5th Columnists In Britain

Written by Mike Whitby

pic004

First appeared on BNP website 26th January 2014

According to Wikipedia – 5th Columnists are; …‘A group of people who clandestinely undermine a larger group, such as a nation, from within’…. 

…‘A clandestine operation is an intelligence or military operation carried out in such a way that the operation goes unnoticed’…

In short, they are SPIES, and they are operating right under our noses, and to use one of their favourite terms, they are; ‘hidden in plain sight’.

HOLLYWOOD FILMS

If you’ve seen the films; ‘The 39 Steps’ and ‘Notorious’, you’ll know that the plots of both of those films revolve around 5th Columnist spies, living amongst the people and working on their plans to subvert the course of democracy in those countries.

In the films, this idea seems so preposterous, that nobody believes it. Also, the 5th Columnists had connections in such very high places, that the authorities wouldn’t even consider the possibility that they were spies, let alone investigate them.

Those were Hollywood films, but back to REAL LIFE; it sounds hard to believe, but such people are conspiring to destroy OUR country, right now! And, what they’re up to is nothing less than the GENOCIDE of our nation.

Here’s What Wikipedia Says About Genocide:

‘Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a co-ordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.’  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/multiculturalism-is-white-genocide/

Who Are The 5th Columnists?

There are, and have been, 5th Columnists operating in Britain for a very long time; the master controller’s are the Banksters, followed by the Iluminatti; Bilderbergers; Fabians; Freemason’s; Common Purpose agents. They are all very secretive and their members are not allowed to openly discuss their involvement in those organisations. In recent years, they’ve stepped-up their plans to take over our nation.

The Chain Of Command:

1) The Twelve Banking Families have dominated and controlled world governments for a very long time. For legal reasons, THEY are the ones that cannot be named. They are often said to be Jews, Christians and Muslims, but the only god they serve is Satan, and they belong to what the bible calls; “The synagogue of Satan”, Revelation 3:9

Their control became particularly strong a few hundred years ago, when they bribed monarchs and governments to allow them to steal vast quantities of money from the people of virtually every nation, through their central banking scam – which purports to ‘lend’ money to nations, but in reality it only takes money from them.

This utterly corrupt process has created worldwide poverty and tax-slavery. In return for money and power, Monarchs, Presidents and Prime Ministers, are dangled like puppets on strings, and willingly do the bankster’s bidding. 

Nowadays the banksters choose the Presidents and Prime Ministers that are most willing to carry out the bankster’s instructions to the letter. Regardless of the pretence of “democracy”, the bankster’s candidates are guaranteed to win – because they control all of the main parties and their leaders.

So, even if the government changes hands, very few real changes take place – each one of those puppets will pretend to do the right thing for the people, but there is absolutely no doubt who they really serve.

In their quest to achieve global dominance, THEY are responsible for virtually every war and revolution throughout the world over the past 400 years. They own/control all of the following organisations; Bank of England; National Reserve Bank; World Bank; IMF; ECB; UN (formerly the League of Nations); NATO; UNICEF; They also own/control most of the well known ‘charitable trusts’.

THEY decide which countries are allowed to manufacture and produce their own goods, and also which countries and organisations are to be demonised, or left to starve. They control the underworld and drug barons, and they decide upon the quantity of drugs to be produced in Afghanistan (and China, in the 19th century) and put on the streets, to poison our youngsters.

They own the ‘dark skinned’ countries of the British Commonwealth, and they have decided to flood Britain with foreigners – by controlling the world’s money supply, they control everything.

2) The Iluminatti is a highly secretive organisation, which is controlled by the banking families. They are the henchmen and Puppet-Masters of world governments and they are the leading bankster-puppets of the New World Order.

27092011583[1]

The Iluminatti was created in 1770 by Adam Weishaupt, as a revolutionary organisation. He and his group set out to infiltrate Freemasonry and (according to several authors) within ten years they had control of EVERY Masonic Chapter in the world, without the knowledge of most Freemasons. From that point on, the Freemason’s have carried out the bidding of the Iluminatti.

They believe that there should ONLY be 500 million people on this Earth. But, there are currently seven billion people. So, in the view of these master-controller’s, six and a half billion of us are surplus to requirements! (see the Georgia Guidestones – (http://www.thegeorgiaguidestones.com/Message.htm)

3) The Bilderberg Group is also a highly secretive organisation, and consist of very powerful globalist industrialists and politicians. They created the totally corrupt organisations known as the United Nations (UN) and the European Union (EU); they control the governments of the world, mainly through bribery and corruption, and they often place sexual perverts in positions of power; presumably, to demonstrate their Satanic beliefs. In fact, one of the UN’s most prominent people let the cat out of the bag, when he said; 

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation.” David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations (UN).  

The Bilderberg Group was used by Ian Fleming, in the James Bond books, as the model for the evil criminal fraternity, known as S.P.E.C.T.R.E. But, be assured that the Bilderbergers are certainly NOT a fictional group.

4) The Order of Freemasons consists of businessmen, politicians, policemen & civil servants and many members of the establishment. If a ‘new direction’ is required by the banksters, then it is co-ordinated through the Masonic movement.

Membership and activities are usually kept secret, for ‘historical reasons’, even between individual members. Consequently, it’s quite easy for the controllers to invoke new directions, simply by suggesting to their members that “we believe this ‘new direction’ is the way forward”, but without telling their members the real reasons.

Because many of them are true patriots and would not stand for it. Hence the fact that it is very difficult to establish exactly how and when members of the establishment were instructed to begin to usurp our country and hand over our sovereignty to the banksters and a foreign power – the EU. 

Freemasonry was originally based upon noble and chivalric traditions and most Masons joined that organisation to make social and commercial connections to improve their chances of success – due to the fact that they each help fellow members to get on in life, and many of them do good charitable work.

But, most of them appear to be oblivious to the fact that their organisation is the conduit for the controllers. From the 17th to the mid-20th century, virtually EVERY man that aspired to climb the greasy pole in business or public office, was a Freemason; all the way from the Church Warden and Vicar, to bankers, Bishops and Kings.

They are the pawns of the Iluminatti and Bilderberger’s, who regard them as, quote; “useful idiots”. Although many honourable men have been Freemasons, the list of usurpers includes Karl Marx and Friederick Engels, who were both Freemason’s and they were financed by the banking dynasties to create Communism and Trade Unions, to control and manipulate people and countries. 

5) The Fabian Society is a semi-secretive Communist organisation, which was established in 1883, the same year that their mentor, Karl Marx left this mortal coil.

They knew that the British people would never voluntarily accept Communism, so in order to gain political power, by stealth and trickery; this organisation has adopted a policy of deceit for 130 years – that is to pretend to be something that it is not.

A very good example of this is the coat of arms that the Fabians used for over a hundred years – a wolf in sheep’s clothing – need I say any more?

$(KGrHqMOKkEE1vjFW+JIBNcSuOh1D!~~_12

In the late 1950’s, a member of the Fabian Society, who was also a very prominent member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, none other than Harold Wilson, gave a speech at a meeting in Oxford, announcing that; 

“…The Communist Party of Great Britain is to disband, because the British people will never accept Communist extremism. Instead, we intend to infiltrate the other political parties in Britain – we will dominate the left wing of the Conservative Party and the right wing of the Labour Party, and we will control British politics forever…”

Within a few years, Wilson became the leader of the Labour Party and was elected to the office of Prime Minister, twice! Since then, Great Britain has had several ‘Communist’ Prime Ministers, all of whom have been wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing!

Membership of the Fabian Society is very secretive and consists of predominantly, but not exclusively, members of the Labour Party and the Trade Union movement, although many Conservatives have owned up to being members of this 5th Columnist control mechanism.

Fabians are the bankster’s link which chooses candidates to stand as MP’s and Prime Ministers, effectively controlling the Houses of Parliament – therefore, nobody is allowed to become a candidate to be a Labour MP, unless they have been sanctioned by the Fabian Society.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/the-fabian-society-a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing/

6) Common Purpose is a Marxist organisation and a registered “charity” which claims to be a training organisation for ‘leaders in the post-democratic era’. So they acknowledge that we no longer live in a democracy!! 

Common Purpose agents are the pawns of all the above, and these 5th Columnist’s are the glue that carries out the orders of the New World Order. Common Purpose agents, or graduates, as they choose to be called, are the eyes and ears in the workplace and on the streets, of those that wish to subjugate and enslave our people and country.

They are predominantly found in the establishment, civil service, politicians, local authorities, charities, police, Fire Brigade, banks, courts, law firms, insurance firms, NHS, architectural practices, job centres, enterprise centres, social entrepreneurs,  Saul Alinsky trainers, construction companies, church ministries, regeneration programmes, prison service, National Trust, GCHQ – the list goes on and on.

These are the people that promote what is popularly known as ‘political correctness’ and they are the ones that ensure that the Marxist subversion continues. Many Common Purpose agents are high ranking judges and establishment bosses, but typically, their members are shallow, selfish people who are easily manipulated, and believe they are special, simply because they were chosen.

The one thing that they all have in common is a self-interested greed, because, just like many Masons, they are only in it for what they can get out of it.

They were recruited because of their position within their particular organisation, or their potential to influence others, and are manipulated to follow the CP mantra – they are useful idiots, but they are still 5th Columnist traitors!

Common Purpose agents are instructed to stealthily spread the tenets of the Bolsjewik (original spelling) Marxist Revolutionaries, which had previously failed to spread their vile and destructive message across Western Europe – their plan was to enslave the world within Communism.

But, no matter what they did, the evil manipulators could NOT break the code of honour in the Western world, where the vast majority of people’s focus was on; the Family, God and Country; so the Bolsjewiks established a Communist think-tank to spread their propaganda. 

Their purpose was to find a solution to the biggest problem facing the implementers of World Communism and their question was; “How can Communism be spread throughout the world?” As their meetings were held in Frankfurt, Germany, they decided to call that think-tank ‘The Frankfurt School’ political correctness was born and Common Purpose agents are the day-to-day proponents of that sick agenda.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/common-purpose-exposed-illuminati-front-organisation/

The Frankfurt School, which began in 1923, recommended the following list of actions; 

Read carefully and see if any of these things sound familiar…

1) The creation of ‘Racialism’ offences – to break down Nationalist ideals, by demonising those who prefer to mix with their own kind.

2) Continual change – to create confusion and destroy the morale of the people.

3) The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children – to distort young minds, break up families and destroy moral values.

4) The undermining of schools and teachers’ authority – to encourage unrest within youngsters and to reduce the value of their education.

5) Mass immigration – to destroy national identity and commitment to land and country, leading to the destruction of national borders.

6) The promotion of excessive drinking – to induce a helpless, alcoholic and drugged nation, that can easily be controlled.

7) Emptying the churches – to remove all moral belief systems that challenge the state’s authority.

8) An unreliable legal system, with bias against the victim of crime – to instil anger and resentment, to create constant upheaval.

9) Dependency on the state (or state benefits) – to ensure that the people do exactly as they are told, for total state-control of the masses.

10) Control and dumbing down of the media – only propagandist news will be allowed; to ensure that people remain controlled and follow orders.

11) Encourage the breakdown of families – as the family and its roots are the links to race, identity and nation – Nationalism; which is the enemy of Communism.

Just remember that when you read or hear about teachers showing primary school children, how to put a condom onto a plastic penis, or tell 5-year-old schoolchildren stories like; ‘And Tango Makes Three’, you will understand that they are being taught the disgusting principles of the Frankfurt School! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364360/Sex-education-Do-want-5-year-old-child-given-explicit-lessons.html

WHY do young children need to know about things like this?! It is nothing but STATE PAEDOPHILIA on a massive scale. Politicians want to reduce the age of consent, so that they can’t be prosecuted for having RENT BOYS & GIRLS! (Labour paedophiles. Google: Labour25 – http://labour25.com/)

Harriet Harman, Deputy Leader of the Labour Party said; “Sexually explicit photographs of children should be legalised”.

Peter Tatchell, Labour Party activist and gay rights campaigner, said; “Not all sex involving children is unwanted”.

Germaine Greer, Marxist author, said; “I admit to being sexually attracted to pre-adult boys”.

Youngsters are also being taught that sexual perversion is normal, and that it’s okay to indulge in disgusting acts of depravity.

All of these are Frankfurt School teachings and they are going on right now in your child’s school!

Brainwashing IOur Youth By Colleges And Broadcasting

Communist teachers and lecturer’s at schools, colleges and universities propagandise students with Marxist, anti-British, mantra’s and teach these pliable youngsters to demonise Nationalism. They use World War 2 propaganda to convince people that Nationalism is wrong (Google: David Cole in Auschwitz, for the facts http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWCOjOj4RAU).

But they don’t tell you about the seven million Christians that were killed by Stalin’s Communists, in ONE YEAR! (Google: The Soviet Story http://www.sovietstory.com/) or the 100 million+ people who have been murdered by Communists so far!

