National hero Lee Rigby – his family shouldn’t get any less than Stephen Lawrence’s.
This is a campaign to make Lee Rigby’s mother a Baroness, award her an OBE, compensate her and build a £10 million “Lee Rigby Community Centre” in her home town. After all that is what the mother of the rather worthless street thug Stephen Lawrence received. Lee Rigby on the other hand was a serving soldier in the British Army.
Please send a letter, or email, to all your MEPs and MP as soon as possible. If you’re not much of a letter writer feel free to copy and paste the letter below.
Dear ( name of your MP/MEP)
Doreen Delceita Lawrence is the mother of murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence. She was awarded an OBE in 2003 and made a life peer (Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon) in 2013. £10 million was spent on the “Stephen Lawrence Community Centre” which opened in 2008 in Deptford, London. There has also been an e-petition to rename Heathrow Airport as “Stephen Lawrence Airport“. Baroness Lawrence is the Honorary President of anti-White race hate group the UAF which promotes racism, violence and intimidation across Britain.
Lee Rigby was not a street thug like Stephen Lawrence, but was in fact a fine young man doing his duty in the British Army. I do not see any valid reason why his family, and in particular his mother, should receive less from the British Nation than Stephen Lawrence’s did. I therefore suggest that his mother is made a Baroness and awarded an OBE. I would also like £10 million to be spent on a “Lee Rigby Community Centre” and an e-petition organised to rename Manchester Airport as “Lee Rigby Airport”.
As my elected representative I expect you to give this campaign your full support and public backing. Could you please clarify whether you will be supporting this campaign, or not, as that will clarify mine and my family’s voting intention.
Yours sincerely ( your name )
You can email this to all your MEPs and MP free of charge via https://www.writetothem.com also consider sending to any members of the House of Lords you can think of at the same address.
If you would prefer to write a paper letter then ( no stamp required) address to:
(Name of your MP), House Of Commons, London, SW1A OAA
(Name of member of House of Lords), House Of Lords, London, SW1A OAA
For MEPs you will need to look up their addresses.
Doreen Lawrence was made a Baroness and is now Honorary President of violent anti-White race hate group the UAF.
Replies To This Campaign:
27th February 2014: Brian Simpson (Labour) MEP North West England has refused to support the campaign.
28th February 2014: Nick Griffin (BNP) MEP North West England has given this campaign his full support.
March 2014: Sir Peter Luff MP (Conservative) MP Worcestshire had a Pensioner constituent who emailed him arrested for racism . He also refused to support this campaign. Video below:
Please copy the emails from your MPs / MEPs in reply to this campaign in the comments section so we can put all replies up on here.
The Labour Party are corrupt, violent, war criminals and multiculturalists.
There was a by-election in Wythenshawe and Sale East constituency on February 13th 2014 following the death of Labour MP Paul Goggins on January 7th 2014.
The M.E.N. has an average daily circulation of 73,622 of which only 47,633 are paid for. Stop buying this rag and put it out of business.
The reporting of the by-election by the local paper the Manchester Evening News was a disgrace to journalism and democracy. The Labour Party was promoted heavily and the M.E.N didn’t even print Eddy O’Sullivan’s (BNP candidate) biography, even though they printed everyone else’s including the candidate for The Monster Raving Loony Party. The M.E.N. also failed to report on the electoral fraud, violence, intimidation, robberies and death threats that were present during the election against The BNP and UKIP. A Freedom Of Information Act Request has revealed a possible reason for this bias. The Labour Party controlled Manchester City Council spends heavily with the M.E.N. on advertising. Their direct spending, of Council Taxpayer’s money, on advertising with the M.E.N. in the last five years was as follows:
Manchester City Council recruitment advertising with M.E.N. £179,384.30
Manchester City Council non-recruitment advertising with M.E.N. £2,024,015.00
TOTAL SPENT ON M.E.N. = £2,203,399.30
This total must also be added to the amount spent by the other nine Councils that make up Greater Manchester resulting in a bought and paid for local press.
Greater Manchester Police:
Greater Manchester Police always compete with the Metropolitan Police for the most corrupt Police Force in Britain. They have a history of supporting, if not organising, political violence against any Party seriously opposing the Labour Party in Greater Manchester. Their complete inaction in combating political violence gives a green light to the Labour Party, and their attack dogs the UAF, to commit any act of violence against the Labour Party’s political rivals.
Without establishment support and protection the “anti-fascist” groups wouldn’t last five minutes.
During the by-election masked gangs of Labour/UAF thugs were openly roaming the streets attacking, robbing and threatening BNP (and to a lesser extent UKIP) canvassers and activists. Any attempt to fight back against these Labour/UAF political tinkerbells is dealt with firmly by G.M.P. At the election count, at the G-Mex Centre on February 13th 2014, a gang of about 20 deranged multiculturalists tried to stop BNP Party members entering the count. G.M.P. Officers were present but took no action as usual. A number of complaints were made to G.M.P. about political violence but no arrests were made because of reasons such as the CCTV not working due to sunlight reflecting on the lens.
Postal Voting, Electoral Fraud And Intimidation:
As usual the Labour Party relied heavily on postal votes to get elected. Out of a total of 24,024 votes cast 10,141 were postal votes – just over 42% of total votes cast. There were instances of up to 15 voters registered at some addresses and no proof of identity is required. Judge Richard Mawrey QC, an election commissioner in Birmingham, has criticised postal voting in a report and described it as “hopelessly insecure” and warned electoral fraud would “continue unabated” unless changes were made.
The BNP were the only Party in the by-election not allowed to have seals on the ballot boxes, with no satisfactory reason given as to why not.
During the by-election campaign I spoke to a number of elderly voters living in residential homes who stated they were pressured in to postal voting. Their votes are collected by their “carers” who are all virtually Labour supporters and largely immigrants. Several confided in me they were too scared to vote anything but Labour.
A number of residents, mostly on Wythenshawe, have reported being threatened for showing BNP or UKIP placards on their homes. This usually entails visits by gangs of masked men at night telling them to take down election placards.
The Unite Against Fascism (UAF) :
The UAF (Unite Against Fascism) are a type of organised gang who attack, bully, intimidate and assault anyone they consider an opponent of Globalisation and zio-multiculturalism. Their leader is Weyman Bennett (UAF National office on 07734032314 / 020 78334916). A fuller description of the UAF, their links to organised paedophilia and who funds them can be found here:
The UAF openly support political violence and are protected, backed and financed by the British establishment.
On February 1st 2014 Mike Killian (Manchester UAF Spokeperson 07903586191) had called for a day of action against UKIP and BNP activists, canvassers and supporters involved in the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election. They had superficially organised a table top demonstration outside ASDA in Wythenshawe at 1p.m.and called for supporters to come along. However their table top demonstration never materialised and instead UAF supporters were roaming Wythenshawe and Sale attacking BNP and UKIP activists, canvassers and supporters. There were a number of assaults, robberies and a death threat to a Lady Pensioner by so-called “anti-fascists”. Whether the UAF had ever intended to have a table top demonstration isn’t known.
Public gang punishment beatings by the UAF are now the norm for British Nationalists in multicultural Britain. Despite video evidence hardly anyone is ever prosecuted.
Greater Manchester Police claim they are investigating a number of serious criminal offences committed against the BNP and UKIP on 1st February 2014, and civil proceedings are being brought by numerous individuals against the UAF for damages. The GMP Police Officer in charge of this alleged investigation is Sergeant Phillips (telephone 0161 856 4882).
Here are some of the alleged supporters of the UAF believed to be involved in “anti-fascist” action on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014.
Chris Haddon:
Chris Haddon.
Chris Haddon is believed to be born around 1990 and claims to be a Wythenshawe resident. He is the lead singer of a seemingly unknown band called “The Minx Band”, he works as a receptionist at Blueprint Studios, Elizabeth House, 39 Queen Street, Manchester, M3 7DQ (0161 8172520). Haddon claims to be a “top boy” on Wythenshawe Estate, although no one we spoke to on Wythenshawe had ever heard of him. Chris Haddon was involved with two other males and a female in some sort of bizarre staring match at a BNP organiser on Wythenshawe Civic Centre Car Park. The BNP organiser fearing for Haddon’s mental health telephoned the authorities.
Andy Evans, his girlfriend Lisa Capelli, Chris Haddon,”Chucky” full name as yet unknown. Wythenshawe Civic Centre car park on 1st Februuary 2014.
Some of Haddons’ Tweets on @HaddonMinx have included:
February 1st 2014: Don’t just sit back and let it happen. I want a war against the BNP.
February 1st 2014:We’re stood in Civic car park having a blazing row with the BNP. We don’t want their van here. There’s only 4 of us. Where are you?
February 1st 2014: Only took 4 of us to unnerve the BNP today in Wythenshawe and get the message across that we don’t want them, or their stupid Monty Python.. ..esq vans spouting shite and causing racial tension on our doorsteps. If everyone did the same, the world would be a much better place.
February 1st 2014: That we don’t want their Nazi views around here, to take that shite van and fuck off.
Chris Haddon’s new look – same toxic politics.
Although there is no evidence yet to directly connect Chris Haddon to the robberies, assaults and the death threat to a British Pensioner he does seem to advocate violence against his political opponents. He has refused to identify who he was with, or provide a witness statement to the Police about UAF criminal activity in Wythenshawe on February 1st 2014.
Andy Evans:
Andy Evans is a close associate of Chris Haddon and fellow band member (drummer) of “The Minx”. He was involved in the bizarre staring match at a BNP organiser on Wythenshawe Civic Centre Car Park on 1st February 2014 in the photo above.
Andy Evans – self-styled “anti-fascist” and clearly involved with the UAF. From the videos he has made of himself he appears to be borderline mentally subnormal.
Yet again there is no direct evidence to connect Andy Evans to the more serious violence and crime on February 1st 2014 committed by self-styled “anti-fascists”. However from reading his Twitter account, @EvansMinx , he was clearly planning on meeting up with UAF organisers at 1 PM at ASDA on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014.
Some of Evans’ Tweets on @EvansMinx have included:
January 30th 2014:Anti-BNP Leafletting In Wythenshawe This Saturday, Meet At ASDA From 1. Antifa Hooligans.
February 1st 2014: 4 Of Us Here Trying To Fuck The BNP Off, Where Are You Lot?
February 1st 2014: @Joe_Farrardise We Needed You Mate, And More..
Kieran Perkins:
Another band member of “The Minx” is called Kieran Perkins. We don’t have any evidence of his involvement or photos of him on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014 yet. However the “anti-fascists” are habitually pack animals and usually operate with one brain.
Kieran Perkins – did you see this individual on Wythenshawe on February 1st 2014?
Kieran Perkins has a Twitter account, @Kieran_Perkins , and made it clear he supports attacking the BNP, UKIP and any other political party or group he considers fascists.
February 1st 2014: @EvansMinx smash the fash
Vehicle Of Interest:
One of the vehicles used in a violent robbery committed by UAF members or supporters was seen by one of the robbery victims. He has described it as a green/blue small saloon or hatchback. The registration plate he noted down was DE04YWD . However Greater Manchester Police are stating that DVLA have no record of this registration plate and he must have got a letter or number wrong. Let Greater Manchester Police (Sergeant Phillips telephone 0161 856 4882) or the BNP know if you have any knowledge of this vehicle, or a similar one, used by UAF thugs.
Persons Of Interest:
There were a number of other people believed to be connected to the UAF on Wythenshawe on 1st February 2014 that we are still looking in to. If you saw any of the following people please let us know or talk to Greater Manchester Police (Sergeant Phillips telephone 0161 856 4882) at the Wythenshawe Police Station:
This photo was on the Twitter account @_JoeMurray . The young man on the right answers the description of a suspect in at least one UAF robbery.
Joe Murray has denied having any knowledge of the violent crimes that were committed by the UAF on 1st February 2014, but has declined to identify the persons on the above photo or provide a witness statement.
This photo was on the Twitter account @AdrienParry. The young man on the left is believed to have some knowledge of UAF violent crimes on February 1st 2014 on Wythenshawe.
Another person of interest, at least as a possible witness, is Adrien Parry (born 1st February 1996). Known to a number of UAF supporters in the Manchester area.
Further Disruption Of The BNP In Sale:
With the “anti-fascists” getting more desperate about The BNP delivering their message of hope to the British People, there was a further incident on Wednesday 5th February 2014 at about 2:40 PM in Sale town centre shopping precinct. With the public of Sale gratefully receiving The BNP’s message of hope, BNP canvassers were disrupted by a seemingly preplanned incident.
This man disrupted BNP election campaigning – but who is he and what party or group is he with?
One man approached The BNP and started asking a lot of questions about BNP policies. While they were being explained to him in detail another man ran up and started screaming “racists” in The BNP canvasser’s face.
Who is attacking who in this photo?
As the BNP canvasser put his arm up to defend himself the man started shouting he’d been assaulted and was telephoning the Police.
He’s telephoning the Police here but who attacked who and why?
Interfering with any Political Party to stop it electioneering is a criminal offence and a breach of electoral rules. We need to identify this man, and find out which group and/or party he is with.
Please either let the Electoral Commission know or contact The BNP on enquiries@bnp.org.uk
with any details you have about this man.
Green Party Political Violence:
Surprisingly even the Green Party decided to join in the political violence against The BNP with an attack on a BNP lady activist on February 13th 2014 (polling day) early in the afternoon in Wythenshawe shopping centre.
This man seemed very strange and had attacked a lady BNP canvasser. We need his details.
To be fair to the Green Party after a member of the BNP spoke to their candidate, Nigel Woodcock, he did send this character home. However the attacker did then show at the election count that night causing distress to the lady he had previously attacked. No apology has been issued by the Green Party yet.
The Result:
The result (if it can fairly be called that) of this by-election was:
Labour 13,261
UKIP 4,301
Conservatives 3,479
LibDem 1,176
Greens 748
BNP 708
Monster Raving Loony Party 288
Turnout 28.24% (11.92% postal votes 16.32%ballot box votes)
Conclusion:
There was a very low turn out for a Parliamentary by-election with 71.76% of the electorate not bothering to vote. From my personal observations this low turn out was due to complete disenchantment with British politics.
