Dr David Duke : The Racial Murder and Rape of White Women in America

Written by Dr. David Duke

Photos & captions by Wat Tyler

How the so-called “Civil Rights” Movement in America has led to loss of the most important civil right of all: life.

The almost simultaneous murders of White co-eds at two different, prominent universities, Auburn and University of North Carolina, should bring attention to an epidemic of brutal African-American crimes against White women in the United States. The murder of Eve Carson, Student Body President of UNC has shocked hercampus andits surrounding community to its core. Ms. Carson was found murdered in the middle of an intersection just outside downtown Chapel Hill. Her body … which had two gunshot wounds, including one to the head, laid just a mile away from her SUV, which was left abandoned. Bank ATM video revealed that the murderer-carjacker, an African American, apparently attempted to get cash from Carson’s stolen ATM card shortly after the crime.

Eve Carson was murdered by a negro savage.

Popular student Eve Carson was murdered by a Third World negro savage.

 In a similar recent incident, police arrested another African American attacker, Courtney L. Lockhart, 23, for the grisly murder and attempted rape of Auburn University freshman co-ed, Lauren Burk, on March 4. Courtney was arrested on March 7 after having brutally pistol-whipped the face of another White victim, 72-year-old Marjorie Llewellyn of Newnan, Alabama and briefly kidnapping her at gunpoint during an armed robbery and attempted carjacking earlier in the day.

Lauren Burk was also murdered by a negro savage.

Lauren Burk was also murdered by a Third World negro savage.

The recent murders of two White coeds at major universities by Black predators underscore a racial reality that the mass media in America hides from the public: the tens of millions of White victims of Black criminality in America. Over the past four decades since the “civil rights” movement, crime figures show that millions of crimes have been committed by Blacks and other non-White predators against White people. The crimes include robbery, assault, rape and murder. The racial component of crime in America has been largely ignored. It took a major newspaper outside of America to address the shocking epidemic Black crime in America.


Black crime rates against White people are many times greater than White crimes against Blacks. You wouldn’t know it by reading or listening to America’s mass media. Saturation national and international news coverage is given to the very few White cross-race crimes against Blacks such as the James Byrd dragging case in Texas, as well as the media-hyped Tawana Brawley case in New Jersey and the alleged rape of a Black stripper by White lacrosse team members at Duke University. Both of those latter cases, after months of front-page, sensationalized coverage decrying “White racism,” turned out to be complete hoaxes.


There is an incredible disproportionate rate of Black crimes against Whites in contrast to White crimes against Blacks. Per capita Black cross racial crimes of 50 or even 100 percent greater than Whites would be bad enough, but the Black crime rates against Whites are actually many times greater than White on Black crimes. Blacks are an estimated 57 (that is 5,700 percent!) times more likely to commit violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times (13,600 percent!) more likely to commit robbery. (see the color of crime report published by the New Century Foundation – an analysis of crime figures taken from official Justice Department crime reports) http://www.nc-f.org/

Eric Holder has loaded the US Justice system against White People.

Eric Holder is a racist who has loaded the US Justice system against White People.

Perhaps the most shocking of all the crime data dealing with cross-race crime is the incredible rate of crime by Black males against White women. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 White women are sexually assaulted or raped by Black men each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. In perhaps the most shocking crime figure of all is the number of White rapes against Black women. Statistically, it is 0! Because they have fewer than 10 cases nationally.


According to murder figures released by the Justice Department in 2002, , Black predators are at least 22 times (2,200 percent) more likely to murder White women than the reverse. In regard to gang attacks including the horrible specter of gang rape, the figures are literally off the charts, with at least a 200 times (that’s 20,000 percent!) greater chance of Blacks committing gang assaults and that includes both White men and women victims!

Muslim gang rape of White Women in Sweden is now common and rarely punished.

Muslim gang rape of White Women in Sweden is now common and rarely punished.

The staggering personal tragedies connected with these huge crime numbers should be a national scandal. Yet, the facts go largely unreported. How many times have the public seen media portrayals of historical or contemporary racial discrimination against Black people. But, the question is, “In the terms of the most important of human rights, how does the discrimination of racially segregated water fountains or neighborhoods or schools compare with the racially born crimes of black slaughter and physical attacks levied against thousands of White people each year?

Abraham Lincoln always said blacks and Whites couldn't live together.

Abraham Lincoln always said blacks and Whites couldn’t live together.

America has been treated to thousands of media articles for instance about the frontier-style vigilante justice of lynchings, events which have occurred at least since the time of the American Revolution when they began on the Virginia frontier. Lynching got its name from Colonel Charles Lynch of Bedford County. He defended his community against outlaws and against Tories who were treacherously aiding the British. The Lynch organizations not only captured suspicious characters but gave them trials. With the frontier moving west and often with not a single law enforcement officer for hundreds of miles, vigilante committees often hunted down criminals and meted out punishment which was called “lynching.”

Much of what is happening in the USA today was predicted in "The Turner Diaries".

Much of what is happening in the USA today was predicted in “The Turner Diaries”.

Lynching also became prominent again in the face of terrible outrages against innocent women and children during the Black Reconstruction period in the South and was mostly employed there against suspected Black rapists and murderers, but lynching was often practiced against Whites in the South, and quite often against criminal Whites in the North and West.

Of course, everyone today naturally condemns the practice of lynching, as well they should. Mob violence cannot be defended. But, if one wants to characterize lynching as a racial crime because lynchings were more commonly employed against Blacks in the South than against Whites, a few facts must be taken into account. If one considers disproportionate rates of Black lynching in the South, one must also consider the Black disproportionate crime rate.

Most White Men now accept the rape of White Women and have taken a submissive role to black men.

Most White Men now accept the rape of White Women and have taken a submissive role to black men.

1) Many scholars who have studied the history of lynching in the United States make it clear that lynching wasn’t simply a racial crime, but one primarily exacted on criminals whether they were Black or White. Consider the fact that even today, Blacks commit more murders than Whites in the United States, and Blacks are many times more likely to commit interracial race crimes such as rape and murder. As pointed out by federal crimes studies, a Black man is 57 times more likely to commit a violent crime against Whites than vice-versa, thousands of times more likely to rape a White women than Whites are likely to rape Black women, and 22 times more likely to murder a White woman than vice versa. There is no reason not to suspect that similar extremely high rates of Black criminality have existed historically. Most of the lynchings up until the War Between the States were against Whites and Significant numbers of Whites in the late 19th and early 20th Century were also lynched. So, considering the rates of crime, historical lynching has always been proportionate to Black crime rates and not one simply based on racist motives.

