Greater Manchester Police Confiscate BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” Banner

Written by Cigpapers

Red Mafia Starts To Crack In Greater Manchester:

On 9th April 2014 a BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner protest was taking place on the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester, England. At about 8:00 AM this banners was safely secured with professional attachments above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester by BNP activists.

2014-04-05 10.32.12

BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner hangs between two commercial signs above the East Lancashire Road in Greater Manchester.The banners are secured with professional attachments before being swung over to the outside.

The banner was warmly supported by the majority of the public with only a few obscene hand gestures by multiculturalists. At around  8:45 AM a Police Officer approached the demonstration. The Police Officer ( Collar Number 14953 ) was friendly enough but had been ordered by his Inspector to take the banner down, then confiscate it and take one demonstrator’s name and details under Section 5 Public Order Act. We’re not sure about his understanding of the legal position here regarding Electoral Law and the Public Order Act.

How offensive is a "Stoo Paedophile Rings" banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

How offensive is a “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner? What sort of person would be offended enough to telephone the Police?

The Greater Manchester Police seizing this banner, which has been warmly supported around Greater Manchester, shows a few cracks appearing in the red Mafia of the Greater Manchester Police and the local Labour Party. There is a video of the confiscation by Greater Manchester Police here:

The confiscation of this banner led to the cancellation of a planned “Stop Paedophile Rings” demonstration outside Manchester Town Hall against Labour Party paedophile rings. Whether this was deliberate or coincidental is impossible to say.

The same banner at a previous bridge banner flash demonstration in Tameside.

The same banner at a previous banner drop flash demonstration in Tameside.

The Police Officer in charge of the election in Greater Manchester is Chief Superintendent O’Hare of Greater Manchester Police ( telephone 0161 872 5050)  who had previously stated he wanted a good, clean election.

The BNP's banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide?

The BNP’s banner was confiscated for opposing paedophile rings but what if you complained that you are offended by this celebration of communism and genocide in Manchester?

These “Stop Paedohile Rings” campaign banners have been well received by tens of thousands of members of the Greater Manchester public. The banners are very good for bridge drop flash demonstrations, or for hanging or holding at other demonstrations. Each banner should also last several years/elections if looked after.

Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986:

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2)An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3)It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a)that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b)that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c)that his conduct was reasonable.

(4)A constable may arrest a person without warrant if—

(a)he engages in offensive conduct which a constable warns him to stop, and

(b)he engages in further offensive conduct immediately or shortly after the warning.

(5)In subsection (4) “offensive conduct” means conduct the constable reasonably suspects to constitute an offence under this section, and the conduct mentioned in paragraph (a) and the further conduct need not be of the same nature.

(6)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

BNP Rescue Banner 10th April 2014:

On April 10th 2014, Gary Tumulty (North West Regional Organiser) went to Swinton Police Station to demand the return of the “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner. Here is the video of what happened:

38 thoughts on “Greater Manchester Police Confiscate BNP “Stop Paedophile Rings” Banner

  1. Z.O.G Pig Scum, They Serve The Jews And Their Proxies Not White Brits! Labour Bolshevik Jews are The Worst Pedos, They Can Feel The Rope Tightening On Their Own Necks When They See A Sign Like This, The Up And Coming Retribution Hunt Is Going To Be A Great Day!

  2. Shame on Greater Manchester Police. Who, exactly, has been caused alarm and distress by this banner? The only people that would be alarmed are paedophiles, grooming gangs and their Labour supporters. Is that whose side the police are on now? Well done to all involved. Vote BNP!

  3. In the light of this and other similar incidents I find myself asking disturbing questions about connections between the police, politicians and paedophiles. Seems like the “Establishment” is struggling to contain all the revelations appearing lately…thanks solely to the Internet. So presumably the mainstream media is involved in the cover-up, too?

  4. What part of ‘stop paedophile rings’ is ‘threatening’, ‘insulting’ or ‘abusive’ as under section 5?
    Was this police action even lawful?
    If this was unlawful harassment by the police or fake complaint, then people should get charged with ‘wasting police time’ and/or the police should be in trouble. And if this was harassment on political grounds, then this is an even more serious matter. The police are not allowed to be used by the state to harass/suppress opposition parties without lawful reason.