As in nearly all elections The BNP won on a vote per pound spent basis.
Labour won officially because of their postal voting fraud, other electoral fraud, violence, intimidation and bullying.
Without the postal vote there is a good chance that UKIP would have taken this seat which should be safe for Labour.
Following the disgraceful and totally biased coverage of the Wythenshawe by-election by the Manchester Evening News (owned by the Guardian until 2010 when it was bought by Mirror Group Newspapers) it is time for the BNP to fight back.
As previously reported the M.E.N. has received over £2.2 million of Council taxpayer’s money in the last 5 years from Labour controlled Manchester City Council alone. Further Freedom Of Information Act requests will reveal the amounts from the other 9 Greater Manchester Councils and other Labour controlled organisations.
The M.E.N. is already a shrinking newspaper, now down to 47,633 sold copies per day – I’m currently investigating how many of these are bought by Labour Councils and other Labour controlled organisations. The size of the M.E.N. has also shrunk to 14 sheets (56 pages).
Fightback Against The Manchester Evening News:
The M.E.N. has several obvious weaknesses relating to advertising:
1. Living off immoral earnings – the M.E.N. has an “Adult Massage” section of paid for adverts. These are all quite clearly brothels making it a criminal offence to advertise them in exchange for financial renumeration. Please email the M.E.N. at the earliest opportunity to point this out to them at email address newsdesk@men-news.co.uk this will remove the “We didn’t realise” defence at a later date. Also report the M.E.N. for their criminal behaviour to Greater Manchester Police at http://www.gmp.police.uk/content/feedbackintelligence.html?openform
Below is a letter you can copy if required:
Dear Officer, I am writing to complain about the “Adult Massage” section in the Manchester Evening News. These “Massage Clubs” are quite clearly brothels. Apart from my obvious moral revulsion at the thought of someone making money from a Woman being reduced to selling her body, there is the criminality of the Manchester Evening News in accepting money for these adverts. Living off immoral earnings is a very serious criminal offence in England. After analysing old Manchester Evening News newspapers I realised this has been going on for at least 25 years, if not longer. There is not only the prosecution of these criminals at the Manchester Evening News, there is also the aspect of seizure of the proceeds of crime. By a very rough estimate the Manchester Evening News has raked in about £10 to 15 million from this sleaze over the last 25 years which needs seizing by the authorities. As you are well aware there is no statute of limitations on these criminal offences in the UK and they would be very easy to prove.
2. Their acceptance of millions of pounds of Greater Manchester Council taxpayer’s money combined with their biased political coverage has put them in breach of the PCC Code of Practice on journalistic standards. Why not drop the PCC an email asking for an investigation in to their relationship with Labour controlled Councils and other organisations at complaints@pcc.org.uk
Below is a letter you can copy if required:
Dear Press Complaints Commission, Could you please investigate the Manchester Evening News for their blatantly biased coverage of the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election. The Manchester Evening News has collected over £2.2 million from Labour controlled Manchester City Council in newspaper adverts alone over the last five years. There are ongoing investigations in to other deals between Manchester City Council and the Manchester Evening News, which may uncover other much bigger financial transactions. I would urge you to look at the relationship between MCC and the MEN and the biased reporting by the MEN of the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election.
3. The M.E.N. still has a number of commercial companies that advertise with it. I will be compiling a full list of these with a view to internet campaigns against these companies and a threatened boycott of them. Not many companies will be interested in advertising anywhere which may be costing them business and creating a bad smell for their company.
4. There are very serious questions relating to the relationship between senior figures in Labour controlled Manchester City Council and the Manchester Evening News relating to rates paid for advertising. I will be publishing all my findings at the earliest opportunity.
Even though none of these reds were involved this is the sort of shit we have to put up with around Manchester.
Golden Dawn Leader, mathematician and Greek National hero Nikos Michaloliakos was arrested on 28th September 2013 and has been jailed pending trial on charges that he used the organisation to operate a criminal gang. He was arraigned before a Magistrate on 2nd October 2013 when he was denied bail.
Golden Dawn Leader Nikos Michaloliakos arrested on the orders of international Jewry.
Nikos Michaloliakos is the first elected political head to be incarcerated in almost 40 years in Greece. A number of other Golden Dawn elected MPs and Party leaders are now also being held in Greek jails without bail.
Appearing on Skai television, former Greek Justice Minister Roupakiotis claimed that pressure from international Jewry was behind for the Golden Dawn arrests.
On Monday, September 23 2013, World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder demanded that the Golden Dawn be destroyed to save democracy, saying:
“It is high time Greek politicians honor their pledge and adopt effective legislation that will put an end to completely unacceptable harassment of immigrants, ethnic minorities, immigrants and political opponents by the extremist Golden Dawn party.
Words of condemnation, although important, won’t suffice. Greece’s leaders need to take action against those who create a climate of fear and who pose a threat to many of their fellow citizens.”
Ilias Panayiotaros, when arrested by the masked servants of the Jewish occupational government, shouted “Shame on them, the Greek people will lift Golden Dawn higher.”
On Saturday, September 28, MPs and key party members were arrested and imprisoned on nonsensical charges that the democratically elected party is a ‘criminal organization.’
Golden Dawn’s Ilias Kasidiaris being hauled off by masked thugs.When he was grabbed, he shouted “Nothing will bend us! Long live Greece!”
So What Happened To Amnesty International?
Amnesty International claim to be a non-political human rights organisation.
Amnesty International claim to be a non-political human rights organisation that support human rights for everyone irrespective of their political beliefs.
Amnesty International UK is divided into two legal entities – the UK Section and the Charitable Trust – and each has its own constitution.The UK section is Amnesty’s membership arm and it is responsible for much of their work, including campaigning, communications, fundraising and administration.For legal reasons the Section cannot be a charity. But the Section does carry out some activities that are considered charitable under English Law.
Amnesty International UK is a company limited by guarantee registered in England no 01735872.
Amnesty International UK Section Charitable Trust no 1051681.
Registered in Scotland as Amnesty International UK Section Charitable Trust no SC039534.
Amnesty International solicit donations and membership fees from the general Public by claiming to be a human rights organisation. If they are in fact a political organisation then they have been involved in a long-running and very serious fraud by obtaining money by deception. If they are a political organisation they have also clearly breached their charitable status which would need removing. There would also be the question of refunding membership fees and donations. Supporters of Amnesty International may also request payment for voluntary work done on campaigns which they weren’t informed were in fact political work.
At the moment we must give Amnesty International the benefit of the doubt on their lack of action regarding the imprisonment of Golden Dawn leaders. However this lack of action needs rectifying as soon as possible.
Please contact Amnesty International at the earliest opportunity about the Golden Dawn situation. Stay calm, polite and non-threatening in all your communications. Their contact details are:
Telephone: 020 7033 1500
Email: sct@amnesty.org.uk
Postal address:
Amnesty International UK
Human Rights Action Centre
17-25 New Inn Yard
London
EC2A 3EA
The Charity Commission:
In England and Wales all charities are regulated and policed by The Charity Commission. The Charity Commission clearly state that charities can not be political or support certain political parties.If you do not receive a positive response from Amnesty International on the Golden Dawn situation please consider contacting The Charity Commission to ask them to investigate here:
Charities are often the most appropriate organisations to speak out and campaign on behalf of their users. From lobbying politicians to running online petitions, you can engage in a range of activities to support your charity’s aims. But charities must never be politically biased – See more at:
It’s an article describing a young boy in State Care being sexually abused by a VIP paedophile ring including a female MP. At the end of the article we’ll narrow down the possible offending female MP.
If you thought for one minute that Britain is really as it appears to be, you’re very sadly mistaken.
Beneath the pomp and pageantrylies a network of paedophilic depravity, so vile and despicable, it literally beggars belief.
From the Elm Guest House scandal to North Wales care home abuse via Dolphin Square; to sickening Warwick Spinks and the Amsterdam connection; from Jersey’s Haut de la Garenne to Kincora in Northern Ireland; from the vile BBC to complicit police and government authorities; from MP’s through to the Royal Family themselves; the whole filthy lot of them are in on it.
The VIP paedophile ring has been able to operate by ensuring all sections of society are controlled by abusers and then children are snatched from Britain’s streets or stolen from loving families (via secret family courts) and thrown into care homes to be trafficked by filth.
This shocking article from the Sunday Express sheds more light on the role of politicians in this sordid and sickening web:
” Andrew Ash (pictured at 14) claims he was abused by two MPs in London in the 1980s [HULL NEWS & PICTURES]
She is alleged to have forced a boy in care to perform a “vile” sex act at one of a series of drug-fuelled parties in Westminster in the Eighties where boys and girls as young as 13 were allegedly abused.Last night her alleged victim told the Sunday Express: “I want justice.”
Andrew Ash, now 45, said he has given Scotland Yard the name of the former MP. We cannot name her for legal reasons.
Mr Ash claims he was frequently ferried down to London from the North of England, where he was in care, to take part in sex parties.
He says they were organised by a paedophile ring involving David Smith, Jimmy Savile’s former chauffeur who killed himself last year before he was due to stand trial for sex offences.
He said: “It wasn’t just politicians, there were also a number of celebrities, including Jimmy Savile, who seemed to have a lot of good links to MPs and powerful businessmen.
“There was usually drugs like cocaine and speed available as well as bottles of champagne.”
Of his encounter with the female MP, he said: “She was extremely drunk and was laughing as she did it.
“I didn’t really know what was going on but the others around her were goading her on.
“I must have been about 13 years old at the time and felt humiliated.” We can also reveal that security services have been working closely with Yard detectives because of the highly sensitive nature of the allegations.
The Sunday Express understands police seized video footage and photographs of an alleged sex party from a well-known paedophile last year.
Mr Ash claims officers have footage which shows a senior male MP in the same frame as him, although no abuse takes place on camera. He said he is speaking out now because he is frustrated by the lack of action after being interviewed for 70 hours by the Met Police’s Paedophile Unit.
He says he was abused by the male MP on another occasion too. He said: “I remember being filmed with this MP, who was abusing me in a garage of a very prominent building behind a Rolls-Royce.
“Another politician turned up with a video camera but the man abusing me just smirked and joked, ‘OK, OK, I’ll vote any way you want’ as if he was being blackmailed. What I want to know is why they haven’t arrested him yet if they have this evidence.“All I want is justice and for the truth to come out because these people have been protected for far too long.”
Mr Ash said two Met officers called at his home in Yorkshire last May.
Interviews were conducted mainly at a safe house in Bridlington, East Yorkshire, but also in London. “The interviews were usually carried out in blocks of three, normally every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.
“On at least two occasions there were two other officers present that I didn’t recognise. They didn’t ask me a thing, they just scribbled notes.
“I asked who they were but all I was told was that they were from ‘upstairs’. It was clear from the tone that they were intelligence officers.
“They had obviously been made aware of the high-profile names and the sensitive information I had given police.”
Dutch intelligence officers attended at least one interview because Andrew told of being trafficked to Amsterdam on a number of occasions to be abused by a group of paedophiles including convicted child killer Sidney Cooke.
He claims Cooke, now 84, made him film the paedophile abusing another young boy on video. It is feared Cooke may have abused and killed young boys in the Netherlands.
Mr Ash also told police he was abused by a big-name celebrity.
He said: “This particular person was able to get youngsters into glitzy nightclubs in the West End. After one evening he invited me and a young girl back to his house where he made us have sex before joining in.”
Mr Ash is being helped by anti-abuse campaigners Bill Maloney and Chris Fay.
Mr Fay said: “The police have spent a good deal of time with him, listening to his evidence, and now potentially have compelling information that Andrew was at one of these parties with at least one prominent former MP.
“He hopes by speaking out, other victims may come forward.”
This appalling account of VIP abuse is just the tip of the iceberg.
When we finally discover the full extent of just how wide the filthy paedo ring operating in this country really is, it may well mean the end of Britain as we know it.
