Political Persecution In The ‘FREE’ Country Of Great Britain

Written by Boadacea

Is one free to object to the political policy of immigration?

Often we hear about the oppressive regimes around the world, the absence of freedom in various countries and the political persecution of dissenters in those places. Frequently we are expected to give political asylum to those people who claim asylum in our country after them allegedly being persecuted for their beliefs in some horrible oppressive country elsewhere. We hear that the Muslims hate us and attack us because they ‘hate our freedoms’. There is a constant stream of statements that reinforce the belief, albeit sometimes by implication, that we in this country are ‘free’.

However, are we free? Are political dissenters persecuted, suppressed or oppressed? Are we free to discuss and hear political policies/ideas/facts?

Well of course we are not free. We live under a massive level of surveillance, with our communications, movements and data monitored and collected. We are forced to work for many extra hours a week to pay our taxes (being forced to work without reward and under duress is not being free). We can be arrested and imprisoned if we offend a member of a more important group(1) (yet us being offended counts for almost nothing(2)).However, here the focus is on the issue of political oppression. Is this country free in a political sense(3)? There are various ways in which political freedom could be examined. For example, may one express one’s political beliefs, proposed policies, etc. without fear or sanction? Are people free to examine and discuss political ideas and related facts (historical or otherwise)? Are certain political ideas suppressed, and their proponents persecuted? Are people scared to express certain dissenting views? Space does not permit a full examination of the concept of political freedom, and this short essay will focus on the issue of whether a particular political idea is suppressed, and its proponents oppressed and/or persecuted. Actually, it is a particular form of dissent – dissenting from the government’s political policy of mass immigration.

Is opposition to immigration inhibited in this ‘free’ country?
In a ‘free’ country a political view cannot be banned – that would expose lack of freedom; the people need to believe they are living in a ‘free democratic’ state, it helps to keep them from rising up against an oppressive regime. However, can a government suppress a dissenting view and/or oppress its proponents to the extent that the dissent poses no effective threat? Can the government with the arms of the state (and media, etc.) effectively suppress dissent to their political policy of mass immigration to the point that there is no effective opposition?

If people face persecution, and even prosecution, for expressing a certain political view and/or dissent to a certain political policy, then this is political suppression. If the arms of the state, including the state-broadcaster (the BBC), the education system, etc. all agree on a particular political policy and propagandise its greatness, then this can act to inhibit certain political ideas. If political parties (and/or their supporters) that object to a certain political policy face persecution by the state, then this is political oppression. If open debate on a government political policy is effectively impossible, then this is inhibition of dissent. If all major media organisations demonise those who express dissent to a political policy, then this has a psychological/emotional effect on the public, and acts to suppress dissent. If the information given to the public in relation to a political policy (and related matters) is distorted or censored, and even untrue, then this can act to manipulate people and suppress dissent.

In relation to open debate and discussion of the political policy of mass immigration, it is almost impossible to hold a rational and fair debate on this topic. Debate is inhibited by various means. One such means of suppressing open debate is that of straightforward banning of debate. Often this is phrased in a saccharin-coated phrase such as ‘no platform for ‘racists’’ or ‘no platform for fascists’ and suchlike rather than openly stating that this idea is banned from discussion.

21062011515[1]

21062011515[1]

The National Union of Students (NUS) bans any speech that is labelled by them as ‘racist’ or ‘fascist’; this ban under the ‘no platform’ guise(4). People using these sorts of phrases attempt to deceive others as to what is really going on: really these people are stopping certain political ideas, facts, beliefs, etc. from being stated or heard. This ‘no platform’ also achieves many other matters, including: giving the impression, albeit by implication, that dissenters are not worthy of being heard; achieving an ‘immunity from criticism (or truth)’(5); etc. However, by claiming a ‘high moral ground’ this ban on debate purports to be for some sort of moral reasons. Of course, the nebulous-power-word ‘racism’ is not a proper word, so such cries are not rational(6). Also, the term ‘fascist’ is thrown around in a non-rational manner (see Orwell(7)), in fact, often in an ironic manner; could it not be classed as ‘fascist’ under some of its definitions to ban open debate of dissenting views? Could one not label the banning of certain inconvenient truths as fascist?

This silencing of certain political ideas/beliefs, etc. is found in many contexts. As well as the ‘no platform’ in universities, there is a ban on dissent in many other contexts (including businesses, schools, state organisations such as the NHS, etc.) and only certain views can be heard or stated. Even during our elections such silencing is found to occur. For example, Mr Nick Griffin was not allowed to give his election declaration speech on stage during the 2001 elections, this prompting Mr Griffin and Mr Treacy to wear gags while on the stage with the other candidates(8):

img609

img610

In some contexts gagging of dissenters is claimed to be for reasons of ‘maintaining the peace’ or ‘community cohesion’ or suchlike – this usually prompted by threats or actual instances of violence(9) and other crimes by ‘lefties’ and/or immigrants.

$(KGrHqUOKjkE29zTBlvOBN1V4K3e3!~~_12

So violence by those supporting the government’s political views is used as an excuse to gag dissenters(10). Surely the police should act to stop the violence? Enforce the law? Would such threats, were they ever to occur, by anti-immigration proponents be pandered to in this manner? Does this mean that the most criminal and violent win? Is this a safe message for the state to be sending out? Is this moral? Interestingly, those threatening and involved in such crime and violence frequently are linked to the government in various ways(11), which might explain the lack of the law being enforced when they break it(12). Such people could hence be being used by the government as a form of informal/unaccountable/deniable enforcers(13). Such people act as state-sponsored enforcers, but with full deniability by the state(14). This all further acts to intimidate the people from dissenting to this government policy.

11111111

Another means by which dissent from the political policy of immigration is inhibited is, of course, the fear of being labelled ‘racist’. ‘Racism’ is a nebulous-power-word, not a properly-defined term, and should not be used in rational discourse. However, it is this very fact of low referentiality that largely contributes to the power of this term (as analysed and explained by Dr Thomas Turner(15)). The establishment has contributed significantly to the social construction of this term (see Dr Turner’s book qv). People fear the consequences of being labelled as ‘racist’ – these consequences including the social(16), financial, legal and also the physical fear of being attacked by ‘anti-racists’ and/or immigrants. Most people understand that the law is not properly/fully enforced against the immigrants or ‘anti-racists’ in this context(17) – they have an almost free pass to enforce the will of the state against ‘racists’, including by use of violence (as noted above). Hence, people are intimidated into silence and acquiescence. Dissent is inhibited.

In fact, people are too scared even to state certain truths in relation to immigration for fear of being labelled ‘racist’ – by this means open and honest debate is further inhibited as many do not even have the true facts to consider. Many truths cannot be stated, and ‘racism’ is not the only excuse for suppression of truth – other means including those of ‘causing offence’, ‘stirring hatred’ and matters such a ‘maintaining community relations’ (often code for: not letting the people know the truth in case they rise up; having no riots; there being no challenge or disruption to government immigration policy; etc.). If one states certain matters one can be accused of being ‘an extremist’, a ‘right wing extremist’, ‘threat to security’, ‘dangerous agitator’, or other scary-sounding labels – such labels can, amongst other things, render one liable for various acts of state suppression and the government is currently seeking more legislation to further silence such truths and debate. The government deems such people as a danger to the state. More honest people will be imprisoned. When true facts that pertain to government policy are suppressed, then this is not political liberty. Neither is this moral nor honest. However, in an inversionist manner, those stating the truth and acting with honour will be imprisoned under the manipulative lie of them being ‘evil’. This is not open and honest debate, and this is not freedom.
21092011576[1]
Political parties and other organisations that object to the political policy of mass immigration are subject to much suppression and persecution. Of course the general factors, including those noted above, apply also here. The mainstream media, including the BBC, make sure that the coverage of such parties is very unfavourable, and frequently the coverage is dishonest (the BBC is not impartial as its charter states). Hence, the unsuspecting public often believe such parties to be dangerous and monstrous. This distorts the democratic political process. However, the persecution and suppression of such parties and organisations also is conducted by many other means. For example, a police officer was forced to resign after being seen while off duty at a football match wearing a BNP badge(18). Have any public servants been punished in any way for wearing other forms of political badges(19) while off duty, e.g. any pro-immigration badges? So it is permissible to support the policies of the government in relation to mass immigration, but not to dissent from them (even while off duty). Many have faced persecution for belonging to or even merely supporting the BNP. For example, a bus driver was sacked for belonging to the BNP(20). The BBC sent an undercover journalist to film Mr Nick Griffin giving a speech and this resulted in Mr Griffin facing two criminal trials – and he was not convicted of any crime(21). During his speech in 2004  he predicted that Muslims would launch an attack on our country and objected to the sexual ‘grooming’ and rape of our children (before any reports such as in Rotherham were released). His predictions and claims were proven to be accurate and true. It is fair to conclude that those organisations (including political parties) dissenting from the establishment’s support for the political policy of immigration do face suppression and persecution. Such suppressive acts not only directly inhibit dissent (and truth), but also others are frightened from dissenting.

img627

There are various pieces of legislation that act in such a manner as to suppress dissent, this by threat of arrest, (e.g. ‘hate laws’). For example, words that might ‘insult’ and ‘stir up hatred’ can result in imprisonment(22). The application of these laws has disproportionately been such that they act to suppress dissent(23). Of course, as is frequently found in this ‘soft totalitarian’(24) state, this is all wrapped up in a cloak of ‘compassion’ and ‘moral values’. But to whom is the compassion being shown? To those who object to what is fairly described as an invasion of the country? As genocide(25)? Can the indigenous people not object to these hateful acts being perpetrated upon them without being arrested (and, ironically, accused of hatred)? Would hatred not be valid in some such instances? Should one hate those who have facilitated or committed mass rape of children or genocide? Does this situation not alarm and distress normal people? Why should the state think it is acceptable to arrest people for their beliefs and emotions anyway? Does the invasion and mass rape not offend you? Are you not offended, insulted or distressed that, by various means, you dare not object to this? Not even to the genocide? Feel threatened or alarmed? And is it moral to ban the truth? How can proper political decisions be made if based on lies and not on truth? Why should ‘offence’ or ‘insult’ be criminalised – and also only is certain contexts? If a comment were to stir up hatred(26) against a group, then if the statement is true, perhaps that group should not be loved, hey? If there were truths that if stated might offend or insult a group (s), or even stir up hatred, then to ban their statement is still to ban truth and takes away true and useful information from the public.This legislation can act to disempower the true victims in many cases, and to give the false impression that the perpetrators are the victims. Also it can act, inter alia, to protect the perpetrators from truth (in case they don’t like to hear it, and/or possibly face the consequences of it becoming widely known). So if the presence of group X meant a significant increase in rapes of children from group Y by group X, then one could not say this because group X might not like it (never mind what group Y don’t like, including their children getting raped, some groups are more equal than others). Better to pretend we are all the same (and at the same time don’t forget to celebrate the diversity!). If group B get arrested or stopped by the police at twice the rate of group A, then even if this were because group B committed twice the rate of crime, one could not state this fact/truth in case group B were insulted and this fact might cause resentment of group B. Better to let them off the crimes they commit and equalise the arrest figures, never mind if the other people are victimised by the crimes (and not to bother if any of this alarms/distresses/threatens/insults them, or even could be interpreted as inciting hatred against them). This all acts to suppress certain truths and challenges to government policy – and often in an insidious and surreptitious manner.

Hence, by various means there is a lack of freedom in this country in relation to the political freedom of dissenting from the government political policy of mass immigration. People are misinformed and are intimidated by various means. Dissenters are oppressed and are susceptible to prosecution by the state. Organisations and political parties dissenting are liable to much mistreatment from the state – this is political persecution.

You will acquiesce, you will not dissent. It’s called freedom. Orwell warned us about this:
“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

1. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/unmasked-merseysider-jailed-anti-semitic-tweet-7966903
2.Even those in government can insult the English and/or the British without sanction – and certainly without going to prison. For example, saying the English are a race too lazy or incapable of working, etc. is fine, but don’t say it about Africans, etc.
3.Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19:
‘Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.’
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
4. http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/11/controversial-university-speakers/
5. ‘Immunity from criticism’ refers to the fact that if no criticism, challenge, debate, alternative ideas, etc. are allowed, then those with this immunity can merely state their ideas, beliefs, policies, etc. and do not have to face any criticism or challenge on them. Such people do not need to defend what they say in any way and can merely state what they wish and leave the impression almost as though it is correct and perfect – with no alternatives.
6. See Dr. T. Turner
http://www.amazon.co.uk/MULTICULTURALISM-WHAT-DOES-Smokescreens-Mirrors-ebook/dp/B00HCQN1B0
7. George Orwell is quoted as stating that: ‘The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies ‘something not desirable’’
8. http://news.sky.com/story/38512/gagged-bnp-silenced
9. See: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b02_1370111676
10. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/republic-of-ireland/bnp-leader-banned-from-university-28670319.html
11. These links to the establishment, frequently by those purporting to be ‘anti-establishment’, will be examined in a forthcoming essay
12. Ironically and dishonestly, many of these types pose as very ‘anti-establishment’ and rebellious.
13. https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/who-are-the-uaf-unite-against-fascism/
14. And of course not all of them are in direct contact with the state in relation to the enforcement, but most of them understand that they will be very unlikely to be held account for threats, violence, etc. against anti-immigration people. Of course, some of them are in direct contact as will be discussed in future essays.
15. http://www.amazon.co.uk/MULTICULTURALISM-WHAT-DOES-Smokescreens-Mirrors-ebook/dp/B00HCQN1B0
16. Many fear social rejection if labelled as such a ‘witch’
17. Also see: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8ec_1269378544
18. http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=479
19. Communist badges? Even anarchists badges?
20. But won on appeal as this breached his human rights, e.g. see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229211/Bus-driver-sacked-member-BNP-wins-legal-battle-claiming-dismissal-breach-human-rights.html
http://andrewbrons.eu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=641:arthur-redfearns-right-to-freedom-of-association
21. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/6135060.stm
22. For further reading on threats to freedom of speech in Britain see:
Johnston, P. (2013) Feel Free to Say It. Threats to Freedom of Speech in Britain Today. Civitas, London.
Also, relatedly, see:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2614834/Arrested-quoting-Winston-Churchill-European-election-candidate-accused-religious-racial-harassment-repeats-wartime-prime-ministers-words-Islam-campaign-speech.html
23. One could interpret some of this legislation in such a manner that it would render many politicians guilty of the offences therein. For example the Public Order Act 1986 makes it, amongst other things, a criminal offence to state certain matters that threaten, abuse or insult and are likely to stir up racial hatred. Are not many pro-immigration speeches thus covered? What about those who state that the immigrants ‘do the jobs Brits are too lazy to do’?
24. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/thought-police-muscle-up-in-britain/story-e6frg6zo-1225700363959
25. https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/stop-white-british-genocide-campaign-join-now/
26. And how can this be shown to be the case? When would it not be resentment, disapproval or disgust, etc. and actually be hatred? Besides, how could causing hatred even be thought in a sane world #to be illegal?

Greater Manchester Police Confiscate BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” Banner

Written by Cigpapers

Red Mafia Starts To Crack In Greater Manchester:

On 9th April 2014 a BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner protest was taking place on the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester, England. At about 8:00 AM this banners was safely secured with professional attachments above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester by BNP activists.