2) One must also understand that historical lynching was most often applied to those guilty of rape, robbery or murder. Of course, there were cases where innocent men were lynched, but in contrast, the thousands of White women and other White victims of Black crime today are guilty of no crime. Lynching cannot be excused in any way, but most of those men lynched were undoubtedly guilty of vicious and horrible crimes against the innocent, especially against women and children. Those were the kinds of heinous crimes that really drove the extra-legal executions.

Negro savages used to know to stay away from White Women.

Third World negro savages used to know to stay well away from White Women.

The U.S. Senate recently issued an apology for not historically taking a stand against lynching, something that has been condemned because for part of its history Blacks disproportionately suffered from it.

If that is deemed appropriate, why does the U.S. Senate stand mute against the brutal rape of over 34,000 White women per year by Blacks. In just one year the number of White women raped by Black males is 6 times the total number of all lynchings during the entire history of the United States. (Estimated to be about 5,000 including both Whites and Blacks)

If racial disparity is an issue, then the Black rate of murder and rape against White men and women has a far greater racial disparity than that of White and Black lynchings. Remember, according to the U.S. Justice Department official figures, 34,000 White women were sexually assaulted compared to less than ten Black women assaulted by White men.


One should also consider that the victims of lynching were men; only a small number were women (estimates are between 75 and 100 women lynched in the history of the United States), and most of those were lynched for crimes committed along with their male criminal partners. Compare the small number of women who suffered lynching compared to the 34,000 women who suffer from Black rape every year. In addition, 700 innocent White women are murdered each and every year by Blacks. Where is the outrage about this racial crime?

If one wants to talk about moral outrages, the historical lynching of men who were overwhelmingly criminal and guilty of horrendous crimes, is quite minor compared to the mass murder and rape of the innocent going on literally as you read these lines. While you are reading this article another White woman will suffer rape at the hands of a Black man. (One White woman every 9 minutes if you accept the conventional wisdom that less than half of rapes are reported).

Violating any White  Woman should carry the heaviest possible penalty.

Violating any White Woman should carry the heaviest possible penalty.

Next time someone comes up and tells you about the horrors of Jim Crow and segregation, how it was so terribly awful that African Americans, as well as White Americans lived in their own neighborhoods, went to their own schools, and even drank from their own water fountains, think about that supposed horror compared to horrendous violations of the most important civil right of all, the right to live and not suffer grievous personal assault or even death.

The fact of the matter is that Blacks as well as the Whites of America were a lot safer in the days of “evil segregation” than we are now. When America was a nation living by the values of White heritage, culture, standards and civilization, most Black kids were born legitimate in two parent families, they were not being shot down by each other on the steps of their homes, millions were not enslaved by drugs, half of them were not in prison or in some part of the criminal justice system. In a real sense, for countless millions of African Americans, the most important civil and human rights of all have been lost by the so-called victories of the civil rights movement.

Another White Victim of black rape and attempted murder.

Cheryl Maddison – another White Victim of black rape and attempted murder. Was her life enriched by multiculturalism?

For Whites the change has been just as dramatic. Millions of our people are now victims of Black robbery, rape, and murder. Millions of White boys and girls whose parents can’t afford private or parochial education, suffer in mostly Black public schools filled with sexual and physical intimidation, filthy language and dismal standards, drugs and the violence of the “gangsta rap” culture, a culture that violates the sanctity of womanhood and all of the most basic of human rights.

Millions more of our elderly are practically home prisoners in their own neighborhoods. Let the media and government tell them about the supposed civil rights and blessings of forced integration. Millions more of hardworking, better-qualified White, middle-class people suffer from the racial discrimination of so-called affirmative action. Constant government and media concern about “civil rights” is the greatest con job in history, because so-called civil rights has taken away practically every conceivable civil right of the American people, including the most important one of all, the right to live and the right not to be physically abused, or raped, or robbed or hurt.

Dr David Duke the White Civil Rights Leader.

Dr David Duke the White Civil Rights Leader – one of the few American politicians to object to White Women being raped and murdered by blacks.

Let the government and media drone on about Black “civil rights” to the grieving parents of Eve Carson and Lauren Burk, two bright and beautiful White women who were so full of love and life but who now have lost the most precious civil right of all, the right to life itself.

They were murdered not just by the predators on our streets, but by a media and government establishment who stripped away their right to live a safe and full life. They were murdered by media who have lied to the American people about the joys of multiracialism and multiculturalism. It is a media that constantly tell us the wonderful and loving future we have in America as it is subversively morphed into a mostly non-White nation. It is the same media who have instilled collective White guilt for real or imagined crimes of White history, but have hidden the terrible crimes going on against us, our heritage, freedom and survival, right before our eyes.

Dr David Duke's sensational book "My Awakening".

Dr David Duke’s sensational book “My Awakening” is a must read.

Lauren and Eva were murdered by the politicians who sold us out for the bloc votes and for the approval of media that celebrates the coming extinction of our people, faith, heritage and nation. They have also sold their souls and ours to the Jewish money men of American politics who make them pledge their subservience to Israel as a quote, “Jewish State for the Jewish people,” while they would not even dare to invoke the term “White people” except in denigration and apology.

Eva and Lauren no longer have breath in their bodies. To the last moments of their lives they probably never for an instant understood why they lost their lives. They probably never knew that our people were in a desperate struggle for their existence, and they probably never dreamed they could be a casualty in that war.


a and Lauren are gone now. They cannot speak to us except by what they left behind. But, they cannot be forgotten. We who are aware of the crisis facing our people will remember them. We will remember them as they were, beautiful expressions of humanity made unique and special by their own efforts and by the imprint of our people’s DNA spiral.

Book Review: “White Girl Bleed a Lot” (5th Edition): Colin Flaherty

Written by Hugh Murray

Photos & Captions by Wat Tyler

This is the 5th Edition of Colin Flaherty’s “White Girl Bleed A Lot” book. The book describes how black racist violence is on the rise in USA and how the authorities and the media cover it up. These patterns are being followed to a degree in Britain and across Europe.

