy of immigration. This definition has high referentiality and possesses no rational problems per se – although being inconsistent with some of the other definitions (see above – all of which it underpins). However, there are some problems with this definition – including those of: this definition not always making sense if a replacement exercise is performed; and the issue of why this would be represented in a positive manner (and, not unrelatedly, why would a government implement this as a policy?).

In relation to the replacing of the term with its definition: how can ‘multiculturalism’ merely mean the diversity of immigration in sentences such as: ‘’multiculturalism’ is the solution to diversity’, ‘’multiculturalism’ is the justification of a ‘multicultural’ society’, etc.? How can it ‘be taught’ (as is recommended)? How can it ‘be’ a value/moral?

In relation to the idea of the positive emotions associated with the term (including its celebration) why would the results of this political policy be considered as positive(57)? Most Brits view immigration in a negative light, as shown in surveys and also by comments made in daily life (when people feel safe to speak that is). In Britain immigration has been harmful – especially to the poor who have been made poorer(58). Immigration (and its associated management) has cost the country a lot of money(59). Immigrants have committed a disproportionate amount of crime(60). The victims of these immigrants include thousands of raped women and children(61). The social fabric is destroyed by immigration, causing much misery – this in both dramatic ways and also the less dramatic daily miseries(62). Many freedoms have been inhibited or lost as a consequence of immigration(63). There have been many other means by which the country has been harmed as a result of immigration(64), (e.g. in education, housing issues, strains on resources such as water, importation of disease, etc.). Hence, immigration into Britain in recent years has caused great harm. In fact, many immigrants and supporters of mass immigration view immigration as an act of revenge against the Brits(65) – not very positive.

Not looking at the specifics harms that immigration has brought to Britain in recent years, one could examine the process of immigration from a theoretical perspective. When there is immigration there is what is known as the dilemma of cultural contact. This dilemma points out that immigration can bring only one of 2 outcomes(66): there is either diversity; or there is homogeneity. This is true irrespective of any specific consequences of immigration, (e.g. financial losses to the country, etc.(67)). Diversity is associated with much harm qv, and homogeneity can only be achieved by cultural destruction, and full homogeneity by racial destruction(68). Even if one supports ‘only’ cultural homogeneity: were this achieved, then racial homogeneity would follow in time. Thus, the dilemma of culture contact illuminates the logical truth that the only 2 options are both associated with harm: harm of diversity or the harm associated with achieving homogeneity. This truth holds no matter which terms are used to describe the relevant processes/outcomes, (e.g. ‘assimilation’, ‘integration’, ‘creolisation’, ‘métissage’, etc.). Of course, there are those who do not view the loss of racial existence as a problem(69), e.g. Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate Walkington is quoted as allegedly stating that: Britain is ‘a country with the most mixed race relationships in the world. In 200 years’ time, we’ll all be coffee coloured and I’ve got no problem with that.’(70)

untitled31

According to the United Nations(71), genocide is an international crime and punishable as such(72). One action that can qualify as genocide is: deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group (see Article 2). Under this definition not only does the political policy of mass immigration possibly qualify as a genocidal act (intent dependent), but many of the academics, media, politicians and other experts appear to possibly be guilty of ‘complicity in genocide’ (an international crime under Article 3).

Hence, it is difficult to see why this term (policy) would be represented with a positive term. In recent years in Britain much harm has been caused, and even from a theoretical perspective the dilemma of cultural contact illuminates the logical truth that such immigration can only result in either homogenisation or diversity(73) – both outcomes/processes associated with harm/loss.

In recent years there have been some critics of ‘multiculturalism’ – but these voices queried ‘multiculturalism’ and not immigration or diversity. By this means, nebulous-power-words can be used to further obscure issues. If these critics are objecting to diversity brought by immigration, then what are they suggesting? Assimilation? Homogenisation? Is this not genocidal? And what happened to the celebration of diversity?

Nebulous-power-words can be used to confuse, distract, stall or otherwise obscure clear perception and conception. Also, when they are no longer useful, they will be either discarded (and possibly replaced(74)) or their meaning switched. What was good might be said to be bad – or vice versa. Nebulous-power-words might no longer be useful for a number of reasons, including: their purpose has been achieved, they have been exposed, etc. It is predicted that in the future even the very powerful nebulous-power-word ‘racism’ will either switch(75) or fall into disuse.