2014-04-05 10.32.12

BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner hangs between two commercial signs above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester.The banners are secured with professional attachments before being swung over to the outside.

The banner was warmly supported by the majority of the public with only a few obscene hand gestures by multiculturalists. At around  8:45 AM a Police Officer approached the demonstration. The Police Officer ( Collar Number 14953 ) was friendly enough but had been ordered by his Inspector to take the banner down, then confiscate it and take one demonstrator’s name and details under Section 5 Public Order Act. We’re not sure about his understanding of the legal position here regarding Electoral Law and the Public Order Act.

How offensive is a "Stoo Paedophile Rings" banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

How offensive is a “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

The Greater Manchester Police seizing this banner, which has been warmly supported around Greater Manchester, shows a few cracks appearing in the red Mafia of the Greater Manchester Police and the local Labour Party. There is a video of the confiscation by Greater Manchester Police here:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO7Jvy90Vy4

The confiscation of this banner led to the cancellation of a planned “Stop Paedophile Rings” demonstration outside Manchester Town Hall against Labour Party paedophile rings. Whether this was deliberate or coincidental is impossible to say.

The same banner at a previous bridge banner flash demonstration in Tameside.

The same banner at a previous banner drop flash demonstration in Tameside.

The Police Officer in charge of the election in Greater Manchester is Chief Superintendent O’Hare of Greater Manchester Police ( telephone 0161 872 5050)  who had previously stated he wanted a good, clean election.

The BNP's banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide?

The BNP’s banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide in Manchester?

These “Stop Paedohile Rings” campaign banners have been well received by tens of thousands of members of the Greater Manchester public. The banners are very good for bridge drop flash demonstrations, or for hanging or holding at other demonstrations. Each banner should also last several years/elections if looked after.

Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986:

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which a constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

BNP Rescue Banner 10th April 2014:

On April 10th 2014, Gary Tumulty (North West Regional Organiser) went to Swinton Police Station to demand the return of the “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner. Here is the video of what happened:

Is Peter Tatchell A Paedophile Or Simply Misunderstood?

Written by Cigpapers
Additional material and photos by Watt Tyler
Peter Tatchell was born in Melbourne Australia on 25th January 1952, he moved to London in 1971 to avoid conscription. In 1978 Tatchell joined the Labour Party and moved to Bermondsey, South East London. Tatchell ran as the Bermondsey Labour Party candidate in the 1983 General Election. Despite Bermondsey being a Labour stronghold he lost to Liberal candidate Simon Hughes. In February 2000 he left the Labour Party for unknown reasons. In 2004 he joined the Green Party and was chosen to be their candidate for Oxford East in the 2010 General Election, however for some reason he withdrew his candidacy in 2009.
TatchellJewPhoto01.jpg-large

Peter Tatchell (the UK’s most prominent homosexual activist and a favourite of the BBC) has done more than demand the abolition of the age of consent, he has broken the law on the age of consent in Britain at least once.

img122

Peter Tatchell is a regular on the BBC. The BBC have refused to state whether he appears as a human rights activist, homosexual campaigner or paedophile apologist. They have also refused to state how much they have paid him for appearances.

As a gay 18-year-old Australian anti-Vietnam war draft-dodger, he came to the UK in 1971 and lived with a 16-year-old boy in London. The homosexual age of consent in England at the time was 21. Later he campaigned for lowering it to 16, and now he wants it lowered again to 14. What will he want after that?

When the age of consent for homosexuals was lowered to 16 an Outrage (Tatchell’s organization) banner said “16 is just a start” – it didn’t state what the end goal was.

 

Mr Tatchell criticises the age of consent laws. Here is a quotation from his own website:

Nevertheless, like any minimum age, it is arbitrary and fails to acknowledge that different people mature sexually at different ages. A few are ready for sex at 12; others not until they’re 20. Having a single, inflexible age of consent doesn’t take into account these differences. It dogmatically imposes a limit, regardless of individual circumstances“.

Peter Tatchell wrote the chapter “Questioning Ages of Majority and Ages of Consent” for a book openly advocating paedophilia and finding ways “to make paedophilia acceptable“.

This book, published in 1986 and called The Betrayal of Youth (B.O.Y.), was edited by Warren Middleton, then vice-chairperson of the Paedophile Information Exchange, Britain’s number one paedophile advocacy group.

Stephen Green, anti-paedophile campaigner wrote: “The book was part of a campaign to abolish all ages of consent,  destroy the responsibilities of parents for their children, deny any ill-effects on children of interference by paedophiles, and withal to make it easier for paedophiles to gain sexual access to children.

In The Betrayal of Youth Tatchell wrote that the age of sexual consent is “Reinforcing a set of increasingly quaint, minority moral values left over from the Victorian era“.

Tatchell often ambushes public figures who don't support the homosexual/paedophile agenda. The MSM and especially the BBC usually give him great publicity for these stunts.

Tatchell often ambushes public figures who don’t support the homosexual/paedophile agenda. The MSM and especially the BBC usually give him great publicity for these stunts.

He was not on his own in this belief.Many of his fellow socio-communists and homosexual activists thought the same:

Campaign for Homosexual Equality chairman Michael Jarrett was identifying paedophiles as an oppressed group, and the CHE list of “demands” included the complete abolition of minimum ages for sexual activity. The Labour Gay Rights Manifesto of 1985 said ‘A socialist society would supersede the family household. … Gay people and children should have the right to live together. … It follows from what we have already said that we favour the abolition of the age of consent.’

27092011583[1]

Feminists like Beatrice Faust contributed to The Betrayal of Youth, as well as other homosexual activists besides Tatchell, including Jeffrey Weeks and Eric Presland, who “related his first paedophile experience with an Asian boy of thirteen, and boasted of interfering with a little boy of six“.

The book is considered so toxic that Amazon doesn’t sell it and you cannot search its content in Google Books.

Tatchell is well aware of how much all this is bad publicity for him and keeps rationalizing and adjusting his positions, but only the ideologically blind or pathologically naive cannot see through his self-excuses.

He has prepared a standard self-defence which can be found on his own website and has been repeated verbatim on many outlets. It used to also be on the site of his friend militant atheist, Richard Dawkins, but it’s not there any more. Maybe even Dawkins draws a line at what is morally allowed, even though his motto is “There’s probably no God – now stop worrying and enjoy your life”.

In this article that supposedly should serve to exculpate him, Tatchell has nothing better than this: “The critics also cite Warren Middleton’s 1980s book, Betrayal of Youth, to which I contributed a chapter. I had no idea that he was involved in child sex abuse matters when I was asked to write.”

Considering that Warren Middleton was co-founder and vice-chairperson of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a prominent group promoting paedophilia, it was impossible for Tatchell not to have known his propensities. In addition, both Tatchell and Middleton were part of the Gay Liberation Front/Angry Brigade, a neo-Marxist revolutionary group of radical students at the London School of Economics, thus making Tatchell’s protestations of ignorance verge on the ridiculous.

Peter Righton of the Paedophile Information Exchange.

Peter Righton of the Paedophile Information Exchange – a Child welfare expert who wanted the age of consent lowering to four.

Were you aware that Tatchell contributed a chapter to this book?

THE BETRAYAL OF YOUTH

The contents and contributors of The Betrayal of Youth:

Chapter 1: ‘Incest’ by Clive Coliman: Described as “An ardent supporter of the children’s rights movement.”

Chapter 2: ‘Child Pornography and Erotica’ by Richard Green: Illustrator for the Paedophile Information Exchange magazine under the pseudonym “Dominik”

Chapter 3: ‘Child Prostitution’ by Warren Middleton of P.I.E.

Chapter 4: ‘Gender Differences’ by Liz Holtom and Kathy Challis: both from the anti-Christian Peace News.

Chapter 5: ‘Power and Consent’ by Eric Presland: Homosexual activist. Contributed also to the American paedophile book “The Age Taboo.”

Chapter 6: ‘Love and Let Love’ by Tuppy Owens, Editor of the Sex Maniac’s Diary, and Tom O’Carroll: ex-Chairman of P.I.E. who was convicted in 1981 of conspiracy to corrupt public morals by sending out a paedophile contact list.

Chapter 7: ‘Children and Sex’ by Fr Michael Ingram: Catholic priest, defender of paedophilia.

Chapter 8: ‘The Paedophiles’ by Beatrice Faust: militant feminist & civil libertarian.

Chapter 9: ‘Questioning Ages of Majority and Ages of Consent’ by Peter Tatchell.

Chapter 10: ‘Ends and Means: How to Make Paedophilia Acceptable?’ by Roger Moody of Peace News: “One of the most outspoken advocates of children’s rights in Britain .” Well-documented as a ubiquitous paedophile intellectual.

Chapter 11: ‘Socialism, Class, and Children’s Rights’ by John Lindsay: “ardent supporter of children’s rights.” Member of the Socialist Workers’ Party. Homosexual activist, hates the institution of the family.

Chapter 12: ‘Childhood Sexuality and Paedophilia: Some Questions Answered’ by Warren Middleton of P.I.E.

Chapter 13: ‘The Oppression of the Young: An Inside Perspective’ by Jeff Vernon: Involved in Gay Youth Movement and Campaign for Homosexual Equality.

Appendix 1: “P.I.E., from 1980 Until its Demise in 1985” by Steven A. Smith: ex-chairman of P.I.E. Fled to Holland in 1984, became “active in the Dutch crusade for children’s rights,” was deported back to the UK in 1991 and sentenced to 18 months for sending indecent articles through the post.

Appendix 2: “The Uranians” by Timothy d’Arch Smith: Bookseller. Author of “Love in Earnest.”

Peter Tatchell’s self-defence begins with:

Unlike many Catholic clergy, I have never abused anyone. Unlike the Pope, I have never failed to report abusers or covered up their crimes.”

These are blatant falsities. It wasn’t many Catholic clergy, it was an extremely small minority. And, as shown in Lies About The Catholic Church Child Sex Abuse Scandal, there is no reason, except bigotry and prejudice, to single out Catholic clergy who in fact have committed fewer of these crimes than any other pedagogic institution, religious or secular.

Peter Tatchell and his homosexual/paedophile allies often attacked the Christian Church for having Christian values. There is no record of him bursting in to a synagogue or mosque to protest against their religous values.

Peter Tatchell and his homosexual/paedophile allies often attacked the Christian Church for having Christian values. There is no record of him bursting in to a synagogue or mosque to protest against their religious values.

Saying what he does about the Pope is a criminal act, it is slander. The Pope has never covered up for anyone.Tatchell and his friends in the mainstream media (especially the BBC) think that if you repeat a lie enough times your audience will start to believe that it’s true.

But blaming the Church whenever you’re in trouble is a good way to distract the public from your own deviations from the norm. It’s worked so far so why shouldn’t it work now? Maybe because people have started calling your bluff, Pete.

Peter Tatchell has a seething hatred of Christian morals and values.

Peter Tatchell has a seething hatred of Christian morals and values.

The above should tell you how trustworthy and credible Tatchell is, but there’s more.

Look at his defence of the book Dares To Speak:

“Dares to Speak was an academic book published in 1997, authored by professors, anthropologists, psychologists, sociologists, a Dutch senator and a former editor of a Catholic newspaper. It discussed the age of sexual consent and whether all sex between young people and adults is necessarily unwanted and harmful, based on what it said was objective research with young people.

The book does not endorse or excuse sexual relationships with young people that involve coercion, manipulation or damage. The authors queried, among other things, the balance between giving young people sexual rights and protecting them against abuse. These are entirely legitimate issues to discuss.”

Leaving aside the irony (probably lost on humorless Tatchell) about his using a “former editor of a Catholic newspaper” as a guarantor of the morality of a book while he constantly treats the Catholic Church like a den of abusers. The book Dares to Speak, that Tatchell praises so much as an academic achievement, was edited by Joseph Geraci, who was also the editor of Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia. The book is a collection of articles from the journal.

Before it was quietly removed, this was Wikipedia’s entry for the publication:

Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia (1987–1995) was a journal published by the Stichting Paidika Foundation whose purpose was to promote the normalization of pedophilia. Its editor was Joseph Geraci and the editorial board included articles by writers Frits Bernard, Edward Brongersma, Vern L. Bullough, and D. H. (Donald) Mader, some of whom campaigned as pro-pedophile activists.

After the normalization of homosexuality, we’ll have the normalization of paedophilia.

15092011573[1]
Here is Tatchell’s letter to the Guardian dated 26th June 1997 (a few weeks after Labour’s General Election win) which he denied writing when I asked him about it. However I can find no record of a complaint to the Guardian, the Press Complaints Commission or any lawsuit for libel:
Ros Coward (Why Dares to Speak says nothing useful, June 23) thinks it is “shocking” that Gay Men’s Press has published a book, Dares To Speak, which challenges the assumption that all sex involving children and adults is abusive. I think it is courageous. The distinguished psychologists and anthropologists cited in this book deserve to be heard. Offering a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people, they document examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike.
Prof Gilbert Herdt points to the Sambia tribe of Papua New Guinea, where all young boys have sex with older warriors as part of their initiation into manhood. Far from being harmed, Prof Herdt says the boys grow up to be happy, well-adjusted husbands and fathers. The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy. While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted,abusive and harmful.
Peter Tatchell.
 Picture 9
Peter Tatchell has repeatedly denied writing the letter above. However below is his reply in the Guardian (1st July 1997) to criticism of his original letter. In his second letter (below) he never denies writing the first letter (above) or claims he was edited in any way.
Peter Tachell's second letter to the Guardian on 1st July 1997.

Peter Tachell’s second letter to the Guardian on 1st July 1997.

Peter Tatchell has often claimed he lives a monk-like existence living on a mere £9,000 income per annum. When I challenged him on this he changed his claim to £29,000 plus expenses. However he has refused to disclose his payments for his numerous main stream media appearances or disclose how much his yearly expenses are.
Peter Tatchell in his Council flat.

Peter Tatchell in his Bermondsey Council flat.

Peter Tatchell has declined to be interviewed for this article, however I will leave him the option of the right of reply in the comments section.

img537

img870

Tachell was also a major player in legalising homopaedo marriage and adoption.

Welcome To Britain – Child Sex Abuse Capital Of The World

 filthy britainJason SwiftSavileCharlesBishop Peter Ball Prince CharlesSavile Gordon Browncyril smithHague Savile Elm Guest HouseDolphin SquareJerseyDSC_0119Warwick SpinksJillings ReportMI5

If you thought for one minute that Britain is really as it appears to be, you’re very sadly mistaken.

Beneath the pomp and pageantry lies a network of paedophilic depravity, so vile and despicable, it literally beggars belief.

Don’t be fooled into thinking Jimmy Savile was an isolated case either.

He wasn’t.

Why did the NSPCC ( Britain’s biggest Child Charity ) sign off the investigation in to Sir Jimmy Savile, saying no one else was involved and there was no Police corruption?

From the Elm Guest House scandal to North Wales care home abuse via Dolphin Square; to sickening Warwick Spinks and the Amsterdam connection; from Jersey’s Haut de la Garenne to Kincora in Northern Ireland; from the vile BBC to complicit police and government authorities; from MP’s through MI5 to the Royal Family themselves; the whole filthy lot of them are in on it.