Josephine Richardson (Labour) 1923-1994 (deceased) MP from 1974 to 1994
Margaret Thatcher (Conservative) 1925–2013 (deceased) MP from 1959 to 1992
Sheila Faith (Conservative) born 1928 (retired) MP from 1979 to 1983
Jill Knight (Conservative) born 1924 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Knight of Collingtree) MP from 1966 to 1987
Sheila Wright (Labour) 1925-2013 (deceased) MP from 1979 to 1983
Ann Taylor (Labour) born 1947 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Taylor of Bolton) MP from 1974 to 1983 and 1987 to 2005
Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour) 1930-2008 (deceased) MP from 1966 to 1970 and 1974 to 2008
Joan Lester (Labour) 1931-1998 (deceased after serving in House Of Lords as Baroness Lester of Eccles) MP frpm 1966 to 1983 and 1987 to 1997
Sally Oppenheim (Conservative) born 1930 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes of Gloucester) MP from 1970 to 1987
Shirley Summerskill (Labour) born 1931 (retired) MP from 1964 to 1983
Judith Hart (Labour) 1924-1991 (deceased after serving in House Of Lords as Baroness Hart of South Lanark) MP from 1959 to 1987
Elaine Kellet-Bowman (Conservative) born 1924 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1997
Janet Fookes (Conservative) born 1936 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Fookes of Plymouth) MP from 1970 to 1997
Peggy Fenner (Conservative) born 1922 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1974 and 1979 to 1997
Joan Maynard (Labour) 1921-1998 (deceased) MP from 1974 to 1987
Dr. Oonagh McDonald (Labour) born 1938 (retired) MP from 1976 to 1987
Lynda Chalker (Conservative) born 1942 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Chalker of Wallasey) MP from 1974 to 1992
Betty Boothroyd (Labour) born 1929 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Boothroyd of Sandwell) MP from 1973 to 2000
Renee Short (Labour) 1919-2003 (deceased) MP from 1964 to 1987
A List Of The 23 Female MPs Elected in 1983:
Josephine Richardson (Labour) 1923-1994 (deceased) MP from 1974 to 1994
Elizabeth Peacock (Conservative) born 1937 (retired) MP from 1983 to 1997
Jill Knight (Conservative) born 1924 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Knight of Collingtree) MP from 1966 to 1987
Clare Short (Labour) born 1946 (retired 2010) MP from 1983 to 2005
Marion Roe (Conservative) born 1936 (retired 2005) MP from 1983 to 2005
Judith Hart (Labour) 1924-1991 (deceased after serving in House Of Lords as Baroness Hart of South Lanark) MP from 1959 to 1987
Lady Ann Winterton (Conservative) born 1941 (retired 2010) MP from 1983 to 2010
Gwyneth Dunwoody (Labour) 1930- 2008 (deceased) MP from 1966 to 1970 and 1974 to 2008
Margaret Beckett (Labour) born 1943 (currently MP) MP from 1974 to 1979 and 1983 to present
Edwina Currie (Conservative) born 1946 (retired 1997) MP from 1983 to 1997
Margaret Thatcher (Conservative) 1925–2013 (deceased) MP from 1959 to 1992
Sally Oppenheim (Conservative) born 1930 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes of Gloucester) MP from 1970 to 1987
Elaine Kellet-Bowman (Conservative) born 1924 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1997
Peggy Fenner (Conservative) born 1922 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1974 and 1979 to 1997
Angela Rumbold (Conservative) 1932-2010 (deceased) First elected in 1982 by-election then MP from 1983 to 1997
Harriet Harman (Labour) born 1950 (currently MP for Peckham) first elected MP in by-election 1982 to present
Janet Fookes (Conservative) born 1936 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Fookes of Plymouth) MP from 1970 to 1997
Anna McCurley (Conservative) born 1943 (retired 1987) MP from 1983 to 1987
Joan Maynard (Labour) 1921-1998 (deceased) MP from 1974 to 1987
Dr. Oonagh McDonald (Labour) born 1938 (retired) MP from 1976 to 1987
Lynda Chalker (Conservative) born 1942 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Chalker of Wallasey) MP from 1974 to 1992
Betty Boothroyd (Labour) born 1929 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Boothroyd of Sandwell) MP from 1973 to 2000
Renee Short (Labour) 1919-2003 (deceased) MP from 1964 to 1987
Jewess Harriet Harman QC MP in butterfly brooch.
The most obvious suspect is Harriet Harman QC MP of the Paedophile Information Exchange but we need more clues than we have already. However Harriet Harman is still an MP. Here’s an article on the evil Harriet Harman:
However if the accused is really an ex-MP and is still alive the 17 suspects are:
Sheila Faith (Conservative) born 1928 (retired) MP from 1979 to 1983
Jill Knight (Conservative) born 1924 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Knight of Collingtree) MP from 1966 to 1987
Ann Taylor (Labour) born 1947 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Taylor of Bolton) MP from 1974 to 1983 and 1987 to 2005
Sally Oppenheim (Conservative) born 1930 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes of Gloucester) MP from 1970 to 1987
Shirley Summerskill (Labour) born 1931 (retired) MP from 1964 to 1983
Elaine Kellet-Bowman (Conservative) born 1924 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1997
Janet Fookes (Conservative) born 1936 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Fookes of Plymouth) MP from 1970 to 1997
Peggy Fenner (Conservative) born 1922 (retired) MP from 1970 to 1974 and 1979 to 1997
Dr. Oonagh McDonald (Labour) born 1938 (retired) MP from 1976 to 1987
Lynda Chalker (Conservative) born 1942 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Chalker of Wallasey) MP from 1974 to 1992
Betty Boothroyd (Labour) born 1929 (now in House Of Lords as Baroness Boothroyd of Sandwell) MP from 1973 to 2000
Elizabeth Peacock (Conservative) born 1937 (retired) MP from 1983 to 1997
Clare Short (Labour) born 1946 (retired 2010) MP from 1983 to 2005
Marion Roe (Conservative) born 1936 (retired 2005) MP from 1983 to 2005
Lady Ann Winterton (Conservative) born 1941 (retired 2010) MP from 1983 to 2010
Edwina Currie (Conservative) born 1946 (retired 1997) MP from 1983 to 1997
Anna McCurley (Conservative) born 1943 (retired 1987) MP from 1983 to 1987
Justice Denied Blog Names Their Five Top Suspects:
The Justice Denied blog has named their five top suspects as:
1. Edwina Currie – an MP at the time, now retired and not deceased.Edwina Currie appointed Savile to run a taskforce in charge of Broadmoor mental hospital in the 1980s, where he is accused of sexually assaulting patients
2. Margaret Thatcher – an MP at the time (actually Prime Minister), now retired and deceased.
3. Virginia Bottomley – not an MP until 1984, now retired and not deceased. Her husband Peter Bottomley is named on the Elm Guest House paedophile VIP party list.
4. Harriet Harman – an MP at the time, not retired and not deceased.Major player in the Paedophile Information Exchange.
5. Ann Winterton – an MP at the time, now retired and not deceased.
If the abuse happened in 1982 or 1983, as it seems, then the only two out of the five fitting the description ( MP at the time, now retired and not deceased) would be Edwina Currie and Ann Winterton. Read more from Justice Denied here:
There is a resistance to the BBC TV Licence growing across the UK, so here’s some facts for those thinking of joining it.
1. What Is The BBC TV Licence:
The TV Licence fee funds public broadcasting by the BBC, allowing it to allegedly run a politically impartial TV and Radio service. The current colour TV Licence Fee is £145:50 per year (a black and white TV Licence is £49:00 per year) . The fee makes up about 75% of the BBC’s income – the BBC are very secretive about where the other 25% comes from.
Here’s a Freedom Of Information Request About BBC funding sources:
The BBC contracts the collection and administration of the TV Licence out to TV Licensing who in turn employ Capita. According to the BBC, the money you pay is split between the following services:
2. You Only Need A Licence If You Watch Or Record “Live” TV:
Everyone in the UK who watches or records “live TV” (content as it is being broadcast) needs to be covered by a TV Licence.
You do not need a TV Licence if you only watch content after it’s been shown on television. This includes TV programmes downloaded or streamed after broadcast using a catch-up service.
So, if you have a TV but only use it to watch videos/DVDs, for gaming or for watching catch-up TV (eg, BBC iPlayer, 4oD), then you don’t need a TV Licence.
What’s ‘live TV’?
When we talk about “live TV”, confusingly it isn’t necessarily a live episode of a programme, it could be pre-recorded.
“Live TV” is content at the time it’s being broadcast on a TV channel.
A TV channel doesn’t just mean the big five on terrestrial TV, nor any channel that’s just on Freeview. It means any channel (including, say, +1 channels or foreign channels) on any main TV platform, including Freeview, Virgin or Sky.
Internet-only services such as YouTube or Netflix don’t need a TV Licence though.
Here are a few examples to show what this means:
When watching an episode of Hollyoaks on your TV, on Channel 4, you DO need a TV Licence.
When watching an episode of Hollyoaks via the Channel 4 online streaming service (4oD) at the same time as it’s being shown on Channel 4, you DO need a TV Licence.
When watching an episode of Hollyoaks online at a time that it isn’t being broadcast “live” on Channel 4, you DON’T need a TV Licence.
3. What If You Have The Equipment To Watch TV But Don’t Use It:
Simply having the necessary equipment to watch TV i.e. a TV, Freeview box, aerial etc. does not mean you must have a TV Licence. For example if you only use your TV, aerial, Freeview box and connectors to listen to the radio, watch DVDs/videos or play games you do not need a TV Licence. If you had a radio, but not a television, until 1971 you had to pay for a Radio Licence.These days, you don’t need a licence to listen to the radio (including BBC stations). This applies however you listen, even if you listen using television equipment, a Freeview box and a TV aerial.
4. Eligibility For A Discount Or Free TV Licence:
Depending on your circumstances, it may be possible to get a discount or free TV Licence.
Over-75s get a free TV Licence. If you’re over 74 and your licence will run out before you turn 75, you’re entitled to a short-term licence covering you until you reach 75.If you’ve got a short-term licence, you should receive the free one automatically as soon as you reach 75. If not, get in touch with TV Licensing.
If you or someone you live with is blind or severely sight-impaired, you’ll get 50% off the cost of a TV licence. So it’s £72.75 for a colour set or £24.50 for a black and white one.
You must provide TV Licensing with a photocopy of one of these documents to confirm you’re certified as either blind or severely sight-impaired:
A copy of the certificate or document issued by or on behalf of your local authority.
A copy of the certificate from your ophthalmologist.
If you’re only partially sighted or sight-impaired, you won’t qualify for the concession.
If you live in a residential care home and watch TV in your own room or flat, then you need a licence. You may be able to apply for an Accommodation or Residential Care Concessionary Licence though, if you qualify.This costs £7.50 per room, flat or bungalow. Both you and your accommodation must qualify.
If you record any live TV programmes from any channel at the time of broadcast by any means (video recorder,DVD recorder,Sky+,TiVo etc.) and through any equipment (aerial, Freeview box, cable or satellite) you will require a TV Licence. However to watch DVDs, videos etc. previously recorded at another premises you will not require a TV Licence.
6. Getting Caught Watching “Live Broadcast TV” Without A Licence:
The BBC claim they have handheld detectors and TV detector vans, most people agree this is highly unlikely due to technical problems and there is no evidence of prosecutions due to this alleged detecting equipment.
How people are usually caught is through a Capita agent knocking on their door. They get the addresses to check simply by going to every home not on the TV Licence data base. These Capita agents are believed to be on a £20 commission for every TV Licence evader they catch. These Capita agents have no right of entry in to your home if you decline to let them in, you are also under no obligation to answer any of their questions. Your best bet is to always video these encounters in full. Here are some Capita TV Licence agents being dealt with on video:
If you don’t need a TV Licence the best advice to deal with the Capita agents would probably be to politely:
a. Ask to see their identity card.
b. Give your name if you’re the householder.
c. Explain you don’t watch or record live broadcast TV so don’t need a TV Licence.
d. Decline to let them in your home – they have no right of entry if they don’t have a uniformed Police Officer with a warrant with them.
e. If you do make the mistake of letting them in, or they have a Police Officer with a warrant with them, don’t comply with any requests to turn on or demonstrate any equipment to them.
f. At no time become angry, abusive or threatening – you’ll just get arrested.
g. Under no circumstances sign a 178 form even if you have been caught “bang to rights”.
The notorious 178 form – never sign one.
Even when they come with a Uniformed Police Officer with a search warrant they don’t always get in Peoples’ houses:
In the UK getting caught watching (or recording) live TV broadcasts without a TV License is a criminal offence. If you do sign the 178 form you will probably be summoned to your local Magistrates Court for plea and sentencing. Your guilt, if you signed a 178 form, is taken for granted and you can be fined up to £1,000. The normal fine for a first time offender is about £50 to £100. There is also the prosecution costs, which are about £90, that you also have to pay. About 10% of criminal prosecutions in British Magistrates Courts are now for TV Licence evasion. You can’t be sent to prison for TV Licence evasion, but can be sent to prison if you don’t pay your fine. A third of women sent to prison in Britain are now for failure to pay a TV Licence fee evasion fine.
A mock-up of a TV detector unit – there’s no evidence this equipment actually works.
Here’s a major player with the TV Licence Resistance making a video about witnessing TV Licence evasion prosecutions at his local Magistrates Court:
You’ll notice at the Magistrates Court he attended there were 86 prosecutions ( 19 men and 67 women) in a total of 75 minutes. All the cases were based on the defendant signing the notorious 178 form with no evidence from TV detector vans or hand-held detectors. The fines ranged from £35 to £600 with a standard £90 prosecution costs.
Freedom Of Information Act Request About TV Licence Fee Prosecutions And Detector Equipment:
If you realise you have paid for a TV Licence you didn’t need it’s easy to claim a refund.
If you have realised that you have been paying for a TV Licence when you didn’t need one, or were eligible for a discount, you can claim up to 2 years ago here:
There’s usually no problem with getting up to two years refunded. For periods before two years ago you will need to make a written application to:
Head of Revenue Management
BBC TV Licensing
2nd Floor, The Lighthouse
BBC White City
201 Wood Lane
London
W12 7TQ
9. As The BBC Is Clearly A Corrupt Criminal Organisation Can It Collect Legally:
Technically the answer is the BBC can’t legally collect the TV Licence anyway. Think of its corruption regarding paedophilia, 911, the Royal Family, foreign wars, PFI Fraud etc. However you are very unlikely to get any result on these defences due to the corruption of the British legal profession and judiciary. Some people who are well resourced with a top legal team and expert witnesses can get results on this basis, however it is not a recommended route to take. Here is a 911 truther who did get a not guilty verdict for TV Licence fee evasion:
10. Read Up Before Applying For Your Refund Or Joining The TV Licence Resistance:
Before applying for your refunds/discount or joining the TV Licence Resistance it is advisable to read up fully so you know what your exact legal position is. Here are some recommended sites:
Here Is A Letter Removing Implied Right Of Access You May Want To Use:
Customer Relations Insert Your Address Here
TV Licensing Insert Date Here
Darlington
DL98 1TL
Removal Of Implied Right Of Access –Insert Your Address Here
TV Licensing Reference Number –Insert Ref. No. From TV Licensing Here
This instruction is made in accordance with the BBC TV Licensing Withdrawal Of Implied Right Of Access (WOIRA) Policy (The Policy).
As the legal occupier of the above mentioned property I hereby remove TV Licensing’s implied right of access to the property, in accordance with the terms of the Policy. By “TV Licensing” I mean any employees, agents or contractors acting on behalf of the BBC as TV Licensing Authority.
The Policy is quite clear that I do not need to give a name for my instruction to be legally valid, so I will not be doing so. You can verify my status as the Legal Occupier by matching the reference number above to my property.
This instruction comes into effect immediately . Should TV Licensing personnel trespass on my property after receipt of this instruction, I reserve the right to eject them from my property and seek redress from the Courts.
Please confirm receipt of this letter and acknowledgement of its terms by writing back to me.