Students are also told that it’s better to have mixed race couples, than to stick to their own kind. But, there’s an old saying that; “Birds of a feather flock together”. That’s because throughout human nature, most people, regardless of their race, colour or creed, would prefer to be with their own kind. The same thing applies to the animal kingdoms.

Hollywood; Music Videos; TV and Newspapers are filled with pornography, to brainwash our youngsters into the Hedonistic (me, me, me) mindset of the Bolsjewik Frankfurt School. This trash and a great deal more is served up to us by the BBC, and the result is that many people are now refusing to pay the BBC TV Licence, due to the BBC’s outrageous lies and Marxist propaganda.

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2014/01/05/tv-license-resistance-not-paying-discounts-refunds/

The essence of ‘nationalism’ is the extended family

In 21st century Britain, we have several political parties, but they all sing the same Zionist tune; Conservative, Liberal, Labour, UKIP, Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru. They all stick together against the British people, and not one of them is willing to expose the bankster puppet masters, but they all claim to speak for the people! 

Many of those politicians are former members of the murderous Communist movement, including; Blair, Brown, Darling, Straw, Harman, Reid, Cameron, Clegg, Clarke, Pickles, and many more. And, Cameron is a signatory to the Communist organisation, Unite Against ‘Freedom’ (UAF).

Also, the Marxist Trades Union Congress (TUC) ensures that all of the unions are controlled by Communists. Thereby, controlling the masses of the British people – ironically, all union members PAY HUGE MEMBERSHIP FEES – for the ‘privilege’ of being controlled and indoctrinated by communists! 

Recently, RT News ran a news bulletin on British Trade Unions; in particular UNISON, marching through London carrying massive banners praising Stalinist Communism – Stalin was one of the most evil monsters that has ever lived!

https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/nationalist-trades-union-congress/

Yet, the people who take YOUR union subscriptions are openly supporting him and his murderous thugs on the streets of your capital city. Also, seven thousand Muslims were recently allowed to march through Bolton, and counter demonstrations by British patriots were banned by the police. http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/whites-threatened-muslims-march

The British media, police and politicians turn a blind eye to this – because they know that the bankster-controllers want to make it known that Britain is now a Communist country, which also embraces the so-called “religion of peace” – Islam. But, woe-betide anyone extolling the genuine virtues of Nationalism and the love of your own nation and people, as you will be hounded and bullied by the thugs-in-uniform.

The truth is that Nationalism is the most natural thing in the world. It is purely based on the instinctual desire to protect your own family and extended families, and those of your neighbours and friends. What could be more natural than that? The people of every nation have the inalienable right to determine their own future, in their own country.

The British people don’t need to literally ‘fight’, to free our country; we only have to get enough people to stand with us, and say; ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, we want our country back?!

Next time your politically correct friend says; “I’m also against immigration, but I’m going to vote for UKIP”, ask them if they realise who finances UKIP and why Nigel Mirage, the Merchant Banker, has been allowed to appear on the BBC’s ‘Question Time’ more often than ANY other politician, over the past 40 years – could he be a friend of theirs? 

Also, do those people understand UKIP’s policy of ‘Balanced Migration’?

What this means is:- UKIP is very happy to see a million immigrants COME INTO OUR COUNTRY, as long as a million British people LEAVE ! Is that what British people REALLY want? I don’t think so. Also, UKIP believes that it is acceptable to force schoolchildren to visit mosques! Here is a clip from a recent report;

‘…Parents fears on Islam “garbage” says UKIP… 

‘…a UKIP politician has announced plans to visit a city mosque at the centre of a row surrounding parents’ decision to stop their children attending on a school trip to a Muslim mosque. Mr Stanley said: “I am in no way condemning these parents but I do not agree with this decision (by the parents) and so I want to go and reassure the Muslim community…

“UKIP is not a racist party and has a clear vision that someone’s religion is their own matter. We want to be clear as a party that we do not back any of the garbage uttered on the subject…

“For anyone to say schoolchildren visiting a mosque is anything to do with political correctness is just nonsense.” http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/parents-fears-islam-garbage-says-ukip

So, to assess what the UKIP man, Mr Stanley is saying is that; He wants to reassure the Muslim community, because he thinks that the Muslims may be offended by the actions of the parents. As he believes that the parents’ action, to protect their children, is somehow ‘wrong’ and he evidently thinks it is racist to stop schools from forcing this evil ideology onto their children.

The UKIP man also believes that the parents’ objections are garbage! There is a word for the UKIP man, but you are far too polite for me to use it.

Would YOU allow someone to force your children to visit a mosque? If you would, you have been well and truly brainwashed, and you probably need to visit a psychiatrist.

We are constantly told that we live in a democracy, yet we were never given the choice about the genocide and enslavement of Britain, by 5th Columnist traitors. There’s only ONE party that can save our people and country and that’s the British National Party.

Those that oppose us are either, anti-British racists, brainwashed, misguided fools, ‘useful idiots’, or they are Communist agitators, who are well aware of the mass deception of the British people.

So, we ALL need to let the public see that we are NOT nutters, or extremists. We are ordinary people, just like them, except that WE have the courage to speak the truth, when, as George Orwell said; 

“In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act”.

Courage seems to be lacking in Britain today, because many people can see what is going on and they agree with us, but they are too frightened to say so. But, when they realise that we are merely struggling for the survival of our people, they will join us in droves. One thing is certain, the only political party that will save Britain, is the British National Party.

Book Review: HOW DID THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

HOW DID THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

SMOKESCREENS AND MIRRORS
LIES, CONFUSION, TRICKERY AND PRETENSIONS.

A Study of Language

A short summary/review of Dr Thomas E. Turner’s book

By Boadicea

Millions pour in from the third world as if a Camp of the Saints(1) were occurring in slow motion. This brings many problems and much strife and grief, e.g.: thousands of British girls are raped; working Brits lose a fortune in lower wages (2) and by paying extra taxes to support the immigrants (and to fund the related industries, etc.(3)); large areas of the land are ‘ethnically-cleansed’ by immigrants; there is destruction of British culture and of the social fabric; and, most significantly, there is the facilitation and threat of genocide of the British people. The people are anxious, angry, unhappy, hurt – the people are being harmed and yet they dare not speak out. How did those who engineered this get away with it?

Picture 9

One significant factor in pulling this off was the use of various words as tools to suppress dissent. These terms suppress dissent by direct means, and also by indirect means – they are used as tools of power to exert social and political power over the people.

In Dr Turner’s book these terms are analysed and it is shown that these words are not even ‘proper’ words – that’s how they work their power.

‘Wayycist!!!’

Picture 9

These terms are a specific type of term: ‘nebulous-power-words’. These terms can act as tools of power because of the very nature of the words. The characteristics of these terms enable them to obscure truth, inhibit rationality – confusing people and distorting perception – and hence the emotions and social forces associated with such terms can act to manipulate people. The power of these terms is contingent upon their features, e.g. their lack of rationality (4) and the fact that most people do not recognise this lack – but instead misperceive the terms as properly rational terms. It is because of these features that the social and emotional power associated with the terms can operate to control people.

You might have heard the non-white Cohesion Officer on television dismissing a poor white person who might have had the audacity to say that he thinks that the policy of favouring non-whites in employment might be unfair and not an act of ‘equality’ – ‘At our Unit’ the Officer snarls, then raising the voice to a terribly superior pitch, ‘we celebrate the diversity and do you not realise that ‘equality’ is the root of ‘multiculturalism’? And quite honestly I think your statement is dangerously close to sounding like ‘racism’!’ The white person will now deny being a ‘racist’ and say how many black friends he has, how much he supports ‘equality’, he thinks it should not matter what a person’s skin colour is, blablabla….on the defence. But defence to what? The statement from the state-paid official is mumbo jumbo.

image001(1)

‘Multiculturalism’ is rooted in ‘equality’ and opposed to ‘racism’

The three terms ‘racism’, ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘equality’ are nebulous-power-words and should not be used in rational discourse. These terms do not possess high referentiality and also hold strong emotional associations and social force. People celebrate ‘multiculturalism’, even constructing monuments to it (5), and opposing ‘equality’ is heresy. Being a ‘racist’ often is considered the most terrible thing.

These terms have been used to discuss, justify and explain changes in the lives of millions of people. But what so these words actually mean?

Let us examine the definitions of these 3 terms. Definitions are available in dictionaries, glossaries, in the literature, from interviews, etc.

I support ‘equality’ as a moral good!

First, examining ‘equality’ (6) one finds many definitions available. In the sense of being the same (in quantity and/or quality, i.e. equivalence), this term possesses high referentiality – it would be perfectly rational to use this term in such senses (7). However, in the social and political sense one finds that this term is problematic. There are many ways in which this term is used in the social and political context(8), including(9): equality of outcome, (e.g. wealth, income, representation, distribution of goods, etc.); equality of process, (e.g. equality of opportunity, etc.); ontological equality; the idea of being the same; equality of recognition; equality of condition; equality of fraternity; equality before the law; equality of rights; etc.

The very fact of multiple meanings is a factor denoting low referentiality – since one could never be sure which definition was being used. However, there are other problems with this set of definitions. For example, some of these uses of the term ‘equality’ are inconsistent with one another. A well-known form of ‘equality’ is that of equality of opportunity. One could use this in reference to places at university, or jobs, etc. However, if the relevant groups differ on the relevant criterion (or criteria), then equal processing will produce unequal outcomes. Hence, in these circumstances, one could not have ‘equality’: one could have equality of outcome at the expense of inequality of process, or vice versa(10). So, if the cry is for ‘equality’ – then to which form of ‘equality’ is one referring? ‘Equality’ is not a sufficient term in itself. One would need to specify the exact form of ‘equality’, and then, if there were such transparency, certain issues might become apparent. For example, if one merely wants equal numbers in relation to outcome, then one might wonder why this is? Is this some sort of numerical OCD? Is it moral to deprive the best qualified candidates merely because of their group membership? And if so, is this ‘equality’? Will this rule apply (dare I say ‘equally’) in all contexts? And how does one determine membership in the group categories – is this not inherently unequal? What harms are associated with this (hence raising moral issues)? Why would this necessarily be a moral good? Or an aim?

A single clear high referentiality definition of the term would illuminate many issues concerning the public good, logic, truth, morality, etc. – issues that are obscured by use of the confused and unclear term ‘equality’. Nebulous-power-words tend to confuse and obscure, yet how very dare anyone object to the holy and righteous term of ‘equality’.

We need action against ‘racism’!

‘Racism’ is a very powerful nebulous-power-word. People go to great lengths to avoid being called ‘racist’ (11) – sometimes even making ‘friends’ with people from other races. Many people do not do what is correct because they want to avoid being labelled as ‘racist’ – this allegation also made against the police(12). International conferences are held to combat ‘racism’(13) and governments speak against it. We need to stop ‘racism’ in football too(14). Some believe ‘racism’ is a criminal offence(15) – many are reported in the media as being arrested for ‘racism’(16). ‘Racism’(17) warrants censorship and many other punishments(18). This term controls speech, perceptions, conception and behaviour.

However, what does this word actually mean?

Many people cannot define the term at all, and some definitions available present low referentiality, e.g. that a racist incident is one so perceived(19) . If one examines the definitions that are available, one finds many definitions – again denoting low referentiality. Popular definitions include (in relation to a race or races): hatred; superiority; stereotyping; prejudice; discrimination; mistreatment; ‘inequality’; genocide(20); preference; intolerance; power; and yet others, including the idea that ‘racism’ is the state of being uninformed/uneducated/unintelligent, evil/wicked, etc.

Again, if a single definition were chosen, then the power of this term would diminish. This term, as a nebulous-power-word, has the immense power it does because it lacks high referentiality. For example if one were to pick the popular definition of ‘hatred’. If this had always been(21) the one and only definition of the term, then what would be so terrible about this? People hate all sorts of groups, why is this case so demonised and not others? Surely people are entitled to their own emotions? And if this were the only definition, then the numerous times this term is attributed in an unwarranted manner (used to silence and control) would become apparent. For example, if someone were to state that ‘group X has on average a lower ability in Y’, then why should this necessarily be attributed to hatred? Could it not just be true or false? This replacement exercise(22) can be performed with all the commonly-found definitions of the term and the intellectual dishonesty becomes clear, as do other matters – such as questions of morality. If one wants action against ‘racism’ what exactly is one wanting to prevent, and why?

All the definitions of ‘racism’ present problems – such as the inconsistent manner in which ‘stereotyping’ is used. It is not ‘racist’ to stereotype groups unless it is unfavourable to non-white groups(23). ‘Anti-racists’ can sneer at whites, including Brits, no problem – ‘Brits are too lazy to work and need immigrants’, etc.(24) Even putting to one side the unequal application, if ‘racism’ were merely defend as stereotyping/generalising about a race(s), then ‘racism’ would merely be such generalising. What is so very terrible about that? Do we really need to hold an International Conference because someone might have made a generalisation in their mind? Or even said it out loud? What if the thought is actually true(25)? And surely if ‘racism’ is defined as mistreatment of a racial group – then is not mass immigration a racist act against us? Which would mean that ‘multiculturalism’ were ‘racism’ and also ‘anti-racism’ (internally inconsistent)? So if ‘racism’ is defined only to disempower one racial group – then is this ‘racist’?