Consider this:

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by celebrities?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by social workers?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by teachers?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by police officers?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by members of the clergy?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by diplomats?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by members of the armed forces?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by members of the intelligence services?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by politicians?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by members of the judiciary?

How many children have been raped, buggered or abused by members of royalty?

Allegedly, many.

Now consider this:

How many children have been filmed being abused?

How many children have been filmed being abused and the abusers have been blackmailed by Intelligence Services?

How many children have been filmed being abused and the films have then sold for thousands of pounds?

How many children have been trafficked before being abused?

How many children, wrongly taken from their parents via secret family courts, have ended up being abused?

How many children have been abused in care homes?

How many children have gone missing after being abused?

How many children have died or been murdered after being abused?

How many children are, at this very moment, suffering horrific abuse?

Allegedly, many.

Welcome to filthy Britain.

No child’s safe here.

Didn’t you know?

Medomsley Detention Centre Homosexual Rapists – Appeal For Victims

Detention Centre Homosexual Rapists Ring Inquiry: Second Rape Victim Speaks Of Systematic Torture In Borstal

Kevin Young said his humiliation included being bound by the neck and being photographed as he was routinely attacked

Complaint: Kevin Young spoke of horrors
Complaint: Kevin Young spoke of horrors
Paul Kingston / North News

A second victim of a suspected borstal paedophile ring accused his attackers of torture yesterday.

And Kevin Young, now 53, says he reported the sex attacks but was ignored.

Kevin said: “The treatment we received was nothing short of torture in its truest form.

“A uniformed person while in charge of others carrying out acts of degrading physical and mental torture.”

Kevin said his humiliation included being bound by the neck and being photographed as he was routinely attacked.

The Mirror yesterday revealed how his and other claims of violent paedophile prison officers raping young boys at the Medomsley Detention Centre are under investigation after an alleged cover-up.

After pushing for an inquiry for 20 years, Kevin welcomed the police’s new probe but was wary because his complaints were rejected.

He was sent to the County Durham detention centre in 1977 aged 17 after being caught with a stolen watch.

He said: “The judge said he was sending me to Medomsley where my character would be improved.

“I would come out a better, stronger, law-abiding citizen. Within days of arriving I was being seriously raped and assaulted.

“I was put into a sick bay where I was locked up and my neck ligatured. It was three months of absolute hell.”

“This was torture day in day out. The victims are being silenced. People have been left so shredded there is nothing left.

“They are just shadows, nothing more.”

Police fear hundreds of young men were assaulted at the centre in the 70s and 80s.

At least four other prison officers were involved, along with individuals outside the centre, they suspect.

Kevin said he suffered at the hands of seven abusers, including prison officer Neville Husband who was jailed for 12 years for the mass rape of boys in his care.

Paedophile Neville Husband
Monster: Neville Husband
North News & Pictures

Originally from South Shields but now living in York, Kevin was released in June 1977, the day before his 18th birthday.

He ran straight from the home to Consett Police Station station but says he was threatened with arrest for making his allegations of being strangled, bound and raped every day by a ring of officers.

A police officer is believed to have covered-up the complaint after Kevin’s paperwork was destroyed.

Waiving his right to anonymity yesterday, Kevin said: “I didn’t want to be referred to as Mr A or Mr B. I’m Kevin Young.

“This is what went on and it was covered up.”

East Kilbride MP Michael McCann has pushed for the case to be re-opened after his constituent John McCabe, who said he was raped by Husband, told him how his bid for justice hit a dead end.

Mr McCann said: “We both know young men attempted to report abuse 30 years ago but were let down by the authorities.That will not happen this time.”

John McCabe
Brave: John McCabe suffered horrific abuse

Only Husband and storeman Lesley Johnson were jailed for abuse. Both men are now dead.

The authorities believe many more attackers remain at large.

Around 26 victims are thought to have come forward.

Some have already been awarded damages without an apology by the Ministry of Justice.

Mr McCabe said: “I urge others to come forward and help police build a case. Please don’t suffer in silence.”

Det Supt Paul Goundry, in charge of Durham Police child protection, said: “Every avenue will be explored and we’ll do our utmost to bring perpetrators to justice.

“If there were officers who ignored evidence at Medomsley then they will be traced and investigated too.

“You’ll be dealt with sensitively by a trained professional.”

Anyone with information should contact Durham Police about the investigation on 101.

The Queen’s Paedophile Lord-Lieutenants And The Dolphin Square Connection

tn

A great article from the Coleman Experience:  http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/the-queens-lieutenants-elm-guest-house-bbc-paedophiles-mark-speight-filthy-cyril-smith-and-the-dolphin-square-connection/

Who are the Queen’s Lord Lieutenants?

According to Wikipedia:

” The title Lord Lieutenant is given to the British monarch‘s personal representatives in the United Kingdom, usually in a county or similar circumscription, with varying tasks throughout history. Usually a retired local notable, senior military officer, peer or business person is given the post honorarily.

Lieutenants were first appointed to a number of English historic counties by Henry VIII in the 1540s.

Lord-lieutenants are the monarch’s representatives in their lieutenancy. It is their foremost duty to uphold the dignity of the Crown, and in so doing they seek to promote a spirit of co-operation and good atmosphere by the time they give to voluntary and benevolent organisations and by the interest they take in the business and social life of their counties.

The lord-lieutenant is supported by a vice lord-lieutenant and deputy lieutenants“.

How very noble.

Or is it?

As with most things in filthy Britain, the Queen’s Lieutenants may not be all they appear to be.

It’s now been revealed that child-rapist and MP for Rochdale, the late Cyril Smith, visited notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House, where vulnerable boys were trafficked from local care homes.

As in the case of murderous Jimmy Savile, the police knew about Smith’s abuse for years but did nothing.

Were the police given a warning not to fully investigate by the intelligence services, who had been filming VIP child-abuse in order to blackmail the perpetrators?

Vile paedophile Cyril Smith MP.

Vile paedophile Cyril Smith MP.

In a moving eulogy to Cyril Smith, the Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg heaped praise on the perverted paedophile:

Cyril Smith was a larger-than-life character and one of the most recognisable and likeable politicians of his day.

I am deeply saddened to hear the news of his death today, and offer my sincere condolences to his family and friends.

“Everybody in Rochdale knew him, not only as their MP but also as a friend.

“He was a true Liberal, dedicated to his constituency, always showing great passion and determination.

“Cyril was a colourful politician who kept the flame of Liberalism alive when the party was much smaller than it is today.

Rochdale and Britain have sadly lost one of their great MPs, and I think we can safely say there will never be an MP quite like Cyril Smith again.”

Why would Clegg pretend he knew nothing about Smith’s child-raping ways when he was obviously aware of all the rumours. Is Nick Clegg himself being blackmailed?

Smith was knighted in 1988 but less well known was his appointment as the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater Manchester in 1991. Why were the Royals so fond of the larger-than-life paedophile that they gave him a prestigious and powerful role?

Mark Speight with Rolf Harris.

Mark Speight with Rolf Harris and Anneka Rice.

In a strange twist, BBC children’s presenter Mark Speight was implicated in the death of his girlfriend Natasha Collins in 2008.

He subsequently disappeared and was found hanging in a disused section of Paddington Station.

We now know Rolf Harris has been arrested by officers from Operation Yewtree., investigating a paedophile ring at the BBC.

It transpires that Mark Speight had done a lot of work with Rolf Harris.

At Mark’s memorial, Rolf made an emotional and tearful address:

It was joyful to work with Mark.

‘I realise now that I never told him how much I appreciated his programmes.

‘You realise you should always tell people what you think, you should tell them you love them because it might suddenly be too late.’

Rolf sang Sun Arise, backed by a band complete with didgeridoos.

He also did his version of Led Zeppelin’s Stairway to Heaven.”

We know Mark Speight did volunteer work for Childline and was one of their spokesmen and a high-profile campaigner.

Some say Childline is a “front” organisation used to filter out callers who may have been abused by VIP’s.

Child Line is simply a filter system to protect VIP paedophiles.

Is Child Line simply a filter system to protect VIP paedophiles?

The coroner who held the inquiry into the deaths of Mark Speight and Natahsa Collins was Paul Knapman.

Knapman was responsible for many high-profile inquests during his 30-year tenure including the following:

He was heavily criticised for his bizarre and gruesome handling of the Marchioness riverboat inquest in 1989:

Chris Pond MP raised serious and urgent questions relating to the conduct of Westminster coroner, Paul Knapman.

He sought to highlight the shocking of families of victims of the Marchioness boat tragedy by the creepy coroner.

For some unexplained reason, Knapman horrifically allowed the victims hands to be cut off and their body parts and tissues to be removed without permission and treated concerned family members with utter contempt.”

There are other significant cases where Paul Knapman was in charge and they relate to another notorious boy-brothel, this time based at the Dolphin Square complex.

In 1997 , the Conservative MP for Meriden, Iain Mills, was found dead in his flat in Dolphin Square, Pimlico.

Initially there was confusion over the cause of death but Westminster’s creepy coroner Paul Knapman soon recorded a verdict of alcohol poisoning.

Iain Mills, MP, was apparently found with extreme levels  of alcohol in his blood and was surrounded by gin bottles.

The media blamed his death on the stress of being a parliamentarian and it was assumed he’d had an alcohol problem for many years.

This was at odds however with members of his local constituency group who insisted he was a teetotaler and only ever drank orange juice during the 20 years they knew him.

His untimely death was soon forgotten and to this day is rarely mentioned, but that might be about to change.

Could it be that Iain Mills MP was aware of the high -level paedophile ring  operating in Dolphin Square and this knowledge led to his death?”

Corrupt coroner Paul Knapman.

Coroner Paul Knapman.

Another strange death occurred at Dolphin Square and yet again Paul Knapman was responsible for the inquest:

In 2007, the Honourable Judge Rodney McKinnon fell 50ft from his Dolphin Square flat.

Despite his family’s protests, Westminster’s creepy coronor, Paul Knapman, recorded a verdict of suicide.

A carefully spun tale of depression and anxiety was woven by Knapman to skew the evidence so McKinnon was portrayed as having suicidal tendencies.

But do the facts really stack up?

Rodney McKinnon’s brother, Warwick, is, by coincidence, also a High Court Judge.

He said at the time of his brother’s inquest:

“I don’t believe it was suicide and neither does anyone in the family or any friends I gave spoken to.

“There is obviously some evidence that could point towards suicide. I am not going to be unrealistic, but there is nothing like enough for it to fill the required standard.”

The rather freaky William Hague - he's certainly gay but is he a paedophile as well?

The rather freaky William Hague – he’s certainly gay but is he a paedophile as well?

The bald oddity known as William Hague once lived in Dolphin Square.

Some claim that Hague is being blackmailed by Mi5 to do their bidding as they have compromising evidence of his less- than manly predilections.

Hague once employed a style guru. The guru jumped to his death from his flat and it was Knapman who held the inquest.

The dapper fashion and etiquette expert John Morgan was hired by Willie and he immediately advised him to ditch the baseball caps.

” Hague is seeking help and has recruited the services of style guru John Morgan to spruce up his image.

Morgan, 39, described as a “Burlington Bertie” because of his dapper appearance, is associate editor of GQ magazine and editor of Debrett’s Guide to Etiquette and Modern Manners.”

Unfortunately. less than 18 months after his appointment, he was dead.

“ The death of the man seen by many as the guru of style and good manners remains a mystery after a coroner recorded an open verdict.”

“John Morgan, the etiquette guru credited with persuading William Hague to abandon baseball caps, has died after apparently falling from a window.

Mr Morgan, 41, was found dead outside his third-floor flat in Albany, central London, in the early hours of Monday.

In 2008, Paul Knapman was made the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater London.

Was he being rewarded for his dubious inquests?

In yet another twist we find Operation Pallial which is charged with investigating child-abuse in North Wales children’s homes.

There is compelling evidence that boys were trafficked from these homes and sent to the Dolphin Square complex in Pimlico.

They were allegedly used by a filthy VIP ring which operated at the address.

This report, from the now-defunct Scallywag magazine, details how Westminster Conservative councillors allegedly knew of and indeed participated in the vile and sordid activities:

tn

SCALLYWAG story on scandal in Westminster City

” As in the right-wing clique in Smith Square, with social headquarters in Dolphin Square, so they were able to put up a bold front in the Westminster City Council so discredited by the Dame Porter fiasco of selling council houses to pals for cash and support.

And here again, it was predominantly, and quite overtly, gay. Tony Karpel, now a special adviser to Kenneth Baker, was not only a prominent force in the council itself at the time, but had joined the CCO at the very same time as Julian Lewis, and shared his sympathies, both for extreme right-wing politics, and his fondness for male company.

You would be more than correct to put them down as bosom pals and political flatmates.

As you weave your way through the insidious net of dirty tricks, gerrymandering, the more sordid side of lobbying through sex, as we have, the more you keep coming across the name of Tony Karpel. Karpel and CO’s peers on the council included the crucial Chairman of Planning, Robert Davies, the Deputy Chairman, Simon Milton, the leader, Miles Young, and Cllrs Martindale, Alan Bradley, Alex Segal, Avery and Mortland.

Tony Karpel - his name keeps cropping up.

Tony Karpel – his name keeps cropping up.

All these belonged to the clique who invariably went out in small groups to the more insalubrious “Boys’ Clubs” in the Soho area where their council was, in fact, also the landlords.

Martindale even once toured the clubs in a Ministry car lent to him to go on a late night tour with a handful of pals. More often they would collect at one of the on-going soirées in Dolphin Square, where, of course, again, their council were the ultimate landlords.

While Karpel retained his very close relationship with the CCO, Deputy Chairman Simon Milton was helping Ian Greer and Associates – the lobby group specially set up to pander to the 100 known Tory gays in Westminster”

Simon Milton is now dead but his partner Robert Davis is still a Westminster Councillor.

By a strange coincidence, Robert Davis is also the Queen’s Deputy-Lieutenant for Greater London.

Isn’t it about bloody time the police looked again at the Royals links to paedophiles.

Why not start with the Lord’s Lieutenants?

We’re sure they’d be only too delighted to help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Lieutenant#Deputies

http://www.royal.gov.uk/TheRoyalHousehold/OfficialRoyalposts/LordLieutenants/LordLieutenants.aspx

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/community/obituaries/sir-cyril-smith-1-2587695

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/nick-clegg-leads-tributes-to-largerthanlife-exmp-sir-cyril-smith-2069888.html

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/11/nick-clegg-leon-brittan-and-the-cambridge-university-conservative-association-connection/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/leon-brittan-ludgate-life-sciences-international-ltd/

http://www.manchester-celebrities.co.uk/celebrities/politicians05.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-24074818

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/grafton-close-childrens-home-and-the-elm-guest-house-scandal/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/operation-fernbridge-vip-child-abuse-and-the-filthy-warwick-spinks-connection/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/cliff-richard-operation-fernbridge-elm-guest-house-and-the-kitty-connection/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Speight

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/rolf-harris-and-the-mark-speight-connection/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/leon-brittan-ludgate-life-sciences-international-ltd/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/barry-george-jill-dando-jimmy-savile-bbc-paedophiles-cliff-richard-alan-farthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Knapman

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/westminsters-creepy-coroner/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/03/10/the-tragic-case-of-iain-mills-mp-and-the-dolphin-square-connection/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/the-mysterious-case-of-judge-rodney-mckinnon-who-jumped-from-dolphin-square/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/william-hague-and-the-mysterious-deaths-of-the-style-guru-and-the-judge/

http://transact.westminster.gov.uk/cttee/committee1/cllr.cfm?cllr_id=16

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/westminster-council-operation-pallial-and-the-scallywag-connection/

http://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/08/the-jillings-report-north-wales-vip-child-abuse-william-hague-leon-brittan-ian-greer-westminster-council-operation-pallial-and-the-dolphin-sqaure-connection/

Join An Anti-Paedophile Campaign – Don’t Just Sit There!