Yours sincerely
The Legal Occupier
Freedom Of Information Act Request Relating To Withdrawl Of Implied Right Of Access : RFI20090807
Please read the Freedom Of Information Act Request at the link below relating to “Withdrawl Of Implied Right Of Access”:
The BBC has just been caught out again by BNP activists spending Licence Fee payer’s money like water. A Freedom Of Information Act request has revealed the staggering amounts spent by BBC staff on expense accounts.
These latest figures are only for food, drink and refreshments over the last three years. The BBC is stalling on giving the most expensive bottles of champagne and wine purchased but we are hunting these figures down.
The figures are:
2010 to 2011 £2,306,496
2011 to 2012 £2,233,938
2012 to 2013 £2,416,070
Total £6,956 ,504
That is a staggering £44,593 every week for the last three years.
These expenses are just for food, drink and food for refreshments for staff purchased off BBC premises.
These figures do NOT include subsidised restaurants and cafes on BBC premises.
These figures do NOT include travel or hotel expenses – we are chasing these expenses down and will release them as soon as we can get them.
As usual this shows the complete contempt the BBC have for the hard pressed Licence Fee payers of Britain.
BBC Blows Nearly £29 Million On Hotels In Last Three Years:
The BBC has a reputation for having complete contempt for Television License fee payers. A Freedom Of Information Act request has revealed just how much of our money is blown by this corrupt, racist and paedophile-infested organisation on luxury hotel rooms for its staff. These figures do not include transport, meals, drinks or any costs other than hotel rooms:
2011 – £8.4 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.
2012 – £8.8 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.
2013 – £11.6 million spent by BBC staff on hotel rooms.
The reason for the jump in 2013 is explained by the BBC as being due to the Sochi Olympics, Brazil World Cup and Glasgow Commonwealth Games. This however would imply that the BBC spent an average of nearly £1 million on hotel rooms for each of these three events.
The BBC hasn’t provided full figures yet but here is a list of the most expensive hotel room paid for each year by the BBC for staff:
2011 – £306 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.
2012 – £632 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.
2013 – £411 was the most expensive hotel room paid for by the BBC.
Photos, Diagrams, Videos and Captions by Watt Tyler
The Twin Towers attack on 11th September 2001
On 11th September 2001 in New York City USA, two passenger jet airplanes (American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175)were flown in to two skyscrapers of the World Trade Centre known as the Twin Towers. The twin towers, World Trade Centre One and Two, collapsed and later that day another building known as World Trade Centre Seven also collapsed. Nearly 3,000 People died ( 67 British ) in the collapsed buildings that day, and an unknown number have also died from related injuries since that day. There was also an attack on the Pentagon that day (American Airlines Flight 77) and another hijacked jet (United Airlines Flight 93) that crashed in Shanksville Pennsylvania, presumed to be heading for Washington. This article will be looking at the attack on the Twin Towers in New York.
Twin Towers terrorist attack 11th September 2001 in New York.
The official version of events, given by the USA Government, was that 19 muslim hijackers from terrorist group Al-Qaeda had hijacked the two planes involved in the New York attacks, and two other planes involved in other terrorist attacks in America that day. Their alleged motive was resentment of American freedoms. They had flown two planes in to the Twin Towers leading to their collapse, while World Trade Centre Seven had allegedly collapsed due to a fire which had been caused by the Twin Towers attack.
Twin Towers attacks on 11th September 2001
The official version of the collapsed buildings was that a “pancake effect” had led to the total collapse of the three World Trade Centre buildings due to the impact of the planes and subsequent fires. However conspiracy theorists claim there were explosive demolition charges placed in the three buildings that led to their total collapse.
Diagram of 911 terrorist attacks.
The main thrust of conspiracy theorists who reject the Government version of events is that 911 was an inside job organised by the jewish criminal mafia, Mossad and the Bush/Cheney zionist neo-conservatives. Some conspiracy theorists also allege that the Saudi Government was involved. Their purpose was an immediate financial gain and the justification for re-shaping the Middle East in Israel’s favour, and also securing oil and other resources, via invasions and occupations by the United States Military.
Following the 911 terrorist attacks the American Military has invaded and occupied several countries as a response.
In no way does this blog dispute the official version of events presented by the United States Government. However we did find the following 20 amazing facts about the 911 terrorist attack:
1. Owner of The World Trade Centre Buildings Larry Silverstein:
Larry Silverstein is a jewish dual Nationality Israeli-American businessman. He had taken out a 99 year lease on the World Trade Centre buildings on 24th July 2001, seven weeks before 911, with a down payment of $100 million. The buildings were virtually worthless, due to the fact they were riddled with asbestos which needed urgent and costly removal. Following 911 the litigation between Silverstein and the insurance companies was overseen by Judge Michael Mukasey, also a dual Nationality Israeli-American, which resulted in a $4.55 billion payout to Silverstein.
Lewis Eisenberg was the jewish head of The Port Authority of New York and authorised Silverstein’s purchase of the World Trade Centre buildings. Eisenberg was a partner in Goldman-Sachs and a major contributor to the Bush-Cheney Presidential campaign. Eisenberg has been a member of the planning board of the United Jewish Appeal and the United Jewish Federation.
2. The US Government’s Pancake Collapse Theory:
The US Government’s official theory for the collapse of Word Trade Centre Buildings 1, 2 and 7 is known as the “pancake collapse” or “wet noodle theory”. What this theory claims is that the fires in the three buildings, caused by burning spilt jet fuel, led to their steel structures losing their strength and each floor collapsing on the one below leading to the complete collapse of the buildings. However conspiracy theorists point out that no steel structured building in the World has ever collapsed in this way, either before or since, due to fires weakening their steel structures.
The hottest a jet fuel fire can burn is about 900 degrees fahrenheit, whereas steel does not lose its strength until about 1600 degrees fahrenheit and melts at about 2,795 degrees fahrenheit . Scientists have calculated that the 911 fires were burning at about 500 to 550 degrees fahrenheit. The US Government never held an independent enquiry in to 911, and FEMA gave $600,000 to a group of investigators known as the Building Performance Assessment Team. BPAT spent a total of five days investigating the attacks.
The Windsor Tower building in Madrid burnt for several days in February 2005 totally gutting it but not leading to its collapse. Apart from on 911 no steel structure building has ever collapsed due to fire.
The four main sources for the US Government’s theory are:
An article by Sheila Barter of the BBC titled How The World Trade Centre Fell published on 13th September 2001
Twenty-one miles North of the WTC in New York complex is Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory which monitors seismic data. On 11th September 2001 it recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake at 9:59:04 at the start of the ten second collapse of the South Tower and a 2.3 magnitude earthquake at 10:28:31 at the start of the collapse of the North Tower. Both these quakes were recorded at the start, not the end, of the collapses. The Earth Observatory also monitors seismic data daily from a quarry 20 miles away which registers local earthquakes between magnitude 1 and 2 caused by 80,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate.
The South Tower collapses.
Independent researchers have discovered a highly engineered explosive-incendiary material in several dust samples collected near the WTC site. In their paper, entitled Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, nine researchers, led by chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen, conclude:
“The red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
4. Security At The Twin Towers:
Following the 1993 WTC bombing the security was awarded to Kroll Associates by the New York Port Authority. Kroll Associates were paid $2.5 million to revamp security at the WTC buildings. Kroll Associates had closed down the Twin Towers during the weekend preceding 911 and no one had been allowed in. The owners of Kroll are two zionist jews called Jules and Jeremy Kroll, the Managing Director was Jerome M. Hauer another zionist jew. It was Jerome Hauer who advised the White House staff to take “Cipro”, the most effective antibiotic against Anthrax, a week before the Anthrax mailings started.
FBI Special Agent John O’Neill 1952-2001
Former FBI Special Agent John O’Neill was hired as head of security at the WTC by Jerome Hauer and was killed on his first day at work on 911. Previously John O’Neill had been forced to resign his FBI post after investigating the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, he had concluded it was not an Al Qaeda attack but was hit by an Israeli cruise missile.
USS Cole attacked in Yemen 12 October 2000. Originally claimed as an Al Qaeda suicide bombing.
5. Disposal Of 911 Evidence:
Following 911 the site of the collapsed buildings was termed “Ground Zero”. The rubble was moved to a dump on Statten Island. All the scrap metal was sold to Alan D. Ratner of Metal Management of Newark, New Jersey and Hugo Neu Schitzer for $70 per ton. They sold it on to scrap metal merchant Baosteel for $120 per ton who sold it on in India and China for recycling.
The New York Times said “The decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses from the WTC in the days immediately after 911 means definitive answers may never be known.”
Dr. W. Gene Corley – who also investigated the Oklahoma City bombing and the Branch Davidian fire in Waco – was put in charge of the Building Performance Assessment Team assembled by FEMA. They investigated from October 7th to 12th 2001 but never tested for traces of explosives. The BPAT investigators were given no authority to impound any materials or question any witnesses during their 5 day investigation that FEMA gave a budget of $600,000 to.
Dr. W. Gene Corley at Ground Zero.
6. The Five Dancing Israelis On 911:
Various witnesses saw five men dancing and celebrating on 911. They were also observed filming the WTC attacks at Liberty State Park,Jersey City, New Jersey. They were soon detained by the New York Police Department who were surprised to discover they were all Israeli citizens. The names of the five dancing Israelis was Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari. Sivan Kurzberg told the NYPD Officers “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” The five Israelis later appeared on an Israeli TV Talk Show and claimed they had been there “documenting the event.”
Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Schmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari
A large number of other Israeli citizens (about 90 to 100) were arrested around New York and New Jersey on 11th September 2001. They were all later released and deported without charge. Most of them had failed polygraph tests, the results of which were classified. One of the strangest events was the arrest of some Israelis in a van with a picture of a plane flying in to the Twin Towers and the numbers 9/11 on the side.
In a separate incident some Israelis were stopped driving this van on September 11th 2001 on the junction of 6th and King Street a few blocks from the Twin Towers in New York.
7. Witnesses To Explosions In The Twin Towers:
There were a large number of witnesses, including MSM reporters, on 911 who reported hearing various explosions in the Twin Towers before they collapsed. In any video of the Twin Towers collapsing you can see small explosions coming out of the sides of the buildings. This video is probably the best audio for explosions and smoke, or dust, coming from the base of the Twin Towers:
8. The Strange Case Of The ZIM Company Vacating The World Trade Centre:
The ZIM Corproation is an Israeli shipping company that leased the 16th and 17th floors of the North Tower in the World Trade Centre Buildings. They had vacated their premises a week before 911 at a cost of $50,000 for breaking their lease. Following 911 their activities were seen as highly suspicious by FBI Agent Michael Dick who started investigating them. Agent Michael Dick was removed from the investigation by Israeli-US Dual Nationality Michael Chertoff, who was Head of the Justice Department Criminal Division. The investigation in to ZIM was not continued.
Israeli-US Dual Nationality Michael Chertoff, who was Head of the Justice Department Criminal Division
9. The Patriot Act And Immunity From Civil Lawsuits Given To Foreign Security Companies:
The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act Of Congress that was signed into law by President George Bush on October 26, 2001 in response to the 911 terrorist attacks. The title of the act is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. It basically gave the United States Government unprecedented powers of surveillance and detention to combat terrorism. There have been many allegations that it could not have been written that quickly and must have been written before 911 happened.
One, not very well-known, part of the Patriot Act gave foreign security companies involved in 911 complete immunity from civil lawsuits. This meant none of the victims of 911 could sue these security companies and get “discovery” of documents and evidence related to 911 in the process. The only foreign security companies involved in 911 were all Israeli.
10. Odigo Instant Messaging Service And Other Warnings:
Odigo is an instant message service Israeli company.A feature of Odigo is the ability to send messages based on certain criteria. One criteria is Nationality e.g. Israeli. Two hours before the Twin Towers attack in New York Odigo had carried a warning of the impending attack via the “Israeli National” option. On 10th September 2001 the Tokyo branch of Golman-Sachs had warned its’ employees to avoid all US Government buildings. Out of about 4,000 Israeli Nationals (not American jews) working in the World Trade Centre Buildings and the Pentagon only three were allegedly killed that day, with another two Israelis allegedly killed on the planes.
President George Bush claimed 130 Israelis were killed on 911
On 20th September 2001 President Bush made an address to the Joint Session of Congress following the 911 attacks. In this address President Bush claimed 130 Israelis had been killed on 911.
11.Remote Control Planes?:
One conspiracy theory is that the planes were being remotely controlled instead of piloted by the alleged hijackers who had only a few hours pilot training on single engine planes. Most flying experts agree that the manoeuvres performed by the much harder to fly Boeing jetliners could not have been undertaken by inexperienced pilots. The remote control theory is not as outlandish as it first appears, after all there are plenty of remote control model airplanes and the military use drones controlled from thousands of miles away all the time. The first plane to hit the WTC (North Tower) crashed directly in to the computer room of Marsh & McLennan ( owned by Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll) which had recently acquired Kroll Associates. Was there guidance equipment in these offices?
The North Tower gets hit on 911 – was this plane remotely controlled?
Remote control piloting of Boeing jetliners is in fact a reality, SPC Corporation supplies the technology and equipment that allows planes to be remotely controlled should pilots become incapacitated or planes hijacked.
12. Military Defense Computer Failures On 911:
On the morning of 911 there was a major computer failure across the US Government. These failures included, amongst other agencies, The FBI, The Secret Service, The IRS, The Department of Justice, US Customs, The IRS, NATO, United States Armed Forces, FAA, Congress, Department of Energy, The White House and many other US Government agencies. All these computer systems were running on software developed and sold by Ptech Software.
US Government computer systems running Ptech Software failed on 911
Ptech Software meant to deal with such incidents as 911 failed right across US Government Agencies on 11th September 2001.
13.Rabbi Dov Zakheim:
Rabbi Dov Zakheim was the co-author of the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) paper on rebuilding US defences and the need for a Pearl Harbour type incident to get the US Public behind a war on terrorism. Zakheim was the Pentagon Comptroller from from 4th May 2001 to 10th March 2004. On 10th September 2001 Donald Rumsfield publically stated that $2.3 trillion had gone “missing” from the Pentagon , this news was buried by the attacks the next day. Zakheim was also unable to account for another $1 trillion that went “missing” later. It was a Zakheim policy to classify squadrons of American F-15s and F-16s as surplus and sold at knock-down prices to Israel.