Dr Turner deconstructs this term to the extent that after reading his analysis you will never view the term ‘racist’ the same again.

It’s a celebration of ‘multiculturalism’

Investigating the definitions available of the term ‘multiculturalism’ one finds that there are 7 commonly found parts of the definitions that are available(26), plus the descriptive definition:

1.    All groups practising their own culture
2.    All the same
3.    Celebration of diversity
4.    Everyone living happily together
5.    Equality
6.    ‘Anti-racism’
7.    Cultural relativism

These elements present problems from a rational perspective – whether examined alone and/or in combination, as will be shown briefly here.

I want to preserve all the world’s cultures and the diversity!!

Element one presents an idea that is not achievable in practice: all groups cannot practise their own cultures(27) in one place at one time. This simply is not possible. The one set of rules dilemma illuminates the logical fact that since a culture is described by a set of descriptive ‘rules’(28), only one such set can define the culture in question. Thus, if two (or more) cultures differ on any of these rules(29), then both sets cannot describe the resultant area at any one time. For example, if a culture has the custom of all houses being painted pink, then if a blue-house-painting culture moves in to the city, then the city-scape cannot remain all blue and all pink. Not possible. One or both cultures will be changed(30). The idea of ‘everyone doing their own thing’ is not preserving the original cultures, and neither does it represent ‘everyone doing their own thing’ in this context. This dilemma is played out across immigrised areas in Britain today(31). Is the Muslim call to prayer to be played across public space(32)? Are gays to be allowed to be gay? What are women to wear? May they drive on the roads? Is alcohol allowed? Is Piglet allowed(33)?

If one really did believe in preservation of culture and all cultures being allowed to practise their own cultures, then the political policy of mass immigration would not be a good idea.

All the different groups are the same!!

As to element two, we are not all the same, and if we were on wonders how on earth one would be able to categorise people into the relevant groups anyway. This is simply an untrue statement as are all the related lies such as ‘we are no different to other people’, ‘there is no such thing as race’, ‘we are all the same inside’, etc. If this element is used to define the term ‘multiculturalism’, then ‘multiculturalism’ is defined with an untruth.

It’s just a non-stop celebration here!!

Picture 9

Element Three (celebration of diversity) does not describe general reality. Diversity (as brought by immigration – which is the only type of diversity relevant here) in fact tends to make people less happy and, despite frequent claims to the contrary, tends to harm the people/society experiencing it (other things being equal). Studies show diversity causes people to be less trusting, less willing to sacrifice for others, less secure, less mentally healthy, more anxious, and is also associated with lower levels of social capital(34).

Such diversity tends to bring discomfort, strife, conflict and increases the chances of civil disorder, (e.g. race riots in 2001 across Britain, Birmingham’s inter-racial riots in 2005(35), etc.) and even civil war(36). Caldwell notes that every country that has experienced mass immigration has some form of ‘simmering’ ethnic conflict (Caldwell, 2009(37)). John Derbyshire predicts our grandchildren asking why we couldn’t see that such diversity obviously causes trouble – and they will be asking ‘what could be more obvious?’(38). Some hold that inter-group conflict is merely the way of nature – and that hostility and separation between groups may be instinctive and natural.
It would be inconsistent to celebrate all diversity (this could involve celebrating uniformity if practised by a group), and amoral by definition. This would also entail celebrating any practice – including child sacrifice, slavery, rape, etc. (e.g. see Press, 2007, page 17(39)). These practices, and others, are still found around the world – even human sacrifice.
Such diversity in one space also tends to uniformity, and this is hence inconsistent (in the context of immigration). This contradiction has prompted some  to say that ‘multiculturalism’ is ‘the anti-thesis’ of what is presented as meaning, thereby making it a form of Orwellian ‘doublethink’(40). If one were a big fan of diversity, then mass immigration should not be a policy one should support.

Picture 9

Hence, such ‘celebration’ is inconsistent, immoral, is rarely found in real life (other than amongst journalists, politicians, etc.), and irrational in light of the problems it brings – plus the diversity brought by immigration ironically tends to become uniformity.

Everyone’s so happy together!!

Element Four (everyone living happily together) also does not describe reality accurately. As documented by Taylor (2011(41)) with numerous real-life examples, people generally prefer to separate and will do so when feasible (and in the absence of other incentives, etc.). Segregation in Britain is increasing, and is significant – as noted by many. For example, the head of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Trevor Phillips, has stated that Britain is ‘sleepwalking’ into segregation(42) and Ted Cantle referred to communities living ‘parallel lives’ in his Report following the 2001 riots(43), etc.
When people are mixed together, this tends to decrease happiness and many other measures of well-being (as noted above). Different groups living together increases the chances of civil disorder or even war (as noted earlier).
Most people do not believe that ‘everyone lives happily together’; quite the contrary. During the author’s research it was found that most people not only desire to be ‘amongst their own kind’, but also believe that this makes people happier. Taylor cites a study conducted by the Institute of Governmental Studies at Berkeley, which found that the majority of the four major racial groups in California surveyed (blacks, whites, Hispanics and Asians) agreed with the statement that ‘people are happier when segregated’ (Taylor, 2011, page 41, ibid).
The desire to live amongst one’s ‘own kind’ is reported around the world – sometimes to and/or by governments (which hence would make it difficult for those governments to claim not to know this). For example, the British Government Home Office Report commissioned after the 2001 riots noted that the main cause for the segregation found in Oldham was the preferences of groups ‘to live with their own kind’ (Oldham Independent Review, 2001, page 9, ibid). German Chancellor Angela Merkel is quoted as stating that:
‘Of course the tendency had been to say, ‘let’s adopt the multicultural concept and live happily side by side, and be happy to be living with each other’. But this concept has failed, and failed utterly,’
(E.g. as quoted in the Guardian, 17th October 2010)
The fact that groups do not live together happily is sometimes noted even by some proponents of ‘multiculturalism’. In fact, the ‘multiculturalism’ industry is based largely on the assumption that diversity is problematic. Many other phenomena implicitly acknowledge that in fact groups do not simply live happily together. For example, the very existence of numerous lavishly-funded government bodies to ‘create cohesion’(44) and suchlike admit, if only by implication, that there is at least a strong possibility of problems between groups. One could also cite the systematic media censorship and distortion conducted for the purpose of ‘maintaining’ ‘cohesion’.
As a description this element is therefore false and irrational, and as an aim it is irrational to attempt since it seems unlikely to occur and is harmful (because of the problems it causes – increasing unhappiness, increasing the chances of civil disorder, etc.).
Some believe that the problems that arise from ethnic diversity are best resolved by the achievement of homogeneity through inter-marriage (hence refuting Element Four). There are a number of influential people in politics, academia and the media who explicitly call for miscegenation as a solution, (e.g. Podhoretz(45)). But if the problems of mixing ethnic/racial groups within one country are so severe and intractable that the best solution involves the ending of the relevant groups  (or at least the indigenous group(46)), this calls into question both the attainability and the descriptive accuracy of this idea of  ‘everyone living happily together’.
Hence, this element is neither a rational description nor an easily achievable policy. The moral justification for attempting to achieve this situation is not clear – especially if this involves destruction of groups (culture and/or people).

Equality! Even if it’s unequal it’s good!

As noted above, the term ‘equality’ (in the social and political sense) is a nebulous-power-word and hence should not be used in rational discourse. However, in the context of mass immigration (descriptive ‘multiculturalism’) this nebulous-power-word presents further specific problems – including the fact that equality of fraternity is not generally found (which can present various problems as well as inconsistencies). Also, in relation to indigenous rights(47), the indigenous group inherently have many of these rights infringed by the very fact of immigration, presenting an intrinsic inequality when descriptive ‘multiculturalism'(48) exists. Equality of representation is not achievable if numbers differ and/or distributions in relation to the relevant criterion (a) – unless some inequalities are enforced to make it equal. This renders descriptive ‘multiculturalism’ incompatible with ‘equality’ in these senses – and in many others.

‘Racism’ is very very bad
‘Anti-racism’ is good
‘Racist’ ‘anti-racism’ – still good!!

‘Racism’ is a nebulous-power-word – and as such should not be used in rational discourse. This is true in general, but there are specific additional issues if this nebulous-power-word is used in the context of descriptive ‘multiculturalism’. For example, if ‘racism’ is hatred (of a racial group or groups), could not mass immigration be viewed as an act of hatred(49) against indigenous people(50)? Some supporters of mass immigration claim that animosity, or even loathing(51), towards Britain is a motivation, e.g. Hitchens states that: ‘we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain’(52). As many have stated, integration/assimilation and having children outside one’s race could be viewed as killing one’s own race and as hateful(53). Which would mean that ‘multiculturalism’ in its descriptive sense is defined both as anti-racism, and also is ‘racist’. The associations of the term ‘racism’ with genocide(54) might become illuminated were the term merely defined as ‘hatred’ (or any other definition). The power to control people and inhibit objections to mass immigration would diminish were this term clearly defined(55).

It’s all relative – don’t bother thinking about it…

Under what is thought to be the original usage of the term ‘cultural relativism’ it was suggested that cultures should (or could) only be judged on their own terms. If this is true, then is problematic for descriptive ‘multiculturalism’, e.g. how is public space to be governed, (e.g. how are laws to be formulated?)?
The more recent interpretations of this phrase include that of ‘you shouldn’t/can’t judge’ – but this is a judgement and hence internally inconsistent, as well as being immoral. The spreading of such ideas has harmed society as some people are inhibited from making moral judgements(56).
Other popular interpretations include that of ‘all cultures are equal’. As ‘equality’ is a nebulous-power-word it is not clear what this actually means. The ways one might interpret this do not necessarily make sense alone or as a definition of the term ‘multiculturalism’ either – this would be a true or a false statement and so what does this have to do with mass immigration? And does anyone actually believe this in the sense of being ‘equally good’?

It’s just a description…

Of course, the term ‘multiculturalism’ is sometimes used in its descriptive sense – to refer to an area that has experienced as influx of incomers and is hence racially and/or ethnically mixed. In Britain this thus denotes the results of the political policy of immigration. This definition has high referentiality and possesses no rational problems per se – although being inconsistent with some of the other definitions (see above – all of which it underpins). However, there are some problems with this definition – including those of: this definition not always making sense if a replacement exercise is performed; and the issue of why this would be represented in a positive manner (and, not unrelatedly, why would a government implement this as a policy?).

In relation to the replacing of the term with its definition: how can ‘multiculturalism’ merely mean the diversity of immigration in sentences such as: ‘’multiculturalism’ is the solution to diversity’, ‘’multiculturalism’ is the justification of a ‘multicultural’ society’, etc.? How can it ‘be taught’ (as is recommended)? How can it ‘be’ a value/moral?

In relation to the idea of the positive emotions associated with the term (including its celebration) why would the results of this political policy be considered as positive(57)? Most Brits view immigration in a negative light, as shown in surveys and also by comments made in daily life (when people feel safe to speak that is). In Britain immigration has been harmful – especially to the poor who have been made poorer(58). Immigration (and its associated management) has cost the country a lot of money(59). Immigrants have committed a disproportionate amount of crime(60). The victims of these immigrants include thousands of raped women and children(61). The social fabric is destroyed by immigration, causing much misery – this in both dramatic ways and also the less dramatic daily miseries(62). Many freedoms have been inhibited or lost as a consequence of immigration(63). There have been many other means by which the country has been harmed as a result of immigration(64), (e.g. in education, housing issues, strains on resources such as water, importation of disease, etc.). Hence, immigration into Britain in recent years has caused great harm. In fact, many immigrants and supporters of mass immigration view immigration as an act of revenge against the Brits(65) – not very positive.

Not looking at the specifics harms that immigration has brought to Britain in recent years, one could examine the process of immigration from a theoretical perspective. When there is immigration there is what is known as the dilemma of cultural contact. This dilemma points out that immigration can bring only one of 2 outcomes(66): there is either diversity; or there is homogeneity. This is true irrespective of any specific consequences of immigration, (e.g. financial losses to the country, etc.(67)). Diversity is associated with much harm qv, and homogeneity can only be achieved by cultural destruction, and full homogeneity by racial destruction(68). Even if one supports ‘only’ cultural homogeneity: were this achieved, then racial homogeneity would follow in time. Thus, the dilemma of culture contact illuminates the logical truth that the only 2 options are both associated with harm: harm of diversity or the harm associated with achieving homogeneity. This truth holds no matter which terms are used to describe the relevant processes/outcomes, (e.g. ‘assimilation’, ‘integration’, ‘creolisation’, ‘métissage’, etc.). Of course, there are those who do not view the loss of racial existence as a problem(69), e.g. Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate Walkington is quoted as allegedly stating that: Britain is ‘a country with the most mixed race relationships in the world. In 200 years’ time, we’ll all be coffee coloured and I’ve got no problem with that.’(70)

untitled31

According to the United Nations(71), genocide is an international crime and punishable as such(72). One action that can qualify as genocide is: deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group (see Article 2). Under this definition not only does the political policy of mass immigration possibly qualify as a genocidal act (intent dependent), but many of the academics, media, politicians and other experts appear to possibly be guilty of ‘complicity in genocide’ (an international crime under Article 3).