A campaign organised by http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com that I am happy to join, endorse and publicise:

I ask everyone to send a copy of the ‘Open letter to David Cameron’ to their MP with a personal message.

Time to stop sitting at home tut tutting over Child rape and doing nothing – either you’re part of the solution or you’re part of the problem!

Send via this website: http://www.writetothem.com/

Send a message in your own words, or if you’re pressed for time you could use this draft email template below.

Please contact me or http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com blog when your MP has replied so their responses can be collated – any MP not assisting we want out at the next General Election.

Dear [my MP]

I call your attention to an open letter to David Cameron (below) which seeks to expose child abuse – both historic and current.

Whilst the letter is addressed to the Prime Minister, I look to all Members of Parliament to put pressure on the Cabinet and those in governmental office to demand investigation of all paedophiles – no matter of their standing in society or high office.

As my MP, I trust you to represent me on this matter and assist in exposing these horrendous crimes.

Do you support the request, summed up in the final paragraph of the open letter, for an independent inquiry and an immediate national police investigation?

Yours sincerely,

[your name]

Dear Mr. Cameron

On the very day, 24th October 2012, that Tom Watson asked you a PMQ re. the possibility of a link between a very large and highly organised paedophile ring and No 10, you made a number of quotes to the mainstream media.

You were in fact referring to the Savile/BBC/NHS scandal.

I made a note of some of those quotes :-

”The Government will do all it can do, other institutions must do what they can do, to make sure that we learn the lesson of this and it can NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN”

“Collusion should NEVER happen again ”

”The measure of how our society is, is how we treat its most vulnerable members”

There are no more vulnerable members of our society than children who have been taken in to care and then re-abused by the very people charged with the responsibility of caring for them and protecting them,and even worse then passing them on to be further abused by the very people who make the laws in this country and are expected to lead the way on the moral compass of that society.

I have no doubt that you have watched or been made aware of Channel 4′s Dispatches on 12th September and the allegations that arose from it regarding the role of senior politicians, the security services and the Crown Prosecution Service in covering up the horrendous abuse carried out by Cyril Smith over 5 decades.The overlap with Savile in terms of who knew about this abuse were laid bare.

I also have no doubt that you are aware that your colleagues in your party, Edwina Currie,Gyles Brandreth and Rod Richards have made very damning statements of how well known in Westminster circles it was that Peter Morrison was a dangerous paedophile, and yet his career was unaffected as he rose to be Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party, Mrs. Thatcher’s PPS in 1990 and her campaign manager that same year despite this knowledge having been around for many years.

I also have no doubt that you are aware of the statement of Tim Fortescue,Edward Heath’s Chief Whip from 1970-73, made public on Michael Cockerell’s BBC Documentary in 1995 called “Westminster’s Secret Service “.
Talking about the role of the chief whip, Fortescue said ” For anyone with any sense who was in trouble would come to the whips and tell them the truth ………….. it might be erm erm a scandal involving small boys ……….. we would do everything we can because we would store up brownie points ……. and if I mean, that sounds a pretty,pretty nasty reason, but it’s one of the reasons because if we could get a chap out of trouble then,he will do as we ask forever more.”

I don’t need to tell you of the revulsion I feel towards our political masters having worked with sexually abused children for over 30 years when I heard of how the Whips ran the Dirt Book system.

Your colleague, John Whittingdale, in his role as Chair of the Culture Committee,put himself forward as the moral voice of Parliament in the days following the exposure of Savile on national TV.
He lost no opportunity to appear on every news channel for many days to demand in effect the head of the Director General of the BBC.To date I have not heard you or Mr. Whittingdale demand such investigations in to your own institution despite the mountain of concern a small proportion of which I have referred to above.
Just on Savile alone without looking any further why was there no investigation along the lines of the many BBC inquiries in to why a British Prime Minister was so close to Savile that he allegedly attended 13 consecutive New Year’s Eve parties at Chequers and why the same Prime Minister allegedly persevered for many years in insisting that such an evil man long identified as having a deviant sexual history should get a knighthood,ignoring the advice of her closest advisers.
Why was the same man so welcome in Prince Charles’s properties despite the security services and similar vetting institutions having enough opportunity to tap in to the ” gossip” about Savile that was around for decades.

I would dearly like to go in to more detail but until the Metropolitan Police’s Operations Fernbridge and Fairbank are completed then for obvious reasons I can not.

In the aftermath of the Lord McAlpine affair I was extremely disappointed by the confusion you attempted to create by making accusations of gay witch-hunts. There is no connection whatsoever between being gay and being a paedophile.
This is about and only about people who abuse young children regardless of whether the abuser is heterosexual or gay.
There is no witch-hunt against gay people and it was most irresponsible for a Prime Minister to make such a statement when the abuse of our most vulnerable was the issue.

Now is the time for you to show the genuine commitment expected of a Prime Minister and do what you preached in those statements last October especially ” COLLUSION SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN ” and the demand that ALL institutions look inwards and examine their role in past collusion/cover up.

A starting point, and to give Parliament and Government any credibility in this heinous historical scandal, is for you to put all party political considerations aside and arrange an urgent meeting with Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband to draw up a blueprint as to how your own institution will be investigated along the lines of the way you and colleagues demanded that people be brought to account in the BBC or NHS for their failure to blow the whistle on Savile.

It would be better if you led such an exercise before it is forced upon you by public demand.
The latter will happen in time.

A starting point would be an immediate statement that there will be urgent cross-party talks to set up an independant body to examine who ordered these cover ups of people like Smith and Morrison, after ordering an immediate Police investigation by the National Crime Agency and ensuring that the latter body has sufficient resources to go wherever the evidence takes them and however long it takes. This must include the investigation of living politicians, police officers,civil servants,security services personnel etc.

Yours sincerely,
The source of Tom Watson’s PMQ

Anti-White Race Hate Crimes In The UK / Britain

Anti-White Race Hate Crimes In The UK / Britain

Introduction by Cigpapers

Research by http://violenceagainstwhites.wordpress.com

Not happening.

Not happening.

In any multicultural society the more intelligent, gentler White People will always be prey to racial violence from the more primitive and backwards Third World interlopers. Our jewish master-race always tell Whites that this is their fault for slavery and the alleged holocaust, however the racial violence will stop once Whites are a minority. We’re not too sure about the logic of that argument.

Across Europe the brutal muslim gang rape of White females is now the norm. The Police and authorities rarely get involved.

Across Europe the brutal muslim gang rape of White females is now the norm. The Police and authorities rarely get involved.

Anyway here is a short list of a small sample of anti-White racist violence in Britain. Simply click on the story to see some of the enrichment these Third World primitives bring with them. This is on top of the estimated 10,000 British White girls gang raped and pimped out by our ethnic chums every year.

19092011574[1]

This list does not include bombings and attempted bombings.

Policeman trying to do his job abused by racist Pakistanis
Dirty white slag, this is a Muslim area”
Alex Holroyd murdered for being racist
“They kept shouting Lee Rigby – like they wanted to re-create what happened.”
Police appealing for witnesses to racist attack without telling us the races
“I’m going to break every white bone in your white face”
Once again the media reports on a race attack without actually telling us what the races were!
Dewsbury man beaten by Muslims shouting “Fucking White Bastard”
Update on Turkish killer Ali Koc: Judge concludes the attacks were racially motivated
Muslims threaten and racially abuse police investigating them for terrorism
Driving instructor driven off the road and called “white scum”
“They called me a ‘fat, white bastard’ and the other day I was showered with a pile of bricks”
“Fuck you, you haggis-munching ginger bastards. I’m going to bomb you white fuckers!”
Racist #PakAttack in Hitchin
Preston cadets racially abused by Muslims
Racist #HateCrime #PakAttack in #Burton
“Westernised women open their legs too easily” says Iranian immigrant doctor who groped patients
Racist hate crime Pak Attack in Bolton
Black immigrant voluntarily moves to Britain, then racially abuses the indigenous community
“The men exclusively wanted white girls to abuse”
“He wanted to hurt us because we were white”
The Unsolved Racist Murder of Keith Blakelock
White Catholic girl killed by Muslim for dating a Muslim
Racist Muslim gang attack in Bolton, called the victims “white trash”
“He said he couldn’t be seen with me in public because I was white and he was Asian”
Racist Pak Attack in Leicester
Nigerian Paedophile Opemipo Jaji was “obsessed with little white girls”
‘You white bitch, I’m going to burn your house down’
Turk racially assaults white bus driver, calling him “white pig” and spitting on him
#Muslim #racial #bullying caught on camera
Shoplifter racially abuses ASDA security guard – newspaper doesn’t say what race
White schoolboy “bullied to death” by racist Pakistani classmates
“White bitch, pale-faced slut, I’ll punch your head in!’
Pakistani Pack Attack in Dewsbury, called victim a “Fucking White Bastard”
Birmingham Mail manages to report on a racist attack without telling us what the races were
Muslim Patrol racially assaulted white man a week before the videos
Shofik Ali, the Racist Rapist of Rochdale
Pakistani Pack Attack in Blackburn: “They started hurling racist abuse”
Racist black attacks white train passenger
Pakistani Pack Attack in Great Lever
Racist attack on Leeds train – but the media don’t tell us the races!
“Told to climb through a back window because the men did not want to be seen with white girls”
Luton Policeman called a “White Bastard”
White kids include Muslims in the local neighbourhood snowball fights – and get bashed with iron bars!
Graveyard vandalised in Luton: “White People Die In Hell”
Racist Muslim Pack Attack in Occupied Bradford
Black customer assaults three ASDA staff, hurling racial abuse
“I Hate White People! White Cunts!” – Black woman has racist meltdown on London tram
Black woman gets off scot free for threatening a “white bitch”
Racist Asians deliberately run over white teenager in Burnley
“White people move out!” – Muslim gang daubing anti-white graffiti across Ravensthorpe
Scottish dog walker shot by Asian in racially motivated attack
Racist Asians beat white man for holding hands with his Asian wife
“It’s not just them who are racist. We are racist too”– Muslim paedophile admits anti-white bias
Racist Muslim Pack Attack in Heckmondwike – but newspaper doesn’t mention the race of the victim!
Police ‘covered up’ violent campaign to turn London area ‘Islamic’
Muslim gang abduct white boy in Oldham and hold him captive saying “White boy, run”
Muslims deliberately dropping bricks onto white people’s cars in Oldham
Explicitly Racist Muslim Pack Attack in Balfour Street, Oldham
“Asians rule supreme! Get out of our area, white scum!”
Muslims deliberately run over white cyclist Kane Duffy in Oldham
Muslim racially abuses and threatens white hospital staff in Oldham
Racist attack on Oldham security guards – but Oldham Chronicle neglects to tell us what the races were!
Muslims beat William McKeaney to death calling him a “white cunt” – not charged with racism
“Get the whiteys” – Brinkworth family flee London due to anti-white violence
“She was singled out because she was white”
“There is a problem of British Pakistani men thinking white girls are worthless and can be abused”
“White scum” – White father and baby son beaten by racist Muslims in Peterborough
“You white bastards!” – Martin Porter and Mark Machin beaten unconcious by racist Muslim gang in Sneyd Green
Muslims attacking Poles . . . in Yorkshire
“Reformed terrorist” attacks British police officers spouting racial abuse
“Dirty white dogs” – “Fucking white bastard”. A preist’s wife writes about the reality of life in Muslim-occupied Birmingham
Sheldon Hague beaten within an inch of his life by Muslim gang in Rochdale – who were looking for a white person
White British woman spat on and assaulted by racist Muslim gang in Keighley town centre
Another racist Muslim rapist targeting white girls and calling them “white trash”
Windsor erupts in a race war after Muslims fresh out of prayers attack white boys with pitchforks, baseball bats and iron bars
Pools of blood on Sidwell Street: White man bottled by racist blacks in Exeter
Jake Peters beaten by black gang shouting racial slurs
“I’m from Afghanistan, I’m a Muslim! I’m going to stab every white person!”
Muslim gang shatter John Payne’s skull with a hammer in Stepney – because he was white
Muslim gang racially abuse and assault white man on his way to church
Reece Johnson slashed in the face by racist Muslim gang seeking revenge on a white man
White man requires 62 stitches after being slashed in the face by Muslims in unprovoked racist attack in Barkingside
Gang of violent Muslims racially attack English people in Blackpool
Another racist Muslim gang attack in Rochdale
Louise Holt punched in the face in Oldham – part of a pattern
Patrick O’Brien & friends assaulted by Muslim gang in Oldham – BNP force the Oldham Chronicle to admit it was racist
Muslim gang beats James Howard in Oldham
“Asian Virus” (their actual gang name) beat Deividas Strizegauskas to death
“That will teach the white man for interfering in Paki business”
“I’ll send that kuffar bitch straight to hell!”
Muslim gang racially abuse and assault British army cadet Gareth Rogers
Billy Ward – another white English boy stabbed to death by African immigrants
“You’re the next Kriss Donald! We’re going to murder you!”
“Manningham belongs to Muslims. We don’t want whites. We rule Bradford. We are going to get you out.”
White British war veteren gets viciously beaten by Muslim gang shouting “Get Out Of Our Area!”
Another white priest attacked by a Muslim gang . . . in London
Muslim gang called “Asian Invasion” attack 15 year-old white boy Henry Webster with a hammer
Black rapist in London: “I WANTED TO FIND A WHITE WOMAN TO RAPE”
Muslim gang severely beats Daniel Stringer-Prince in the head just because he’s white
“I stabbed up some white boy”
Muslim gang beat two white boys in Burnley, spouting anti-white slurs
Somali Muslim gang viciously assault Rhea Page shouting “Kill the white bitch!”
White man bottled and teenager punched in second unprovoked Muslim gang race hate attack in just days
“White Bastard”: Father-of-two beaten up and left for dead by Muslim gang for being white
Muslims racially abuse White family putting flowers on a grave
Gang of 15 Asians attack Joseph Haigh with screwdrivers and bricks, calling him “white trash”
Fresh attacks in no-go Savile Town
Muslim gang kidnaps, stabs, tortures and immolates Kriss Donald
Muslim gang stabs Ross Parker to death because he’s white
“Death to Whites” “Paki Powa” “No-Go Area For Whites”
Youth exiled to Pakistan by dad after Blackburn attack

19092011574[1]

P.I.E. The Paedophile Information Exchange Exposed

Written by Cigpapers with members information provided by  http://ukpaedos-exposed.com

P.I.E (Paedophile Information Exchange)

PIE was set up as a special interest group within the Scottish Minorities Group by founder member Michael Hanson in Edinburgh, who became the group’s first Chairman. PIE received Government funding through the Scottish Minorities Group.
Since the majority of funding and members were from England, PIE relocated to London in 1975 where 23-year old Keith Hose became its new Chairperson.
Hose had connections with the Gay Liberation Front (GLF). GLF thinking questioned the family as the basis of an economic, social and sexual system and most of the GLF favoured the abolition of the age of consent altogether. At the time Patricia Hewiitt and Peter Tatchell were certainly members of the GLF’ and have confessed to being so.