Hence, ‘multiculturalism’ is not adequate from a rational perspective. This term possesses low referentiality – the elements are all problematic from a rational perspective (ether per se and/or in the context of descriptive ‘multiculturalism’) and the one high referentiality meaning(76) found does not always make sense in the contexts in which the term is used – in these contexts the term must mean something else – but what? All the other meanings are shown to be problematic.

27092011583[1]

Social Representation Perspective on Meaning

So, if ‘multiculturalism’ is a nebulous-power-word, then what does it actually mean to those who know/use/hear/read, etc. it? Dr Turner concludes his book by taking another perspective on meaning. Whereas from a rational perspective this term is inadequate, a social representation perspective on meaning can explain, inter alia, what this term actually means to those who know it – and how social and emotional forces are contained within the very meaning (from a social representation perspective) of this term(77).
Dr Turner identifies various narrative voices (‘identities’) that contribute to constructing the social representation meaning that is found. One voice is that of the abstract – representing the abstract nature of the term and imbuing it with authority. All these experts, judges, highly-decorated academics, etc. use the term – surely it is not bogus? If the politicians have it as a policy it must at least be a real word? The Emperor isn’t naked is he?(78) A second such voice is the ‘nice’ narrative – it is just not nice(79) to challenge this – that would be nasty and ‘racist’(80). Thirdly, there is the danger of being attacked by the voice of the angry if one challenges/dissents(81) – these attacks can be in the form of the sneering/demeaning, the name-calling, or financial and legalistic attacks. There are also many cases of physical attacks to people and to property, and threats of such.  Rage-filled people attempt to resolve their emotional problems by drawing upon the construct of ‘villain and victim’ – the immigrants being the ‘pet victims’ of their fantasy community, and the ‘racists’ the villains(82). Snobbery and viciousness are acted out upon dissenters. This frightens many people into submission/silence/compliance. Such utopian thinking is inherently destructive – the abstract and unachievable absurd visions ‘justifying’ destruction, violence, hate and control(83). Many immigrants themselves constitute a fourth voice – one that makes a claim of victimhood and offers motivations such as self-indulgence, pity, fear, shame and guilt.  Immigrants can draw upon the utopian rainbow loving images and social representations without necessarily believing the vision/tenets(84) – this can be used, in a manipulative manner, as a tool to further one’s own goals. A fifth significant voice is that of the crowd – following the majority view (as is perceived(85)) and being swayed by social forces, many of this group follow the path of least resistance. All these forces combine and interact to construct the social representation meaning that is found – the social forces hence contained within the very meaning of this term (from a social representation perspective).
Fully assimilated visual images render the social representation impermeable to reason and truth. Images can replace concepts(86). Such images are ubiquitous in Western culture(87), and can ‘make sense’ of the elements in a manner that rational discourse cannot – and hence the term (and its elements) is ‘understood’ in this manner (by all being fitted into an organised structure of thought). The elements match and describe the image, but the image remains decontextualised and abstract.

untitled31

Repeated linking between such images and the relevant phenomena, terms, mantras, etc. forms and reinforces the associations. This happy rainbow is contrasted constructively against ‘racism’ and this dichotomy constitutes the figurative nucleus of bipolar oppositional form of this hegemonic social representation (parallel to the ‘boy-girl’ construction of gender(88)).