Hence, it is difficult to see why this term (policy) would be represented with a positive term. In recent years in Britain much harm has been caused, and even from a theoretical perspective the dilemma of cultural contact illuminates the logical truth that such immigration can only result in either homogenisation or diversity(73) – both outcomes/processes associated with harm/loss.

In recent years there have been some critics of ‘multiculturalism’ – but these voices queried ‘multiculturalism’ and not immigration or diversity. By this means, nebulous-power-words can be used to further obscure issues. If these critics are objecting to diversity brought by immigration, then what are they suggesting? Assimilation? Homogenisation? Is this not genocidal? And what happened to the celebration of diversity?

Nebulous-power-words can be used to confuse, distract, stall or otherwise obscure clear perception and conception. Also, when they are no longer useful, they will be either discarded (and possibly replaced(74)) or their meaning switched. What was good might be said to be bad – or vice versa. Nebulous-power-words might no longer be useful for a number of reasons, including: their purpose has been achieved, they have been exposed, etc. It is predicted that in the future even the very powerful nebulous-power-word ‘racism’ will either switch(75) or fall into disuse.

Hence, ‘multiculturalism’ is not adequate from a rational perspective. This term possesses low referentiality – the elements are all problematic from a rational perspective (ether per se and/or in the context of descriptive ‘multiculturalism’) and the one high referentiality meaning(76) found does not always make sense in the contexts in which the term is used – in these contexts the term must mean something else – but what? All the other meanings are shown to be problematic.

27092011583[1]

Social Representation Perspective on Meaning

So, if ‘multiculturalism’ is a nebulous-power-word, then what does it actually mean to those who know/use/hear/read, etc. it? Dr Turner concludes his book by taking another perspective on meaning. Whereas from a rational perspective this term is inadequate, a social representation perspective on meaning can explain, inter alia, what this term actually means to those who know it – and how social and emotional forces are contained within the very meaning (from a social representation perspective) of this term(77).
Dr Turner identifies various narrative voices (‘identities’) that contribute to constructing the social representation meaning that is found. One voice is that of the abstract – representing the abstract nature of the term and imbuing it with authority. All these experts, judges, highly-decorated academics, etc. use the term – surely it is not bogus? If the politicians have it as a policy it must at least be a real word? The Emperor isn’t naked is he?(78) A second such voice is the ‘nice’ narrative – it is just not nice(79) to challenge this – that would be nasty and ‘racist’(80). Thirdly, there is the danger of being attacked by the voice of the angry if one challenges/dissents(81) – these attacks can be in the form of the sneering/demeaning, the name-calling, or financial and legalistic attacks. There are also many cases of physical attacks to people and to property, and threats of such.  Rage-filled people attempt to resolve their emotional problems by drawing upon the construct of ‘villain and victim’ – the immigrants being the ‘pet victims’ of their fantasy community, and the ‘racists’ the villains(82). Snobbery and viciousness are acted out upon dissenters. This frightens many people into submission/silence/compliance. Such utopian thinking is inherently destructive – the abstract and unachievable absurd visions ‘justifying’ destruction, violence, hate and control(83). Many immigrants themselves constitute a fourth voice – one that makes a claim of victimhood and offers motivations such as self-indulgence, pity, fear, shame and guilt.  Immigrants can draw upon the utopian rainbow loving images and social representations without necessarily believing the vision/tenets(84) – this can be used, in a manipulative manner, as a tool to further one’s own goals. A fifth significant voice is that of the crowd – following the majority view (as is perceived(85)) and being swayed by social forces, many of this group follow the path of least resistance. All these forces combine and interact to construct the social representation meaning that is found – the social forces hence contained within the very meaning of this term (from a social representation perspective).
Fully assimilated visual images render the social representation impermeable to reason and truth. Images can replace concepts(86). Such images are ubiquitous in Western culture(87), and can ‘make sense’ of the elements in a manner that rational discourse cannot – and hence the term (and its elements) is ‘understood’ in this manner (by all being fitted into an organised structure of thought). The elements match and describe the image, but the image remains decontextualised and abstract.

untitled31

Repeated linking between such images and the relevant phenomena, terms, mantras, etc. forms and reinforces the associations. This happy rainbow is contrasted constructively against ‘racism’ and this dichotomy constitutes the figurative nucleus of bipolar oppositional form of this hegemonic social representation (parallel to the ‘boy-girl’ construction of gender(88)).

THE JABBERWOCKY GYMBLES AND GYRES
TALISMAN AND TABOO

As can be seen from the foregoing, ‘multiculturalism’ meets all the criteria to be categorised as a nebulous-power-word – words which can exert control because of their very nature. The power of these words is contingent upon low referentiality and on the fact that people do not recognise their true nature – without these factors the emotional and social forces could not hold such power over people. The low referentiality inhibits rational processing, causing confusion and obfuscation. Their emotional and social power governs perceptions, thoughts and feelings – and hence behaviour too. Representation by visual imagery exacerbates these effects. Only because of the nature of these terms can their powerful content operate. Nebulous-power-words are inadequate from a rational perspective, and should not form a part of rational discourse. They are inadequate to be used as social or political policies.
These terms can act as smokescreens and mirrors. The mirrors can reverse the perception of reality, and the smoke obscures truth. In the smoke people are confused and emotional, and hence easily manipulated. Amidst the smoke there is fear and panic and many will be misled – some following the crowd for safety, others are tricked into falsehoods, some push others towards the fire to save themselves, etc.
When one reads that toves are gyring and gymbling one might sort of understand, but it does not really make sense. Some do not want to admit they cannot understand – and others will feel that they do.
As Orwell might have said, ‘People bellyfeel ‘multiculturalism’, it is double plus good and goodthink; ‘racism’ is a thoughtcrime and double plus non good, ‘racists’ are thought criminals and non-persons’. Using the terms ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘racism’ (or any other nebulous-power-words) is, in Orwell’s terminology, a form of ‘duckspeak’. Duckspeak was the form of speech that involved movements of the voice centres, with sound being produced, but this movement and noise occurred without the higher brain parts needing to be engaged (Orwell, 1984 ibid). Hence, people could be speaking to each other, but not in a rational sense; the noises made acted to control people, and this control was made possible because of the very nature of the noises.
The duckspeak noises acted as tools of power – and yet the people never realised that duckspeak was not rational, nor that the power controlling them derived partly from themselves(89), contained within the very meaning of the terms they knew and used. This is how nebulous-power-words function. People can be controlled from within by such surreptitious means – a more total and perfect form of control than many others.
Boot (2006(90)) discusses such powerful terms being used by ‘glossocrats’ and how such terms can be used ‘as instruments of power’ this ‘long after the seemingly more violent weapons have dulled’. Nebulous-power-words contribute to a sociopolitical environment that is seen by some as ‘soft totalitarianism’. Author Hal Colebatch(91) believes Britain to be becoming the first soft totalitarian state of the modern world – ‘soft’ because it lacks the gulags of previous such regimes, but ‘totalitarian’ nonetheless because of the immense state power over people – including control over people’s thoughts and the punishments for dissent (The Australian, 21st April 2009(92)).
The simple but politically embarrassing truth is that ‘multiculturalism’ simply fails to meets the intellectual, practical or moral standards required for such a world-changing concept. And yet for now, the mass ‘multicultural’ mania continues almost unabated, and challenging its cosy consensus remains a hazardous undertaking. The ethnic emperor is appallingly naked – but although some in the West have started to notice, still too few dare to mention it. It is the very nature of some of the terms used that has facilitated much of this harm. The use of clear rational language could be a significant step in freeing people. If the Lion takes genuine courage, the Tin Man sees where the real compassion is, and the Scarecrow is intellectually honest and rigorous, then perhaps the curtain can be pulled and the pretensions, inaccuracies and dishonesties will be exposed. While the smoke and mirrors confuse, obscure, deceive, intimidate and shame, the good people of Emerald City are being manipulated and controlled.

Dr Turner’s book is recommended reading.
It is available to borrow or to buy from Amazon:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/MULTICULTURALISM-WHAT-DOES-Smokescreens-Mirrors-ebook/dp/B00HCQN1B0

1.  Raspail, J. (1994 print) The Camp of the Saints. Social Contract Press

Click to access Camp_of_the_Saints.pdf


2.  Also see:
Express 5th November 2007
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/24232/Immigration-is-causing-depths-of-poverty-last-seen-in-Dickens-time
And relatedly:
Telegraph 17th November 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10455384/Roger-Daltrey-I-will-never-forgive-Labour-for-their-immigration-policies.html
3.  E.g. benefits advice, translation services, ‘cohesion’ teams, ‘community’ officers, etc.
E.g. see: Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/442977/Police-forces-forced-to-pay-2m-bill-a-month-for-translators-for-migrant-influx
4.  Lack high referentiality – meaning that they do not possess definitions that clearly signify the relevant phenomenon.
5.  E.g. Perilli’s monuments to ‘multiculturalism’.
See http://spacingtoronto.ca/2009/03/20/monument-to-multiculturalism/
6.  When the term ‘equality’ is in speech marks this refers to the social and political use of the term – because in this sense it is not properly rational to use. Without speech marks this term is used in its rational sense of equivalence, either quantitative or qualitative equivalence, (e.g. 2 plus 2 equals 4, etc.). Also, speech marks can be used to denote reference to the term itself
7.  E.g. ‘the two beakers contain an equal volume of liquid’, ‘the two children are of equal ability in X’, ‘2 plus 2 equals 4’, ‘I like the two cars equally’, etc.
8.  Also see: Turner, B. S. (1986) Equality. Tavistock Publications Limited: London, UK
9.  Some such categories are overlapping in some senses.
10.  Of course, one frequently finds that non-white groups are given unequal preference in such contexts, and this is inversionistly labelled as ‘equality of opportunity’.
11.  Google ‘Simon Mol’ (Poland), e.g. see: http://www.e-teatr.pl/en/artykuly/33711.html
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/02/another-man-knowingly-infects-40-girls-with-aids-in-poland/
12.  Such claims are made in many contexts, e.g. see:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-545289/Muslim-leader-accuses-police-cautious-stopping-Asian-gangs-pimping-white-girls.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8570506/Police-covered-up-violent-campaign-to-turn-London-area-Islamic.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/191013/Police-fear-being-called-racist-so-illlegal-immigrants-stroll-free
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8476605/WikiLeaks-fear-of-offending-Muslims-allowed-extremists-into-Britain-ahead-of-77-London-bombings.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1271457/General-Election-2010-Postal-vote-fraud-amid-fears-bogus-voters-swing-election.html
13.  For example, there was a UN ‘anti-racism’ conference held in April 2009 in Geneva, Switzerland (20th-24th April 2009): the ‘Durban II Anti-Racism UN Conference’. These international conferences use the term ‘racism’ in their titles and literature e.g., the term ‘racism’ wass used in the outcome document at Geneva – including the reaffirming of the call on states to formulate national action plans to prevent, combat and eradicate ‘racism’ (e.g. s.28) and the encouraging of parliaments to regularly address the issue of ‘racism’, and to enhance their policies to fight it, (e.g. s.112).
14.  http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2011-12/mar/goverment-pledges-funds-to-show-racism-the-red-card.html
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/deputy-prime-minister-announces-200000-to-show-racism-the-red-card
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21881626
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-13361478
15.  E.g. see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/advice/factfile_az/racism
16.  Although the legislation used in such arrests uses different vocabulary – for what frequently are termed as ‘racism’ charges, often the relevant sections are Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 or sections 28 and 31 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. For example, the Crime and Disorder Act 1988 does not use the term ‘racism’ (or ‘racist’).
Also see:
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/9477548.Arrest_made_after_racist_abuse_towards_Newcastle_United/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4877412.stm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17515992
17.  And/or an accusation of ‘racism’
18.  E.g. see:
http://www.thisissussex.co.uk/Ukip-chair-hits-suspension-following-racism/story-20223643-detail/story.html
19.  E.g. see: The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. Report Of An Inquiry. By Sir William Macpherson of Cluny. Advised by Tom Cook, The Right Reverend Dr John Sentamu, and Dr Richard Stone. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty. February 1999
http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm42/4262/4262.htm
Also see
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/285537.stm
And http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm42/4262/sli-47.htm
This was the result of an enquiry into the police investigation into the death of Stephen Lawrence. See:
Dennis, N., Erdos, G., Al-Shahi, A. (2000) Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics: the McPherson Report and the Police. Civitas. The Institute for the Study of Civil Society: London
20.  This term is associated with the idea of genocide, and yet in many ways this connection is inversionist qv.
21.  Of course, were one definition to be chosen now, then it might be a little late to instantly reduce the power. However, the power of this term will reduce in the future – nebulous-power-words are not terms with high referentiality and so their emotional associations can switch as can their definitions in other senses.
22.  The ‘replacement exercise’ is merely replacing the term with its definition.
23.  Including unfavourable by comparison, one cannot praise whites without risking the R-word, nor take pride, e.g. ‘white pride’ is considered as ‘racist’, but not ‘black pride’, etc.
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/kevin-myers-i-can-say-americans-are-lazy-and-boorish-morons-thats-fine-if-i-say-the-same-about-nigerians-im-jailed-26629424.html
24.  The Express 28th March 2013:
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/387469/Why-does-the-Left-hate-the-working-classes-so-much
25.  If the thought/statement were true, then this would be defining ‘multiculturalism’ as against truth. And even if it were mistaken and untrue – really, an International Conference? Arresting people? What if they get their maths wrong? Arrest them too?
26.  The ‘elements’ – these are used alone or in combination in most definitions in the literature and dictionaries.
27.  Cultures in an unlimited sense
28.  These do not necessarily all have to be legal – here ‘rules’ refers to descriptive rules that describe a culture in all its qualities – this including habits, traditions, customs and ‘legal’ rules forming a subset of this qualitative description
29.  Which they must to be distinguished as different cultures
30.  There are endless possibilities on any such variable. In this example it could be the case that both groups maintain their original colours – so the city is now part blue and part pink. This would mean that there are no longer all blue or all pink cities for the residents to preserve their cultural practices. Alternatively, either group (or split combinations of either or both) might change their painting habits to those of the other group, or to any other colour (s), (or maintain their original traditions).
31.  Also see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386558/Tower-Hamlets-Taliban-Death-threats-women-gays-attacked-streets.html
32.  This is sometimes an emotive issue in Britain. See
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575506/Loudspeaker-plan-re-ignites-call-to-prayer-row.html
Also http://www.iengage.org.uk/component/content/article/1-news/856-daily-express-criticises-nick-clegg-for-defending-the-call-to-prayer
Sometimes these issues are discussed in relation to threat to culture (or ‘way of life’). See:
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2007/12/so-much-for-our.html
Divergences in opinion on this have been recorded from other countries too –
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149955#.T946xLVfGHw
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/netanyahu-backs-law-to-ban-loudspeakers-at-mosques-across-israel-6276173.html
33.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3620128/Making-a-pigs-ear-of-defending-democracy.html
34.  For example, Putnam studies the reductions in social capital (Putnam, 2007, ‘Diversity and Community in the Twenty First Century’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30 (2), 137-174); the reduction in willingness to sacrifice for others is discussed by David Goodhart (e.g. see Prospect Magazine, 2004, and : http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/feb/24/race.eu); general levels of trust reduce with diversity (also see for further reading: Salter, F. K., Ed., 2002, Risky Transactions. Trust, Kinship, and Ethnicity. Oxford and New York, Berghahn); studies show detrimental consequences to mental health in some such circumstances, see below. Also see for related issues, e.g. Stafford, M., Becares, L. and Nazroo, J. ‘Objective and Perceived Ethnic Density and Health: Findings From a United Kingdom General Population Survey’, American Journal of Epidemiology (2009) 170 (4):484-493.doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp160
35.  see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-12777437
The concerns of future riots (or other such problems) are sometimes expressed by ‘experts’, e.g. see: Daily Mail 12th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2502072/Influx-Roma-migrants-spark-city-riots-warns-Blunkett.html
36.  Many predict civil war as a result of mass immigration – even if this does not occur, the fear/anxiety, etc. is a form of suffering for many people
Also, relatedly, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsjc5CVujrM