GLF are militant homo-paedos who demand access to Children..

GLF are militant homo-paedos who demand access to Children..

Paedophile Action for Liberation had developed as a breakaway group from the Gay Liberation Front after some members of the GLF balked at the idea of having sex with under 4 year olds.
PIE was set up to campaign for an acceptance and understanding of paedophilia by producing controversial documents. But its formally defined aims also included giving advice, legal defence and counsel to paedophiles who wanted it, and providing a means for paedophiles to contact one another. PIE also dealt in large amounts of Child pornography between members for a hefty cut, and provided contact details for vulnerable Children.
By the mid 70s PIE , PAL and GLF members were in charge of Children’s Care Homes in Islington, Lambeth and Hackney under New Labour Councils with the predictable outcome that they became the most horrific places of Child sex abuse , rape , pornography and murder. Due to their ability to procure vulnerable Children PIE/PAL/GLF wielded a lot of political power and were fully protected by the Metropolitan Police. Any questions were met with allegations of homophobia.

PIE are well organised, corrupt and a danger to Children.

PIE are well organised, corrupt and a danger to Children.

By 1978 PIE/PAL/GLF had become affiliated to the National Council for Civil Liberties, now known as Liberty, with members attending meetings. The NCCL campaigned against newspapers’ treatment of the paedophile activist groups. Whilst affiliated with NCCL, PIE also campaigned to reduce the age of consent and oppose the proposed banning of child pornography. In 1978, in a submission to the Criminal Law Revision Committee, Harriet Harman Labour MP QC of the NCCL asserted that “childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage to Children”. The NCCL also proposed abolishing incest laws and Child pornography laws.
By 1983 Patricia Hewitt, Jack Dromey and Harriet Harman were no longer at the National Council for Civil Liberties and PIE/PAL/GLF lost their Political protection. The Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens had campaigned long and hard against PIE/PAL/GLF and had organised a petition of over one million signatures demanding their closure. Geoffrey Dickens MP also presented a dossier of evidence of Child sex abuse to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan ( later Sir Leon). Leon Brittan was forced to act against PIE/PAL/GLF, but never acted on Dicken’s dossier and claims to have no memory of it. However Brittan did have to close down PIE and PAL and a couple of it’s Executive Committee received minor prison sentences for corrupting public morals.

Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens fought against GLF and PIE.

Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens fought against GLF and PIE.

The Metropolitan Police did seize membership and mailing lists from PIE/PAL/GLF in 1983, however the Met Police claim they destroyed the membership list and have given no account about the mailing list.
PIE and PAL claimed to have disbanded in around 1984, but had in fact gone underground. The GLF distanced itself from PIE and PAL and none of its members were ever prosecuted.

The Metropolitan Police seized the membership list and mail order list of the Paedophile Information Exchange in 1983. They claim they destroyed the membership list and have no copy of it – does that sound likely? However the http://ukpaedos-exposed.com  website has done a great job in tracking down and exposing PIE members. Here are a small number of members below:

UPDATED – Click any of the red names to open up more information on each member

Members/Activists of P.I.E

Former PIE Chairperson and current pro-paedophile activisTom O’Carroll

tom

David Joy, 66 – once No2 in the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange. In 1984 he was jailed for 18 months for publishing obscene material in a PIE newsletter. In 1996 he got two more years after admitting indecent assaults dating back to the 80s. Then in January 2006 cops found 1,129 images of children aged one to 13 at his rundown flat in Loughborough, Leics. Some were in the level 5 category – featuring sado-masochism, torture or bestiality.

david-joy1

DR Morris Fraser – P.I.E founder member & leading child psychiatrist – had a criminal record for taking indecent photographs of children and assault in 1972. Good friends with both Napier, Waters and Righton

morris

Terrence Waters – Former prep school teacher – Closely linked to several P.I.E members incl Andrew Sadler – adopted the alias “James Opphin daler”. The name contains an anagram of the word “paedophile”. In 1994 Waters was sentenced to ten years for possessing child abuse images and the sexual abuse of a 10 year old boy. In 2011 convicted for more sexual abuse against children at Allen House School –

More on Waters on this link

Michael Johnson – jailed for four years on six specimen counts of indecent assault against two boys aged nine and 11. In 1988 Dr Morris Fraser and Michael Johnson set up a sailing charity for disadvantaged boys called the Azimuth Trust based in Cornwall.

Andrew Sadler – Former teacher who was jailed abroad for sex offences against boys – Links to Fraser and Napier – 

Andrew Sadler

More on Sadler on this link

Leo Adamson helped set up Pie to distribute obscene pictures of young boys while John Parratt was a former vice-chairman of the organisation

Leo Adamson, left. John Parratt right

Former chairman/leader Steven Freeman aka Steven Smith

freeman

John Morrison and Barry cutler – Members

john morrison left. Barry Cutler, right

Geoffrey Prime – Former member and KGB spy

957218

Sir Peter Hayman – Several links to P.I.E and its members – Former High Commissioner to Canada

peterhayman01

Notorious paedophile and TV presenter Jimmy Savile was almost certainly a full member of P.I.E

Jimmy+Savile

Peter Bremner (aka Roger Nash) Member level – Bremner has convictions for indecently assaulting children. Jailed for 6 months in 1994 with David Joy. in 1978 Bremner was given a three month prison sentence suspended for 2 years and fined £150 for indecently assaulting 3 boys, two aged 8 and one aged just 5

peter brmner

John Stamford – A former church minister published international guides for child molesters. He died before his trial. Stamford used a homosexual travel guide called spartacus as a front for a mailing ordering service offering information on child prostitutes in Thailand, Brazil and other nations. The organisation was alleged to have operated through a box number in London. The details of each of the members, including their sexual preferences, the desired age of the children and preferred countries of origin were stored on a computer. The members received personalised lists of children.

john st

For more on Stamford and Spartacus magazine click here

Stephen King aka Stephen Gosling – so called child expert was a member of P.I.E. His unbelievable role was to advise UK judges on sentencing for paedophiles

stephen_king

Richard Bigham – Eldest son of viscount of Mersey admitted he was a member

Former Vicar and millionaire Michael Studdert financial backer and member level

millionaire-michael-studdert

David Wade – The treasurer of P.I.E

Michael Hanson – First chairman (set up P.I.E. as a special interest group within the Scottish Minorities Group with Ian Dunn)

Keith Hose – 2ND Chairman In the PIE Chairperson’s Annual Report for 1975-6, Keith Hose wrote that ‘The only way for PIE to survive, was to seek out as much publicity for the organization as possible…. If we got bad publicity we would not run into a corner but stand and fight. We felt that the only way to get more paedophiles joining P I E… was to seek out and try to get all kinds of publications to print our organization’s name and address and to make pedophilia a real public issue.’

Ian Campbell Dunn – Co-founder (born 01/05/43 died 10/03/98) 

iandunn1

Shortly before his death, Dunn, a prominent gay activist, became convener of lobby group Outright Scotland. In 1997, he condemned police over a camera surveillance operation in public toilets in Stirling which led to several gay men being charged – even though the investigation also revealed that some men had sex with a 13-year-old boy. In 1974, Dunn co -founded the Paedophile Information Exchange ( PIE) with Michael Hanson. It became the leading contact group for adults campaigning for the right to have sex with children. In an interview in 1997, Dunn admitted he and Hanson had agreed to facilitate research into sex with children.

Dunn was caught on tape bragging abut interfering with a fourteen-year-old boy. The existence of the tape caused him to abandon a libel action he had brought against a Sunday newspaper, which named him as a paedophile. The encounter itself does not seem to have been a one-off – at his funeral in 1998, a young man claimed Dunn had raped him when he was fifteen. Dunn also supported a paedophile magazine called ‘Minor Problems.’

Charles Napier One-time treasurer of PIE Charles Napier is alleged to have sexually assaulted boys whilst a gym master at Copthorne School. He became an English Language Trainer at the British Council and was convicted of sexual assault against minors in London in 1995 and investigated as an alleged member of a paedophile network operating in British schools in 1996. He set up his own school in Turkey and resumed English Language Training with the British Council after serving his sentence

Charles Napier

Michael Dagnall  · Tony Zalewski – Lee Edwards –Named in Daily Express, 26th August 1983

Bernard Haunch – Teacher – He was also a member of a group called the Paedophile Information Exchange but apparently claimed it was a discussion group

Bernard Haunch

Dr Edward Brongersma (Deceased) – has written extensively in the area of sexuology, especially on pornography, ephebophilia, pedophilia and the age of consent. His books on this subjects include: Das Verfehmte Geschlecht (in German, 1970), Sex en Straf (“Sex and Punishment”, 1972), Over pedofielen en kinderlokkers (“On Pedophiles and Child Molesters”, 1975), and his last work is his magnum opus and entitled Loving Boys (two volumes, 1988–1990).

Dr Edward Brongersma

Peter Righton AKA Paul Pelham – Righton was the former director of education at the National Institute for Social Work, and a consultant for the National Children’s Bureau. Yet he was also a founding member of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which wanted the age of consent reduced to four. Righton published essays justifying paedophilia, which he called no more mysterious than “a penchant for redheads”. Police raided his home and found hundreds of letters between him and other paedophiles

peter ri

Warren Middleton, one of PIE’s first London members – Creater of the Understanding Paedophilia (UP) magazine that was eventually replaced by Magpie 

Michael Dagnall – Close friend and fellow abuser with Tom O’carroll Click this , it mentions Dagnall and P.I.E involvement @ page 19

Richard Travell – Active member status – Travell was handed a three-year community order in 2006 for possessing indecent images of children.

Alan John Doggett (1936-1978), conductor, composer and choir master. Leader of London Boys Choir – A letter in Magpie 10 reported and commented on the suspected suicide of Alan Doggett weeks before he was due to face child sex charges for having sex with a choir boy. Hit by train. Also has links to a certain Paul Raven aka Gary Glitter

C. J. Bradbury Robinson – American author who wrote several times for Magpie magazine – His pro-paedophile books include A crocodile of choirboys “Bare Knees, Boy Knees.” The latter offers an “unmatched” and “startling trip into the strange world of the Paederast,” says the description on Amazon, which has one used copy for sale for $500

Richard James – Writer at Magpie 

Paul Green – Writer at Magpie

Peter Deathman – P.I.E member who was regulary visited in prison by Tom O’Carroll. Deathman served a 10 year sentence not for mere sexual abuse but for child stealing

Den Nichols – Author of paedophilia literature called “Towards a Better Perspective For Boy-Lovers”. Published in 1976. In its preface to ‘serious minded adult males who feel an existential attraction to young boys”. Copies were advertised and sold by P.I.E/Magpie for £1 each, including post & packaging

David Grove – AKA Robin Brabban – born 1904 – secretary and Ex treasurer of PIE

Michael Walker – London – Member level of P.I.E – He did not agree on certain issues of P.I.E but condemned hostility against P.I.E

Anthony Green – Somerset – He attended a meeting of P.I.E that was attacked by the Nation Front. He urged tolerance and understanding of paedophiles

William Thornycroft – He was disgusted at attacks on P.I.E. He was quoted “The sexual freedom of children was needed” – Member of Communist Party Gay Rights Committee in the 70′s

Robert Atkinson – Newcastle teacher was arrested for sexually abusing a 13 year old student. He was fined £200. The headmaster and staff however continued to support him after the his guilt. Member level status in P.I.E

Ian Harvey – P.I.E member – He sought to differentiate bewteen “good paedophiles” and pedarasts, but without defining his terms or explaining why

Micky Burbidge – He supported P.I.E’s proposal to abolish the age of consent laws. Also wrote a book entitled Evidence on the law relating to and penalties for certain sexual offences involving children for the Home Office Criminal Law Revision Committee” with Kieth Hose

Frits Bernard (1920 – 2006) was a Dutch psychologist,sexologisthomosexual activist, and pro-pedophile activist.Together with the lateEdward Brongersma, he laid the foundations of the emancipation movement of boylovers in the Netherlands.

Keith Spence – He applauded the “courage” of the leaders of P.I.E in the face of ; quote – Hysteria, hostility and violence, also wrote several paedophile articles for Magpie about sexual abuse of young boys

Jane Rule – Canadian Writer of lesbian-themed novels and non-fiction. Co author of Magpie: Journal of the Paedophile Information Exchange –  Also supporter of NAMBLA (The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) was founded in December 1978 and is an activist homosexual and pedophilia coalition group. Their primary aim is stated to be the overturn of statutory rape laws and reduction of “age of consent” laws that require a child be of a certain age (which varies by state) before they can agree to sexual intercourse.

John Finnin – Co author of Magpie: Journal of the Paedophile Information Exchange

Peter Saxon – Co author of Magpie: Journal of the Paedophile Information Exchange

Kenneth Plummer – Involved with O’Carroll. He stated “Any study that can take adult-child sexuality out of the zone of shrieking horror and place it in the demystified zone of everyday experience must be welcomed”. sociologist Dr Kenneth Plummer of Essex University, sent a “warm message of support” for “Betrayal of Youth,” and, in company with Nettie Pollard and Professor Donald West (qv), also read, made suggestions and then praised “Paedophilia the Radical Case” receiving “heartfelt thanks” from its author, Paedophile Information Exchange Chairman Tom O’Carroll. Attented several P.I.E meetings

Dr Brian Taylor – Sociologist Brian Taylor adopted the pseudonym “Humphrey Barton” when he was research director of the PIE magazine “Understanding Paedophilia,” being co-opted to its executive committee. Another contributor to his book was a PIE EC member from 1976-77: Peter Righton, who was Director of Education at the National Institute for Social Work. He contributed a chapter entitled “the adult.” He too is quoted in praise of Tom O’Carroll’s book. Attended at least one P.I.E meeting

Named below linked due to being mentioned by Spartacus magazine when mentioning P.I.E click here for source 

Ralph Alden – PIE member who ran a one man “Gay Youth Help Service” in London. 

Tony Zalewski – P.I.E EC member

Richard Travell – P.I.E member

Roger Lawrence – PIE member who fled to Holland in the early 1980s and joined Spartacus, presumably at around the same time as ex-PIE leader Steven Smith. Lawrence used several aliases, and was arrested in his car at Dover in 1987 with notorious Swiss paedophile and sadist Beat Meier. The car was searched, and along with a large collection of child abuse films and magazines, the police found a three year old boy hidden under a blanket. The boy was called Dimitri Thevenin, and had been kidnapped from his parents’ house in Paris. Unbelievably, Roger Lawrence wasn’t charged and was allowed to go free.