The book is available in either paperback or e-book. If possible we would reccomend the e-book as there are links to click on in the book

This is a book review by Hugh Murray


The book is simply a series of reports of black flash mobs crashing into stores, grabbing, insulting, robbing, beating, and occasionally sending Whites to hospital or to the morgue. On one level, this book is quite boring, for it is the same story told and retold again. It is the same story in Philadelphia, San Francisco, New York, Miami, Myrtle Beach, Indianapolis, Charlotte, Texas, New Jersey, Milwaukee, etc. The stories are variations on the same theme, how can young blacks humiliate Whites, destroy their property, steal, beat, and then run away. Black racism, black on White hatred, black on White crime, black on White violence is an epidemic in America. This part of Flaherty’s book is solid.

Going through a crowd of blacks with a bucket of fried chicken wasn't a smart move.

Going through a crowd of blacks with a bucket of fried chicken wasn’t a smart move.

Unfortunately, the response to these crimes is usually as repetitious as the crimes themselves. Local newspapers generally refuse to identify the race of the perpetrators. The author is able to do so by using Youtube videos, often posted by the criminals. They are proud of their violent crimes against Whites (sometimes, against Asians). One amazon reviewer dismissed the content of the book, maintaining it was anecdotal and not accord with the FBI’s hate crime statistics. In Milwaukee on July 3, 2011, a groups of blacks ransacked a gas station’s convenience store. They then rampaged in a nearby park beating and stealing from Whites, who were there to view the fireworks. Police were called and came to the scene. However, because of the politically correct sensitivity to minorities, even sensitive to those engaging in crime, the officers refused to file reports of the crimes. If there are no police reports of the blacks attacking Whites, then the crimes do not exist, and these crimes are not included in FBI or any other statistics.

Blacks rape 35,000 White Women in the USA every year - about 100 per day.

Blacks rape 35,000 White Women in the USA every year – about 100 per day.

Does one expect the Eric Holder Justice Department (the one that dropped the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party) to investigate possible anti-white racism in a police department that permitted them to ignore the violent crimes by blacks against Whites? Only after some of the Whites were treated at hospital and called talk radio did local TV reports begin to expose the black racist assaults. Finally, [White] Police Chief Ed Flynn conceded that some “fights” had occurred. Flaherty snidely commented, “‘fights,’ which is a curious way to describe a race riot where some of the victims actually tried to defend themselves.”(p. 120) One of the White girls was slugged so hard, that her blood evoked the comment that inspired the title of this book. Mayor Tom Barrett, a liberal Democrat, and Chief Flynn, an import from New York, denied these were hate crimes, assured the city that crime was colorblind, and decried those who sought to “sensationalize” the occurrences.

White Man forced to strip naked by black mugger.

White Man forced to strip naked by black mugger in Britain.

Flaherty has amassed a book of crimes – crimes by blacks against Whites, and a few of blacks against Asians. Flaherty recounts page after page of black on White hostility, insults, theft, beatings, some of which may have led to emergency treatment, and sometimes to the grave. Page after page. Boring to read; painful to read, distressing to read of such injustice perpetrated so often by violent, Black racists, depressing to read how the crimes are not reported in the press, or not reported as racist crimes.

Josef Stalin, the Soviet dictator, observed that the death of one person is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic.

Unfortunately, in the US it becomes harder to acquire accurate statistics of black on White crime. If you simply read the local newspaper accounts of most of these incidents, all of the racial animosity and motivation is removed, deleted, expunged, censored. Why are Americans not supposed to read about the massive hatred and violence against Whites committed by blacks?

This White Man didn't show enough respect.

This White man didn’t show enough respect.

Black mobs are not identified as such; they are roving groups of “youths,” “teens,” “young people,” indulging in unseemly behavior. These are not hate crimes, and race has little or nothing to do with it. Of course, the reality is NOT what is reported. The reality is that young blacks engage in insulting, threatening, beating, and robbing Whites. But the major media do NOT want to reveal this basic fact. Flaherty finds the facts – on Youtube, where the color of the crime is visible and often posted by the proud black racist criminals themselves.
Why do the national and most local media cover up the criminality of black mobs? On this question Flaherty is silent. He clearly exposes the media cover-ups, but fails to ask why.


To answer this question, an older book might be more helpful, William McGowan’s Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism. Beginning with the large-scale black riots in hundreds of American cities in the mid- to late-1960s, the liberal analysis of events was encapsulated in the report of the Kerner Commission. Basically, the blue-ribbon panel blamed the riots on White racism, excused the rioters, and urged changes to prevent future outbreaks. Universities, which became the think-tanks of the Left developed theories to exculpate black violence; they were “culturally deprived,” they were victims of institutional racism, and their outbursts were simply a means to cope with such oppression. Furthermore, blacks could not, by definition, be racists. They might show prejudice, but racism required power, and since blacks in America lacked power, they were incapable of being racist. Only White racism was the problem. Of course, if you walk alone on a street at night, who has the power, a black with a pistol, or you? And in the era of President Obama and Attorney General Holder, who does have the power? Moreover, if this definition made any sense and were applied elsewhere, then Afrikaners, by definition, can no longer be racists in the new South Africa.

Would you want to see this coming down your street?

Would you want to see this coming down your street?

The Left-wing theories of race spun by academics were popularized by the media. In the journalism and communications departments of universities, students were taught that as reporters they were to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Objective reporting was deemed not merely old fashioned, but immoral. The reporter was to take the side of the oppressed. And in race reporting, that meant coloring the news for the benefit of blacks, who were by definition, the oppressed. And so academe and the media melded into the academedia complex.

One defense strategy for weaker White males is to become submissive to black culture - these Whites are known as "wiggers".

One defense strategy for weaker White males is to become submissive to black culture – these Whites are known as “wiggers”.

Other issues were also fused with the new, politically correct mission of the communication majors. For example, as the method of affirmative action became clearer in practice, (basically a way to give the job or scholarship to a lesser qualified or unqualified minority and deny it to the best qualified, if he were White.) To justify these practices of denying equal opportunity to Whites, the Left developed the theory of “White male privilege.” According to this, all Whites were privileged, and to create a level playing field, preferences had to be granted to minorities, even rich ones. The Whites who did not understand this justification, were clearly racists, and probably deserving of a Fanonesque tutoring session (i.e., violence).


The curriculum of schools has changed drastically to incorporate many of the Leftist theories. No longer is the West applauded as the center of a civilization that freed many men and women of drudgery, that provided light throughout the night, that sped people and goods across a continent on rail, and even in the air, – now the West is depicted as oppressive. Whites smashing the wonderful civilizations of the Aztecs, of Africa, of wherever. And White oppression must be fought. Multiculturalism is the glorification of all cultures – except oppressive, colonial, racist, white culture. The West became the enemy in many of America’s schools.