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/February/Europes-Multiculturalism-Leading-to-Civil-War-/
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/allen-west-america-on-verge-of-race-war/
37.  Caldwell, C. (2009) Reflections on the Revolution Europe. Can Europe be the Same with Different People in it? Allen Lane/Penguin, London: England
38.  John Derbyshire, Taki’s Magazine, 29th March 2012:
http://takimag.com/article/multiculturalism_when_will_the_sleeper_wake_john_derbyshire/print#axzz2jiRyi2m3
39.  Press, J. K. (2007) Culturalism. Social Books: New York
40.  E.g. see: ‘The Rivkin Project: How Globalism Uses Multiculturalism to Subvert Sovereign Nations’, Dr. K R Bolton Foreign Policy Journal, 12 March 2011
41.  Taylor, J. (2011) White Identity. Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century. New Century Foundation: USA
42.  E.g. see BBC News website 22nd September 2005
43.  The ‘Cantle Report’ – Community Cohesion: a Report of the Independent Review Team. Chaired by Ted Cantle and published January 2001. Home Office.
44.  ‘Cohesion’ is a problematic term. Frequently this term is used as a code-word for the absence of civil war and/or race riots.
45.  Podhoretz, N. (1963) My Negro Problem and Ours. New York: American Jewish Committee
46.  Immigrant groups might have populations remaining in their home countries
47.  Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People adopted by the United Nations General Assembly during its 61st session at UN Headquarters in New York City on 13 September 2007

Click to access DRIPS_en.pdf


48.  I.e. descriptive ‘multiculturalism’ as a result of immigration
49.  And also of ‘mistreatment’.
50.  And those objecting to mass immigration were not ‘haters’ but acting against hatred?
51.  Also see: Express 14th July 2011
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/258644/No-surprise-that-migrants-head-for-soft-touch-Britain
52.  Daily Mail 28th June 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301743/How-invasion-immigrants-corner-England-mockery-PMs-promise-close-door.html
53.  Also see Muhammad Ali being interviewed by Parkinson on the BBC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi6fvwxB2Bg
54.  E.g. see http://spacingtoronto.ca/2009/03/20/monument-to-multiculturalism/
55.  With high referentiality
56.  Also see Dalrymple, T. (2001) Life at the Bottom. Ivan R. Dee: Chicago
57.  Is immigration always good?
Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/442943/Mass-immigration-was-a-mistake-Come-off-it-Jack
and, relatedly, Daily Mail, 12th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2504398/A-spectacular-mistake-immigration-Straw-finally-admits-Labour-messed-letting-million-East-Europeans.html
Also see: http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/387469/Why-does-the-Left-hate-the-working-classes-so-much
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html
58.  Also see: Daily Mail 13th May 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386537/Mass-immigration-UK-s-poor-poorer.html
As well as by other means, many of the poorest of Britain have been made poorer by being unemployed – immigration often cited as a (or the main) cause, e.g. also see Daily Mail 18th November 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509087/Who-frontman-Roger-Daltrey-blames-Labour-immigration-policy-left-working-class-unemployed.html
Telegraph 17th November 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10455384/Roger-Daltrey-I-will-never-forgive-Labour-for-their-immigration-policies.html
59.  Express 5th November 2007:
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/24232/Immigration-is-causing-depths-of-poverty-last-seen-in-Dickens-time
Express 29th April 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/leo-mckinstry/395471/Immigration-The-British-public-is-close-to-despair
Express 14th November 2013
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/442977/Police-forces-forced-to-pay-2m-bill-a-month-for-translators-for-migrant-influx
Such costs are found to occur in many Western countries. Also see:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/norway-loses-713000-on-every-muslim-immigrant/
60.  Also see: Mirror 29th May 2013
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/carole-malone-oxford-grooming-ring-1896865
61.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2156296/British-gangs-raping-sexually-exploiting-vulnerable-white-young-girls-Asian-problem-Crown-prosecutor-admits.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-18050192
62.  Telegraph 29th January 2013
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9831912/I-feel-like-a-stranger-where-I-live.html
63.  For further reading on threats to freedom of speech in Britain see:
Johnston, P. (2013) Feel Free to Say It. Threats to Freedom of Speech in Britain Today. Civitas, London.
Also see Telegraph 25th November 2004:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/turkey/1477496/Turkish-workers-a-mistake-claims-Schmidt.html
64.  E.g. see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/election/article-1264963/Migrant-citys-help-Anguished-letter-Brown-Cameron-reveals-devastating-toll-immigration.html
65.  ‘Payback time’, etc. Also see: Browne, A. (2005) Do We Need Mass Immigration? (second edition) Civitas: London
66.  ‘Outcomes’ and/or processes. Both processes can be occurring at the same time, e.g. diversity as some groups (and/or subsets of groups) homogenise
67.  E.g. this is true whether the immigrants in question are more or less criminal than the indigenous people, more or less intelligent, whether the immigration in question brings financial losses or gains, etc. Whether there are any alterations on any such measures or not – this is still true. The dilemma of cultural contact is applicable to any case of immigration irrespective of the specifics of that immigration, and irrespective of the consequences of that immigration in other ways.
68.  The old ‘melting pot’ metaphor
69.  Also see: http://www.badeagle.com/2009/06/16/the-hated-white-race/
70.  Available at:  http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2010/04/candidate-calls-britain-the-most-mongrel-country-in-the-world-yet-the-left-havent-batted-an-eyelid.html ; or http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/election/article-1268826/General-Election-2010-Nutters-Nick-Clegg-Theyre-closer-think.html etc.
71.  The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.
72.  Also see: https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/10/27/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-people-of-europe/
https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/stop-white-british-genocide-campaign-join-now/
73.  Of course in many cases there will be a slow genocide occurring simultaneously with the problems of diversity
74.  It could be that a new replacement word will be used for ‘multiculturalism’, such as that of ‘inter culturalism’, e.g. see:
Cohesion, Integration and Openness: From ‘Multi’ to ‘Inter’ Culturalism. Institute of Community Cohesion (February 2012)
However, any such term should be clearly defined and also examined in light of the issues noted in Dr Turner’s book, e.g. how would such a policy aim to address the dilemma of cultural contact?
75.  E.g. become a badge of pride/rebellion; or settle on one single high referentiality meaning, (e.g. stereotyping or otherwise) and hence lose its power by this means; etc.
76.  A nebulous-power-word can still be a nebulous-power-word even if one or more of its definitions possess high referentiality – not all (or any) the meanings need to be problematic per se
77.  Moscovici, S. (2000) Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Translated by G. Duveen. Polity Press, Cambridge University
Marková, I. (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
78.  This voice hence provides, amongst other things, a motivation not to appear stupid – many do not want to admit that they do not quite understand. Also, people do not want to question or challenge, etc. that which they do not quite understand (and who could understand a nebulous-power-word?). The authority and faux intellectual validity intimidates and confuses many people. Some are shamed into compliance/acquiescence
79.  Of course, the definition of ‘nice’ is relevant. Does it mean pleasing people? Is so, then whom? Are some chosen groups pleased at the expense (financial and otherwise) of others? If so, then that is not ‘nice’. Neither is it ‘nice’ to destroy people’s culture, suppress truth, support lies, harm some groups in many ways, or facilitate genocide. Saccharin-covered poison-pills. If ‘nice’ is about truth, genuine compassion or honour, then this voice is not very nice.
80.  Also, relatedly, see Horowitz, D. (1997) Radical Son. A Generational Odyssey Simon and Schuster New York: USA; Horowitz, D. (2003) Left Illusions. An Intellectual Odyssey. Spence Publishing Company, Dallas: USA.
Anthony, A. (2008) The Fallout. How a Guilty Liberal Lost His Innocence. Vintage Books: London
And also, relatedly:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-440318/The-night-daughter-stabbed–liberal-instincts-died.html
81.  Also see ‘Passover Syndrome’, e.g.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh6YIaJyFnk
82.  Also see: Rossiter, L. H. (2006) The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. Free World Books, LLC, St. Charles, IL: USA
Glazov, J. (2009) United in Hate – The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror. Los Angeles, CA: WND Books
83.  For a great analysis of utopians see: Scruton, R. (2010) The Uses of Pessimism and the Dangers of False Hope. Atlantic Books: London, UK
84.  Also, relatedly, see:
http://news.sky.com/home/politics/article/16143154
Daily Mail, 6th January 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2082527/Diane-Abbott-Twitter-race-row-MP-faces-calls-resign-racist-tweet.html
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/154022/Diane-Abbott-reported-to-cops-for-racism-over-black-jobs-appeal
http://pandyablog.dailymail.co.uk/2011/12/the-equality-and-human-rights-commission-should-abolished-not-just-because-it-is-expensive-but-becau.html
Fourest, C. (2008) Brother Tariq. The Doublespeak of Tariq Ramadan. Encounter Books, USA
85.  In modern life the media largely influence such perceptions
86.  Also see: ‘magic-ritual language’ Herbert Marcuse, (1964) One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press
87.  E.g. see:
http://www.morleyobserver.co.uk/news/local/thorpe-primary-launches-bid-for-stephen-lawrence-award-1-6061990
http://www.coca-cola.co.uk/about-us/coca-cola-corporate-blog/ted-ryan-id-like-to-buy-the-world-a-coke.html
Martin Luther King’s much publicised I Have a Dream speech (1963) evoked images of this kind.
Much of this form of repetition and linking is focussed on children, such as Crayola’s suggestions for celebrating the diversity, e.g. see:
http://www.crayola.com/crafts/detail/freedom-hands-craft/
There are many such activities for children, such as making chains for Black History Month, e.g. see:
http://fun.familyeducation.com/martin-luther-king-jr/black-history-month/35249.html
88.  See Duveen, G. and Lloyd, B. (1990), Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
89.  Although, of course, the ultimate origins are from the social and political context – and the intersubjective. By ‘from within’ it is meant that the terms are internalised.
90.  Boot, A. (2006), How The West Was Lost. I. B. Tauris Publishers: London
91.  Author of the award-winning Blair’s Britain: British Culture Wars and New Labour (1999) Claridge Press, UK – a Spectator book of the year in 1999
92.  http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/thought-police-muscle-up-in-britain/story-e6frg6zo-1225700363959