Paedophile Action for liberation

PAL was founded in 1974, within the South London Gay Liberation Front. It was very lively, but rather small and local. It held regular and none too dicreet meetings in a Brixton squat. It did not survive its first press expose and its remnants merged with PIE in 1976

Douglas slade – Secretary of P.A.L (paedophile action for liberation), (former navy catering official) told members, ” You’ve got to be honest to yourself. If you want sex with children, dont bottle it up – just do it”. Linked strongly to the Paedophile information exchange

slade

Ian Melville – Another P.A.L member who boasted of expeditions to nudist camps to chat up youngsters. He says he worked as a teacher, and two local authorities as a child welfare officer. He talks about P.A.L meetings where displays would be shown of naked young boys under 16 yrs old.

melville

christopher Skeaping – Another P.A.L member who even took a “young boyfriend” to a meeting. In 2009 he was jailed for 5 years after a series of attacks on a 12 year old boy.

chris s

David bloomfield – Author of P.A.L ‘s “action programme”,which seeked to make paedophilia legal. Bloomfield boasted at meetings of his prowess at picking up children – and his hobby of peeping at children from his office in St James in London.

John Hall – P.A.L member who attended several meetings carrying a expensive camera. He made it clear that he was a practising paedophile and would proudly show of pictures of nude boys. 

Click this for: The Paedophile propaganda machine in magazine

During the 1960′s and decades before the internet, the general thought was that paedophiles acted alone, but by then they had already set up a sophisticated and well organized worldwide network, that involved thousands of paedophiles. The distribution of pro-paedophile propaganda had begun to spread like it had never done before – Click above link for Paedophile “travel guide” on where best to abuse children and how much it would cost

Click this for Magpie issue 11 May 1978

1

19 september 1977 – Police hold back outraged mothers as they attack members of the paedophile information exchange with eggs , stink bombs and rotten-eggs as they arrived for their first open meeting in London at the Conway hall in Red Lion square

19594529

Paedophile Information Exchange

The Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) was a UK pro-paedophile activist group, founded in October 1974 and officially disbanded in 1984.In January 2006 the Paedophile Unit finally arrested the last of its members on child pornography charges, with David Joy warned by his sentencing judge that his beliefs may preclude his release ever from jail.

Early history and activity

PIE was set up as a special interest group within the Scottish Minorities Group by founder member Michael Hanson, who became the group’s first Chairman.

Since the majority of enquiries were from England, PIE relocated to London in 1975 where 23-year old Keith Hose became its new Chairperson. Hose had connections with the South London group of the Gay Liberation Front (GLF). GLF thinking questioned the family as the basis of an economic, social and sexual system and certain sections of GLF favoured the abolition of the age of consent; their youth group had staged a march in support of this demand (however, it should be noted that the age of consent for homosexuals was 21 at the time, in comparison to 16 for heterosexuals).

Paedophile Action for Liberation had developed as a breakaway group from South London Gay Liberation Front. It was the subject of an article in the Sunday People, which dedicated its front page and centre-spread to the story. The result was intimidation and loss of employment for some of those who were exposed. It later merged with PIE.

This exposé on PAL had a chilling effect on PIE members’ willingness for activism. In the PIE Chairperson’s Annual Report for 1975-6, Keith Hose wrote that ‘The only way for PIE to survive, was to seek out as much publicity for the organization as possible…. If we got bad publicity we would not run into a corner but stand and fight. We felt that the only way to get more paedophiles joining P I E… was to seek out and try to get all kinds of publications to print our organization’s name and address and to make paedophilia a real public issue.’

A campaign to attract media attention was not effective at that time, but Hose’s attendance at the 1975 annual conference of the Campaign for Homosexual Equality (CHE) in Sheffield, where he made a speech on paedophilia, was covered at length in The Guardian.

In the same year Hose also attended a conference organized by Mind, the national mental health organization, where it was suggested that PIE should submit evidence to the Home Office Criminal Law Revision Committee on the age of consent. PIE submitted a 17-page document in which it proposed that there should be no age of consent, and that the criminal law should concern itself only with sexual activities to which consent is not given, or which continue after prohibition by a civil court.

PIE was set up to campaign for an acceptance and understanding of paedophilia by producing controversial documents. But its formally defined aims also included giving advice and counsel to paedophiles who wanted it, and providing a means for paedophiles to contact one another.

To this end it held regular meetings in London but also had a ‘Contact Page’, which was a bulletin in which members placed advertisements, giving their membership number, general location, and brief details of their sexual and other interests.

Here some of real ads that were used

No. 273 Energetic middle-aged male sincere and discreet Iks boys 8-15 yrs and the various ways in which they dress. Int swimming. Wld lk to hear from others with similar ints. 

No. 390 Male. Interested public school type boys, 12-16, either in football shorts or corduroy trousers, wd like to meet young male, 20-30, with similar interests. (S W London/Surrey). 

No. 379 Male Int girls 6-13 wd lk to correspond/meet others with similar interests; music, sports, fashion, Hi-Fi, photography, dance, reading, films. (Blackpool). 

No. 373 Doctor, male. Poet and author, interested photos little girls in white pants and little boys out of white pants. Wd like to hear from male or female with similar interests. All letters answered. Perfect discretion. (Reading, Berks). 

No. 401 Anglican priest, south London, anxious to meet other paeds for friendship and help. 

Replies were handled by PIE, as with a box number system, so that correspondents were unidentifiable until they chose to exchange their own details. Since the purpose of this contact page was to enable paedophiles to contact one another, advertisements implying that contact with children was sought and advertisements for erotica were turned down. The Contact Page ultimately resulted in a prosecution for a ‘conspiracy to corrupt public morals’.

PIE produced regular magazines that were distributed to members. The original Newsletter was superseded in 1976 by Understanding Paedophilia, which was intended to be sold in radical bookshops and be distributed free to PIE members. It was mainly the concern of Warren Middleton, who attempted to make the magazine a serious journal that included extracts from sensitive paedophilic literature and articles from psychologists with the aim of establishing respectability for paedophilia.

When Middleton ceased active work with PIE, Understanding Paedophilia was replaced by the magazine Magpie, which was more of a compromise between the proselytising of the earlier publication and a forum for members. It contained news, book and film reviews, articles, non-nude photographs of children, humour about paedophilia, letters and other contributions by members.

In 1977 PIE produced another regular publication called Childhood Rights. When the editor (‘David’) retired, this content was assimilated into Magpie.

In 1976 both PIE and PAL had been asked to help the Albany Trust to produce a booklet on paedophilia which was to have been published by the Trust. This collaboration was ‘uncovered’ by Mary Whitehouse, who alleged that public funds were being used indirectly to subsidize ‘paedophile groups’. The Albany Trust was partly supported by government grants. The Trustees decided not to publish the booklet, saying that it wasn’t sufficiently ‘objective’. A year later a question relating to the incident was brought up in Parliament by Sir Bernard Braine but, despite a statement by Home Office Minister Brynmor John that there was no evidence of public money going to PIE, the issue was drawn out into 1978 in the letters pages of The Guardian and The Times.

For pro-paedophile propaganda click this link for Tom O’Carroll – Paedophilia ; The radical case. 

Affiliation to the NCCL

Patricia Hewitt  – Former Secretary of State for Health

By 1978 PIE and Paedophile Action for Liberation had become affiliated to The National Council for Civil Liberties, later rebranded as Liberty, with members attending meetings. The organisation was headed by future government Minister Patricia Hewitt (pic above) and it campaigned against newspapers’ treatment of the Paedophile activist groups. Whilst affiliated with NCCL, PIE also campaigned to reduce the age of consent, arguing that “childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage”. The organisation also argued for incest to be decriminalised and argued that sexually explicit photographs of children should be legal unless it could be proven that the subject had suffered harm or that the an inference to that effect or to the effect that harm might have been caused could reasonably be drawn from the images themselves. NCCL excluded PIE in 1983

Before she became an MP, Harriet Harman (pic above) was the legal officer in the late 1970s for the National Council for Civil Liberties. When Harman joined NCCL in 1978, PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange, had already been affiliated for three years. Another group, Paedophile Action for Liberation, a Gay Liberation Front offshoot, had also been affiliated to NCCL until it was absorbed by PIE. PIE, which campaigned for adults to have sex legally with children, only broke off its relationship with NCCL when it went undercover in 1982, the same year that Harriet Harman left her NCCL post to become Member of Parliament for Peckham.

So when the Protection of Children Bill was put before Parliament in order to tighten the laws on child pornography by banning indecent images of under-16s Harriett Harman was at the forefront of the NCCL response.  Signed by Harriett Harman in April 1978, the NCCL’s formal response to the Government proposals to reform sex laws dubbed a “Lolita’s Charter” was unbelievable.

Harman argued that, “…childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage…Although this harm may be of a somewhat speculative nature, where participation falls short of physical assault, it is none-the-less justifiable to restrain activities by photographer which involve placing children under the age of 14 (or, arguably, 16) in sexual situations. We suggest that the term ‘indecent’ be qualified as follows: – A photograph or film shall not for this purpose be considered indecent (a) by reason only that the model is in a state of undress (whether complete or partial); (b) unless it is proved or is to be inferred from the photograph or film that the making of the photograph or film might reasonably be expected to have caused the model physical harm or pronounced psychological or emotional disorder.”

NCCL people were earlier involved in keeping the name of an NCCL council-member, Jonathan Walters, out of the People newspaper when it ran an exposé of Paedophile Action for Liberation, of which he was secretary, in 1975. The People still ran the story, but Walters was not named. Even more extraordinary is the fact that a current Cabinet Minister was running the National Council of Civil Liberties at the time all this was going on.

Here are her Motoring convictions, which proves she is certainly being “looked after”

In 2003, Harman was fined £400 and banned from driving for seven days after being convicted of driving at 99 mph (159 km/h) on a motorway, 29 mph (47 km/h) above the speed limit.

In 2007, Harman was issued with a £60 fixed penalty notice and given three penalty points on her licence for driving at 50 mph (80 km/h) in a temporary 40 mph (64 km/h) zone. Harman paid the fine several months late and avoided appearing at Ipswich magistrates court. Harman was again caught breaking the speed limit the following April, this time in a 30 mph zone, receiving a further 3 points on her driving licence.

In January 2010, Harman pleaded guilty to driving without due care and attention in relation to an incident on 3 July where she struck another vehicle whilst driving using a mobile phone, she admitted the offence in court becoming the first serving Cabinet minister in memory to plead guilty to a criminal offence. Harman was fined £350, ordered to pay £70 costs, a £15 victim surcharge and had three points added to her licence. Road safety organisations such as Brake condemned the leniency of the punishment and decision to drop the charge of driving whilst using a mobile phone. The judge defended the decision stating “Ms Harman’s guilty plea to driving without due care and attention included her admitting that she had been using a mobile phone at the time”

Jack Dromey, (pic above) whom Harriet Harman married in 1982, and who was Treasurer of the Labour Party, was also involved with the NCCL. He served on its Executive Committee from 1970 to 1979, so he was there when the decision to invite the two paedophile groups to affiliate was made. NCCL also set up a gay rights sub-committee at the same time, members of which included prominent paedophiles Peter Bremner (alias Roger Nash), Michael Burbidge, Keith Hose and Tom O’Carroll. And of course Walters and Locke were on the Executive.

Who else was involved ?

Untitled

Legal action against members

In the summer of 1978, the homes of several PIE committee members were raided by the police as part of a full-scale inquiry into PIE’s activities; as a result of this inquiry, a substantial report was submitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions and the prosecution of PIE activists followed.

In particular, five activists were charged with printing contact advertisements in Magpie which were calculated to promote indecent acts between adults and children.

Others were offered lesser charges of sending indecent material through the mail if they testified against the five. These charges related to letters that the accused exchanged detailing various sexual fantasies. It eventually became clear that one person had corresponded with most of the accused but had not been tried. After the trial, it emerged that there had been a cover-up: Mr “Henderson” had worked for MI6 and been a high commissioner in Canada.

Steven Adrian Smith was Chairperson of PIE from 1979 to 1985. He was one of the PIE executive committee members charged in connection with the contact advertisements; he fled to Holland before the trial.

In 1981 the former PIE Chairperson, Tom O’Carroll, (PIC BELOW) – Full profile on pervert ‘Carroll here ; was convicted on the conspiracy charge and sentenced to two years in prison. O’Carroll had been working on Paedophilia: The Radical Case in the period between the initial police raid and the trial. While the charges did not relate in any way to the publication of the book, the fact that he had written it was listed by the judge as a factor in determining the length of his sentence.

PIE’s Tom O’Carroll says age of consent should be 0, and 4 yr olds can give consent

720640113

In 1975 the delegates at the second annual conference of the Campaign for Homosexual Equality held in Sheffield were challenged by Keith Hose of the Paedophile Information Exchange to stand if they could honestly say they had no sexual interest in children. According to the local paper, one third of the 1,000 delegates remained in their seats.

In 1984 The Times reported that two former executive committee members of PIE had been convicted on child pornography charges but acquitted on charges of incitement to commit unlawful sexual acts with children and that the group’s leader had fled the country while on bail. It was announced that the group was closing down in the PIE Bulletin as of July 1984.

Surveys

In 1978-9, the Paedophile Information Exchange surveyed its members and found that they were most attracted to girls aged 8–11 and boys aged 11–15. In 1978, Glenn Wilson and David Cox approached Mr O’Carroll with a request to study the PIE membership. A meeting was held with the PIE leadership to vet the survey instruments and, after approval, these were distributed to PIE members in the course of their regular mailing. Wilson and Cox went on to use the data in writing their book, The Child-Lovers – a study of paedophilies in society.

The EPQ and a lifestyle questionnaire were completed by 77 members of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a self-help club for men who are sexually attracted to children. Compared with control males the paedophiles were significantly introverted and high on P and N. Examination of individual items revealed that PIE members were more likely to be shy, sensitive, lonely, depressed and humourless, but they were not particularly troubled by guilt, obsessionality or worry about their looks. Individual variations within the paedophile sample were also found. Those who were high on P and low on E were interested in younger children and were less able to contemplate sex with adults. Paedophiles high on N were less happy about their sexual preference and were more likely to have sought treatment.

Indeph look at those members Click RED links for more info on each member

December 2007 – Paedo’s ‘life’ term slashed

A PERVERT who led a campaign to legalise sex with kids was smirking behind bars last night after his “indefinite” jail term was slashed to A YEAR.

David Joy, 66 – once No2 in the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange or PIE – was warned earlier this year he may die in prison after admitting child porn offences. But three Court of Appeal judges ruled the indefinite sentence was inappropriate – as Joy had only accessed porn for himself and was not a serious danger to the public.

Leo Adamson, left, helped set up Pie to distribute obscene pictures of young boys while John Parratt, right, was a former vice-chairman of the organisation

July 2011 – Stephen Freeman/Barry Cutler/John Morrison

John Parratt, 63, a former vice chairman of Pie, also known as Warren Middleton, was jailed for 12 months for having indecent images

 Leo Adamson, 49, a former executive member of Pie, was found guilty of failure to disclose a computer password and was jailed for a year at an earlier hearing.