THE JABBERWOCKY GYMBLES AND GYRES
TALISMAN AND TABOO

As can be seen from the foregoing, ‘multiculturalism’ meets all the criteria to be categorised as a nebulous-power-word – words which can exert control because of their very nature. The power of these words is contingent upon low referentiality and on the fact that people do not recognise their true nature – without these factors the emotional and social forces could not hold such power over people. The low referentiality inhibits rational processing, causing confusion and obfuscation. Their emotional and social power governs perceptions, thoughts and feelings – and hence behaviour too. Representation by visual imagery exacerbates these effects. Only because of the nature of these terms can their powerful content operate. Nebulous-power-words are inadequate from a rational perspective, and should not form a part of rational discourse. They are inadequate to be used as social or political policies.
These terms can act as smokescreens and mirrors. The mirrors can reverse the perception of reality, and the smoke obscures truth. In the smoke people are confused and emotional, and hence easily manipulated. Amidst the smoke there is fear and panic and many will be misled – some following the crowd for safety, others are tricked into falsehoods, some push others towards the fire to save themselves, etc.
When one reads that toves are gyring and gymbling one might sort of understand, but it does not really make sense. Some do not want to admit they cannot understand – and others will feel that they do.
As Orwell might have said, ‘People bellyfeel ‘multiculturalism’, it is double plus good and goodthink; ‘racism’ is a thoughtcrime and double plus non good, ‘racists’ are thought criminals and non-persons’. Using the terms ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘racism’ (or any other nebulous-power-words) is, in Orwell’s terminology, a form of ‘duckspeak’. Duckspeak was the form of speech that involved movements of the voice centres, with sound being produced, but this movement and noise occurred without the higher brain parts needing to be engaged (Orwell, 1984 ibid). Hence, people could be speaking to each other, but not in a rational sense; the noises made acted to control people, and this control was made possible because of the very nature of the noises.
The duckspeak noises acted as tools of power – and yet the people never realised that duckspeak was not rational, nor that the power controlling them derived partly from themselves(89), contained within the very meaning of the terms they knew and used. This is how nebulous-power-words function. People can be controlled from within by such surreptitious means – a more total and perfect form of control than many others.
Boot (2006(90)) discusses such powerful terms being used by ‘glossocrats’ and how such terms can be used ‘as instruments of power’ this ‘long after the seemingly more violent weapons have dulled’. Nebulous-power-words contribute to a sociopolitical environment that is seen by some as ‘soft totalitarianism’. Author Hal Colebatch(91) believes Britain to be becoming the first soft totalitarian state of the modern world – ‘soft’ because it lacks the gulags of previous such regimes, but ‘totalitarian’ nonetheless because of the immense state power over people – including control over people’s thoughts and the punishments for dissent (The Australian, 21st April 2009(92)).
The simple but politically embarrassing truth is that ‘multiculturalism’ simply fails to meets the intellectual, practical or moral standards required for such a world-changing concept. And yet for now, the mass ‘multicultural’ mania continues almost unabated, and challenging its cosy consensus remains a hazardous undertaking. The ethnic emperor is appallingly naked – but although some in the West have started to notice, still too few dare to mention it. It is the very nature of some of the terms used that has facilitated much of this harm. The use of clear rational language could be a significant step in freeing people. If the Lion takes genuine courage, the Tin Man sees where the real compassion is, and the Scarecrow is intellectually honest and rigorous, then perhaps the curtain can be pulled and the pretensions, inaccuracies and dishonesties will be exposed. While the smoke and mirrors confuse, obscure, deceive, intimidate and shame, the good people of Emerald City are being manipulated and controlled.

Dr Turner’s book is recommended reading.
It is available to borrow or to buy from Amazon:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/MULTICULTURALISM-WHAT-DOES-Smokescreens-Mirrors-ebook/dp/B00HCQN1B0