911 Twin Towers Terrorist Attack: 20 Amazing Facts

Written by Cigpapers

Photos, Diagrams, Videos and Captions by Watt Tyler

The Twin Towers attack on 11th September 2001

The Twin Towers attack on 11th September 2001

On 11th September 2001 in New York City USA, two passenger jet airplanes (American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175)were flown in to two skyscrapers of the World Trade Centre known as the Twin Towers. The twin towers, World Trade Centre One and Two, collapsed and later that day another building known as World Trade Centre Seven also collapsed. Nearly 3,000 People died ( 67 British ) in the collapsed buildings that day, and an unknown number have also died from related injuries since that day. There was also an attack on the Pentagon that day (American Airlines Flight 77) and another hijacked jet (United Airlines Flight 93) that crashed in Shanksville Pennsylvania, presumed to be heading for Washington. This article will be looking at the attack on the Twin Towers in New York.

Twin Towers terrorist attack 11th September 2001 in New York.

Twin Towers terrorist attack 11th September 2001 in New York.

The official version of events, given by the USA Government, was that 19 muslim hijackers from terrorist group Al-Qaeda had hijacked the two planes involved in the New York attacks, and two other planes involved in other terrorist attacks in America that day. Their alleged motive was resentment of American freedoms. They had flown two planes in to the Twin Towers leading to their collapse, while World Trade Centre Seven had allegedly collapsed due to a fire which had been caused by the Twin Towers attack.

Twin Towers attacks on 11th September 2001

Twin Towers attacks on 11th September 2001

The official version of the collapsed buildings was that a “pancake effect” had led to the total collapse of the three World Trade Centre buildings due to the impact of the planes and subsequent fires. However conspiracy theorists  claim there were explosive demolition charges placed in the three buildings that led to their total collapse.

Diagram of 911 terrorist attacks.

Diagram of 911 terrorist attacks.

The main thrust of conspiracy theorists who reject the Government version of events is that 911 was an inside job organised by the jewish criminal mafia, Mossad and the Bush/Cheney  zionist neo-conservatives. Some conspiracy theorists also allege that the Saudi Government was involved. Their purpose was an immediate financial gain and the justification for re-shaping the Middle East in Israel’s favour, and also securing oil and other resources, via invasions and occupations by the United States Military.

Following the 911 terrorist attacks the American Military has invaded and occupied several countries as a response.

Following the 911 terrorist attacks the American Military has invaded and occupied several countries as a response.

In no way does this blog dispute the official version of events presented by the United States Government. However we did find the following 20 amazing facts about the 911 terrorist attack:

1. Owner of The World Trade Centre Buildings Larry Silverstein:

Larry Silverstein is a jewish dual Nationality Israeli-American businessman. He had taken out a 99 year lease on the World Trade Centre buildings on 24th July 2001, seven weeks before 911, with a down payment of $100 million. The buildings were virtually worthless, due to the fact they were riddled with asbestos which needed urgent and costly removal. Following 911 the litigation between Silverstein and the insurance companies was overseen by Judge Michael Mukasey, also a dual Nationality Israeli-American, which resulted in a $4.55 billion payout to Silverstein.

Lewis Eisenberg was the jewish head of The Port Authority of New York and authorised Silverstein’s purchase of the World Trade Centre buildings. Eisenberg was a partner in Goldman-Sachs and a major contributor to the Bush-Cheney Presidential campaign. Eisenberg has been a member of the planning board of the United Jewish Appeal and the United Jewish Federation.

pic004

2. The US Government’s Pancake Collapse Theory:

The US Government’s official theory for the collapse of Word Trade Centre Buildings 1, 2 and 7 is known as the “pancake collapse” or “wet noodle theory”. What this theory claims is that the fires in the three buildings, caused by burning spilt jet fuel, led to their steel structures losing their strength and each floor collapsing on the one below leading to the complete collapse of the buildings. However conspiracy theorists point out that no steel structured building in the World has ever collapsed in this way, either before or since, due to fires weakening their steel structures.

pic005

The hottest a jet fuel fire can burn is about 900 degrees fahrenheit, whereas steel does not  lose its strength until about 1600 degrees fahrenheit and melts at about 2,795 degrees fahrenheit . Scientists have calculated that the 911 fires were burning at about 500 to 550 degrees fahrenheit. The US Government never held an independent enquiry in to 911, and FEMA gave $600,000 to a group of investigators known as the Building Performance Assessment Team. BPAT spent a total of five days investigating the attacks.

The Windsor Tower building in Madrid burnt for several days in February 2005 totally gutting it but not leading to its collapse.

The Windsor Tower building in Madrid burnt for several days in February 2005 totally gutting it but not leading to its collapse. Apart from on 911 no steel structure building has ever collapsed due to fire.

The four main sources for the US Government’s theory are:

An article by Sheila Barter of the BBC titled How The World Trade Centre Fell published on 13th September 2001

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1540044.stm

Zdenek Bazant and Yong Zhou’s article Why Did The World Trade Centre Collapse? published on 13th September 2001

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/405.pdf

A PBS Nova Special Why The Towers Fell produced and directed by Garfield Kennedy and Larry Klein April 30th 2002

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wingtv.net%2F911ontrial.doc%2F2officialstory.doc&ei=HRSyUpqxCsGihgeSw4HgDg&usg=AFQjCNEIb_ZjlxwSaswE_IsqHSRYlrOp-A&sig2=r2PC0bhyjU4ulY6Pxt6p7w&bvm=bv.58187178,d.ZG4

FEMA’s World Trade Centre Building Performance Study May 2002

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_cover-toc.pdf

3. Seismographic Data:

Twenty-one miles North of the WTC in New York complex is Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory which monitors seismic data. On 11th September 2001 it recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake at 9:59:04 at the start of the ten second collapse of the South Tower and a 2.3 magnitude earthquake at 10:28:31 at the start of the collapse of the North Tower. Both these quakes were recorded at the start, not the end, of the collapses. The Earth Observatory also monitors seismic data daily from a quarry 20 miles away which registers local earthquakes between magnitude 1 and 2 caused by 80,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate.

The South Tower collapses.

The South Tower collapses.

Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site.  In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:

“The red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

4. Security At The Twin Towers:

Following the 1993 WTC bombing the security was awarded to Kroll Associates by the New York Port Authority. Kroll Associates were paid $2.5 million to revamp security at the WTC buildings. Kroll Associates had closed down the Twin Towers during the weekend preceding 911 and no one had been allowed in. The owners of Kroll are two zionist jews called Jules and Jeremy Kroll, the Managing Director was Jerome M. Hauer another zionist jew. It was Jerome Hauer who advised the White House staff to take “Cipro”, the most effective antibiotic against Anthrax, a week before the Anthrax mailings started.

FBI Special Agent John O'Neill 1952-2001

FBI Special Agent John O’Neill 1952-2001

Former FBI Special Agent John O’Neill was hired as head of security at the WTC by Jerome Hauer and was killed on his first day at work on 911. Previously John O’Neill had been forced to resign his FBI post after investigating the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, he had concluded it was not an Al Qaeda attack but was hit by an Israeli cruise missile.

USS Cole attacked in Yemen 12 October 2000. Originally claimed as an Al Qaeda suicide bombing.

USS Cole attacked in Yemen 12 October 2000. Originally claimed as an Al Qaeda suicide bombing.

5. Disposal Of 911 Evidence:

Following 911 the site of the collapsed buildings was termed “Ground Zero”. The rubble was moved to a dump on Statten Island. All the scrap metal was sold to Alan D. Ratner of Metal Management of Newark, New Jersey and Hugo Neu Schitzer for $70 per ton. They sold it on to scrap metal merchant Baosteel for $120 per ton who sold it on in India and China for recycling.

The New York Times said “The decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses from the WTC in the days immediately after 911 means definitive answers may never be known.”

Dr. W. Gene Corley – who also investigated the Oklahoma City bombing and the Branch Davidian fire in Waco – was put in charge of the Building Performance Assessment Team assembled by FEMA. They investigated from October 7th to 12th 2001 but never tested for traces of explosives. The BPAT investigators were given no authority to impound any materials or question any witnesses during their 5 day investigation that FEMA gave a budget of $600,000 to.

Dr. W. Gene Corley at Ground Zero.

Dr. W. Gene Corley at Ground Zero.

6. The Five Dancing Israelis On 911:

Various witnesses saw five men dancing and celebrating on 911. They were also observed filming the WTC attacks at Liberty State Park,Jersey City, New Jersey. They were soon detained by the New York Police Department who were surprised to discover they were all Israeli citizens. The names of the five dancing Israelis was Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. Sivan Kurzberg told the NYPD Officers “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.”   The five Israelis later appeared on an Israeli TV Talk Show and claimed they had been there “documenting the event.”

Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari

Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari

A large number of other Israeli citizens (about 90 to 100) were arrested around New York and New Jersey on 11th September 2001. They were all later released and deported without charge. Most of them had failed polygraph tests, the results of which were classified. One of the strangest events was the arrest of some Israelis in a van with a picture of a plane flying in to the Twin Towers and the numbers 9/11 on the side.

In a seperate incident some Israelis were stopped driving this van on September 11th 2001.

In a separate incident some Israelis were stopped driving this van on September 11th 2001 on the junction of 6th and King Street a few blocks from the Twin Towers in New York.

7. Witnesses To Explosions In The Twin Towers:

There were a large number of witnesses, including MSM reporters, on 911 who reported hearing various explosions in the Twin Towers before they collapsed. In any video of the Twin Towers collapsing you can see small explosions coming out of the sides of the buildings. This video is probably the best audio for explosions and smoke, or dust, coming from the base of the Twin Towers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDlzBXyxZkI

Here is a video of New York Firefighters describing the explosions they witnessed on 911 in the Twin Towers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAAveeeVVfM

8. The Strange Case Of The ZIM Company Vacating The World Trade Centre:

The ZIM Corproation is an Israeli shipping company that leased the 16th and 17th floors of the North Tower in the World Trade Centre Buildings. They had vacated their premises a week before 911 at a cost of $50,000 for breaking their lease. Following 911 their activities were seen as highly suspicious by FBI Agent Michael Dick who started investigating them. Agent Michael Dick was removed from the investigation by Israeli-US Dual Nationality Michael Chertoff, who was Head of the Justice Department Criminal Division. The investigation in to ZIM was not continued.

Israeli-US Dual Nationality Michael Chertoff, who was Head of the Justice Department Criminal Division

Israeli-US Dual Nationality Michael Chertoff, who was Head of the Justice Department Criminal Division

9. The Patriot Act And Immunity From Civil Lawsuits Given To Foreign Security Companies:

The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act Of Congress that was signed into law by President George Bush on October 26, 2001 in response to the 911 terrorist attacks. The title of the act is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. It basically gave the United States Government unprecedented powers of surveillance and detention to combat terrorism. There have been many allegations that it could not have been written that quickly and must have been written before 911 happened.

One, not very well-known, part of the Patriot Act gave foreign security companies involved in 911 complete immunity from civil lawsuits. This meant none of the victims of 911 could sue these security companies and get “discovery” of documents and evidence related to 911 in the process. The only foreign security companies involved in 911 were all Israeli.

Picture 9

10. Odigo Instant Messaging Service And Other Warnings:

Odigo is an instant message service Israeli company.A feature of Odigo is the ability to send messages based on certain criteria. One criteria is Nationality e.g. Israeli.  Two hours before the Twin Towers attack in New York Odigo had carried a warning of the impending attack via the “Israeli National” option. On 10th September 2001 the Tokyo branch of Golman-Sachs had warned its’ employees to avoid all US Government buildings.  Out of about 4,000 Israeli Nationals (not American jews) working in the World Trade Centre Buildings and the Pentagon only three were allegedly killed that day, with another two Israelis allegedly killed on the planes.