So the “youths” who roam about lurking to beat whites (and sometimes Asians) are simply affirming what they have been taught in their multicultural curriculum and in the general media. So, poor, raped, Tawana Brawley – persecuted and raped by the KKK policeman, for a year was a page-1 story for Rev. Al Sharpton to inform reporters about the evils of Whites. It was a hoax; but the Left did not care. Think of all the educational material that Rev. Sharpton could present to the cameras during that year. And poor, O. J. Simpson – that White bitch of a wife was receiving OJ’s alimony to squander on that jewish waiter! They surely deserved what happened to them – whoever might have killed them. Another big racial event occurred in the Howard Beach section of New York City in which a black was killed by autos as he fled a group of angry White youths. Even a year following the event, there was a television movie about it to remind America of White racism and its murderous consequences. Yet, at about the same time, in Milwaukee a White youth, fleeing a group of black youths, jumped in Lake Michigan, and drowned. There was no publicity about the death of Maldonado in Milwaukee. Maldonado was just a White. Instead of running to the lake, he should have simply let the blacks beat the s___ out of him, and then he might still be alive. The media and those who control it could not state blatantly the main difference between these stories. One is a rare example of White racism; the other an all too common example of black racism. The media choose the spotlight the rare example, hoping to convince that it is the common type of racism. The media also dismiss the more common type of racist attacks, because that would show blacks in an unfavorable light. The media rationally choose the stories that they will emphasize. They choose those stories that fit their ideology. So, they provide massive coverage to one story, and bury the other.

Whites are gagged by political correctness.

Whites are gagged by political correctness.

Even though his mother was White, most people view Barack Obama as black. George Zimmerman had a jewish father and an Hispanic mother. But for the Leftist media, like CNN, Zimmerman was identified as the “White” who had brutally murdered the young Trayvon Martin. The point of the Leftist media was to show a wicked white racist murdering an innocent young black. That story fit the Left-wing agenda. Zimmerman resided in a neighborhood recently targeted by burglaries. He was part of a neighborhood watch, seeking to keep his neighborhood safe. However, the Left objects to that. (To the Left, if you want to live in a safe neighborhood, get rich and live in a gated community. The poor, according to the Left, should have to endure the crazies, the muggers, the rapists, and the Trayvon Martins.) The Left vigorously opposes the 2nd Amendment and the right to own arms to defend oneself; one’s loved ones, one’s property. Whatever happened in the confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin, the Left media sensationalized the event seeking to make it into a racist White killing an innocent black. I was not there to witness the event, and it is possible that Zimmerman shot Martin without provocation. However, there are other possibilities. Noteworthy, the Martin family has sought to keep Trayvon’s school records sealed. He had been suspended for several days, and there were indications that he was involved with drugs and stolen property. Is it not possible that Trayvon was casing the neighborhood when Zimmerman caught him? But, young blacks cannot be guilty when confronting a “White” (or even an Hispanic-white) according to the ideology that dominates the academedia complex. Noteworthy also, when the New Black Panther Party called for the apprehension of Zimmerman, dead or alive, this threat did not stir the Department of Justice to protect Zimmerman. After all, Obama marched beside leaders of the NBPP in Alabama and he also shared a platform with them. Some members of the NBPP have called for the murder of all Whites, men, women, and children. If Obama could share a platform with them, and have his Attorney General Holder dismiss a lawsuit against the NBPP, why would his Administration object to that party’s threats against the Hispanic Zimmerman?

Black mob flash racist violence is now prevalent across the USA.

Black flash-mob racist violence is now prevalent across the USA.

If our media were doing their jobs properly, there would be no need for Flaherty’s book. Because the media, on race issues, are dominated by Left-wing ideologues, they consciously try NOT to report stories unfavorable to blacks. When the story becomes too big to suppress, then the media spins it to distort, with the objective to make the blacks appear in the most favorable light.

What would happen if the media reported honestly? The Left would have “the community” (blacks and some radical Whites) march on the station, organize boycotts of the sponsors’ products, gather signatures from academe and tax-exempt Leftist groups like the NAACP, the ACLU, for law suits, demand firings of the honest reporters, etc. The station would quickly cave, and to prove its sincerity, it would grant a large contribution to some of the protesting organizations, fire the reporter or have him sent to an appropriate re-education center on sensitivity training. The station would also promise that in the future no such honest reports would be aired.

Eric Holder has loaded the US Justice system against White People.

Eric Holder has loaded the US Justice system against White People.

Sadly, since the 1960s, one cannot report the truth about race and crime in the major media in America. Flaherty’s book is not published by a major publisher. One can read about these incidents daily in some internet sites like Jared Taylor’s American Renaissance. He includes clips about racial crime in the US, and in addition, racial conflict and crime in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, and other nations.

Sweden now has a massive muslim gang rape culture and has become the rape capital of Europe.

Sweden now has a massive muslim gang rape culture and has become the rape capital of Europe.

Those old enough may recall black/white photographs from the 1930s of refugees fleeing Nazi Europe. The pictures make one sympathize with the victims of the bullying, belligerence, and terror they endured in storm-troopered Europe. With WWII won, America’s economy turned from building tanks to automobiles and consumer goods, and this nation embarked upon a period of great prosperity. Some could now afford cars, and even new homes in the suburbs. But others preferred to remain in the neighborhoods they knew from childhood. They did not want to move to the green burbs; they preferred to stay near the church their parents had helped build, the one in which they had been confirmed, been married, etc. Then came the riots of the late 1960s. The threats, the shots, the burned cars, burned buildings, beatings. The blacks doing this did not wear fancy storm-trooper uniforms, but they were just as racist, just as threatening, just as brutal. Now many more Whites found it necessary to flee the city. Like the jews of Hitler’s Europe, they had to leave, sometimes quite quickly, out of fear. They often suffered financial loss in the process of a fast relocation. Yes, they went to the burbs, and often loved it; like the jews who came to America and loved it. But many of these Whites were driven from their homes. White flight was a reality. While the academedia complex can only envision White racism, it was the brutality of black racism that caused many to flee. (Jack Cashill’s Sucker Punch: The Hard Left Hook that Dazed Ali and Killed King’s Dream describes how black racism led to the collapse of his home neighborhood in Newark, NJ, in the late 1960s.)

In multi-racial areas a lot of White Women are choosing having a black boyfriend for protection from black gang rape.