The former leader of the paedophile pressure group Pie was jailed after becoming the first person to be convicted for making drawings of children being raped. 

Detectives found 3,000 drawings at Steven Freeman’s home, where he held weekly meetings to view and trade images of child abuse. The images were described at the Old Bailey as “vile and disgusting” and were amongst the worst seen by police, they said. Some 14,500 pictures and films were found on computer discs there and at the address of two of his paedophile ring

Freeman, 57, previously known as Smith, the chairman of Pie, was given an indeterminate term for public protection. He was given a minimum term of 30 months after pleading guilty to specimen charges of possessing indecent images, having prohibited drawings, distributing indecent images and failing to disclose the password for an encrypted computer.

John Morrison, left, and Barry Cutler, right

John Morrison, 44, was jailed for 24 months after he admitted having indecent images and failure to disclose a computer password.

Barry Cutler, 60, pleaded guilty to three offences of having indecent images and failure to provide a password, and was jailed for 15 months

Geoffrey Prime – Hereford

A KGB spy whose perverted actions in Hereford led to his downfall, is back in the news.

Moscow’s key British agent, Geoffrey Prime, was jailed for 35 years in November 1982 after admitting he had been selling secrets to the Russians for 14 years.

Prime was also a member of the Paedophile Information Exchange and had a card index of 2,287 young girls whom he targeted by phone.

Imprisoned for three years for indecently assaulting three young girls, including a 14-year-old Herefordshire girl – Released in 2001. 

November 1984

Child sex case men jailed

Untitled

Two pro child sex campaigners were yesterday (1984) sent to prison where they knew they would face a hate campaign from other prisoners. Peter Bremner (pic above) and David Joy had tea thrown over them by inmates of the jail where they spent the night before being sentenced

Sir Peter Hayman

peterhayman01

In 1978 a packet containing obscene literature and written material was found on a bus. The subsequent police investigation revealed a correspondence of an obscene nature between Sir Peter Hayman and number of other persons. The papers involved an obsession about the systematic killing by sexual torture of young people and children.

720878576

Another cover up ?

A very dubious and defensive reply from the The Attorney-General when asked by the MP of Huddersfield in April 1981 whether the Director of Public Prosecutions gave special treatment to Sir Peter Hayman by taking steps to prevent his indentity being revealed in court.

Attorney-Generals reply : 

No special treatment was afforded to Sir Peter Hayman and no steps were authorised or taken to protect his identity in evidence given to the court during the trial of O’Carroll and other members of the executive committee of PaedophileInformation Exchange. I made this clear in answers I gave to the hon. Member for Lewisham, West (Mr. Price) on 6 April—[Vol. 2, c. 682–83.]—to which I refer my hon. Friend.

Furthermore, although the indictment in that case was amended before trial, this was because Treasury Counsel had doubts, following a preliminary hearing, as to whether the wording of the original charges might, as a matter of law, be open to objection. The amendment did not arise from any wish to protect the indentity of any person.

The material of a pornographic nature found in the possession of Sir Peter Hayman was not relied on by the prosecution at the trial. There was, so far as the Director of Public Prosecutions is aware, no evidence whatsoever of Sir Peter Hayman having received or sent by post any obscene photograph of a child or young person or of his having taken such photographs or of his having committed any other act which might have been an offence under section 1 of the Protection of Children Act 1978. The mere possession of obscene material whether relating to children or adults is not in itself a criminal offence.

The Director’s decision not to take proceedings under the Post Office Act against Sir Peter Hayman and others was taken in January 1979 before he received any papers relating to the activities of O’Carroll and other members of the executive committee of PIE.

Does UK justice still cover up for the establishment ? March 1981 – The Montreal Gazette

1

2

4

It was perhaps most notoriously summed up in the obituary posted after the death of Sir Peter Hayman in the Times of April 9, 1992: “…a distinguished diplomatic career… knighted in 1971… Deputy under secretary FCO… High Commissioner to Canada until 1974… retirement damagingly disrupted… police raided his flat… discovered he was a member of Paedophile Information Exchange… 45 volumes of diaries, entries relating to sexual experiences”.

Jimmy Savile member of the Paedophile Information Exchange – an Organisation which campaigned for the abolition of the age of consent in the UK 

October 18, 2012

NEWS RELEASE

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is embroiled in a child sex scandal centred on Jimmy Savile, its anchorman on many popular entertainment shows for over thirty years. Now new information is surfacing which indicates that Jimmy Savile was a fully paid up member of the Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E) – an organisation which campaigned for the abolition of the age of consent in the UK.

The letter below has been sent to Lord Patten, Chairman of the BBC Trust. In it I have stated “I am placing this information before you in this open letter as I feel that the BBC should now initiate a full investigation into these reports suggesting that during the 1970’s and early 1980’s the BBC’s editorial policy was influenced in favour of P.I.E. This alleged infiltration of the BBC by P.I.E might also explain how Savile was able to operate as a sexual predator during his extended tenure at the BBC without challenge and/or prosecution.”

I will pursue my objective of securing a full investigation into the alleged membership of Jimmy Savile of the organisation, P.I.E. I will also continue to seek a full and open investigation of the influence, if any, that P.I.E exerted on BBC editorial policy during the 1970′s and 1980′s. I also expect the authorities to investigate whether any BBC employees were members of P.I.E or expressed sympathy and support for the aims and objectives of P.I.E.

Further links are set out at the bottom of this email.

MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE. PRESTON. PR2 9TZ

Lord Patten
Chairman
The British Broadcasting Association Trust
The BBC Trust Unit
180 Great Portland Street
London
W1W 5QZ

12th October 2012.

Dear Lord Patten,

RE: BBC / Jimmy Savile.

This is an open letter, i.e. I do not regard it as confidential and reserve the right to publish it. There are some parts of it in italics, these sections I do regard as confidential and, as such, they will not be published.

During 1982 I initiated an investigation into corruption in public life which resulted in the criminal prosecution of some high profile figures for offences against children, including serial child rape.

PARAGRAPH DELETED.

I turn now to the reason for my writing to you at this point.

My investigation led me to the fringes of the Paedophile Information Exchange (P.I.E), an organisation whose history is a matter of public record. The organisation was founded during October 1974 and officially disbanded during 1984.

Due to a lack of financial support my investigation into PIE was severely limited although I did secure two names on the membership list of the organisation, one was Jimmy Savile. One of the key aims of the organisation was to secure a reduction of the age of consent in the UK to FIVE and then abolish it altogether. The organisation secured significant support within parliament, the entertainment industry, the media and similar, professional, organisations. It was reported that, when the organisation was finally closed down, the membership list was found to contain the names of nationally known politicians, entertainers and people engaged in professions, including the medical and legal profession. Some teachers were, I believe, also found to be registered members. The quality and influential nature of its membership and the extent of support for the aims of the organisation among ‘opinion formers’ probably explains how it managed to remain in existence in this country for a decade before it was finally closed down. My investigations did clearly indicate that the tentacles of P.I.E extended deep into the establishment including the BBC and Parliament.

This quote from the book Paedophilia – The Radical Case (Chapter 11) gives an indication of just how far the tentacles of P.I.E had spread and how influential the organisation had become.

“One outcome of the MIND conference was the suggestion to Keith that PIE should submit evidence to the Home Office Criminal Law Revision Committee on the age of consent. With amazing despatch Keith did exactly this, preparing and submitting the seventeen-page document discussed in Chapter 6 in a matter of weeks, without the benefit of research time or facilities at his disposal. What’s more, we have it on reliable authority that his work caught the imagination of no less a figure than the Home Secretary of the time, Roy Jenkins.”

The source who notified me that Savile was a fully paid up member of the organisation is extremely reliable. Other sources implied that Savile’s membership of P.I.E was known to others within the BBC who were either sympathetic to its objectives or were members themselves. This might explain why there appeared to be no effective pursuit of the organisation by BBC sponsored current affairs and investigative programmes during that period of P.I.E’s existence.

I am placing this information before you in this open letter (except for the parts in ITALICS) as I feel that the BBC should now initiate a full investigation into theses reports suggesting that during the 1970’s and early 1980’s the BBC’s editorial policy was influenced in favour of P.I.E. This alleged infiltration of the BBC by P.I.E might also explain how Savile was able to operate as a sexual predator during his extended tenure at the BBC without challenge and/or prosecution.

It has been reported that Savile was responsible for the sexual assault of a brain damaged child at Stoke Mandeville Hospital. It has been stated “it can get no lower than this.” I beg to differ. My understanding is that the archive at New Scotland Yard hold an image of the youngest child recorded as being sexually abused, the child was female and was still attached to its mother by the umbilical cord. Perhaps there is some way to go before we reach the bottom of this “cesspit?”

I do expect and formal and comprehensive response from you within a reasonable time period. A copy of this letter has been forward to The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Mr Bernard Hogan-Howe.

Yours sincerely,

Michael H. Murrin

Child sex men found guilty over article – Glasgow Herald dated November 1984

1

2

Campaigners against P.I.E

against p.i.e

March 2004 – Stephen King (pic below) Child sex ‘expert’ is jailed for girls’ abuse – member of the Paedophile Information Exchange. His unbelievable role was to advise judges on sentencing for paedophiles !

stephen_kingWill Great Britain’s paedophile scandal bring down Lord Carrington? December  13,  1983

33

Peers son is sex case “revolted” – July 1978

Untitled

Untitled

Peter Righton/Paul Pelham (pic below) – Child care expert fined over photographs of naked boys

leadingchildcareexpertpeterrighton

Magistrates at Evesham, Worcestershire, heard that the material included copies of a recognised paedophile magazine and photographs of young boys under the age of 16 posing partly dressed or naked. Peter Righton, 66, of Badsey Road, Evesham, admitted two illegal importation charges and one charge of possessing obscene material. He was ordered to pay pounds 75 costs and the magistrates ordered that the magazines should be destroyed.

Dec 2006 – Former vicar jailed over child pornography

Millionaire Michael Studdert

A former vicar has been jailed for four years over his role in amassing a huge “Aladdin’s Cave” of child pornography.Millionaire Michael Studdert was convicted along with paedophile rights campaigner Thomas O’Carroll, who received a two-and-a-half-year prison term.

Ian Campbell Dunn

iandunn1

Pioneering Scottish lesbigay campaigner Ian Dunn died suddenly in Edinburgh on Tuesday 10th March. He collapsed as he was leaving Edinburgh Royal Infirmary whence he had been discharged after receiving tests for shortness of breath and chest pains. He was readmitted, but doctors were unable to revive him.

He was a founding member of the Paedophile Information Exchange, he believed in the rights of sexual minorities to organise politically.

Educated at Hillhead High School in Glasgow, Ian worked for a time for the Met Office at Prestwick Airport and later in London. If he had remained with the Met Office, his next promotion would have been to present TV weather bulletins.

However, he moved to Edinburgh, attending Heriot Watt University where he studied Town Planning. Unfortunately, his work in co-organising the world’s first International Gay Conference in 1974 meant that he neglected his studies and didn’t graduate – something he was careful to hide from his parents. Nevertheless, he worked for many years in the City’s planning department until he took early retirement during the recent local government reorganisation.

In 1969, he was a founder member of the Scottish Minorities Group (which became the Scottish Homosexual Rights Group and is now OUTRIGHT Scotland). He was Convenor of OUTRIGHT Scotland at the time of his death and played a pivotal role in the organisation over the years. His main success was in persuading Robin Cook to move the amendment to the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980 which decriminalised sex for gay men aged 21 and over, but he continued to lobby for complete social and legal equality for homosexuals.

When he agreed to act as ‘postbox’ for a paedophile theoretical journal called Minor Problems (which had been expelled from its previous mailing facility), he was the subject of a front page expose by the Sunday Mail and, although he sued the paper, he later quietly dropped the action

Charles Napier – former envoy for the British Council in Cairo, was imprisoned for nine months in 1995 for two offences of sexually abusing a boy under the age of 16. He had enticed the boy to his home in Surrey during the 1980s. Napier was once treasurer of the PIE network

charlesnapier

notw22381

people25575a

people25575b

people25575c

4

5

6

7

Picture 9

 

The Mary Moss Elm Guest House VIP Paedophile Party List

The Mary Moss Elm Guest House VIP Paedophile Party List
Special Report by Cigpapers
Elm Guest House. Now flats.

The Elm Guest House was on Rocks Lane, Barnes , South West London – now converted in to flats. Between 1979 and 1982 it was owned and run by Carole Kasir and her husband Haroon, who were both bisexual jews. Carole Kasir had been paid by the Spartacus Club ( ostensibly a gay club but really for paedophiles with up to 25,000 members ) to become a venue for their “parties” after being approached by leading Spartacus Club member Peter Glencross. The Spartacus Club is exposed in this article in 1983:  http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/the-spartacus-paedophile-network-was-exposed-by-the-sunday-people-in-february-1983/

Sickening homo-paedos.

Sickening homo-paedos.

The Spartacus Club was run by Catholic Priest John Stamford from Amsterdam. Stamford masqueraded as a gay rights champion but was secretly a leading member of the Paedophile Information Exchange. The venue was advertised in the Press including Capital Gay magazine and Conservative Party literature.

Advert in Conservative Party and Capital Gay literature - the 10% discount is code for young boys available.

Advert in Conservative Party and Capital Gay literature – the “10% discount” is code for “young boys available” to Spartacus Club Members.

A large number of rich and powerful VIPs would attend these parties where mostly White Working Class Boys were trafficked from local Care Homes to be sexually abused and raped during perverted “parties”.  Several Boys have reported that they were forced to dress up as girls and/or fairies for these sordid “parties”. The Boys were also plied with alcohol and drugs.

VIP paedo parties.

Homo-paedo VIP parties.

One of the Councils providing the Boys was Richmond , whose jewish Social Services boss Louis Minster also seems to have attended these parties according to Mary Moss. It is believed that the Spartacus Club was getting boys taken in to Richmond Council Care to order after choosing them from photographs in School records. It was later found Louis Minster was unqualified for the job and he was given a large golden handshake to leave. A number of these abused Boys have since taken their own lives or died suspiciously.

Evil scum who prey on Children.There are allegations linking Sir Jimmy Savile to Elm Guest House, but his name doesn’t appear on any lists released yet. However some guests did use fake names.
A party at the Elm Guest House was raided by Police in 1982, following which 12 boys gave evidence that they had been sexually abused by men.
img744

Eric Kasir’s arrest sheet from 1982

German born jew Carole Kasir was convicted for running a disorderly house but no charges of Child sex abuse were brought against anyone.

Elm Guest House owner Carole Kasir in 1983

Elm Guest House owner Carole Kasir in 1983

Haroon Kasir in 2013 - he is trying to emigrate to USA.

Haroon Kasir in 2013 – he is trying to emigrate to USA. On 16th July 2013 Haroon Kasir was arrested on Child porn offences, he was bailed until September 2013.

Following Carole Kasir’s suspicious death from an insulin overdose in 1990 at the age of 47 two Social Worker friends of hers gave disturbing evidence at her inquest. Mary Moss and Christopher Fay made serious allegations of Child sex abuse by rich, powerful People at Elm Guest House. There are also two local Boys still missing from that time who are believed to be linked to Elm Guest House.
Mary Moss was raided by the Metropolitan Police Special Branch and other unknown Police Units looking to seize and destroy any evidence, however she managed to photograph and upload the alleged VIP guest list and other evidence before the Police could get to it.