President George Bush claimed 130 Israelis were killed on 911

President George Bush claimed 130 Israelis were killed on 911

On 20th September 2001 President Bush made an address to the Joint Session of Congress following the 911 attacks. In this address President Bush claimed 130 Israelis had been killed on 911.

11.Remote Control Planes?:

One conspiracy theory is that the planes were being remotely controlled instead of piloted by the alleged hijackers who had only a few hours pilot training on single engine planes. Most flying experts agree that the manoeuvres performed by the much harder to fly Boeing jetliners could not have been undertaken by inexperienced pilots. The remote control theory is not as outlandish as it first appears, after all there are plenty of remote control model airplanes and the military use drones controlled from thousands of miles away all the time. The first plane to hit the WTC (North Tower) crashed directly in to the computer room of Marsh & McLennan ( owned by Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll) which had recently acquired Kroll Associates. Was there guidance equipment in these offices?

The North Tower gets hit on 911 - was this plane remotely controlled?

The North Tower gets hit on 911 – was this plane remotely controlled?

Remote control piloting of Boeing jetliners is in fact a reality, SPC Corporation supplies the technology and equipment that allows planes to be remotely controlled should pilots become incapacitated or planes hijacked.

12. Military Defense Computer Failures On 911:

On the morning of 911 there was a major computer failure across the US Government. These failures included, amongst other agencies, The FBI, The Secret Service, The IRS, The Department of Justice, US Customs, The IRS, NATO, United States Armed Forces, FAA, Congress, Department of Energy, The White House and many other US Government agencies. All these computer systems were running on software developed and sold by Ptech Software.

US Government computer systems running Ptech Software failed on 911

US Government computer systems running Ptech Software failed on 911

Ptech Software meant to deal with such incidents as 911 failed right across US Government Agencies on 11th September 2001.

13.Rabbi Dov Zakheim:

Rabbi Dov Zakheim was the co-author of the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) paper on rebuilding US defences and the need for a Pearl Harbour type incident to get the US Public behind a war on terrorism. Zakheim was the Pentagon Comptroller from from 4th May 2001 to 10th March 2004. On 10th September 2001 Donald Rumsfield publically stated that $2.3 trillion had gone “missing” from the Pentagon , this news was buried by the attacks the next day. Zakheim was also unable to account for another $1 trillion that went “missing” later. It was a Zakheim policy to classify squadrons of American F-15s and F-16s as surplus and sold at knock-down prices to Israel.

Picture 9

On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the 911 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George Bush stating:

“…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”

Very interesting video on Rabbi Dov Zakheim:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlNQTG8B6hw

14. ICTS Security Company:

The security companies that ran the security at the three aiports (Boston’s Logan, New Jersey’s Newark and Maine’s Portland International) and where the alleged hijackers boarded the four planes on 911 were ICTS Security and a wholly owned subsidary Huntsleigh USA. ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were owned by Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon, both Israeli Nationals and zionist jews. The companies are run by intelligence experts from Israel – that is Mossad and ex-Mossad agents. ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were exempted from lawsuits and “discovery” relating to the 911 attacks by the Patriot Act.

ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were exempted from lawsuits relating to 911 by the Patriot Act.

ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were exempted from lawsuits relating to 911 by the Patriot Act.

15. $7 Billion Of Taxpayers Money For The Victims:

Following the 911 attacks the US Government set up a $7 billion fund of US Taxpayer’s money to compensate the victims. About 97% of the victims, or their families, accepted offers from this fund thereby avoiding a large number of lawsuits and “discovery” by lawyers. This also saved the companies involved from facing financial claims. All the Israeli security companies involved had already been exempted from lawsuits by the Patriot Act.

A $7 billion taxpayer fund for victims prevented lawsuits questioning the official narrative

A $7 billion taxpayer fund for victims prevented lawsuits questioning the official narrative

16. World Trade Centre Building 7 :

Apart from the Twin Towers one other building collapsed in New York on 11th September 2001 – WTC Building 7 (AKA Salomon Brothers Buildings). WTC Building 7 was a 47-story steel structure skyscraper built-in 1984 and was also owned by Larry Silverstein . It collapsed at 5:20 pm allegedly due to damage and fire from the Twin Towers attack. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.World Trade Centre Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Centre, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker”.

Picture 9

According to a Zogby poll in 2006, 43% of Americans did not know about WTC7 and it’s collapse was never even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for WTC7 following various internet campaigns. Over 1,700 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7, specifying that it should include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives.

img414Here is a video of the WTC 7 building collapse, the BBC reporting it twenty minutes before it happened and some experts’ opinions on the collapse being a controlled demolition:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3ACKK7HGUE

17. The Twin Towers And WTC 7 Fell At Nearly Free-Fall Speed:

The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed and fell at nearly free-fall speed. Free-fall is the speed an object, such as a brick, would fall if it was dropped from the roof with only wind-resistance to slow it down. The way of calculating free-fall speeds is t(time in seconds)=square root(2height in feet/g) where (g) is the acceleration due to gravity (32.174 / second squared). The Twin Towers were 110 storeys (1,368 feet) and their free-fall time would be about 9.2 seconds, both of the Twin Towers took about 10 to 11 seconds to completely collapse. The WTC7 buiding was 47 storeys high (570 feet)and its free-fall time would be about 5.95 seconds, it’s collapse took about 6.5 seconds.These speeds of collapse suggest there was virtually no resistance to the building falling i.e. a controlled demolition.

Picture 9

Here is a good video of WTC 7 collapsing and a very strange interview with Larry Silverstein:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI

18. New York Post Reports Foreign Government Involvement In 911:

After the 911 attacks, the Public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 911 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi Nationals. President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood. A pair of lawmakers (Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.)) who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

pic004

The September 11, 2001 attacks in the US were a “false flag” operation carried out jointly by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia with “Zionists playing the lead role,” an analyst tells Press TV.

http://linkis.com/ow.ly/Jfc9p

19. 911 As Global Theatre For The Masses?

8:46 a.m. American Airlines Flight 11 apparently crashed into the World Trade Centre North Tower (WTC1).

9:03 a.m United Airlines Flight 175 apparently crashed into the World Trade Centre South Tower (WTC2).

9:37a.m. American Airlines Flight 77 apparently crashed in to the Pentagon.

10:03a.m. United Airlines 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania after passengers had apparently fought back against hijackers. It seems that UA93 was headed to the White House.

At this stage virtually every TV Station on Earth was covering the Twin Towers in New York. I was personally on a beach in South Gran Canaria which emptied as everyone went to the bars at the back of the beach to watch the TV’s showing the events in New York. With JFK everyone remembers where they were when they heard, but with 911 nearly everyone watched the drama unfold. With people jumping to their deaths to escape the smoke and fires nearly the whole TV watching World was glued to the screens.

The timeline of 911 gave nearly everyone in the World with access to a TV enough time to watch the final collapses.

The timeline of 911 gave nearly everyone in the World with access to a TV enough time to watch the final collapses.

9:59 a.m. The South Tower (WTC2) collapsed after burning for 56 minutes.

10:28 a.m.The North Tower (WTC1) collapsed  after burning for 102 minutes.

5:20 p.m. WTC 7 eventually collapses long after most People had stopped watching, this is why so few People know about WTC7.

If you look at the time from 8:46 a.m when WTC1 was first hit to 10:28 a.m when WTC1 collapsed you have 102 minutes. This is a pretty standard length for a Hollywood film nowadays. Any longer and People get bored. Was this Global Theatre for the Masses played out on Worldwide TV?

20. Disinformation, 911 Truthers And Mysterious Deaths:

Immediately after 911 a lot of very strange conspiracy theories started circulating including UFOs, holograms, guided missiles, swapping airplanes etc. This is known as disinformation   and its purpose is to discredit any real theories that don’t agree with the official narrative.

Alex Jones is probaly the most famous shabos goy shill in the World - the rewards are fame and fortune.

Alex Jones is probaly the most famous shabos goy shill in the World – the rewards are fame and fortune.

On one advert for Mastercard in America they even had a man wearing a tinfoil hat stating that he believed 911 was an inside job. This is a way of keeping the media and the general population in line with the implied threat of ridicule for asking pertinent questions.

Mastercard 911 was an inside job advert:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lulaih8W55A

When ridicule fails with the 911 truth movement more radical steps are often taken. There have been a number of strange deaths of 911 truthers and 911 witnesses across the World. One of the most famous ones being the death of Phillip Marshall (who had written several 911 conspiracy books) and his two teenage children which was officially determined to be a murder-suicide.Wayne Masden, former national security officer, claims he is “100 percent certain that 911 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit.” He said “The crime scene was illegally cleaned up by professionals.”

Phillip Marshall and his Children before their untimely deaths

911 Author Phillip Marshall and his Children before their untimely deaths

img544

Let’s leave the final word on 911 to Alan Sabrosky, US Army College, now retired and free to speak his mind:

“I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters of the Marine Corps and I’ve made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is absolutely 100% certain that 911 was a Mossad operation. Period. The zionists are playing this as an all or nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they’re done.”

President George Bush receives his orders from his jewish Chabad Lubovitch handlers.

President George Bush receives his orders from his jewish Chabad Lubovitch handlers.

Conspiracy theorists are often dismissed as cranks.

Conspiracy theorists are often dismissed as cranks.

Well worth a read on 911, zionism and the fabricated “War On Terror”:

http://lesvisible.net/DOCS/MastersOfDeception.pdf

Cigpapers Freedom Of Information Act Request To BBC:

From: Sean Moran

18 December 2013

Dear British Broadcasting Corporation,

I was recently reading the following article published on 13th
September 2001 on the 911 terrorist attacks on 11th September 2001
in New York:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/america…

This BBC report is one of the four investigations repeatedly quoted
as giving scientific backing to the US Government’s findings on the
attacks.

Could you please provide me with the following information:

What are Sheila Barter’s scientific or engineering qualifications?
Between what dates did Sheila Barter work for the BBC?
What are Chris Wise’s scientific or engineering qualifications?
Between what dates did Chris Wise work for the BBC?
What are Professor John Knapton’s scientific or engineering
qualifications?
Between what dates did Professor John Knapton work for the BBC?
If any of the above weren’t BBC employees on 13th September 2001
when the article was published how much were they each paid for
their information?
Where did the BBC get the information that the jet fuel based fires
were burning at 800 degrees celcius or 1472 degrees fahrenheit in
the Twin Towers?
Does the BBC realise that jet fuel burns at about 260–315 °C
(500–599 °F)in open conditions?
Does the BBC realise that the starting point of steel losing any
strength is about 871 degrees celcius or 1,600 degrees fahrenheit?
Does the BBC realise that the melting point of steel is about 1,535
degrees celcius or 2,795 degrees fahrenheit?
Are Sheila Barter,Chris Wise or Professor John Knapton standing by
the scientific claims they made about the Twin Tower’s collapse?

Yours faithfully,

Sean Moran

BBC Climate Panel 26 January 2006

pic005

In 2006 the BBC hosted a climate-change seminar to decide on its reporting of alleged climate-change. The BBC has spent tens of thousands of pounds trying to keep secret who attended this seminar. The publicly funded broadcaster fought off requests for the list of people who attended under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws.

This surreal story is only partly about climate change: the disclosure raises questions about the evidence submitted to the information tribunal by the BBC and Helen Boaden – it’s Director of News who stepped down in 2012.

The case also highlights once again the BBC’s corporate strategy of using an FOI derogation, or legal “opt-out” clause, to withhold a wide range of material from citizens who wish to know whether the BBC is fulfilling its statutory obligations for impartiality under its Royal Charter.

And it raises further questions about the effectiveness of the BBC Trust. The trust, which replaced the Board of Governors, was created with a mission: an “unprecedented obligation to openness and transparency”.

pic005

A ‘brainstorm’ that became historic

The seminar whose attendees the Beeb sought to keep secret was founded by three organisation. In 2004, the International Broadcasting Trust – a lobby group funded by a number of charities, including many involved in campaigning on climate change – devised the first in a series of seminars on development issues, where the lobbyists could address broadcasters.

One event on 26 January 2006 was a “brainstorm”, in the IBT’s own words, “focusing on climate change and its impact on development”. The BBC sent 30 senior staff, and 30 outsiders were invited. The event was also organised by CMEP, its second parent – a now dormant or defunct outfit operated by BBC reporter Roger Harrabin and climate activist Dr Joe Smith, and at one time funded by the Tyndall Centre at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and various pressure groups.

Harrabin later explained that the BBC’s head of news in the 1990s, Tony Hall, had invited him “to devise meetings with politicians, business people, think tanks, academics from many universities and specialists (science, technology, economic and social sciences, and history), and policy experts and field workers from NGOs – particularly from the developing world”.

The third parent of the seminar was the BBC.