In multi-racial areas a lot of White Women are choosing to have a black boyfriend for protection from black gang rape.

What were Whites fleeing? Black racism. Black crime. Black “culture” (loud, noisy music, vulgarity, shouting, arguments, hatred of Whites, etc. Why is there such crime? Because liberal judges do not require blacks to abide by the same rules required of Whites. If they commit crimes, their punishment will often be lighter. A black who attacks a White can get away with it. So why not do it? It will not make news. It is deleted from the newspaper. If it does make news, it will somehow be the White man’s fault. The black is exonerated. OJ was declared not guilty and across the nation black university students cheered. (Stick it to Whitey!)

Also telling, shortly after being elected President, Ronald Reagan was shot and severely wounded by attempted assassin John Hinckley. The crime occurred in Washington, D.C., a city overwhelmingly black in population. A jury was selected to hear the case – eleven blacks and one White. Rather than convict the attempted murderer, the jury found him not guilty due to insanity! Do you think that jury would have reached a similar verdict had Hinckley attempted to assassinate Obama?

The blacks have been wound up by the jewish media and now they're armed, dangerous, angry and organised.

The blacks have been wound up by the jewish controlled media and now they’re armed, dangerous, angry and organised.

Flaherty writes about the past two years, atrocity after atrocity. So many attacks by blacks against Whites that it no longer seems a tragedy, but a Stalinist statistic. What might the numbers be? Though she includes all crimes and all races, Ann Coulter includes an important paragraph in her new book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama – “Between 1960 and 1973, the number of FBI index crimes – which are serious offences such as murder, rape, robbery, arson, assault, kidnapping and burglary – nearly tripled from 2,019,600 offences a year to 5,891,924. Hundreds of thousands of Americans had to die, be raped, or have their property destroyed or stolen because liberals had some neat new ideas about crime.”(p. 12-13)

Abraham Lincoln never wanted different races to live together.

Abraham Lincoln never wanted different races to live together and didn’t think it was possible.

Recall Stalin emphasized how one can conceive of an individual death, but not the death of a million. That is a statistic. Yet, Flaherty’s endless recording of one after another attack on Whites by black racists has a more powerful impact. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. It is not a single incident, but the cumulative effect of reading about attacks on Whites by black racists. Equally important, the equally cumulative effect of the consistent cover-ups and lies by the mass media and the government officials to hide or excuse the black attacks.

Happily, not all blacks have taken up the war against Whites. Many blacks prefer peace with White people. But too often blacks vote for the liberal politicians and judges who refuse to crack down on black crime. If they are jurors, they too often vote to let guilty blacks go free.

"The Turner Diaries" by Andrew macDonald predicted much of what is happening in USA.

“The Turner Diaries” written by Andrew MacDonald predicted much of what is happening in the USA today.

What has happened to America in recent decades is a tragedy. In reality, the jewish elite have encourage blacks to make war on Whites. It is a war consciously ignored by the academedia complex. It is a war encouraged and subsidized by the extremely wealthy foundations (most of which are dominated by the Left). It is at present a one-sided war, for only one groups is involved in the aggression. The other is victimized. The media pretend there is no war. The politicians appease the aggressors. Statistics and tragedies.

New Black Panther Party are growing.

The New Black Panther Party is growing across USA.

Despite the flaws of typographical errors, misspelt and omitted words, despite the lack of analysis and index, despite the sloppy look and oversized print, White Girl Bleed A Lot provides accurate description of the continuing race war that the mainstream media consciously refuse to report.

Leon Trotsky of the UAF And SWP Exposed

Written byDavid McCalden

Photos & Captions by Watt Tyler

Introduction by Cigpapers

If you ever see any Socialist Worker’s Party, or their front organisation the Unite Against Fascism, marches you will usually see pictures of the jewish Communist Leon Trotsky and multiple references to him. He is the spiritual leader and political guru of the SWP and UAF.

For a full exposure of the SWP/UAF and their backers see here: https://cigpapers.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/who-are-the-uaf-unite-against-fascism/

The policies and belief system of the SWP/UAF are based on Leon Trotsky, so to see in to the minds of SWP/UAF supporters it might be an idea to look at the life of Trotsky.

So who was this Leon Trotsky that is worshipped today by the SWP and UAF?


By David McCalden

The Polish surname Trotsky was not the one the revolutionary was born with. His true name was Levi Davidovich Bronstein, and he was born in 1879 into a wealthy family of jewish landowners in southern Ukraine.

Leon Trotsky the jewish Communist who enslaved and murdered millions of White Russians.

Leon Trotsky the jewish Communist who enslaved and murdered millions of White Russians.

In the fall of 1888, at the age of 9, Levi Davidovich moved from the family estate to the coastal resort of Odessa, where he lived with his mother’s nephew, Moses Filipovich Spentzer — a liberal, jewish publisher. After attending high school in Odessa, he went on to junior college at Nikolayev, where he fell in with a group of jewish socialists. He began to read Marx around this time and started to agitate among the fledgling trades unions in the area. He ended up being arrested and it was at this point in his career that he decided to adopt a pseudonym. With a stroke of irony, he took on the name of his Polish prison warden, Trotsky.

A young Leon Trotsky

A young Leon Trotsky

During the fall of 1899 he was moved to a prison in Moscow, and was tried early in the following year. He was sentenced to four years exile in Siberia. However, before the transfer could be brought about, Trotsky decided to wed one of his fellow jewish agitators: Alexandra Lyovna Sokolovskaya. A rabbi was brought to the prison cell to officiate.

The Trubetskoy Bastion Prison for Political Prisoners like Leon Trotsky

The Trubetskoy Bastion Prison for Political Prisoners like Leon Trotsky

Soon after the couple’s exile to Siberia, a baby daughter was born, with another following in 1902. Despite the rigors of Siberia, Trotsky was able to contribute prolific articles to the local Irkutsk newspaper, and to receive and study Marxist books. Around this time he heard of Lenin, another Communist agitator, and the two began corresponding. Lenin wrote Trotsky that he should abandon his Siberian exile and go and live in a foreign country. Friends would help.

Trotsky's friend Lenin - an evil man who ended democracy in Russia for 80 years.

Trotsky’s friend Lenin – an evil man who ended democracy in Russia for 80 years.

So Trotsky found his way to Vienna, where he was aided by his fellow jewish Communist, Victor Adler; and then on to Zurich, where another jewish Communist, Paul Axelrod, was point man. Trotsky’s wife and children were left behind in Siberia.