1.  Raspail, J. (1994 print) The Camp of the Saints. Social Contract Press

Click to access Camp_of_the_Saints.pdf


2.  Also see:
Express 5th November 2007
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/24232/Immigration-is-causing-depths-of-poverty-last-seen-in-Dickens-time
And relatedly:
Telegraph 17th November 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10455384/Roger-Daltrey-I-will-never-forgive-Labour-for-their-immigration-policies.html
3.  E.g. benefits advice, translation services, ‘cohesion’ teams, ‘community’ officers, etc.
E.g. see: Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/442977/Police-forces-forced-to-pay-2m-bill-a-month-for-translators-for-migrant-influx
4.  Lack high referentiality – meaning that they do not possess definitions that clearly signify the relevant phenomenon.
5.  E.g. Perilli’s monuments to ‘multiculturalism’.
See http://spacingtoronto.ca/2009/03/20/monument-to-multiculturalism/
6.  When the term ‘equality’ is in speech marks this refers to the social and political use of the term – because in this sense it is not properly rational to use. Without speech marks this term is used in its rational sense of equivalence, either quantitative or qualitative equivalence, (e.g. 2 plus 2 equals 4, etc.). Also, speech marks can be used to denote reference to the term itself
7.  E.g. ‘the two beakers contain an equal volume of liquid’, ‘the two children are of equal ability in X’, ‘2 plus 2 equals 4’, ‘I like the two cars equally’, etc.
8.  Also see: Turner, B. S. (1986) Equality. Tavistock Publications Limited: London, UK
9.  Some such categories are overlapping in some senses.
10.  Of course, one frequently finds that non-white groups are given unequal preference in such contexts, and this is inversionistly labelled as ‘equality of opportunity’.
11.  Google ‘Simon Mol’ (Poland), e.g. see: http://www.e-teatr.pl/en/artykuly/33711.html
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/02/another-man-knowingly-infects-40-girls-with-aids-in-poland/
12.  Such claims are made in many contexts, e.g. see:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-545289/Muslim-leader-accuses-police-cautious-stopping-Asian-gangs-pimping-white-girls.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8570506/Police-covered-up-violent-campaign-to-turn-London-area-Islamic.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/191013/Police-fear-being-called-racist-so-illlegal-immigrants-stroll-free
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8476605/WikiLeaks-fear-of-offending-Muslims-allowed-extremists-into-Britain-ahead-of-77-London-bombings.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html
13.  For example, there was a UN ‘anti-racism’ conference held in April 2009 in Geneva, Switzerland (20th-24th April 2009): the ‘Durban II Anti-Racism UN Conference’. These international conferences use the term ‘racism’ in their titles and literature e.g., the term ‘racism’ wass used in the outcome document at Geneva – including the reaffirming of the call on states to formulate national action plans to prevent, combat and eradicate ‘racism’ (e.g. s.28) and the encouraging of parliaments to regularly address the issue of ‘racism’, and to enhance their policies to fight it, (e.g. s.112).
14.  http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2011-12/mar/goverment-pledges-funds-to-show-racism-the-red-card.html
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/deputy-prime-minister-announces-200000-to-show-racism-the-red-card
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21881626
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-13361478
15.  E.g. see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/advice/factfile_az/racism
16.  Although the legislation used in such arrests uses different vocabulary – for what frequently are termed as ‘racism’ charges, often the relevant sections are Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 or sections 28 and 31 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. For example, the Crime and Disorder Act 1988 does not use the term ‘racism’ (or ‘racist’).
Also see:
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9477548.Arrest_made_after_racist_abuse_towards_Newcastle_United/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4877412.stm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17515992
17.  And/or an accusation of ‘racism’
18.  E.g. see:
http://www.thisissussex.co.uk/Ukip-chair-hits-suspension-following-racism/story-20223643-detail/story.html
19.  E.g. see: The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. Report Of An Inquiry. By Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. Advised by Tom Cook, The Right Reverend Dr John Sentamu, and Dr Richard Stone. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty. February 1999
http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm42/4262/4262.htm
Also see
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/285537.stm
And http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm42/4262/sli-47.htm
This was the result of an enquiry into the police investigation into the death of Stephen Lawrence. See:
Dennis, N., Erdos, G., Al-Shahi, A. (2000) Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics: the McPherson Report and the Police. Civitas. The Institute for the Study of Civil Society: London
20.  This term is associated with the idea of genocide, and yet in many ways this connection is inversionist qv.
21.  Of course, were one definition to be chosen now, then it might be a little late to instantly reduce the power. However, the power of this term will reduce in the future – nebulous-power-words are not terms with high referentiality and so their emotional associations can switch as can their definitions in other senses.
22.  The ‘replacement exercise’ is merely replacing the term with its definition.
23.  Including unfavourable by comparison, one cannot praise whites without risking the R-word, nor take pride, e.g. ‘white pride’ is considered as ‘racist’, but not ‘black pride’, etc.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/kevin-myers-i-can-say-americans-are-lazy-and-boorish-morons-thats-fine-if-i-say-the-same-about-nigerians-im-jailed-26629424.html
24.  The Express 28th March 2013:
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/387469/Why-does-the-Left-hate-the-working-classes-so-much
25.  If the thought/statement were true, then this would be defining ‘multiculturalism’ as against truth. And even if it were mistaken and untrue – really, an International Conference? Arresting people? What if they get their maths wrong? Arrest them too?
26.  The ‘elements’ – these are used alone or in combination in most definitions in the literature and dictionaries.
27.  Cultures in an unlimited sense
28.  These do not necessarily all have to be legal – here ‘rules’ refers to descriptive rules that describe a culture in all its qualities – this including habits, traditions, customs and ‘legal’ rules forming a subset of this qualitative description
29.  Which they must to be distinguished as different cultures
30.  There are endless possibilities on any such variable. In this example it could be the case that both groups maintain their original colours – so the city is now part blue and part pink. This would mean that there are no longer all blue or all pink cities for the residents to preserve their cultural practices. Alternatively, either group (or split combinations of either or both) might change their painting habits to those of the other group, or to any other colour (s), (or maintain their original traditions).
31.  Also see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386558/Tower-Hamlets-Taliban-Death-threats-women-gays-attacked-streets.html
32.  This is sometimes an emotive issue in Britain. See
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575506/Loudspeaker-plan-re-ignites-call-to-prayer-row.html
Also http://www.iengage.org.uk/component/content/article/1-news/856-daily-express-criticises-nick-clegg-for-defending-the-call-to-prayer
Sometimes these issues are discussed in relation to threat to culture (or ‘way of life’). See:
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2007/12/so-much-for-our.html
Divergences in opinion on this have been recorded from other countries too –
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149955#.T946xLVfGHw
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/netanyahu-backs-law-to-ban-loudspeakers-at-mosques-across-israel-6276173.html
33.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3620128/Making-a-pigs-ear-of-defending-democracy.html
34.  For example, Putnam studies the reductions in social capital (Putnam, 2007, ‘Diversity and Community in the Twenty First Century’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2), 137-174); the reduction in willingness to sacrifice for others is discussed by David Goodhart (e.g. see Prospect Magazine, 2004, and : http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/feb/24/race.eu); general levels of trust reduce with diversity (also see for further reading: Salter, F. K., Ed., 2002, Risky Transactions. Trust, Kinship, and Ethnicity. Oxford and New York, Berghahn); studies show detrimental consequences to mental health in some such circumstances, see below. Also see for related issues, e.g. Stafford, M., Becares, L. and Nazroo, J. ‘Objective and Perceived Ethnic Density and Health: Findings From a United Kingdom General Population Survey’, American Journal of Epidemiology (2009) 170 (4):484-493.doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp160
35.  see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-12777437
The concerns of future riots (or other such problems) are sometimes expressed by ‘experts’, e.g. see: Daily Mail 12th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2502072/Influx-Roma-migrants-spark-city-riots-warns-Blunkett.html
36.  Many predict civil war as a result of mass immigration – even if this does not occur, the fear/anxiety, etc. is a form of suffering for many people
Also, relatedly, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsjc5CVujrM