 The following year ( 2007) a BBC Trust report  on impartiality cited the 2006 seminar and said it had settled the argument once and for all  (as far as the BBC was concerned) on climate change.

pic005

Filmmaker John Bridcut wrote:

The BBC has held a high-level seminar with some of the best scientific experts [our emphasis] and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus [on anthropogenic climate change].

The BBC is under a statutory obligation to remain impartial, so this gave the “brainstorm” a historic significance.

An independent blogger, Tony Newbery, was struck by the difference between contemporary evidence that the seminar was educational and composed largely of activists (as confirmed by Harrabin) and the BBC Trust’s insistence that it was a sober scientific presentation that could justify a historic policy change.

Fresh light was shed on Harrabin’s CMEP in 2010, in the second batch of Climategate emails. An email from Mike Hulme, the director of the Tyndall Centre for Climatic Change Research at UEA,complained about a BBC Radio 4 item broadcast in February 2002. The broadcast featured global-warming sceptic Professor Philip Stott and Sir John Houghton, who was a Met Office chief and the editor of the first three IPCC reports on climate change. Houghton came off worst, and an infuriated Hulme wrote:

Did anyone hear Stott vs Houghton on Today, Radio 4 this morning? Woeful stuff really. This is one reason why Tyndall is sponsoring the Cambridge Media/Environment Programme to starve this type of reporting at source.

Newbery filed his FOI request for the seminar’s attendees to the BBC in 2007 and was denied the information, leading to a second round of information tribunal hearings in November 2012. The cross-examination of the BBC’s Helen Boaden in a court room was reported here.

The BBC is regarded as a public authority by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, but it can withhold information held “for the purposes of journalism”.

In an earlier and separate FOI case against the BBC, Supreme Court Judge Neuberger argued the opt-out should be interpreted narrowly – otherwise the BBC could withhold information about “cleaning the board room floor” using the journalism get-out clause – an obvious absurdity.

In the Newbery case, the BBC maintained that archival material on the seminar could not be found, but also it should not be found: as a back-up argument it argued that the seminar was held under the Chatham House Rule – an agreement of etiquette, rather than a law, to prevent quotes being attributed to particular speakers at a meeting – information that Newbery had never asked for.

In November 2012 the tribunal ruled against Newbery and for the BBC.

pic005

Case closed? Think again

However science writer Maurizio Morabito has unearthed the list of attendees.

It confirms the accuracy of Harrabin’s description of the composition of the invitees, with most coming from industry, think tanks and NGOs. And as suspected, climate campaigners Greenpeace are present, while actual scientific experts are thin on the ground: not one attendee deals with attribution science, the physics of global warming. These are scarcely “some of the best scientific experts”, whose input could justify a historic abandonment of the BBC’s famous impartiality.

Intriguingly, Tony Newbery had been supplied with a later version of this document, he tells us – but with the attendee list stripped out.

How much of the Public's license fee did the BBC spend on lawyers to cover up this list of attendees at their Climate Panel in 2006?

How much of the Public’s license fee did the BBC spend on lawyers to cover up this list of attendees at their Climate Panel in 2006?

The dramatic appearance of the list raises many questions. Did the BBC know the information was publicly available? If so, why were corporation lawyers spending thousands of pounds to keep a public document “secret”? (FOI requests for public information typically state, quite simply, “this information is public”.)

Questions abound  online about the ability of the BBC Trust to maintain its duty to transparency. The BBC’s legal strategy entails the indiscriminate application of its FOI derogation “for the purposes of journalism” – this effectively rewrites the 2000 Act, and redefines the BBC as a private body. The trust is surely aware of this; it has a small mountain of correspondence on the subject. But it has yet to enquire, let alone pronounce on whether this is healthy – or legal.

All the names on the revealed seminar list

Here’s the list – according to the FOI Act reply.

January 26th 2006, BBC Television Centre, London

Specialists:
Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Anuradha Vittachi, Director, Oneworld.net
Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
Claire Foster, Church of England
Saleemul Huq, IIED
Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Matthew Farrow, CBI
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
Joe Smith, The Open University
Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
Anita Neville, E3G
Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
Tim Jackson, Surrey University
John Ashton, Director E3G
BBC attendees:
Jana Bennett, Director of Television
Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
Helen Boaden, Director of News
Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures
Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes

Fran Unsworth,Head of Newsgathering
Pete Clifton, Head of News Interactive
Liz Cleaver, Controller Learning
Keith Scholey, Head of Specialist Factual
Sarah Brandist, Head of Development, Drama Commissioning
Michael Hastings, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility
Lorna Walsh, BBC TV
Roger Harrabin, Today Programme

Stop White Genocide Leaflets And Posters A3/A5 pdfs

attachment

Here are the links to some Stop White Genocide pdf files for A5 leaflets and A3 posters.

They can be downloaded and printed off at home or sent to printers for printing out.

Multiculturalism Is White Genocide for A5 leaflets or A3 posters:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/cwcuwoyce1gb5p9/MulticulturalismIsWhiteGenocideA5A3.pdf

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan For The Genocide Of White Europe for A5 leaflets or A3 posters:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/umu6jpf5mlf0eit/Coudenhove-KalergiA5A3%20-%20Copy.pdf

United Nations Resolution 260 Against Genocide for A5 leaflets or A3 posters:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/j3aeopdal9uq21i/UN-3.jpg?dl=0

People Against Bankers for A5 leaflets or A3 posters:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gn25azi9n559a5z/People%20Against%20Bankers%20A3.pdf

Here is where I get 5,000 A5 leaflets and 30 A3 posters from for £62 including delivery:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/usr/ecolourprint

attachment

attachment

The Guardian Newspaper Exposed!

The Manchester Guardian was founded by John Edward Taylor in 1821, and was first published on May 5 of that year.The Guardian soon built a solid reputation for fighting against social injustice following the Peterloo Massacre and the Corn Laws. The Guardian was published weekly until 1836, when it was published on Wednesday and Saturday, becoming a daily in 1855.The Guardian achieved national and international recognition under the editorship of CP Scott, who held the post for 57 years from 1872.

img002bg

Scott bought the paper in 1907 following the death of Taylor’s son.CP Scott died in 1932 and was followed only four months later by one son Edward, so sole ownership fell to his other son JR Scott.In June 1936, JR Scott gave ownership of the paper to the trustees of the Scott Trust. The Guardian moved to London in 1964.The Guardian relied heavily on the Manchester Evening News for financial support which it owned. In the late 70s and early 80s the Guardian’s position as the voice of the left was unchallenged. However in recent times the Guardian has become the by-word for trendy, faux Working-class values peddled by over privileged cultural-marxists. The Guardian is now run at a huge loss with it’s future uncertain as its assets are run down.

Current Guardian Editor Alan Rusbridger

Current Guardian Editor Alan Rusbridger since 1995. His currect salary is £395,000 plus bonuses of around £170,000 per year. In 2009 it was reported that one of his daughters, Isabella, had been working at The Guardian, but had been using her jewish mother’s surname (Mackie) as a nom de plume to avoid suspicion of having obtained the job through nepotism. It’s not known if The Guardian wasted People’s time by going through a charade of advertising the job.

The senior staff at the Guardian and the exclusive, private schools they attended:

The yearly fees stated do not usually include lunches, music, drama, travel or uniforms.

Editor: Alan Rusbridger (Cranleigh) £10,230

Political Editor: Patrick Wintour (Westminster) £10,830

Leader Writer: Madeleine Bunting (Queen Mary’s,Yorkshire) £17,940

Policy Editor: Jonathan Freedland (University College School) £13,410

Columnist: Polly Toynbee (Badminton) £9,470

Executive Editor: Ian Katz (University College School) £13,410

Security Affairs Editor: Richard Norton Taylor (King’s School)£32,225

Arts Editor-in-Chief: Clare Margetson (Marlborough College)£32,280

Literary Editor: Clare Armitstead (Bedales) Approx. £30,000

Public Services Editor: David Brindle (Bablake)£9,816

City Editor: Julia Finch (King’s High, Warwick)£10,414

Environment Editor: John Vidal (St. Bees)£12,315 – £29,995

Fashion Editor: Jess Cartner-Morley (City of London School for
Girls) £13,866

G3 Editor: Janine Gibson (Walthamstow Hall)£11,970

Northern Editor: Martin Wainwright (Shreswbury)£11,652

Industrial Editor: David Gow (St. Peter’s, York)£19,440

Columnist and Associate Editor: Seumas Milne (Winchester College)Approx.£30,000

The Observer’s Andrew Rawnsley (Rugby School)£31,245

Columnist: George Monbiot (Stowe)£27,390

Columnist: Zoe Williams (Godolphin and Latymer)£17,280

The Guardian also offer to pay for all senior staff to send their Children to the private school of their choice – a perk most take up willingly.

Seumas Milne incidentally is the son of former BBC Director General Alisdair Milne.

Guardian News & Media has lost nearly £200m in the past six years as it pursues its ambition of being the “world’s leading liberal voice”.
GMG already enjoys advantages over some of its commercial media rivals. Ownership by the Scott Trust means it does not have to answer to shareholders. The group has a cash and investment fund of £254m. Those other assets such as its 50 per cent stake in Trader Media Group and a 33 per cent share in Top Right are security for the loss-making news business.Two years ago, as he committed GMG to a “digital-first strategy”, Mr Miller warned staff the newspaper’s losses were so great it could run out of money in “three to five years”. The latest losses of £31m for the year to the end of March were an improvement on the £44m of the previous 12 months and he took succour from a 28.9 per cent rise in digital revenues.

Converting pounds to dollars (£1 = $1.64), you find £200 million equals about $325 million. Divide that by six and you find that they’re losing money at a rate in excess of $54 million a year. The £31 million the Guardian group lost in the most recent year is more than $50 million. The £44 million they lost in the previous year was $72 million.

Please note Alan Rusbridger:

The Scott Trust has the duty to maintain a secure financial footing for the business: “…to devote the whole of the surplus profits of the Company which would otherwise have been available for dividends…towards building up the reserves of the Company and increasing the circulation of and expanding and improving the newspapers.” These principles remain the only instructions given to an incoming editor of the Guardian.

New Labour And Operation Ore (Child Pornography) 10 Years On

Nothing else like the filth, squalor and corruption of the Blair regime has ever happened in British politics before.

The events surrounding Operation Ore ( Child pornography investigation) and the subsequent cover up, summed up what Tony Blair and his New Jew Labour Government were really like.

Tony Blair - Britain's most dishonest politician ever.

Tony Blair – Britain’s most dishonest politician ever.

The best article we found in the MSM is copied below with a photo of the original article.

The Sunday Herald : Child Porn Arrests Too Slow
Herald And Sunday Herald : Sunday January 19th 2003

Operation Ore : The Police enquiry which plans to arrest a further 7000 men across the UK , in addition to Who guitarist Peter Townshend, for buying Child pornography online is set to end in disaster with many suspects walking free.
Detective Chief Inspector Bob MacLachlan, former head of Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit, told the Sunday Herald that the lack of urgency in making arrests will lead to suspects destroying evidence of downloading child pornography before they are arrested.
The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high profile former Labour Cabinet Minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politicians name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a “rolling” cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the Government if arrests occur.
Since the September 2002 Operation Ore arrest of Detective Constable Brian Stevens, a key officer in the inquiry into the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, the public have been aware that wanted suspects had downloaded Child pornography from a US website called Landslide.
MacLachlan, who was one of the main officers on Operation Ore before his retirement last year, said “Sufficient warnings have been given that if people haven’t got rid of their computers then they are either stupid, don’t believe they’ll be arrested or are so obsessive about their collections that they can’t destroy it. As time goes on, the chances of successful  prosecutions will diminish with speed and the information out there must impact on the offenders.”
With only 1200 men arrested so far, MacLachlan says that claims by Police Chiefs and the Government that they were prioritising paedophile crime were “smoke and mirrors”. Paedophilia is still not a priority on the Home Office’s National Policing Plan for 2003-06. MacLachlan claimed that before he left Scotland Yard his team were under-staffed, over-worked, under-funded and reduced to using free software from computer magazines.
There are around one million images of an estimated 20,000 individual Children being abused online. Some Police seizures involve hauls of more than 180,000 images. Last year, images of 13,000 new Children were uncovered. Only 17 Child victims have been identified worldwide.
Police have also revealed that images of Fred West abusing one of his Children are among Child pornography available for downloading from the internet. It is unclear whether the Child was West’s murdered daughter Heather.
Peter Robbins, the Chief Executive of the Internet Watch Foundation, which works with the Police, Government and internet service providers, in tackling paedophilia online, says software is in development which could remove child pornography from the net forever. The software should be ready in two years.
Police say that the list of rich and famous Operation Ore suspects would fill newspaper front pages for an entire year.

Provided by: Financial Times Information Limited.
Index terms: Police Protection, Crimes : General News.
Location(s): United Kingdom Europe Western Europe
Record Number: A20030120-10A4-EIW,O,XML,EIW