On September 20, 2001 (nine days after the 911 attacks), the PNAC sent a letter to President George Bush stating:
“…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism.”
The security companies that ran the security at the three aiports (Boston’s Logan, New Jersey’s Newark and Maine’s Portland International) and where the alleged hijackers boarded the four planes on 911 were ICTS Security and a wholly owned subsidary Huntsleigh USA. ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were owned by Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon, both Israeli Nationals and zionist jews. The companies are run by intelligence experts from Israel – that is Mossad and ex-Mossad agents. ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were exempted from lawsuits and “discovery” relating to the 911 attacks by the Patriot Act.
ICTS Security and Huntsleigh USA were exempted from lawsuits relating to 911 by the Patriot Act.
15. $7 Billion Of Taxpayers Money For The Victims:
Following the 911 attacks the US Government set up a $7 billion fund of US Taxpayer’s money to compensate the victims. About 97% of the victims, or their families, accepted offers from this fund thereby avoiding a large number of lawsuits and “discovery” by lawyers. This also saved the companies involved from facing financial claims. All the Israeli security companies involved had already been exempted from lawsuits by the Patriot Act.
A $7 billion taxpayer fund for victims prevented lawsuits questioning the official narrative
16. World Trade Centre Building 7 :
Apart from the Twin Towers one other building collapsed in New York on 11th September 2001 – WTC Building 7 (AKA Salomon Brothers Buildings). WTC Building 7 was a 47-story steel structure skyscraper built-in 1984 and was also owned by Larry Silverstein . It collapsed at 5:20 pm allegedly due to damage and fire from the Twin Towers attack. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.World Trade Centre Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Centre, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker”.
According to a Zogby poll in 2006, 43% of Americans did not know about WTC7 and it’s collapse was never even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for WTC7 following various internet campaigns. Over 1,700 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7, specifying that it should include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives.
Here is a video of the WTC 7 building collapse, the BBC reporting it twenty minutes before it happened and some experts’ opinions on the collapse being a controlled demolition:
17. The Twin Towers And WTC 7 Fell At Nearly Free-Fall Speed:
The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed and fell at nearly free-fall speed. Free-fall is the speed an object, such as a brick, would fall if it was dropped from the roof with only wind-resistance to slow it down. The way of calculating free-fall speeds is t(time in seconds)=square root(2height in feet/g) where (g) is the acceleration due to gravity (32.174 / second squared). The Twin Towers were 110 storeys (1,368 feet) and their free-fall time would be about 9.2 seconds, both of the Twin Towers took about 10 to 11 seconds to completely collapse. The WTC7 buiding was 47 storeys high (570 feet)and its free-fall time would be about 5.95 seconds, it’s collapse took about 6.5 seconds.These speeds of collapse suggest there was virtually no resistance to the building falling i.e. a controlled demolition.
Here is a good video of WTC 7 collapsing and a very strange interview with Larry Silverstein:
18. New York Post Reports Foreign Government Involvement In 911:
After the 911 attacks, the Public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 911 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi Nationals. President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood. A pair of lawmakers (Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.)) who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.
The September 11, 2001 attacks in the US were a “false flag” operation carried out jointly by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia with “Zionists playing the lead role,” an analyst tells Press TV.
8:46 a.m. American Airlines Flight 11 apparently crashed into the World Trade Centre North Tower (WTC1).
9:03 a.m United Airlines Flight 175 apparently crashed into the World Trade Centre South Tower (WTC2).
9:37a.m. American Airlines Flight 77 apparently crashed in to the Pentagon.
10:03a.m. United Airlines 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania after passengers had apparently fought back against hijackers. It seems that UA93 was headed to the White House.
At this stage virtually every TV Station on Earth was covering the Twin Towers in New York. I was personally on a beach in South Gran Canaria which emptied as everyone went to the bars at the back of the beach to watch the TV’s showing the events in New York. With JFK everyone remembers where they were when they heard, but with 911 nearly everyone watched the drama unfold. With people jumping to their deaths to escape the smoke and fires nearly the whole TV watching World was glued to the screens.
The timeline of 911 gave nearly everyone in the World with access to a TV enough time to watch the final collapses.
9:59 a.m. The South Tower (WTC2) collapsed after burning for 56 minutes.
10:28 a.m.The North Tower (WTC1) collapsed after burning for 102 minutes.
5:20 p.m. WTC 7 eventually collapses long after most People had stopped watching, this is why so few People know about WTC7.
If you look at the time from 8:46 a.m when WTC1 was first hit to 10:28 a.m when WTC1 collapsed you have 102 minutes. This is a pretty standard length for a Hollywood film nowadays. Any longer and People get bored. Was this Global Theatre for the Masses played out on Worldwide TV?
20. Disinformation, 911 Truthers And Mysterious Deaths:
Immediately after 911 a lot of very strange conspiracy theories started circulating including UFOs, holograms, guided missiles, swapping airplanes etc. This is known as disinformation and its purpose is to discredit any real theories that don’t agree with the official narrative.
Alex Jones is probaly the most famous shabos goy shill in the World – the rewards are fame and fortune.
On one advert for Mastercard in America they even had a man wearing a tinfoil hat stating that he believed 911 was an inside job. This is a way of keeping the media and the general population in line with the implied threat of ridicule for asking pertinent questions.
When ridicule fails with the 911 truth movement more radical steps are often taken. There have been a number of strange deaths of 911 truthers and 911 witnesses across the World. One of the most famous ones being the death of Phillip Marshall (who had written several 911 conspiracy books) and his two teenage children which was officially determined to be a murder-suicide.Wayne Masden, former national security officer, claims he is “100 percent certain that 911 investigator and author Philip Marshall and his two children were killed in a black ops hit.” He said “The crime scene was illegally cleaned up by professionals.”
911 Author Phillip Marshall and his Children before their untimely deaths
Let’s leave the final word on 911 to Alan Sabrosky, US Army College, now retired and free to speak his mind:
“I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters of the Marine Corps and I’ve made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is absolutely 100% certain that 911 was a Mossad operation. Period. The zionists are playing this as an all or nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they’re done.”
President George Bush receives his orders from his jewish Chabad Lubovitch handlers.
Conspiracy theorists are often dismissed as cranks.
Well worth a read on 911, zionism and the fabricated “War On Terror”:
This BBC report is one of the four investigations repeatedly quoted
as giving scientific backing to the US Government’s findings on the
attacks.
Could you please provide me with the following information:
What are Sheila Barter’s scientific or engineering qualifications?
Between what dates did Sheila Barter work for the BBC?
What are Chris Wise’s scientific or engineering qualifications?
Between what dates did Chris Wise work for the BBC?
What are Professor John Knapton’s scientific or engineering
qualifications?
Between what dates did Professor John Knapton work for the BBC?
If any of the above weren’t BBC employees on 13th September 2001
when the article was published how much were they each paid for
their information?
Where did the BBC get the information that the jet fuel based fires
were burning at 800 degrees celcius or 1472 degrees fahrenheit in
the Twin Towers?
Does the BBC realise that jet fuel burns at about 260–315 °C
(500–599 °F)in open conditions?
Does the BBC realise that the starting point of steel losing any
strength is about 871 degrees celcius or 1,600 degrees fahrenheit?
Does the BBC realise that the melting point of steel is about 1,535
degrees celcius or 2,795 degrees fahrenheit?
Are Sheila Barter,Chris Wise or Professor John Knapton standing by
the scientific claims they made about the Twin Tower’s collapse?
In 2006 the BBC hosted a climate-change seminar to decide on its reporting of alleged climate-change. The BBC has spent tens of thousands of pounds trying to keep secret who attended this seminar. The publicly funded broadcaster fought off requests for the list of people who attended under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws.
This surreal story is only partly about climate change: the disclosure raises questions about the evidence submitted to the information tribunal by the BBC and Helen Boaden – it’s Director of News who stepped down in 2012.
The case also highlights once again the BBC’s corporate strategy of using an FOI derogation, or legal “opt-out” clause, to withhold a wide range of material from citizens who wish to know whether the BBC is fulfilling its statutory obligations for impartiality under its Royal Charter.
And it raises further questions about the effectiveness of the BBC Trust. The trust, which replaced the Board of Governors, was created with a mission: an “unprecedented obligation to openness and transparency”.
A ‘brainstorm’ that became historic
The seminar whose attendees the Beeb sought to keep secret was founded by three organisation. In 2004, the International Broadcasting Trust – a lobby group funded by a number of charities, including many involved in campaigning on climate change – devised the first in a series of seminars on development issues, where the lobbyists could address broadcasters.
One event on 26 January 2006 was a “brainstorm”, in the IBT’s own words, “focusing on climate change and its impact on development”. The BBC sent 30 senior staff, and 30 outsiders were invited. The event was also organised by CMEP, its second parent – a now dormant or defunct outfit operated by BBC reporter Roger Harrabin and climate activist Dr Joe Smith, and at one time funded by the Tyndall Centre at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and various pressure groups.
Harrabin later explained that the BBC’s head of news in the 1990s, Tony Hall, had invited him “to devise meetings with politicians, business people, think tanks, academics from many universities and specialists (science, technology, economic and social sciences, and history), and policy experts and field workers from NGOs – particularly from the developing world”.
The third parent of the seminar was the BBC.
The following year ( 2007) a BBC Trust report on impartiality cited the 2006 seminar and said it had settled the argument once and for all (as far as the BBC was concerned) on climate change.
Filmmaker John Bridcut wrote:
The BBC has held a high-level seminar with some of the best scientific experts [our emphasis] and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus [on anthropogenic climate change].
The BBC is under a statutory obligation to remain impartial, so this gave the “brainstorm” a historic significance.
An independent blogger, Tony Newbery, was struck by the difference between contemporary evidence that the seminar was educational and composed largely of activists (as confirmed by Harrabin) and the BBC Trust’s insistence that it was a sober scientific presentation that could justify a historic policy change.
Fresh light was shed on Harrabin’s CMEP in 2010, in the second batch of Climategate emails. An email from Mike Hulme, the director of the Tyndall Centre for Climatic Change Research at UEA,complained about a BBC Radio 4 item broadcast in February 2002. The broadcast featured global-warming sceptic Professor Philip Stott and Sir John Houghton, who was a Met Office chief and the editor of the first three IPCC reports on climate change. Houghton came off worst, and an infuriated Hulme wrote:
Did anyone hear Stott vs Houghton on Today, Radio 4 this morning? Woeful stuff really. This is one reason why Tyndall is sponsoring the Cambridge Media/Environment Programme to starve this type of reporting at source.
Newbery filed his FOI request for the seminar’s attendees to the BBC in 2007 and was denied the information, leading to a second round of information tribunal hearings in November 2012. The cross-examination of the BBC’s Helen Boaden in a court room was reported here.
The BBC is regarded as a public authority by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, but it can withhold information held “for the purposes of journalism”.
In an earlier and separate FOI case against the BBC, Supreme Court Judge Neuberger argued the opt-out should be interpreted narrowly – otherwise the BBC could withhold information about “cleaning the board room floor” using the journalism get-out clause – an obvious absurdity.
In the Newbery case, the BBC maintained that archival material on the seminar could not be found, but also it should not be found: as a back-up argument it argued that the seminar was held under the Chatham House Rule – an agreement of etiquette, rather than a law, to prevent quotes being attributed to particular speakers at a meeting – information that Newbery had never asked for.
In November 2012 the tribunal ruled against Newbery and for the BBC.
Case closed? Think again
However science writer Maurizio Morabito has unearthed the list of attendees.
It confirms the accuracy of Harrabin’s description of the composition of the invitees, with most coming from industry, think tanks and NGOs. And as suspected, climate campaigners Greenpeace are present, while actual scientific experts are thin on the ground: not one attendee deals with attribution science, the physics of global warming. These are scarcely “some of the best scientific experts”, whose input could justify a historic abandonment of the BBC’s famous impartiality.
Intriguingly, Tony Newbery had been supplied with a later version of this document, he tells us – but with the attendee list stripped out.
How much of the Public’s license fee did the BBC spend on lawyers to cover up this list of attendees at their Climate Panel in 2006?
The dramatic appearance of the list raises many questions. Did the BBC know the information was publicly available? If so, why were corporation lawyers spending thousands of pounds to keep a public document “secret”? (FOI requests for public information typically state, quite simply, “this information is public”.)
Questions abound online about the ability of the BBC Trust to maintain its duty to transparency. The BBC’s legal strategy entails the indiscriminate application of its FOI derogation “for the purposes of journalism” – this effectively rewrites the 2000 Act, and redefines the BBC as a private body. The trust is surely aware of this; it has a small mountain of correspondence on the subject. But it has yet to enquire, let alone pronounce on whether this is healthy – or legal.
All the names on the revealed seminar list
Here’s the list – according to the FOI Act reply.
January 26th 2006, BBC Television Centre, London
Specialists:
Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Anuradha Vittachi, Director, Oneworld.net
Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
Claire Foster, Church of England
Saleemul Huq, IIED
Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Matthew Farrow, CBI
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
Joe Smith, The Open University
Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
Anita Neville, E3G
Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
Tim Jackson, Surrey University
John Ashton, Director E3G BBC attendees:
Jana Bennett, Director of Television
Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
Helen Boaden, Director of News
Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures
Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes
Fran Unsworth,Head of Newsgathering
Pete Clifton, Head of News Interactive
Liz Cleaver, Controller Learning
Keith Scholey, Head of Specialist Factual
Sarah Brandist, Head of Development, Drama Commissioning
Michael Hastings, Head of Corporate Social Responsibility
Lorna Walsh, BBC TV
Roger Harrabin, Today Programme
Nothing else like the filth, squalor and corruption of the Blair regime has ever happened in British politics before.
The events surrounding Operation Ore ( Child pornography investigation) and the subsequent cover up, summed up what Tony Blair and his New Jew Labour Government were really like.
Tony Blair – Britain’s most dishonest politician ever.