On to Paris, and then to London, where Trotsky finally met Lenin at a rooming house at 30 Holford Square, King’s Cross. Trotsky was immediately appointed editor of The Spark, an underground Communist newspaper which was directed at Russian agitation. Trotsky also gave some Marxist lectures in London’s predominantly jewish Whitechapel district, and he took up with a Ukrainian (Gentile) woman, Natalya Ivanovna Sedova. Before long the two became lovers, and produced two male children.

Karl Marx - Lenin and Trotsky were Marxists.

Karl Marx – Lenin and Trotsky were Marxists.

After establishing strategy at various conferences in London, Brussels and Paris, Trotsky and Natalya (using fake passports) returned to Russia in 1905 in order to launch the revolution. After several months of apparently harassment-free agitation, Trotsky was arrested and then thrown into the Peter-Paul prison in St. Petersburg, along with two other jewish Marxists: Leon Deutsch and Alexander “Parvus” Helphand. After VIP treatment in jail, and a democratic trial, the agitators were exiled to Siberia once more. However, after arrival in Siberia, Trotsky hardly even stooped to unpack but merely got on a train going in the opposite direction and ended up once more with his common-law wife Natalya in Finland.

Natalya - Trotsky's common law wife.

Natalya – Trotsky’s common law wife.

After more agitating around western Europe, Trotsky set sail for New York, where he worked as a journalist on the Russian Communist newspaper Novy Mir, out of their offices at 177 St. Mark’s Place on the Lower East Side — right in the heart of the jewish section of Manhattan. Novy Mir (New World) was owned by two Communist jews named Weinstein and Brailovsky. According to the New York police, who monitored Trotsky’s activities, his main associates during this period were Emma Goldman and Alexander Berman.

Jacob H. Schiff who lent the Bolsheviks $20million to otherthrow the democratic Russian Government

Jacob H. Schiff the jewish financier who lent the Bolsheviks $20million to otherthrow the democratic Russian Government

Things were starting to heat up in Mother Russia in 1917, and Trotsky sensed that the time was ripe for another Soviet takeover bid. But finance for the revolution was essential. Oddly, these so-called enemies of Capitalism had no difficulty whatsoever in raising vast amounts of capital from jewish financiers around the World. Trotsky worked on Jacob H. Schiff, who it was, later admitted, poured $20 million of Kuhn Loeb bank money into the projected Bolshevik takeover. “Parvus”, Trotsky’s room-mate at the executive suite of the Peter-Paul prison, was himself a wealthy coal broker, and he was off in the Balkans making deals on behalf of the Imperial German government. Naturally, being a good businessman with loyalty only to the dollar, he had no qualms about trading with any enemy power during wartime.

In Scandinavia, another jewish banker, Olaf Aschberg, was busy putting together an investment portfolio to propel the nascent Bolshevik state into financial bliss.

On 26 March 1917 Trotsky embarked from New York, for Russia He was accompanied by a good many jewish Marxist soldiers-of-fortune from the Lower East Side, plus a large amount of gold courtesy of Jacob Schiff.

President Woodrow Wilson had Trotsky released by the British.

President Woodrow Wilson had Trotsky released by the British.

However, when the ship stopped to refuel at Halifax, Nova Scotia, Trotsky was arrested by the British authorities, on the sound rationale that he was heading for Russia to take Russia out of the Great War and thereby increase the Germans’ capabilities on the Western front. But in a stunning reversal of “how things are supposed to be”, the American President Woodrow Wilson intervened with the British and Trotsky was allowed to continue on his way since he had the advantage of an American passport.

By the time Trotsky reached Russia, the revolution had already taken place. The Tsar had been deposed and a Democratic government installed. But being a good Communist, Trotsky wanted to have things his own way. The Democrats, under Kerensky, were wise to these ambitions and warrants were issued for the arrest of Trotsky and Lenin. The basis for the warrants was evidence that they were agents of the Imperial German government – a not unreasonable assumption since Lenin had been sent back into Russia on a sealed German train, and Trotsky had been sent by Jacob Schiff, a cousin of the German Minister of the Interior, Felix Warburg, both jews.

Alexander Kerensky died in exile in 1970

Russian Democratic Nationalist Alexander Kerensky died in exile in New York in 1970

But after a short period of imprisonment for Trotsky, and hiding for Lenin, both were back on the streets again. Soon afterward, the Lenin-Trotsky Communists led a street rebellion against the Democrats, and with just a handful of men seized control of the government. Within a short time a delegation of jewish Communists, led by Trotsky, met with the German commanders and signed away vast tracts of Russia, in return for a cessation of hostilities.

Russian Civil War 1918 to 1922 between the jewish Bolsheviks and White Russians.

Russian Civil War 1918 to 1922 between the jewish Bolsheviks and White Russians.

However, the Communists’ troubles were not over yet. As soon as their tyrannical regime started to bite into the newly-won freedoms of the Russian people, a civil war broke out, with a White Russian army taking up arms against the Communists. Anarchists under Nester Makhno also fought the new government and the Whites, with his Ukrainian Army of Insurgent Peasants. Makhno soon controlled vast tracts of Ukraine, so in an effort to neutralize him, the Communist government agreed to recognize Ukraine as an autonomous anarchist region. A treaty was signed by three jewish Commissars : Bela Kuhn, S. I. Gusev and M. V. Frunze. As soon as the other fronts were secure, the Red Army then turned all its force against the Ukrainian autonomous region and, treaties notwithstanding, crushed all resistance. The charismatic Makhno fled overseas and ended up laboring in a Paris factory.

Nester Makhno died in exile in Paris.

Ukranian Anarchist Leader Nester Makhno died in exile in Paris.

Some of the opposition to the Communists was fuelled by anti-Semitism. The White Russians published explicitly anti-Semitic posters showing an ugly jewish Trotsky with Oriental Bolshevik soldiers. Allegations that Makhno was anti-Semitic have never been proven; in fact he had jewish lieutenants.

There were some ironic twists during the bloody days of the Civil War. A jewess, Fanny Kaplan, tried to assassinate Lenin in Moscow. And a comrade of hers did actually assassinate Moses Uritsky, the head of the Communist CHEKA (secret police).

While the Communists were busy trying to batten down all resistance to their tyranny, the Poles decided to try their luck by invading Russia. A counter-attack by the Reds initially succeeded in driving back the Poles, but ended in a stalemate. The Poles too used anti-Semitic propaganda to counter the Jewish commissars.