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/February/Europes-Multiculturalism-Leading-to-Civil-War-/
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/allen-west-america-on-verge-of-race-war/
37.  Caldwell, C. (2009) Reflections on the Revolution Europe. Can Europe be the Same with Different People in it? Allen Lane/Penguin, London: England
38.  John Derbyshire, Taki’s Magazine, 29th March 2012:
http://takimag.com/article/multiculturalism_when_will_the_sleeper_wake_john_derbyshire/print#axzz2jiRyi2m3
39.  Press, J. K. (2007) Culturalism. Social Books: New York
40.  E.g. see: ‘The Rivkin Project: How Globalism Uses Multiculturalism to Subvert Sovereign Nations’, Dr. K R Bolton Foreign Policy Journal, 12 March 2011
41.  Taylor, J. (2011) White Identity. Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century. New Century Foundation: USA
42.  E.g. see BBC News website 22nd September 2005
43.  The ‘Cantle Report’ – Community Cohesion: a Report of the Independent Review Team. Chaired by Ted Cantle and published January 2001. Home Office.
44.  ‘Cohesion’ is a problematic term. Frequently this term is used as a code-word for the absence of civil war and/or race riots.
45.  Podhoretz, N. (1963) My Negro Problem and Ours. New York: American Jewish Committee
46.  Immigrant groups might have populations remaining in their home countries
47.  Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People adopted by the United Nations General Assembly during its 61st session at UN Headquarters in New York City on 13 September 2007