  5. Pingback: DFB trikot WM 2014

  6. Brothers, if the banner was popular and the campaign was locally celebrated, then perhaps a parallel campaign to inform the local citizens of who took it down and who,by implication, celebrates pedophilic rapes committed against Manchester’s children is in order.

    I don’t know how far you can go with that, but it would seem advisable to interpose yourselves between the state, on the side of pedophilia. and the children of Manchester who are in danger from the pedophilic Islamic mob and their state backers. In other words, if they object to the prick of a pin in the form of a “Stop Paedophile Rings” banner , then bring the hammer of public outrage down on them with full force, and they will beg for the tender mercies of the pin-pricker.

    “So presumably the mainstream media is involved in the cover-up, too?”

    Our media, whether we are speaking of Great Britain,Germany,France,Canada,Australia,New Zealand, or the U.S., or any Western country composed of ethnic Europeans,is completely against us and totally supportive of the anti-White proposition that White countries and only White countries must be flooded with millions of non-Whites and non-Europeans with whom we must undergo forced assimilation and integration. For that reason, it is necessary that we must communicate the important and pertinent facts of the day ourselves to all of our people who seek such information. This is a daunting task, but carries with it the reward that we are able to select that which is most important to communicate and attach what we feel to be a proper amount of weight to social issues that impact us for a change.

    Yes, our mainstream media, all of our mainstream media, is captured. But this is cause to rejoice, for their methods are inferior and produce an inferior product. Our way is superior, and soon, even the enemy will be coming to us for accurate news. That may be the case already.

    Long live the British people,and long live OMHR.

    • Jimmy I can appreciate you’re a mainstream kind of person but to describe The BNP’s opposition to the multicultural genocide of White Nations as racist is total nonsense.
      Try reading my blog in full for a better understanding of modern European politics.
      Love & Peace.

      • That is not me commenting BTW. I never comment using the name ‘Outlaw Jimmy’ just Outlaw… Check my IP Address it’ll show as being Wrexham.. no proxy. What you have here my friend is a troll trying to stir shit…. I have published some of your articles on the Outlaw remember, you have my email address

      • This is true – the fake Jimmy Jones’s IP address is
        I won’t publish the real Jimmy Jones’s IP address, but can confirm what the real Jimmy Jones is saying here is true.

    • I Notice None Of You “Anti Racists” Ever Mention Israels Anti African Sentiment, Or The Blatant Anti White Sentiment Of Communists And Non White Groups Alike. You Are Just A White Uncle Tom, YOU Are The Real Racist! Africans Have Africa, Asians Have Asia Semites Have The ME Yet Whites Cannot Have Their Own Land Too, Give Your “Wayssisstt” Rants A Rest Now, White People Have Had Enough, That Word Means Nothing To Us Anymore, The Game Is Up!

    • Outlaw Jimmy:

      ‘Racist’ is not a proper word by the way, but if you mean that the desire of white people to survive is ‘racist’ please explain?

      ps Jimmy, check out what the new academics think of the word ‘racist’:

      Also, calling people ‘loons’ for opposing paedophilia makes little sense to me.

      If you think the BNP are ‘loons’, then perhaps you could elaborate on this, for example exactly which policies are ‘loony’?

      We want to survive as a race and we want to protect children from abuse, all the shouting, sneering and name-calling you can perform will not change those desires. These are honourable and natural desires.

      • Don’t hold your breath, Ross. These loony Lefties chip in from time to time with their one-liners (invariably containing the “Racist” accusation) and promptly scuttle off before they can be questioned in detail about their views. Why? Because their views are unsupportable and easily destroyed by reasoned argument. Open and honest debate is what these paedo-supporters and apologists fear above all, hence all the laws curbing free speech wherever you look in the West today.

  7. Dear Lefty Hater,

    Indeed. SO true. Just recommended this book to CJ, and I think you would also like it; it is less than £2 to buy as an e-book from Amazon, or one can borrow it for free from Amazon. There is a lot about the ‘wayssist’ accusation and a lot about reasoned debate, honest argument, free speech, the motivations of the ‘lefties’, and suchlike.

Leave a Reply to Cj aka Elderofzyklons Blog Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s