Trotsky made sure his various families were taken care of. His father, the wealthy landowner David Bronstein, had been subjected to attack from both sides in the Civil War, so Trotsky gave him a job as manager of a state mill just outside Moscow. Trotsky’s Gentile wife was made Minister of Museums in Moscow. His first (Jewish) wife was a political functionary in Petrograd (the new name for St. Petersburg).

St. Petersburg was renamed Petrograd by the Communists.

St. Petersburg was renamed Petrograd by the jewish Communists.

Eventually, the White Army resistance was crushed, but not before some startling set-backs for the Reds. Any further opposition was brutally suppressed by the Soviet secret police. Trotsky then turned his attention toward fomenting similar Communist takeovers in neighboring countries. Events did not omen well for this venture.

In January 1919, a jewish Communist uprising in Berlin was a dismal flop, ending with the deaths of the two main proponents: Rosa Luxemberg and Karl Liebknecht. In March 1919, the Soviet Jew Bela Kuhn took over the government of Hungary, but after a bloody couple of months, this attempt also failed. A short-lived uprising in Munich under the leadership of the jew Kurt Eisner was also put down.

Rosa Luxemburg a jewish communist who died in a failed revolution.

Rosa Luxemburg a jewish Communist who died in a failed revolution against Democracy.

Early in 1921, there was a mutiny at the naval base of Kronstadt. Kronstadt had always had a reputation for revolutionary zeal – the sailors had mutinied against the Tsar and also against the Democrats. Each time Trotsky had supported them. But this time, the sailors were rebelling against Trotsky. So, instead of defending their demands for free speech and freedom of association, Trotsky sent in Red Army units to brutally crush the uprising. To explain away this murder, Trotsky recycled the same lame excuse that he had used to smear Makhno’s anarchists — that they were in league with the White Army. Perhaps it was episodes like this that inspired George Orwell to write Animal Farm.

Trotsky reaped what he sowed.

Trotsky reaped what he sowed.

Soon, it was Trotsky himself who suffered from such double standard morality. Lenin died suddenly in 1924, and his place was taken by Stalin. (Trotsky was indisposed at the time, taking a health cure on the Black Sea.) Stalin very shortly discovered “crimes” which Trotsky had committed, and he was exiled first to Turkestan and then overseas. Stalin eventually had him murdered in Mexico in 1940. The assassin clubbed Trotsky to death with an ice-pick — a most unusual implement to find lying around in sweltering Mexico City.

Stalin's henchman killed Trotsky in 1940.

Josef Stalin : Stalin’s henchman killed Trotsky in 1940 in Mexico.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the Bolshevik takeover in Russia was but a jewish takeover. As Winston Churchill wrote: “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international, and for the most part atheistical, jews. It is certainly a very great one, it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin*, ( Note: Unknown to Churchill, Lenin himself, has since been revealed to be part jewish) the majority of the leading figures are jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the jewish leaders … In the Soviet institution the predominance of jews is even more astounding. And the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by jews …” — Illustrated Sunday Herald 8 February 1920.

Jewish bankers were behind the Communist enslavement of Russia.

Jewish bankers financed the jewish Communist enslavement of Russia.

(Stefan Possony of the Hoover Institute argues that, contrary to Churchill’s exception, Lenin was of jewish descent; his mother’s maiden name being Blank — a most unlikely Russian name, and she was in fact the daughter of a jewish doctor and his German wife.) Both British and American diplomats in Russia at the time sent back reports describing how the vast majority of the Bolsheviks were jewish. Reproductions and excerpts appear in the comprehensive Six Million Reconsidered by William Grimstad. Page after page of frank admissions by jews themselves and by on-the-spot observers prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Bolshevism was jewish from top to bottom.

Like in Communist Russia no White person can criticise the jews in anyway in modern Britain.

Like in Communist Russia no White person can criticise the jews in anyway in modern Britain.

Of particular interest to us here is the attitude of the “People of the Book” toward cruelty and destruction. The Soviets’ secret police–an alphabet soup of initials which began with CHEKA and ended up today as the KGB – was conceived and operated almost exclusively by jews. The first head of the CHEKA was Moses Uritsky. His successor was a person of dubious “Polish” origin named Felix Dzerzhinski, but it was common knowledge that he was overshadowed by his nominal subordinate, I. S. Unschlicht. Over the years, control of the torture apparatus has been passed to other jews: Genrik Yagoda, Lavrenti Beria, and today, Yuri Andropov.

Yagoda’s case was interesting in that he was Chief Inquisitor and Executioner of two Jewish ex-colleagues Kamenev and Zinoviev. As the wheel of fate turned, Yagoda himself was purged and executed.

According to the Russian writer Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the slave labor camps were dreamt up “by the Turkish Jew, Frenkel”. Known as “the timber king of the Black Sea” Frenkel quickly became a consultant to the Bolshevik government, and advised them on the most profitable gems and precious metals to loot from the Russians. It may have been these same valuables which were sent back to Jacob Schiff in New York, as repayment of his original “venture capital” sent over with Trotsky. Later, Frenkel set up the slave labor camps as probably the cheapest form of labour supply in the World, and vast work projects were undertaken, such as the (ill fated ) White Sea/Baltic Sea canal scheme.

Communism,marxism,socialism and multiculturalism are all jewish-fascist ideologies which enslave and murder White People.

Communism,marxism,socialism and multiculturalism are all jewish-fascist ideologies which enslave and murder White People.

In the third chapter of volume two of Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, the author provides a rogues’ gallery of the Soviet architects of the slave-labor/extermination program: Yakov Rappaport, Matvei Berman, Lazar Kogan, Semyon Firin, Sergei Zhuk.

Trotsky himself approved of the reign of terror that swept Russia. He wrote:

“Terror as the demonstration of the will and strength of the working class is historically justified, precisely because the proletariat was able to break the political will of the Intelligentsia, pacify the professional men of various categories and work, and gradually subordinate them to its own aims within the fields of their specialties.” — Izvestia 10 January 1919.

During a speech at the International Communist Congress in Moscow the following March he opined: “Blood and mercilessness must be our slogans.” Later, to try and explain away the bloody slaughter of the rebellious Kronstadt sailors he wrote:

“Idealists and pacifists always accused the Revolution of excesses. But the main point is that ‘excesses’ flow from the very nature of revolution which in itself is but an ‘excess’ of history.”