The best article we found in the MSM is copied below with a photo of the original article.
The Sunday Herald : Child Porn Arrests Too Slow Herald And Sunday Herald : Sunday January 19th 2003
Operation Ore : The Police enquiry which plans to arrest a further 7000 men across the UK , in addition to Who guitarist Peter Townshend, for buying Child pornography online is set to end in disaster with many suspects walking free.
Detective Chief Inspector Bob MacLachlan, former head of Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit, told the Sunday Herald that the lack of urgency in making arrests will lead to suspects destroying evidence of downloading child pornography before they are arrested.
The Sunday Herald has also had confirmed by a very senior source in British intelligence that at least one high profile former Labour Cabinet Minister is among Operation Ore suspects. The Sunday Herald has been given the politicians name but, for legal reasons, can not identify the person.
There are still unconfirmed rumours that another senior Labour politician is among the suspects. The intelligence officer said that a “rolling” cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the Government if arrests occur.
Since the September 2002 Operation Ore arrest of Detective Constable Brian Stevens, a key officer in the inquiry into the murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, the public have been aware that wanted suspects had downloaded Child pornography from a US website called Landslide.
MacLachlan, who was one of the main officers on Operation Ore before his retirement last year, said “Sufficient warnings have been given that if people haven’t got rid of their computers then they are either stupid, don’t believe they’ll be arrested or are so obsessive about their collections that they can’t destroy it. As time goes on, the chances of successful prosecutions will diminish with speed and the information out there must impact on the offenders.”
With only 1200 men arrested so far, MacLachlan says that claims by Police Chiefs and the Government that they were prioritising paedophile crime were “smoke and mirrors”. Paedophilia is still not a priority on the Home Office’s National Policing Plan for 2003-06. MacLachlan claimed that before he left Scotland Yard his team were under-staffed, over-worked, under-funded and reduced to using free software from computer magazines.
There are around one million images of an estimated 20,000 individual Children being abused online. Some Police seizures involve hauls of more than 180,000 images. Last year, images of 13,000 new Children were uncovered. Only 17 Child victims have been identified worldwide.
Police have also revealed that images of Fred West abusing one of his Children are among Child pornography available for downloading from the internet. It is unclear whether the Child was West’s murdered daughter Heather.
Peter Robbins, the Chief Executive of the Internet Watch Foundation, which works with the Police, Government and internet service providers, in tackling paedophilia online, says software is in development which could remove child pornography from the net forever. The software should be ready in two years.
Police say that the list of rich and famous Operation Ore suspects would fill newspaper front pages for an entire year.
Provided by: Financial Times Information Limited.
Index terms: Police Protection, Crimes : General News.
Location(s): United Kingdom Europe Western Europe
Record Number: A20030120-10A4-EIW,O,XML,EIW
In British Schools, and constantly on British television, we are bombarded with the alleged murder of 6 million jews by the Germans during World War Two. This is commonly referred to as “The Holocaust”. This alleged historical event is also thrown at anyone objecting to mass immigration in to White Nations as proof of the absolute evil of White Nationalism.The alleged holocaust was also the official reason for setting up the Sate of Israel on May 14th 1948 – if the alleged holocaust was proved not to have happened then the State of Israel would have no legal basis.
Holocaust denial in London, England during January 2015.
In most European Countries even disputing any detail of this alleged historical event is a very serious criminal offence, which can result in up to 20 years imprisonment. In France this can be served in solitary confinement if the authorities believe there is any chance of re-offending.
Even though this blog in no way denies “The Holocaust”, or disputes any of the alleged details of any of the different versions, we did list 21 amazing facts about it here:
1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records:
The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War Two. The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War Two. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps despite strong Israeli objections. The Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus.
In a letter to the US State Department dated November 22nd 1944 The Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated : “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”
Official Red Cross records.
2.United States Airforce Aerial Photos Of Camps:
From 1942, until the end of World War Two, the United States Airforce performed low flying, low-speed photography of all the alleged “death camps” to obtain evidence of what was going on. This followed jewish claims in the West that a mass murder was occurring. All these photographs were released in 1979 when they were declassified. None of these photographs show any sign of mass murder or disposal of millions of bodies.
No USAF aerial photos show any mass murder in the camps.
3. Western Allies Never Liberated Any Death Camps With Gas Chambers:
None of the Western Allies ( Britain, Canada, USA, Australia, France etc. ) liberated any camps that had gas chambers, or other systems of mass murder in them. All the alleged death camps with gas chambers were liberated by the Russians.
Consequently any alleged evidence of death camps and/or gas chambers was forthcoming solely from Soviet Russia. The Western Allies liberated a total of 12 main camps and the Soviet Russians 8 main camps.
Western Allies never liberated or inspected any death camps or gas chambers.
4.The Leuchter Report:
One of the pieces of evidence Professor Ernst Zundel produced at his trials in Canada was the “Leuchter Report” compiled by Fred Leuchter on his commission. Fred Leuchter is the World’s foremost expert on gas chambers.
After inspecting the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Leuchter concluded they were unsuitable for use as gas chambers due to their lack of airtight doors, lack of a gas extraction system and general shoddy build. He also chemically analysed the walls for ferrocyanide ( produced when Zyklon-B reacts with brick walls ) and concluded there was none – the Auschwitz authorities took the same tests with the same results and now admit there was no gas chamber in Auschwitz.
5. The British Secret Service Monitored All Concentration Camp Deaths:
Using some of the World’s first computers the British Secret Service had cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German Military communications by 1942. Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War ; It’s Influence On Strategy And Operations, stated “The returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.” The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe – why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?
The British Secret Service were monitoring all German Military and Police communications by 1942.
6. The French Resistance Denied The Holocaust:
During World War Two Germany invaded France and occupied Northern France from 1940 to 1944. A secret army of French Patriots known collectively as “The French Resistance” fought the German occupiers in various ways. A large number of French Resistance members were imprisoned, tortured and executed including their leader, and French National hero, Jean Moulin. After World War Two French resistance members were released from various German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France they all gave horrific accounts of their treatment by the Germans, and were full of hatred for them because of the events of World War Two. However they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programme in the concentration camps.
French Resistance leader Jean Moulin
7. The Gas Chambers Of World War One:
It was widely reported during World War One ( 1914 to 1918 ) that the Germans, and their allies, were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. However after the end of the War Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda and no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologised publicly to the German People for this racist slur on them.
During World War One it was falsely claimed that the Germans were gassing prisoners.
8. Amounts Of Zyklon-B Used At The Camps:
Zyklon-B was the trade name for of a cyanide-based pesticide invented in the early 1920s. It was used in Germany, before and during the Second World War, for disinfection and pest extermination in ships, buildings and machinery. Zyklon-B consisted of diatomite, in the form of granules the size of fine peas, saturated with prussic acid. In view of its volatility and the associated risk of accidental poisoning, it was supplied in sealed metal canisters. One of the co-inventors of Zyklon-B, the chemist and businessman Bruno Tesch, was executed by the British in 1946 for his role in the alleged Holocaust.
In the concentration camps it was used for sanitation and pest control. There were disinfectant chambers, in all the camps, where inmates clothes were disinfected to combat typhus and other diseases. When you break down the amount of Zyklon-B used in all the camps, those not alleged to have gas chambers and those alleged to have gas chambers, the amount per inmate is very similar. This means the alleged death camps would have had to have had a secret supply for the “gas chambers”.
Zyklon-B granules came in sealed tins.
9. The Nuremberg Trials 1945 to 1949:
The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German City of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. These Trials were held by the victorious Allies ( France, Britain , USA and Soviet Russia ) with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials with the main Judge being Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalins’ show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union. The Court came up with ridiculous findings like jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap, these claims are now discredited and even the jews admit they were untrue.
The Chief Justice of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He said “Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he wrote. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a Court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”
The Nuremberg Trials – the ultimate Soviet show trial held under the Allies.
Associate Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg. “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled,” he wrote. “Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.”
According to British General Montgomery, the Germans had only one sin : They lost the war.
President John F Kennedy in his book, Profiles in Courage, criticised Nuremberg as a show trial.
Out of 139 German witnesses who testified that the Holocaust had occurred, the British Medical Officer recorded that 137 had “damage to their testicles that is beyond repair”. A number of Germans had died under interrogation by the Allies. There was also the threat of sending Peoples’ families to Soviet Gulags.
The Nuremberg prosecutors – Kempner, Rapp, Niederman – all Jews.
10. The Concentration Camp Crematorium:
One of the main problems with the 6 million jews being murdered claim was disposal of the bodies. It was claimed at Nuremberg that they had been disposed of in the camp crematorium. There were crematorium in each camp, but they simply didn’t have the capacity. Each crematorium oven could burn a body in about one and a half hours, meaning a maximum capacity of 16 bodies every day or just less than 6000 bodies per year per oven. The camps had between four and twelve ovens each giving 24,000 to 72,000 bodies per year maximum at each camp – this still wouldn’t be possible as you can’t run these ovens non-stop without the metal fracturing. Even double or triple loading wouldn’t help as this increased the time to three hours for two bodies or four and a half hours for three bodies. Also bodies aren’t totally reduced by this process and usually leave the pelvis and thigh bones which need crushing with special machinery – no such machinery was found at any of the camps. There is also the problem of fuel as each body would need about 40 kilograms of coke to burn – there is no record of the massive amount of coke required being supplied.
Each oven could only burn less than 6000 bodies per year if working non-stop which isn’t possible without fracturing the metal.
11. The Liberation Of Belsen Concentration Camp Film:
The whole World has probably seen the film of the liberation of Belsen concentration camp, it is horrific to say the least. Human skeletons are walking round with dead bodies covering the ground. This film was shown Worldwide at the time to show the evil of Nazi Germany. However Belsen was liberated by the Western Allies, and was never alleged to have had any gas chamber or be part of a systematic mass murder programme. The victims are in fact all dying from typhus which is confirmed by German Military, Red Cross and British Military medical records – this is never pointed out whenever this film is shown. Ironically the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B, at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, leading to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.
British Military sign warning of typhus at Belsen concentration camp shortly after liberation.
12. No Film Or Photographs Of Any Gas Chambers:
The Nazis were technology freaks, to say the least, and filmed and photographed virtually everything they did during World War Two. Hitler even had executions of his political enemies filmed so he could watch them with his cronies. However there has never been a single photograph or film found of any of the alleged gas chambers in operation. The Nazis did film, and photograph, themselves committing many atrocities across occupied Europe so it seems unlikely they wouldn’t film the alleged gas chambers. All the films we are shown of gas chambers are Hollywood recreations made after the war.
Hitler and his cronies demanded film of virtually everything happening in Nazi occupied territory but no film of gas chambers was ever found.
13. Sir Winston Churchill Never Mentioned The Alleged Holocaust:
In his monumental six volume The Second World War Sir Winston Churchill, British wartime Prime Minister, never makes any reference to gas chambers or a planned mass extermination of European jews. This is despite the fact he goes in to great detail about virtually every facet of World War Two including many atrocities committed by the Nazis. The same can be said about Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe. After the Second World War, with the Cold War starting, Churchill stated “I think we slaughtered the wrong pig here” a clear reference to the fact Britain would have been better helping Germany defeat Soviet Russia, or at least staying out completely.
Sir Winston Churchill – realised too late that Soviet Russia was more of a threat than Nazi Germany.
14. Star Witness To The Alleged Holocaust Elie Wiesel:
One of the star witnesses to the Auschwitz allegations is Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel. Wiesel was born in Sighet, Romania on September 30th, 1928. Wiesel has given evidence at various trials around the World on his alleged experiences in German camps during World War Two. Wiesel is a well-known writer of fiction with over 40 published books. However it is his autobiography of Auschwitz, Night , which has come under scrutiny. Firstly, Wiesel claims the bodies were disposed of by a secret Nazi method of using bodies to burn bodies – if this was scientifically possible wouldn’t they just use this method to burn the bodies? Secondly Wiesel claims that his concentration camp number A7713 was tattooed on his left arm like all inmates, however video evidence shows no such tattoo and he has never explained where his tattoo went. Thirdly his camp number, A7713, was assigned to a different prisoner and there is no record of him at Auschwitz despite all camp records being recovered after the War. Fourthly in all his different accounts of Auschwitz Weisel never mentions any gas chambers. Fifthly Wiesel makes bizarre claims about mass graves that would shoot fountains of blood up in to the air, this is also scientifically impossible. Sixthly Wiesel claims he spent three weeks in the Auschwitz Camp hospital with an infected leg – would a death camp bother curing prisoners? There are many other major discrepancies to his claims, and a read of his book Night is recommended.
For a more precise look at Elie Wiesel and why his allegations don’t stand up to any scrutiny please visit:
15. Fake Photographic And Film Holocaust Evidence And The Ever Changing Numbers:
The first time fake evidence was used was during the Nuremberg Trials. This however became an industry in its own right after 1945, with large rewards paid to investigators for “finding” Holocaust evidence. At the time a lot of this evidence was very cutting-edge, but under modern scrutiny it simply doesn’t stand up.
Modern forensic techniques have exposed a lot of “Holocaust” photographic evidence as faked.
New systems of examining photographs and film have exposed large amounts of it as totally fake, other evidence has been exposed as coming from completely different sources e.g. The Russian Gulags.
As evidence has emerged discrediting large parts, if not all, of the alleged Holocaust narrative the jews have been forced to constantly change the numbers in their claims. They have, however, constantly stuck to an overall total of 6 million jewish deaths, even though this makes no mathematical sense as the component numbers are revised downwards. This hasn’t led to a partial refund of the damages paid to Israel by Germany based on the 6 million figure.
16. The Balfour Declaration, World War One And 6 Million Jews:
During World War One the British Government had agreed with leading jews that they would support a jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the jews a homeland in Palestine.
After discussions in the British Cabinet, and consultation with Zionist leaders, the decision was made known in the form of a letter by Arthur James Lord Balfour to Lord Rothschild. The letter represents the first political recognition of Zionist aims by a Great Power.
After World War One the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the jews claimed 6 million jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.
The jews have been waving the 6 million figure around since at least 1914 and maybe even earlier – the number seems to have a special significance to them.