Click to access DRIPS_en.pdf


48.  I.e. descriptive ‘multiculturalism’ as a result of immigration
49.  And also of ‘mistreatment’.
50.  And those objecting to mass immigration were not ‘haters’ but acting against hatred?
51.  Also see: Express 14th July 2011
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/258644/No-surprise-that-migrants-head-for-soft-touch-Britain
52.  Daily Mail 28th June 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301743/How-invasion-immigrants-corner-England-mockery-PMs-promise-close-door.html
53.  Also see Muhammad Ali being interviewed by Parkinson on the BBC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi6fvwxB2Bg
54.  E.g. see http://spacingtoronto.ca/2009/03/20/monument-to-multiculturalism/
55.  With high referentiality
56.  Also see Dalrymple, T. (2001) Life at the Bottom. Ivan R. Dee: Chicago
57.  Is immigration always good?
Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/442943/Mass-immigration-was-a-mistake-Come-off-it-Jack
and, relatedly, Daily Mail, 12th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2504398/A-spectacular-mistake-immigration-Straw-finally-admits-Labour-messed-letting-million-East-Europeans.html
Also see: http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/387469/Why-does-the-Left-hate-the-working-classes-so-much
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html
58.  Also see: Daily Mail 13th May 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386537/Mass-immigration-UK-s-poor-poorer.html
As well as by other means, many of the poorest of Britain have been made poorer by being unemployed – immigration often cited as a (or the main) cause, e.g. also see Daily Mail 18th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509087/Who-frontman-Roger-Daltrey-blames-Labour-immigration-policy-left-working-class-unemployed.html
Telegraph 17th November 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10455384/Roger-Daltrey-I-will-never-forgive-Labour-for-their-immigration-policies.html
59.  Express 5th November 2007:
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/24232/Immigration-is-causing-depths-of-poverty-last-seen-in-Dickens-time
Express 29th April 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/395471/Immigration-The-British-public-is-close-to-despair
Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/442977/Police-forces-forced-to-pay-2m-bill-a-month-for-translators-for-migrant-influx
Such costs are found to occur in many Western countries. Also see:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/norway-loses-713000-on-every-muslim-immigrant/
60.  Also see: Mirror 29th May 2013
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/carole-malone-oxford-grooming-ring-1896865
61.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2156296/British-gangs-raping-sexually-exploiting-vulnerable-white-young-girls-Asian-problem-Crown-prosecutor-admits.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-18050192
62.  Telegraph 29th January 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9831912/I-feel-like-a-stranger-where-I-live.html
63.  For further reading on threats to freedom of speech in Britain see:
Johnston, P. (2013) Feel Free to Say It. Threats to Freedom of Speech in Britain Today. Civitas, London.
Also see Telegraph 25th November 2004:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/1477496/Turkish-workers-a-mistake-claims-Schmidt.html
64.  E.g. see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html
65.  ‘Payback time’, etc. Also see: Browne, A. (2005) Do We Need Mass Immigration? (second edition) Civitas: London
66.  ‘Outcomes’ and/or processes. Both processes can be occurring at the same time, e.g. diversity as some groups (and/or subsets of groups) homogenise
67.  E.g. this is true whether the immigrants in question are more or less criminal than the indigenous people, more or less intelligent, whether the immigration in question brings financial losses or gains, etc. Whether there are any alterations on any such measures or not – this is still true. The dilemma of cultural contact is applicable to any case of immigration irrespective of the specifics of that immigration, and irrespective of the consequences of that immigration in other ways.
68.  The old ‘melting pot’ metaphor
69.  Also see: http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/16/the-hated-white-race/
70.  Available at:  http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2010/04/candidate-calls-britain-the-most-mongrel-country-in-the-world-yet-the-left-havent-batted-an-eyelid.html ; or http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/election/article-1268826/General-Election-2010-Nutters-Nick-Clegg-Theyre-closer-think.html etc.
71.  The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.
72.  Also see: https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/10/27/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-people-of-europe/
https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/stop-white-british-genocide-campaign-join-now/
73.  Of course in many cases there will be a slow genocide occurring simultaneously with the problems of diversity