Lenin too demanded buckets of blood. In June 1918 he reprimanded the Leningrad (nee St. Petersburg) Soviet for being too genteel in their treatment of opponents: “This is unheard of! The energy and mass nature of the terror must be encouraged!” The following month he promulgated a new edict in Izvestia (27 July 1918) to the effect that all “anti-Semites” were to be shot.

Anyone objecting to jewish-fascist enslavement was labelled an anti-semite and shot.

Any White Russian objecting to jewish-fascist enslavement and genocide by the communists was labelled an anti-semite and shot.

Lesser luminaries in the Jewish-Soviet heavens took up the refrain. Hirsch Apfelbaum (aka Zinoviev) penned a charming article in the Krasnaya Gazeta (1 September 1918) under the rubric “Blood for Blood”:

“We will make our hearts cruel, hard and immovable, so that no mercy will enter them, and so that they will not quiver at the sight of a sea of enemy blood. We will let loose the floodgates of that sea. Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood! For the blood of Lenin and Uritsky, Zinoviev and Volodarsky, let there be floods of blood of the bourgeois — more blood! As much as possible!”

One would have thought that all this blood-letting would have quickly terminated any sympathy for the Soviets from their kinfolk in the West. But such was not the case.

Jewish communism has killed about 100+million White People. Multiculturalism will finish off any White Nations.

Jewish communism has killed about 100+million White People. Multiculturalism will finish off any White Nations.

“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many jews are Bolsheviks, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of judaism.” — London jewish Chronicle, 4 April 1919.

“What jewish idealism and jewish discontent have so powerfully contributed to produce in Russia, the same historic qualities of the jewish mind are tending to promote in other countries.” — New York American Hebrew, 20 September 1920.

“Jewish histories rarely mention the name of Karl Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of Israel than most who are forever talking of it.” — Rabbi Lewis Brown: Stranger Than Fiction, NY, 1928.

However, at the business end of this great contribution to progress, matters were not quite so explicitly dealt with. No Soviet citizen could be referred to as “jewish” on pain of death. And almost to a man, the jewish leaders of the Bolshevik takeover changed their jewish names to Gentile-sounding noms de guerre, usually Russian but sometimes, Polish.

How can one interpret this idiosyncratic phenomenon? Let us back-track a little bit. We have Trotsky growing up in a wealthy land owning jewish family, attending exclusive private schools, and marrying in a jewish ceremony. Yet he hides his jewishness behind a Gentile pseudonym and claims to represent the Russian working class. He has definite links with wealthy jewish foreign bankers, yet he claims to oppose Capitalism. He claims to support continuous working-class violent revolution against the ruling-class, yet when he himself becomes the ruler he suppresses workers’ uprisings, such as at Kronstadt and in Ukraine. He opposes privilege for the ruling class, yet he fixes up his own family with cushy positions.

Ed Miliband is an East European marxist jew who hides behind a British sounding name. He supports the multicultural enslavement and genocide of White British People.

Ed Miliband, Labour Party Leader, is a multi-millionaire, East European marxist jew who hides behind a British sounding name. His family have strong links to banking. He supports the multicultural enslavement and genocide of White British People.

What is the answer to this conundrum? It would be easy to dismiss Trotsky and his fellows as mere charlatans, tricksters and hypocrites. There can be little doubt that George Orwell based the pigs in Animal Farm on these crooks.

George Orwell based 1984 and Animal Farm on jewish communist states.

George Orwell based 1984 and Animal Farm on jewish-fascist states. Note the racial supremacy of the pigs (symbolising jews) in Animal Farm.

But somehow, this “criminal” explanation does not totally fit the bill, for the “ideals” propounded by Trotsky and company were given theoretical support from respectable jewish organizations in the West. Can it be that there is some “split personality” at work here, where the Bolsheviks actually believed in what they were advocating, but another part of their personality kept superimposing itself on top of their “principled” side? Did Trotsky perhaps fantasize that he was not jewish; that he was not privileged; that he was in search of justice? Was there a side of him that was struggling to be Gentile; that craved to feel inside himself the Gentile values of honor, truth, courage, and fairness? Did he envy these qualities so much that he turned jealousy into hate; turned a wish-to-be-like into a wish-to-destroy? All we can do is speculate, because unfortunately little is known of Trotsky’s real psychology. There are no personal letters, no opening-up to friends or family, no records at all of any substance. All we can do is line up Trotsky with his kinfolk in this psychohistorical study, and see if we can find any interesting patterns of behavior showing up.

The National Union of Journalists ( Labour affiliated ) featured Trotsky.

The National Union of Journalists ( Labour affiliated ) featured Trotsky.

Do Official Red Cross Records Show Nazi Holocaust Was A Holohoax?

In 1948 the United Nations agreed to “give” part of Palestine to the jewish people to form Israel because they claimed 6 million of them had died in a deliberate genocide by Nazi Germany. The allegations included Nazi death ray guns, gas chambers and turning jews in to soap. Although the jews admit most of their initial claims were lies, they still insist the 6million genocide was true and they are therefore entitled to Israel.

It has been contended since, that although in some internment camps ( the jews had declared war on Germany in 1933 leading to some of them being interned – Britain and the USA also had internment camps) a number of jews had died, mostly due to typhus, there had been no deliberate genocide. There is evidence to support both theories, however the Red Cross ( who monitored German, USA and UK internment camps ) have now released their records indicating they don’t support the genocide theory.

The Israeli Government has fought for years to stop these records being released – was it due to concern for the victims’ families feelings or was there another reason?

NOTE: I am not a holocaust denier or an anti-semite in any way, and I know this is a taboo topic but given the new evidence we need to look at the basis for the State of Israel.


No Evidence Of GenocideThe Jews And The Concentration Camps:
A Factual Appraisal By The Red Cross.There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).

The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.

Red Cross Recipients Were Jews
The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).

In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.

The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

No Evidence Of Genocide

One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).

Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).

Not All Were Interned

Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”

In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).

Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.

A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).

The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”

For the entire book “Did Six Million Really Die?”, click here.

PHOTO DESCRIPTION: A scanned image of the Official Death Total report from the International Red Cross.

DISCLAIMER: “One cannot and must not try to erase the past merely because it does not fit the present.” – Golda Meir [Fourth Prime Minister of Israel]

SOURCE: http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com.au/2007/06/official-records-from-international-red.html

 — with Janne Välimäki.

So was it holocaust or holohoax? You decide.