17. Holocaust Denial And The Holocaust Deniers:
In most parts of Europe questioning any aspect of the findings of the Nuremberg Trials is a very serious criminal offence on par with rape, murder or armed robbery. In France you can receive up to 20 years in prison, which may have to be served in solitary confinement. Even where it is not illegal questioning the official Holocaust narrative will probably cost you your job, family, house etc.
Despite this a lot of top writers, academics, historians and scientists have questioned the official Holocaust narrative or denied it entirely. Professor Ernst Zundel was put on numerous trials around the World, had his house firebombed, received death threats, his family broke up, was deported from several countries and eventually was imprisoned for five years in Germany. No other historical event can attract this type of punishment for questioning the official narrative.
Despite these threats, the official narrative is constantly exposed as being a lie and the jews have to constantly change their claims when faced with irrefutable evidence of their lies.
18. The Main Stream Media And The Alleged Holocaust:
The Main Stream Media never question the official narrative of the holocaust, and go on an all-out attack on anyone who does. They have created the term “Holocaust Denier” for anyone who doesn’t believe, or dares to question, the official narrative. “Holocaust Denier” is one of the multicultural buzz-words like “Fascist/Nazi/racist/homophobe” designed to denigrate the person described as such, and lead to “pack-attacks” by the media, politicians and the general lefty PC crowd. However bear in mind that around 96% of the Western World’s media is controlled by jews and/or zionists. You will notice that the jews/zionist are willing to keep running newspapers/TV channels and other media outlets at a financial loss simply to keep control of the MSM.
The jews and zionists control about 96% of the Western World’s media – a large part is now run at a financial loss.
19. There’s No Business Like Shoa Business:
“Shoa” is the term used by jews and zionists to describe the alleged Holocaust. After the Second World War Germany was forced to pay trillions of Dollars in compensation to set up Israel, and is still paying to this day. There are now second and third generation, the children and grandchildren of alleged Holocaust victims, who receive compensation from the German Government and various German Corporations. The American Government also use this as an excuse to give billions of American taxpayers’ money to Israel, although the real reason behind these payments is the strength of the Israeli lobby in America.
As early as 1941, two years before the alleged Holocaust was even meant to have started, the World Jewish Congress had been demanding that the Germans pay for the resettlement of jews in Israel as reparations.
20. The Census of Jews Worldwide Figures:
Here are some census figures of jews living Worldwide to consider:
World Almanac, 1925, pg. 752 — 15,630,000, “In 1925 a census of Palestine gave a total of 115,151 Jews”
World Almanac, 1929, pg. 727 — 15,630,000
National Council of Churches 1930 — 15,600 ,000
March 24, 1933, jewish newspaper Daily Express — 14,000,000 jews worldwide
World Almanac, 1933, pg. 419 — 15,316,359, [“The estimate for Jews in the above table is for 1933, and is by the American Jewish Committee”
World Almanac, 1936, pg. 748 — world jewish population = 15,753,633
World Almanac, 1938, pg. 510 — world jewish population = 15,748,091, with 240,000 in Germany
American Jewish Committee Bureau of the Synagogue Council, 1939 — 15,600,000
World Almanac, 1940, pg. 129: World Jewish Population — 15,319,359
World Almanac, 1941, pg. 510: World Jewish Population — 15,748,091
World Almanac, 1942, pg. 849 — 15,192,089, “Jews include Jews by race not necessarily by religion”
World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population — 15,690,000
World Almanac, 1949, pg. 289: World Jewish Population — 15,713,638
Statistical Handbook of Council of Churches USA 1951 — 15,300,000
World Almanac, US News & World Report, 1983 population of jews — 16,820,850
World Almanac, 1996, pg. 646: World Jewish Population — 14,117,000
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 1989: World Jewish Population –18,080,000
World Almanac & Book of Facts, 2001: World Jewish Population — 13,200,000
World Almanac 1933
World Almanac 1948
21. Inmate Facilities At Auschwitz:
With two very different witness versions of what was going on in the camps, let’s have a quick look at the facilities available to inmates to see if that can clarify matters. The jews have now admitted there wasn’t any gas chambers in Auschwitz following the two sets of scientific tests, but there were some facilities that certainly were in Auschwitz and can still be seen today.
A free dental service available to all inmates – specialist dentists were brought in for intricate work.
A walk-in clinic and hospital for inmates.
Dr. Carl Clauberg the World famous Berlin surgeon who was called in for difficult inmate cases.
Camp kitchen – one of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz, with state-of-the-art cooking facilities. There were twelve of these throughout the camp. The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp and Red Cross delegates.
Camp religious facilities made available on a rotating basis to every denomination for religious services.
A camp theatre where live plays were performed by camp inmate actors.
Up to 16 camp orchestras with every conceivable instrument available for inmates – there was also free tutoring by music teachers.
A camp library where inmates could borrow books from forty -five thousand volumes available.
Camp complaints office where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. Camp Commander Hoess had a standing order that any inmate could approach him personally to register a complaint about other inmates such as “Kapos” and even guards.* A system of strict discipline for guards and also for inmates, with severe punishment being handed out against those found guilty (for even slapping an inmate).
Auschwitz marriages took place because worker inmates fell in love and married their inmate partners.
The camp sauna for inmates.
The camp brothel, just inside the main gate was a building used during the war as a brothel for the inmates.
A camp swimming pool for use by the inmates, where there were walkways with comfortable benches for inmates to relax in the shade of the trees. Swimming galas were held during the Summer months.
The Auschwitz University where inmates could take various courses. Professors from nearby Universities often visited to give lectures.
Genuine photograph of inmates leaving for Auschwitz – notice the train is a passenger train not the Hollywood cattle train version.
These are the facilities that are still standing and can be inspected by any visitor. Other facilities that are now overgrown, or have been knocked down, included a soccer field, fencing area, handball court, camp canteen, cinema and maternity ward that delivered over 3,000 live births without losing a single mother or baby.
This blog in no way denies the alleged Holocaust, or questions any of the different versions of it from the last 68 years. However here is some further reading and videos:
The claim that 6 million jews were murdered by the Germans during World War Two is on the British School’s National Curriculum and is publicised by the BBC on a near daily basis. The following Freedom Of Information Act Requests were recently submitted to find out where they obtained their information:
From: Sean Moran
16 November 2013
Dear Department for Education,
Please provide a copy of all information on the alleged holocaust
of 6 million jews during World War Two by the Germans on the
National Curriculum in the last 20 years.Please also confirm where
you obtained this information from and how much was paid for it.
Thank you for your recent enquiry. A reply will be sent to you as soon as possible. For information; the departmental standard for correspondence received is that responses should be sent within 20 working days as you are requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Your correspondence has been allocated reference number 2013/0071785
Thank you
Department for Education
Ministerial and Public Communications Division
Tel: 0370 000 2288
Dear Mr Moran,
Thank you for your request for information, which was received on 18
November. You requested “a copy of all information on the alleged
holocaust of 6 million jews during World War Two by the Germans on the
National Curriculum in the last 20 years.” In addition you asked “Please
also confirm where you obtained this information from and how much was
paid for it.” I am dealing with your request under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.
First of all, and by way of background, I would point out that the
Department for Education (DfE) sets the framework for the national
curriculum, and teaching about the Holocaust is a compulsory part of the
history curriculum at key stage 3. The DfE does not however specify how
it should be taught, nor what resources teachers should use.
With this in mind, in order to identify and locate the information that
you have asked for, I require some further information from you, as the
scope of your request is unclear. In particular, it would be useful to
know exactly what recorded information you are seeking, so that I might
establish whether it is held by this Department.
If you have any queries about this letter, please contact me. Please
remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
If you are unhappy with the way your request has been handled, you should
make a complaint to the Department by writing to me within two calendar
months of the date of this letter. Your complaint will be considered by
an independent review panel, who were not involved in the original
consideration of your request.
If you are not content with the outcome of your complaint to the
Department, you may then contact the Information Commissioner’s Office.
Your correspondence has been allocated reference number 2013/0071785. If
you need to respond to us, please visit:
[1]www.education.gov.uk/contactus, and quote your reference number.
Dear Department for Education,
You must know where you get your information on the alleged murder
of 6 million jews by the Germans during World War Two. Also how
much you pay for this information. Are you saying Schools simply
teach what they want on this subject?
Thank you for your recent enquiry. A reply will be sent to you as soon as possible. For information; the departmental standard for correspondence received is that responses should be sent within 20 working days as you are requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Your correspondence has been allocated reference number 2013/0078740.
Thank you
Department for Education
Ministerial and Public Communications Division
Tel: 0370 000 2288
From: FOI Enquiries
British Broadcasting Corporation
5 November 2013
Dear Mr Moran,
Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as detailed in your email below. Your request was received on 4th November 2013. We will deal with your request as promptly as possible, and at the latest within 20 working days. If you have any queries about your request, please contact us at the address below.
The reference number for your request is RFI20131643.
Kind regards
The Information Policy & Compliance Team
BBC Freedom of Information
BC2 B6, Broadcast Centre
201 Wood Lane
London W12 7TP
Who is England’s patron saint? If you think it’s St George, you’re behind the times. In fact, it’s the martyr St Stephen. But not the Stephen stoned to death in Palestine 2,000 years ago. No, the Stephen stabbed to death by Whites at a bus-stop in London in 1993. He was a young Black male, but that didn’t make his death unusual or worthy of special attention.
Black power: St Stephen Lawrence
It wasn’t until 2012, after huge expense by the London Metropolitan police and the abolition of the centuries-old principle of double jeopardy, that two White men were found guilty of the murder and given long jail sentences. Cries of joy greeted the conviction in all sections of the media, particularly at The Guardian and BBC. But further suspects are still free and Doreen Lawrence, mother of the murder victim, wants to see more millions spent on pursuing and convicting them.
Doreen has become a familiar and highly respected figure in the UK. She has recently been elevated to the House of Lords, where she will sit as Baroness Lawrence and continue to promote the martyr cult. She was prominent at the twentieth-year commemoration of her son’s murder, which was attended by the leaders of all three main political parties. And you may have seen her helping to carry the flag at the 2012 London Olympics. It was a further honour in recognition of her long campaign for justice, equality and tolerance in the UK.
The image of an aspiring young Black architect slaughtered by thuggish White racists continues to be reinforced through every medium of news, art and commentary. Doreen has often appeared in the media to criticize Britain for failing to live up to the high standards she demands of it as a British Jamaican. And the government listens. Here she is in the closing days of 2012 with fellow activist Dr Richard Stone, who will be the main focus of this essay:
Advertisement
Coalition responds to Doreen Lawrence over race equality
David Cameron and Nick Clegg have moved to head off an embarrassing row with race equality campaigners after the Guardian highlighted an uncompromising attack on the coalition [between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats] by the mother of the murdered black teenager Stephen Lawrence. It has emerged that 24 hours after Doreen Lawrence castigated ministers, accusing them of backtracking on the government’s commitment to equalities, the prime minister and deputy prime minister penned a joint reply from Downing Street aiming to reassure her and to bolster the government’s credentials.
The timing of the letter is significant, as Lawrence and Richard Stone, an adviser to the Macpherson inquiry into Stephen’s death, had written to Cameron and Clegg – and Ed Miliband [leader of the Labour Party] – a month earlier outlining concerns about government equality policies. Lawrence said her letter had been ignored, adding that improvements in equalities prompted by the Macpherson inquiry were being imperilled and race no longer appeared to be on the agenda. …
In their reply to Lawrence, Cameron and Clegg write: “We recognise how important it is to ensure the legacy of Stephen’s murder and Lord Macpherson’s report will never be lost.” … Lawrence was not available for comment, but Stone, co-signatory to her letter, said he had hoped for a more positive response. “We sent our letter a month ago. It is good to have a reply from the prime minister and deputy prime minister. But it is written very carefully. There is nothing concrete here.” (Coalition responds to Doreen Lawrence over race equality, The Guardian, 23rd December 2012)
So who is Richard Stone, the man playing such a prominent role in calling the government to account? Thanks to the media’s untiring work, Stephen and Doreen Lawrence are now familiar to millions of ordinary Britons, but very few of them would recognize the name or features of Richard Stone. This is a pity, because he is an interesting man. Here is the biography at his personal website:
Dr Richard Stone
Dr Richard Stone is a medical doctor who also has extensive experience working against social exclusion, homelessness, and in the grant-making charitable sector. He is a leading expert in social cohesion, anti-racism, and Islamophopia, and is a regular speaker around Europe at conferences on these topics. Richard was a panel member of the 1997/99 Home Office inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence. He served as a Cabinet Advisor to the Mayor of London, President of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, and spent 5 years on the Runnymede “Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia”, from 2000 to 2004 as chair. He has also been a trustee and vice-Chair of the Runnymede Trust [an “anti-racist” organization founded by Jews] and a Council and Board member of Liberty [the British equivalent of the ACLU]. His work bringing together British Jews and Muslims includes being a founding trustee of the Maimonides Foundation in 1985, and of Alif-Aleph UK in 2003 [alif and aleph are the initial letters of the Arabic and Hebrew alphabets] … In 2010 he was awarded an OBE [Order of the British Empire] for “public and voluntary” service. (See Biography at Dr Stone’s website)
Identity on the Agenda
Despite his presidency of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, Dr Stone claims to self-identify as a member of the White British majority:
Enough of this anger-creating suppression of the hopes and opportunities of people from black backgrounds. My message to white (mainly) men (like me), who have the power to discriminate is this: just stop doing it. (Where are the black police officers?, Dr Richard Stone, The Guardian, 4th January, 2012)
In Britain, the vast majority of power is wielded by middle-aged, middle-class white men – like Dr Stone. (An Independent Commentary to Mark the 10th Anniversary of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (2009), Dr Richard Stone, pg. 17)
I don’t know whether Dr Stone also self-identifies as self-righteous, but that is a label some might be inclined to give him. They might even add that he is self-important and arrogant too. Dr Stone seems to enjoy issuing orders and demands on behalf of ethnic and religious minorities. For further examples, let’s examine his behaviour at the Macpherson Inquiry. This was the official inquiry set up by the New Labour government into the police failures surrounding the murder of Stephen Lawrence. What role did he have there? It’s described at the website of the organization ROTA (Race On The Agenda), where Dr Stone is a patron with the British-Nigerian Lord Victor Adebowale, CBE (Commander of the British Empire). Here is part of Dr Stone’s biography:
Dr Stone was a panel member of the “Stephen Lawrence Inquiry” into racism in policing (1997/99) as Adviser to the judge Sir William Macpherson. He was also on the panel of the 2003/04 NHS “David Bennett Inquiry” into the death of a Black [sic] patient during restraint in the white-staffed [sic] medium secure psychiatry unit in Norwich. (See the biography at ROTA’s website)
Despite their advisory capacity and lack of specialized legal training, Stone and the other panel members, like the dedicated self-publicist John Sentamu, a British-Ugandan bishop, would often take the role of prosecuting counsel during the inquiry:
Bishop John Sentamu dives for publicity
In a criminal court the accused is not there so that he can be compelled to confess his crimes; still less so that he can confess his sins; much less again so that he can disclose the sins of his subordinates. English law expelled those abhorrent ideas long ago. But confession was the spirit of much of the Macpherson proceedings, partly due to the effect of the “truth and reconciliation” proceedings in post-apartheid South Africa. This was especially clear in the interruption by one of Sir William’s three advisers, Dr Richard Stone, of [the Metropolitan Police Commissioner] Sir Paul Condon’s evidence in Part II of the inquiry. ‘It seems to me, Sir Paul,’ he said, ‘that the door is open. It is like when Winnie Mandela was challenged in the Truth Commission in South Africa by Desmond Tutu to acknowledge that she had done wrong …’ Sir Paul might well have been taken aback by his being put in the same category as a convicted kidnapper, and his relationship to racist attitudes and conduct in the Metropolitan Police in the same category as Winnie Mandela’s relationship to the Mandela United Football Club and the murderers of Stompie Seipei. Dr Stone continued: ‘She just did it and suddenly a whole burden of weight, of sort of challenge and friction melted away … I say to you now, just say, “Yes, I acknowledge institutional racism in the police” … Could you do that today?’ (Please see here, pg. 15)
That quotation is taken from a very interesting study of the Macpherson Inquiry called Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics (2000) by Norman Dennis, George Erdos and Ahmed Al-Shahi, who are English, Hungarian and Kurdish, respectively. They all also appear to be left-wing or liberal in the traditional sense. I can recommend their study highly to anyone who wants an alternative perspective on the Macpherson Inquiry – “alternative,” that is, to the perspective offered by all respectable opinion in the UK. Recall that, in the Guardian extract above, the prime minister and his deputy referred respectfully to the “legacy” of “Lord Macpherson’s report,” as though it were some highly valuable contribution to British public life.