74.  It could be that a new replacement word will be used for ‘multiculturalism’, such as that of ‘inter culturalism’, e.g. see:
Cohesion, Integration and Openness: From ‘Multi’ to ‘Inter’ Culturalism. Institute of Community Cohesion (February 2012)
However, any such term should be clearly defined and also examined in light of the issues noted in Dr Turner’s book, e.g. how would such a policy aim to address the dilemma of cultural contact?
75.  E.g. become a badge of pride/rebellion; or settle on one single high referentiality meaning, (e.g. stereotyping or otherwise) and hence lose its power by this means; etc.
76.  A nebulous-power-word can still be a nebulous-power-word even if one or more of its definitions possess high referentiality – not all (or any) the meanings need to be problematic per se
77.  Moscovici, S. (2000) Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Translated by G. Duveen. Polity Press, Cambridge University
Marková, I. (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
78.  This voice hence provides, amongst other things, a motivation not to appear stupid – many do not want to admit that they do not quite understand. Also, people do not want to question or challenge, etc. that which they do not quite understand (and who could understand a nebulous-power-word?). The authority and faux intellectual validity intimidates and confuses many people. Some are shamed into compliance/acquiescence
79.  Of course, the definition of ‘nice’ is relevant. Does it mean pleasing people? Is so, then whom? Are some chosen groups pleased at the expense (financial and otherwise) of others? If so, then that is not ‘nice’. Neither is it ‘nice’ to destroy people’s culture, suppress truth, support lies, harm some groups in many ways, or facilitate genocide. Saccharin-covered poison-pills. If ‘nice’ is about truth, genuine compassion or honour, then this voice is not very nice.
80.  Also, relatedly, see Horowitz, D. (1997) Radical Son. A Generational Odyssey Simon and Schuster New York: USA; Horowitz, D. (2003) Left Illusions. An Intellectual Odyssey. Spence Publishing Company, Dallas: USA.
Anthony, A. (2008) The Fallout. How a Guilty Liberal Lost His Innocence. Vintage Books: London
And also, relatedly:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-440318/The-night-daughter-stabbed–liberal-instincts-died.html
81.  Also see ‘Passover Syndrome’, e.g.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh6YIaJyFnk
82.  Also see: Rossiter, L. H. (2006) The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. Free World Books, LLC, St. Charles, IL: USA
Glazov, J. (2009) United in Hate – The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror. Los Angeles, CA: WND Books
83.  For a great analysis of utopians see: Scruton, R. (2010) The Uses of Pessimism and the Dangers of False Hope. Atlantic Books: London, UK
84.  Also, relatedly, see:
http://news.sky.com/home/politics/article/16143154
Daily Mail, 6th January 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2082527/Diane-Abbott-Twitter-race-row-MP-faces-calls-resign-racist-tweet.html
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/154022/Diane-Abbott-reported-to-cops-for-racism-over-black-jobs-appeal
http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2011/12/the-equality-and-human-rights-commission-should-abolished-not-just-because-it-is-expensive-but-becau.html
Fourest, C. (2008) Brother Tariq. The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan. Encounter Books, USA
85.  In modern life the media largely influence such perceptions
86.  Also see: ‘magic-ritual language’ Herbert Marcuse, (1964) One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press
87.  E.g. see:
http://www.morleyobserver.co.uk/news/local/thorpe-primary-launches-bid-for-stephen-lawrence-award-1-6061990
http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/about-us/coca-cola-corporate-blog/ted-ryan-id-like-to-buy-the-world-a-coke.html
Martin Luther King’s much publicised I Have a Dream speech (1963) evoked images of this kind.
Much of this form of repetition and linking is focussed on children, such as Crayola’s suggestions for celebrating the diversity, e.g. see:
http://www.crayola.com/crafts/detail/freedom-hands-craft/
There are many such activities for children, such as making chains for Black History Month, e.g. see:
http://fun.familyeducation.com/martin-luther-king-jr/black-history-month/35249.html
88.  See Duveen, G. and Lloyd, B. (1990), Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
89.  Although, of course, the ultimate origins are from the social and political context – and the intersubjective. By ‘from within’ it is meant that the terms are internalised.
90.  Boot, A. (2006), How The West Was Lost. I. B. Tauris Publishers: London
91.  Author of the award-winning Blair’s Britain: British Culture Wars and New Labour (1999) Claridge Press, UK – a Spectator book of the year in 1999
92.  http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/thought-police-muscle-up-in-britain/story-e6frg6zo-1225700363959