Elm Guest House VIP list.

Elm Guest House VIP list.

A complete set of the 130 Mary Moss original documents can be found at the bottom of this article.

Here are some of the highlights of the alleged VIP guest list released by Mary Moss:

Anthony Blunt, Royal Connections, MI5, traitor, Russian spy deceased.
Harvey Proctor, Monday Club, well known convicted paedophile.
Sir Peter Bottomley. Worthing MP and Monday Club
Charles Irving
Leon Britton, Lord, ex Thatcher Minister
Peter Brooke, Life Peer
John Rowe, MI5, former MP
Cyril Smith, deceased, ex Rochdale MP
Ron Brown
Colin Jordan, Politician and author
George Tremlett, Former GLC Leader
Peter Campbell, Monday Club
Gary Walker, Sinn Fein
Cliff Richard,aged  Pop Star, known at Elm Guest House as ‘Kitty’
Jess Conrad, aged ex Pop Star.
Ron Wells, aged Musician, aka ‘Gladys’ at Elm Guest House.
Richard Miles, Monday Club
Chris Denning, ex BBC DJ, convicted paedophile.
R Langley, Buckingham Palace Equerry
Terry Dwyer
Patrick Puddles
Louis Minster, Head of Richmond Social Services
Colin Peters, QC – a convicted paedophile sentenced to 8 years in 1989
Steve Everett, Senior Westminster Social worker
Ray Wire, so called expert on Paedophile therapy
Peter Glencross, editor of Monday Club newsletter
Guy Hamilton Blackwell, son of Westland Helicopters Chairman
London's finest.
The following Police Officers and an alleged informant also appear on Mary Moss’s list for some reason:
Colin Peters QC, Police informant and convicted paedophile.
D. Naismith, Chief Constable Wandsworth
DC Chris Carter, CID Richmond
DC David Lines, CID Barnes
DC Ron Thornton, CID Richmond
PC Roderick Smeaton
WPC Sheila McInnes
PC Chris Wicks
WPC Elizabeth Meredith
PC Alan Jones
Cliff or Kitty? Either way we'll keep it quiet!
Allegedly Sir Cliff Richard presently has a super injunction from the High Court preventing anyone naming him in connection with Elm Guest House – don’t worry Kitty your secret is safe on the internet!
It was first reported in 2010 that Sir Cliff Richard had surrended his British citizenship and become a National of Barbados known as a “Bajan”.
On 14th August British Police raided Cliff Richard’s mansion in Berkshire looking for evidence of Child sex abuse. Later on 14th August 2014 Sir Cliff Richard released this statement from Portugal:

Here is Sir Cliff Richard’s statement of 14th August 2014 in full after police started searching his Berkshire home:

“For many months I have been aware of allegations against me of historic impropriety which have been circulating online.

“The allegations are completely false. Up until now I have chosen not to dignify the false allegations with a response, as it would just give them more oxygen.

“However, the police attended my apartment in Berkshire today without notice, except it would appear to the press.

“I am not presently in the UK but it goes without saying that I will cooperate fully should the police wish to speak to me.

“Beyond stating that today’s allegation is completely false it would not be appropriate to say anything further until the police investigation has concluded.”

A paedophile network diagram.
      A diagram of a paedophile network – get the picture yet?
Louis Minster is now 81 and retired to Malta on a large Government Pension, however the investigative website Exaro tracked him down and telephoned him. In the telephone conversation he denies who he is initially before making some strange excuses. The telephone conversation can be heard here:
Main Stream Media suddenly dropped this massive story in 1982
Following the Police raid in 1982, the main stream media were full of the Elm Guest House story between 7th August and 23rd August 1982. However, perhaps due to a D-Notice, from 24th August 1982 until 2013 no mention was made in the main stream media. Here are some of the stories from the MSM between 7th and 23rd August 1982:
Keith Vaz MP was solicitor of Richmond Council.
Keith Vaz ( now a Labour MP ) was the solicitor of Richmond Council at the time. He has refused to answer a number of questions about the matter and an investigation in to him has begun on this website:
Here are the complete set of documents uploaded by Mary Moss:
WHERE ARE THEY NOW?
We are planning on holding an “Elm Guest House” VIP reunion party in a couple of months. These are the latest addresses we have to send invitations to our guests, so if you can help with any further information we would be grateful:
Anthony Blunt, Royal Connections, MI5, Russian spy died 1983.
Harvey Proctor, Monday Club, well known convicted paedo. 11 MORPETH GARDENS, SHEFFIELD S3 7LD aged 75
Sir Peter Bottomley. Worthing MP and Monday Club CHIMNEYS, LOWER MOUSHILL LANE, MILFORD, GODALMING GU8 5JX
Charles Irving died 1995
Leon Britton, Lord, ex Thatcher Minister LOWER GARDEN HOUSE, SPENNITHORNE, LEYBURN DL8 5PR
Peter Brooke, Life Peer PUDDLE HOUSE, CHICKSGROVE, TISBURY, SALISBURY SP3 6NA
John Rowe, MI5, former MP current address unknown
Cyril Smith, deceased, ex Rochdale MP died 2012
Ron Brown died 2002
Colin Jordan, Political Leader and author died 2009
George Tremlett, Former GLC Leader living somewhere in South Wales – current address unknown aged 73.
Peter Campbell, Monday Club current address unknown
Gary Walker, Sein Fein current address unknown
Cliff Richard,Pop Star, known at Elm as ‘Kitty’ aged 72 current address unknown – had a home on St George’s Hill estate in Weybridge, Surrey.
Jess Conrad, ex Pop Star. BAMBI LODGE, TILEHOUSE LANE, DENHAM, UXBRIDGE UB9 5DA aged 76
Ron Wells, Musician, aka ‘Gladys’ at Elm current address unknown believed to be in London area.
Richard Miles, Monday Club current address unknown
Chris Denning, ex DJ, convicted paedo. aged 72 arrested at an East London Homeless Hostel on 3rd June 2013 on paedo charges not seen since.
R Langley, Buckingham Palace Equerry current address unknown
Terry Dwyer current address unknown
Patrick Puddles current address unknown
Louis Minster, Richmond Social Services – previously reported as dead but the Exaro Website found him alive and living in Malta.
Colin Peters, QC current address unknown
Steve Everett, Westminster Social worker FLAT 9, LINSTED COURT, RESTONS CRESCENT, LONDON SE9 2JQ
Ray Wire, so called expert on Paedo therapy died 2008.
Peter Glencross, editor of Monday Club newsletter current address unknown
Guy Hamilton Blackwell, son of Westland Helicopters Chairman FLAT 2, 367 COMMERCIAL ROAD, LONDON E1 2PS
We’ll put copies of our invitations to the reunion up on here with their replies/threats/legal actions etc.
The following article appeared on the Independent Newspaper website on 21st July 2013:

Elm Guest House investigation: Former senior cabinet minister faces rape investigation

By James Hanning , Paul Cahalan

A former senior cabinet minister is now the subject of a rape allegation currently being considered by the Crown Prosecution Service. Police investigating possible child abuse at the Elm Guest House in West London have submitted a file on the former minister, and the CPS is expected to come to a decision over the matter during the summer. The claims are not believed to relate to the abuse of minors at the guesthouse, and the alleged victim was over the age of consent.

The allegation follows evidence given to the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Fernbridge, which is investigating claims that a well-connected paedophile ring was operating from a guesthouse in Rocks Lane, Barnes, south-west London, in the early 1980s. The inquiry has been examining hundreds of leads submitted to it after a politician claimed that a historic paedophile ring with connections to Downing Street had been in operation there. The extent, breadth and wide timeframe of the claims led police to look beyond the Elm Guest House’s allegedly dark epoch and beyond the abuse of children.

Police have been looking into claims that young boys from the Grafton Close care home, run by Richmond council, were sexually assaulted at the guesthouse – now a block of respectable flats. It is alleged that the boys were taken to organised parties at the house attended by prominent people, where they were made to dress up. The parties were often “Kings and Queens” themed, a practice begun around the time of the Silver Jubilee in 1977.

The lack of charges relating to the guest house has given rise to counter-claims of “conspiracy theories” and cover-ups. But in January 2013, The Independent on Sunday revealed that the disgraced Liberal Democrat politician Sir Cyril Smith, who for decades abused children without ever facing justice, was a regular visitor to the Elm Guest House.

The revelation came after police raided the house of one childcare worker and seized documents said to contain the names of some of those who stayed at the guesthouse. Those on the list also included prominent politicians, judges and celebrities.

The Fernbridge investigation came in the wake of the allegations surrounding the TV presenter and DJ Jimmy Savile.

In October last year, Tom Watson MP told Parliament that an evidence file on Peter Righton, a former child care worker convicted of importing illegal homosexual pornography in 1992, contained “clear intelligence of a widespread paedophile ring”. At Prime Minister’s Questions, he said: “One of its members boasts of a link to a senior aide of a former prime minister, who says he could smuggle indecent images of children from abroad.”

Scotland Yard is still investigating those claims, as well as suggestions that its officers failed to carry out a proper examination of child abuse claims in Richmond in 2003, when the Independent Police Complaints Commission received allegations from a concerned council worker.

And on October 20th 2013, the Daily Express ran a story about a former child protection officer, Chris Fay, who had a gun held to his head by a Special Branch officer when he was trying to help victims of child abuse which included Elm Guest House in Richmond, South London.

From Express.co.uk:

“It became very dangerous. People seem to forget that Special Branch could do what they liked, they were a law unto themselves.

At one point they had me up against a wall by my throat with a gun at my head telling me in no uncertain terms that I was to back away if I knew what was good for me.

A colleague of mine had the same treatment, as did a number of the volunteers. Victims who were actually abused at Elm House were also physically stopped from coming to speak to us at the NAYPIC office in north London.

I witnessed Special Branch officers manhandling them and turning them away with a warning to keep their mouths shut. It was blatant, it was open, they were acting like gangsters.

In the end we had to meet victims at a local community centre without the knowledge of the police to hear what they had to say.” NAYPIC was given the identities of senior politicians who formed part of an alleged paedophile ring at the heart of government.

However, Mr Fay said: “I was told by the police implicitly, ‘We do not want you to come to us with big names’.”

In a sinister twist, he said his kitchen window was shot at, leaving three bullet holes in the glass, although he never found out who was responsible.

An interesting interview here by Bill Maloney of Chris Fay:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORU5x-ryedU

The following article appeared in the “This is Local London” series of newspapers and website on 22nd July 2013:

Two charged with historic child abuse under Operation Fernbridge by Richmond Reporter

The former deputy head of Richmond Council’s Grafton Close children’s home has been charged with offences on boys aged nine to 15.

John Stingemore, 71, was today charged along with Father Anthony McSweeney, 66, with indecent assault and making indecent images of children.

Both were arrested under the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Fernbridge, which is investigating historic allegations of sexual abuse at Elm Guest House in Barnes.

They were charged today and will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on bail on September 4 – rebailed to September 18th 2013.

Stingemore and McSweeney.They are due to appear at Southwark Crown Court at 9:30 AM on September 18th.

Stingemore and McSweeney.They are due to appear at Southwark Crown Court at 9:30 AM on Sept. 18th 2013.

AdChoices

Mr Stingemore, who lives in East Sussex, will face eight counts of indecent assault, two of taking indecent images of a child and one of conspiracy with persons unknown to commit buggery.

Mr McSweeney, a Roman Catholic priest from Norfolk, has been charged with three counts of indecent assault, one of taking indecent images of a child, three of making indecent images of a child and one of possessing indecent images of a child.

The charges relate to seven victims, all aged between nine and 15 years when the alleged offences took place during the 70s and 80s.

Anyone with information, who has any concerns or believes they may have been a victim is asked to contact the NSPCC on its helpline 0808 800 5000.

A 69-year-old man remains on police bail, to return in September.

On 24th August 2013 the following appeared on the Justice Denied blog:

http://google-law.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/leon-brittan-finally-questioned-by.html?spref=tw&m=1 

It alleges Leon Britton has been questioned, and has some other updates – well worth a look.

Cigpapers Opens Investigation

With no real progress in this investigation by the authorities this blog has filed it’s own Freedom of Information Request with this website https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/ :

From: Sean Moran

14 September 2013

Dear Richmond upon Thames Borough Council,

Please provide a list of all Richmond upon Thames Borough Council
Councillors for the last 40 years ( or as long as possible ) and
Heads and Deputies of Richmond upon Thames Borough Council
Departments.

Yours faithfully,
Sean Moran

The article below isn’t directly linked to the Elm Guest House paedophile scandal, but is in regard to the Operation Ore child pornography investigation and subsequent cover up and demonstrates the corruption in Britain:

The Sunday Herald : Child Porn Arrests Too Slow
Herald And Sunday Herald : Sunday January 19th 2003

Operation Ore : The Police enquiry which plans to arrest a further 7000 men across the UK , in addition to Who guitarist Peter Townshend, for buying Child pornography online is set to end in disaster with many suspects walking free.
Detective Chief Inspector Bob MacLachlan, former head of Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit, told the Sunday Herald that the lack of urgency in making arrests will lead to suspects destroying evidence of downloading child pornography before they are arrested.
The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high profile former Labour Cabinet Minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politicians name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a “rolling” cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the Government if arrests occur.
Since the September 2002 Operation Ore arrest of Detective Constable Brian Stevens, a key officer in the inquiry into the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, the public have been aware that wanted suspects had downloaded Child pornography from a US website called Landslide.
MacLachlan, who was one of the main officers on Operation Ore before his retirement last year, said “Sufficient warnings have been given that if people haven’t got rid of their computers then they are either stupid, don’t believe they’ll be arrested or are so obsessive about their collections that they can’t destroy it. As time goes on, the chances of successful  prosecutions will diminish with speed and the information out there must impact on the offenders.”
With only 1200 men arrested so far, MacLachlan says that claims by Police Chiefs and the Government that they were prioritising paedophile crime were “smoke and mirrors”. Paedophilia is still not a priority on the Home Office’s National Policing Plan for 2003-06. MacLachlan claimed that before he left Scotland Yard his team were under-staffed, over-worked, under-funded and reduced to using free software from computer magazines.
There are around one million images of an estimated 20,000 individual Children being abused online. Some Police seizures involve hauls of more than 180,000 images. Last year, images of 13,000 new Children were uncovered. Only 17 Child victims have been identified worldwide.
Police have also revealed that images of Fred West abusing one of his Children are among Child pornography available for downloading from the internet. It is unclear whether the Child was West’s murdered daughter Heather.
Peter Robbins, the Chief Executive of the Internet Watch Foundation, which works with the Police, Government and internet service providers, in tackling paedophilia online, says software is in development which could remove child pornography from the net forever. The software should be ready in two years.
Police say that the list of rich and famous Operation Ore suspects would fill newspaper front pages for an entire year.

Provided by: Financial Times Information Limited.
Index terms: Police Protection, Crimes : General News.
Location(s): United Kingdom Europe Western Europe
Record Number: A20030120-10A4-EIW,O,XML,EIW