Uproar from the Gallery
In fact, the inquiry overseen by Lord Macpherson seems to have been a cross between a Stalinist show-trial and a hearing by the Spanish Inquisition, with a garnish of kangaroo-court and a sprinkling of lynch-mob. Here is Dr Stone again, sniffing hard for heresy:
‘You have heard me say …’, Sir Paul said in the course of being interrogated. But he was interrupted by Dr Richard Stone. ‘You have told us ten times you are not in denial … I say to you now, just say, “Yes, I acknowledge institutional racism in the police …”’
‘It was an approach that pleased the public gallery’, writes Cathcart [former deputy editor of the Independent on Sunday and author of The Case of Stephen Lawrence (1999)], ‘and the pressure on the Commissioner was intense. Sir William chipped in: “You have been given the challenge, or the question, Sir Paul. What is your answer?”’
His answer was that it would be very easy to please the panel. It would be easy to please the people in the public gallery — ‘this audience’, as he called them. It would be easy, also, to gain the favour of ‘superficial media coverage’. But he would not do what would please any of them, because it would be ‘dishonest’. Over the uproar from the gallery, Sir William called for quiet and moved the discussion into other areas.
Sir Paul’s stand attracted critical headlines. But whose judgement, freed from the enthusiasm of a righteous crowd, would conclude that Sir Paul’s opinion, reasoning, and sense of reality and responsibility were inferior to those expressed in the ‘uproar from the gallery’ or … to the semi-religious appeal of Dr Stone? (Op. cit., ch. 3, “The Crowd in Hannibal House,” pg. 28)
Why was there uproar from the public gallery? Because it was full of anti-racism activists from groups like the Nation of Islam, who applauded witnesses whom they liked, such as Doreen Lawrence, and jeered witnesses whom they did not like, such as the police:
During the police evidence, and particularly when [the radical barrister Michael] Mansfield was in action, laughter and groans would greet answers from police officers. This would not normally be allowed in a court of law. In order to protect Inspector Groves from the gallery crowd (and, though he perhaps did not think of it in this way, from the crowd influences that could be affecting the performances of all the witnesses, all the barristers and the judgement of all the assessors) counsel for the MPS [Metropolitan Police Service], Jeremy Gompertz QC [Queen’s Counsel], rose to complain about ‘constant interruption and background noise’ from the gallery.
Though he said that his warning was ‘crystal clear’, Sir William’s intervention could scarcely be described as full-hearted. If the laughing did not stop, he said, he would clear the gallery. He reminded Mansfield that he was not addressing a jury. Inspector Groves did not need to be ‘pilloried’ — (slight pause) — ‘unnecessarily’. The pillory in its literal sense is essentially an instrument of control by a crowd. What had being figuratively ‘pilloried’, necessarily or not, to do with ascertaining the facts of the case? (Ibid., pg. 25)
Reality Shmeality
But there was no need to ascertain the facts of the case, because they were known well in advance: both the murder of Stephen Lawrence and the failure to jail the murder-gang were the result of “an endemic and universal English racism which has severe consequences generally in the lives of members of ethnic minorities” (ch. 2, “The Methods of Inquiry used by Macpherson,” pg. 12). The role of Doreen Lawrence at the inquiry was to describe the racism of British society; the role of the police was to admit their complicity in it. The role of Judge Macpherson, Dr Richard Stone, Bishop Sentamu et al was to assist the former against the latter. The methods they employed might, in another context, be taken as deliberately satirical or absurdist: “To question whether the murder of Stephen Lawrence was a purely racist crime was, in itself, adduced as evidence of racism” (Summary, pg. xix).
Distance was no obstacle to the inquiry’s hunt for the evil and injustice perpetrated by Whites: inter alia, the inquiry drew on the Rodney King case in Los Angeles, thousands of miles away, though the relevance there might seem “indirect,” at best (ch. 4, “Mr and Mrs Lawrence’s Treatment at the Hospital as Evidence of Police Racism,” pg. 34). Any negative interpretation of police behaviour by a Minority Ethnic had to be accepted; any attempt to deny police racism was further proof of police racism.
But the sceptical authors of Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics conclude that:
The Macpherson report has had a detrimental impact on policing and crime, particularly in London. Police morale has been undermined. Certain procedures which impact disproportionately on ethnic groups, like stop and search, have been scaled down. The crime rate has risen. Nevertheless, the Macpherson report has been received with almost uncritical approval by pundits, politicians and academics. It is still routinely described as having ‘proved’ that the police and British society are racist. (Summary, pg. xx)
Elsewhere, the authors point out that the rise in the crime rate, “the first in six years, was largely due to increases in two police areas, London and the West Midlands, the areas with the highest concentrations of ethnic minorities. In London the increase was nine per cent, in the West Midlands 16 per cent” (ch. 3, “The Crowd in Hannibal House,” pg. 29). In other words, there have been more murders of young Black males as a result of the Macpherson Inquiry, not fewer. There have also been more murders of individuals from other, less important groups. And more rapes and other crimes of violence. Nor has the report helped the cause of equality: the police now devote more resources and attention to cases in which they can prove their devotion to fighting White racism.
Unpunished Murder
Compare the racist murder of Richard Everitt in London in 1994, a year after the murder of Stephen Lawrence in 1993. This was not a highly unusual crime, because it involved violence by a gang of Minority Ethnics against a White. Only one member of the fifteen-strong Bengali-British gang was jailed and he is now free again. In the Stephen Lawrence case, the Metropolitan Police have promised “to go on looking ‘forever’ for evidence that would convict the murderers” (Preface, pg. xv). They have made no such promise about Richard Everitt. Nor have “resources in money and specialist support” been made “available on a scale more often seen in anti-terrorist investigations than a civil murder,” as they were for Stephen Lawrence (Ibid., pg xiv).
Many other non-Whites are still at liberty after the brutal murders of British Whites: Charlene Downes and Gavin Hopley are merely two examples. But those murders have not received the prolonged attention of the media, nor provoked harsh criticism of the police and served as damning indictments of British society. The murder of Stephen Lawrence is quite different in all respects. Of the many people responsible for elevating Stephen Lawrence to his role as England’s new patron saint, no-one has worked harder or more effectively than Doreen Lawrence and her good friend Dr Richard Stone. I don’t question Doreen Lawrence’s motives, though I do question her intelligence, common sense and ability to see the harmful effects of her campaign on the Black community, among others.
Thorny Issues
I do, however, question the motives of Dr Richard Stone. It may be cynical of me, but I have detected little benevolence or philanthropy in Dr Stone when I have seen or heard him appear in the media. He strikes me, in fact, as cold, manipulative and even sinister. He also strikes me as lacking in honesty. In his self-aggrandizing Independent Commentary to Mark the 10th Anniversary of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (2009), he lamented the way in which:
[during] the past decade, the issue of ‘institutional racism’ seemed to slip down the agenda. Maybe some of those in leadership positions sighed with relief that this thorny issue did not have to be dealt with. It could perhaps be left for the next Commissioner, the next Chief Constable, or the next government Minister. But every year, with damaging regularity, racism seems to explode back on to the police agenda. This causes damage to police and community relations, but also to the reputation of the very leaders who had hoped the issue had gone away. (Op. cit., pg. 7)
But who has worked harder than Dr Stone to make racism a “thorny” issue? Who has been more eager to help racism “explode” regularly on the police agenda? And who has been more willing to issue self-righteous pronunciations on the topic? Here is another extract from his Independent Commentary:
Racism is not in the heads of BME [Black and Minority Ethnic] people, just as Islamophobia and anti-semitism are not in the heads of Muslims or Jews. There is not much that BME people can do to change the racism exhibited by white people, any more than Muslims can do much to change the Islamophobia of non-Muslims, or Jews the anti-antisemitism [sic] of non-Jews. The people who have to change are those outside who hold prejudices and stereotypes in their heads which lead them “unwittingly” or to be frank, ‘wittingly’ to disadvantage people from these communities. (Op. cit., pg. 17 – all anomalies of punctuation are in the original)
To be frank, such an important topic deserved better proof-reading. It is also ludicrous to claim that all beliefs held by “BME people” about the motives and behaviour of Whites must automatically be correct. In making this claim, Dr Stone is not assisting the cause of objective analysis and impartial justice. He is, however, assisting the cause of BME grievance, paranoia and self-pity.
Saints and Demons
But why is he doing this? What are his motives for encouraging antagonism between BME people and White society? Why does he wish to demonize ordinary Whites and elevate BME people to infallible sainthood? I would suggest that he is, unwittingly or otherwise, following an ethnocentric agenda and seeking to advance the interests of his own ethno/religious group. When Dr Stone self-identifies as a “middle-aged, middle-class White man,” I think he is being dishonest or disingenuous. In reality, he belongs to the Jewish elite, not to the White middle-class. He is the son of the Labour peer Lord Stone and a nephew of the Conservative peer Lord Ashdown.
I don’t believe that Dr Richard Stone truly regrets the murder of Stephen Lawrence. Given the chance to travel back in time, would he try to prevent it? I don’t think he would. The Lawrence murder has been far too useful as an ideological weapon against ordinary Whites. Dr Richard Stone, son of a Labour peer, nephew of a Conservative peer, has been working on behalf not of Minority Ethnics but of the hostile elite – the Ruling Stones of the UK who want to dispossess the historic majority and secure their own power and profit in perpetuity. Lord Glasman broke ranks from that elite and pointed out its treachery and lies on immigration. He was heavily criticized and forced into silence.
By contrast, Dr Stone continues to spout his self-righteous, self-serving gas about “an endemic and universal English racism which has severe consequences generally in the lives of members of ethnic minorities.” He is, in fact, one of Britain’s most dedicated and hard-working hate-mongers:
One of the easiest ways to unite people is to mobilise their hatred for others. It is infinitely more difficult to unite them on the basis of constructive proposals. This unity of having an enemy in common gives rise to various kinds of sociological formation. In the short-term there is the specialised and transitory hatred of ‘the lynch mob’. There is the longer-term unity of hating communists, or hating capitalists, or hating Protestants, or hating Catholics, or hating blacks, or ‘hating whitey’. (Racist Murder and Pressure Group Politics, 2000, pg. 21)
“Hating whitey” is what Dr Stone specializes in. He is a card-carrying member of the UK’s hostile elite, bent on completely gutting the people and culture of traditional of the UK. His tireless work on behalf of Stephen Lawrence has not benefited Blacks or other minorities, but then it has never been intended to. Instead, it has been intended to incite hatred, grievance and discord. Why can’t Minority Ethnics get no satisfaction? Because the Ruling Stones don’t want them to. Using mass immigration and multi-racialism as weapons of mass destruction, they want to destroy the historic nation of Britain and enjoy power and profit here in perpetuity.
Britain’s message for the United States and all other Western nations is simple: Nomine mutato, de te fabula narratur – “With a change of name, the tale is told of you.” The same hostile, hate-filled elite are at work everywhere in the West, lying, cheating, betraying and using mass immigration to divide and destroy those who stand in their way.
Exploring the little known, but true history of National Socialism, Hitler and WWII, what was really behind it, and seeking truth, justice and honour for the German people
The Blog of Ian Pace, pianist, musicologist, political animal. A place for thoughts, reflections, links, both trivial and not so trivial. Main website is at http://www.ianpace.com . Contact e-mail ian@ianpace.com.
cigpapers 